Differences between homography and transformation matrix












2












$begingroup$


I'm wondering whats the differences between a homography and a transformation matrix?



For me it's kinda look like the same? Or is homography just the more precise word in the area of computer vision and transformation of image plane?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What would you say is the difference between a linear transformation and a matrix?
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Aug 9 '17 at 19:14










  • $begingroup$
    @amd thats literally what I'm asking ?!
    $endgroup$
    – user1234
    Aug 21 '17 at 12:01










  • $begingroup$
    A transformation is a function. A matrix is an array of numbers that can represent a transformation. Do you see the difference?
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Aug 21 '17 at 19:49












  • $begingroup$
    @amd well I wasn't asking for the difference between an transformation and a matrix. I was asking for the difference between a homopgrahy and a transformation matrix. But in the mean time I found the difference on my own
    $endgroup$
    – user1234
    Aug 22 '17 at 20:32










  • $begingroup$
    A homography is a particular type of transformation. The difference between that and a matrix is exactly the same: the latter is one possible representation of the former.
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Aug 22 '17 at 21:51
















2












$begingroup$


I'm wondering whats the differences between a homography and a transformation matrix?



For me it's kinda look like the same? Or is homography just the more precise word in the area of computer vision and transformation of image plane?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What would you say is the difference between a linear transformation and a matrix?
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Aug 9 '17 at 19:14










  • $begingroup$
    @amd thats literally what I'm asking ?!
    $endgroup$
    – user1234
    Aug 21 '17 at 12:01










  • $begingroup$
    A transformation is a function. A matrix is an array of numbers that can represent a transformation. Do you see the difference?
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Aug 21 '17 at 19:49












  • $begingroup$
    @amd well I wasn't asking for the difference between an transformation and a matrix. I was asking for the difference between a homopgrahy and a transformation matrix. But in the mean time I found the difference on my own
    $endgroup$
    – user1234
    Aug 22 '17 at 20:32










  • $begingroup$
    A homography is a particular type of transformation. The difference between that and a matrix is exactly the same: the latter is one possible representation of the former.
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Aug 22 '17 at 21:51














2












2








2





$begingroup$


I'm wondering whats the differences between a homography and a transformation matrix?



For me it's kinda look like the same? Or is homography just the more precise word in the area of computer vision and transformation of image plane?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I'm wondering whats the differences between a homography and a transformation matrix?



For me it's kinda look like the same? Or is homography just the more precise word in the area of computer vision and transformation of image plane?







transformation computer-vision






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 9 '17 at 19:12









user1234user1234

1215




1215












  • $begingroup$
    What would you say is the difference between a linear transformation and a matrix?
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Aug 9 '17 at 19:14










  • $begingroup$
    @amd thats literally what I'm asking ?!
    $endgroup$
    – user1234
    Aug 21 '17 at 12:01










  • $begingroup$
    A transformation is a function. A matrix is an array of numbers that can represent a transformation. Do you see the difference?
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Aug 21 '17 at 19:49












  • $begingroup$
    @amd well I wasn't asking for the difference between an transformation and a matrix. I was asking for the difference between a homopgrahy and a transformation matrix. But in the mean time I found the difference on my own
    $endgroup$
    – user1234
    Aug 22 '17 at 20:32










  • $begingroup$
    A homography is a particular type of transformation. The difference between that and a matrix is exactly the same: the latter is one possible representation of the former.
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Aug 22 '17 at 21:51


















  • $begingroup$
    What would you say is the difference between a linear transformation and a matrix?
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Aug 9 '17 at 19:14










  • $begingroup$
    @amd thats literally what I'm asking ?!
    $endgroup$
    – user1234
    Aug 21 '17 at 12:01










  • $begingroup$
    A transformation is a function. A matrix is an array of numbers that can represent a transformation. Do you see the difference?
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Aug 21 '17 at 19:49












  • $begingroup$
    @amd well I wasn't asking for the difference between an transformation and a matrix. I was asking for the difference between a homopgrahy and a transformation matrix. But in the mean time I found the difference on my own
    $endgroup$
    – user1234
    Aug 22 '17 at 20:32










  • $begingroup$
    A homography is a particular type of transformation. The difference between that and a matrix is exactly the same: the latter is one possible representation of the former.
    $endgroup$
    – amd
    Aug 22 '17 at 21:51
















$begingroup$
What would you say is the difference between a linear transformation and a matrix?
$endgroup$
– amd
Aug 9 '17 at 19:14




$begingroup$
What would you say is the difference between a linear transformation and a matrix?
$endgroup$
– amd
Aug 9 '17 at 19:14












$begingroup$
@amd thats literally what I'm asking ?!
$endgroup$
– user1234
Aug 21 '17 at 12:01




$begingroup$
@amd thats literally what I'm asking ?!
$endgroup$
– user1234
Aug 21 '17 at 12:01












$begingroup$
A transformation is a function. A matrix is an array of numbers that can represent a transformation. Do you see the difference?
$endgroup$
– amd
Aug 21 '17 at 19:49






$begingroup$
A transformation is a function. A matrix is an array of numbers that can represent a transformation. Do you see the difference?
$endgroup$
– amd
Aug 21 '17 at 19:49














$begingroup$
@amd well I wasn't asking for the difference between an transformation and a matrix. I was asking for the difference between a homopgrahy and a transformation matrix. But in the mean time I found the difference on my own
$endgroup$
– user1234
Aug 22 '17 at 20:32




$begingroup$
@amd well I wasn't asking for the difference between an transformation and a matrix. I was asking for the difference between a homopgrahy and a transformation matrix. But in the mean time I found the difference on my own
$endgroup$
– user1234
Aug 22 '17 at 20:32












$begingroup$
A homography is a particular type of transformation. The difference between that and a matrix is exactly the same: the latter is one possible representation of the former.
$endgroup$
– amd
Aug 22 '17 at 21:51




$begingroup$
A homography is a particular type of transformation. The difference between that and a matrix is exactly the same: the latter is one possible representation of the former.
$endgroup$
– amd
Aug 22 '17 at 21:51










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

The term homography is often used in the sense of homography matrix in computer vision. In maths, I guess, the term homography describes the substatial concept, not the matrix. So the question is: What is the difference between homography matrix and transformation matrix?



The mathematical name for homography concept is "projective transformation" (source) and in computer vision it refers to transforming images such as if they were taken under different perspective. This is a much narrower question than any arbitrary transformation and hence homography can be computed by using mathematical tricks (see this question for details), avoiding geometrical computations. The effect of applying the matrix should be the same, but the way to get this matrix is easier.



An example from opencv: we have two images of the same place, taken from different angle. We will compute homography H. If we now select one pixel with coordinates (x1, y1) from the first image and another pixel (x2, y2) that represents the same point on another image, we can transform the latter pixel to have the same viewing perspective as the first one by applying H:



OpenCV example of applying homography



As we see, it is identical to applying transformation matrix, hence homography is just a special case of transformation. Most examples that I have seen, consider homography only for 2D (i.e., for images). Still, homography can be extended to larger dimension (source). Thanks to homography, 3D to 2D planar projection (i.e., mapping coordinates in 3D space to points on 2D plane) reduces to 2D to 2D, i.e., to a less complex problem (source).



While transformation is very general concept and includes all kinds of conversions, including conversion between coordinate frames, homography is a subset of it, mostly only applied when rotation is needed (source). In computer vision it is a technical term that describes above-mentioned case of transformation. You can achieve the same result by using proper geometrical transformation, but it will be more complex.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2388259%2fdifferences-between-homography-and-transformation-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    The term homography is often used in the sense of homography matrix in computer vision. In maths, I guess, the term homography describes the substatial concept, not the matrix. So the question is: What is the difference between homography matrix and transformation matrix?



    The mathematical name for homography concept is "projective transformation" (source) and in computer vision it refers to transforming images such as if they were taken under different perspective. This is a much narrower question than any arbitrary transformation and hence homography can be computed by using mathematical tricks (see this question for details), avoiding geometrical computations. The effect of applying the matrix should be the same, but the way to get this matrix is easier.



    An example from opencv: we have two images of the same place, taken from different angle. We will compute homography H. If we now select one pixel with coordinates (x1, y1) from the first image and another pixel (x2, y2) that represents the same point on another image, we can transform the latter pixel to have the same viewing perspective as the first one by applying H:



    OpenCV example of applying homography



    As we see, it is identical to applying transformation matrix, hence homography is just a special case of transformation. Most examples that I have seen, consider homography only for 2D (i.e., for images). Still, homography can be extended to larger dimension (source). Thanks to homography, 3D to 2D planar projection (i.e., mapping coordinates in 3D space to points on 2D plane) reduces to 2D to 2D, i.e., to a less complex problem (source).



    While transformation is very general concept and includes all kinds of conversions, including conversion between coordinate frames, homography is a subset of it, mostly only applied when rotation is needed (source). In computer vision it is a technical term that describes above-mentioned case of transformation. You can achieve the same result by using proper geometrical transformation, but it will be more complex.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      The term homography is often used in the sense of homography matrix in computer vision. In maths, I guess, the term homography describes the substatial concept, not the matrix. So the question is: What is the difference between homography matrix and transformation matrix?



      The mathematical name for homography concept is "projective transformation" (source) and in computer vision it refers to transforming images such as if they were taken under different perspective. This is a much narrower question than any arbitrary transformation and hence homography can be computed by using mathematical tricks (see this question for details), avoiding geometrical computations. The effect of applying the matrix should be the same, but the way to get this matrix is easier.



      An example from opencv: we have two images of the same place, taken from different angle. We will compute homography H. If we now select one pixel with coordinates (x1, y1) from the first image and another pixel (x2, y2) that represents the same point on another image, we can transform the latter pixel to have the same viewing perspective as the first one by applying H:



      OpenCV example of applying homography



      As we see, it is identical to applying transformation matrix, hence homography is just a special case of transformation. Most examples that I have seen, consider homography only for 2D (i.e., for images). Still, homography can be extended to larger dimension (source). Thanks to homography, 3D to 2D planar projection (i.e., mapping coordinates in 3D space to points on 2D plane) reduces to 2D to 2D, i.e., to a less complex problem (source).



      While transformation is very general concept and includes all kinds of conversions, including conversion between coordinate frames, homography is a subset of it, mostly only applied when rotation is needed (source). In computer vision it is a technical term that describes above-mentioned case of transformation. You can achieve the same result by using proper geometrical transformation, but it will be more complex.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        The term homography is often used in the sense of homography matrix in computer vision. In maths, I guess, the term homography describes the substatial concept, not the matrix. So the question is: What is the difference between homography matrix and transformation matrix?



        The mathematical name for homography concept is "projective transformation" (source) and in computer vision it refers to transforming images such as if they were taken under different perspective. This is a much narrower question than any arbitrary transformation and hence homography can be computed by using mathematical tricks (see this question for details), avoiding geometrical computations. The effect of applying the matrix should be the same, but the way to get this matrix is easier.



        An example from opencv: we have two images of the same place, taken from different angle. We will compute homography H. If we now select one pixel with coordinates (x1, y1) from the first image and another pixel (x2, y2) that represents the same point on another image, we can transform the latter pixel to have the same viewing perspective as the first one by applying H:



        OpenCV example of applying homography



        As we see, it is identical to applying transformation matrix, hence homography is just a special case of transformation. Most examples that I have seen, consider homography only for 2D (i.e., for images). Still, homography can be extended to larger dimension (source). Thanks to homography, 3D to 2D planar projection (i.e., mapping coordinates in 3D space to points on 2D plane) reduces to 2D to 2D, i.e., to a less complex problem (source).



        While transformation is very general concept and includes all kinds of conversions, including conversion between coordinate frames, homography is a subset of it, mostly only applied when rotation is needed (source). In computer vision it is a technical term that describes above-mentioned case of transformation. You can achieve the same result by using proper geometrical transformation, but it will be more complex.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The term homography is often used in the sense of homography matrix in computer vision. In maths, I guess, the term homography describes the substatial concept, not the matrix. So the question is: What is the difference between homography matrix and transformation matrix?



        The mathematical name for homography concept is "projective transformation" (source) and in computer vision it refers to transforming images such as if they were taken under different perspective. This is a much narrower question than any arbitrary transformation and hence homography can be computed by using mathematical tricks (see this question for details), avoiding geometrical computations. The effect of applying the matrix should be the same, but the way to get this matrix is easier.



        An example from opencv: we have two images of the same place, taken from different angle. We will compute homography H. If we now select one pixel with coordinates (x1, y1) from the first image and another pixel (x2, y2) that represents the same point on another image, we can transform the latter pixel to have the same viewing perspective as the first one by applying H:



        OpenCV example of applying homography



        As we see, it is identical to applying transformation matrix, hence homography is just a special case of transformation. Most examples that I have seen, consider homography only for 2D (i.e., for images). Still, homography can be extended to larger dimension (source). Thanks to homography, 3D to 2D planar projection (i.e., mapping coordinates in 3D space to points on 2D plane) reduces to 2D to 2D, i.e., to a less complex problem (source).



        While transformation is very general concept and includes all kinds of conversions, including conversion between coordinate frames, homography is a subset of it, mostly only applied when rotation is needed (source). In computer vision it is a technical term that describes above-mentioned case of transformation. You can achieve the same result by using proper geometrical transformation, but it will be more complex.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Apr 26 '18 at 11:43









        Mårten W

        2,57241837




        2,57241837










        answered Apr 19 '18 at 20:39









        MF.OXMF.OX

        1011




        1011






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2388259%2fdifferences-between-homography-and-transformation-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

            Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

            A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$