Cartan-Killing metric and Lie-groups












2












$begingroup$


We defined the Cartan-Killing metric of a Lie-Group $G$ as $$g_{ab}equiv C_{acd}C_{bdc},$$
where $C_{abc}$ are the structure constants of the Lie-algebra $mathfrak{g}$. According to my professor it is possible to show that
$$operatorname{tr}(A_aA_b)=g_{ab},$$
where $A_i$ denote the generators in the adjoint representation.



I'm honestly having a really hard time on trying to show that. As far as I understand we have
$$A_a=left.frac{partial tau_A(g)}{partial alpha_a}right|_{g=e},$$
where $tau_A$ is the adjoint representation and $e$ the unit-element of $G$. I know that one can write $|A_a|_{bc}=C_{abc}$. This would then imply that
$$g_{ab}=C_{acd}C_{bdc}= sum_{c,d=1}^3|A_a|_{cd}|A_{b}|_{dc}.$$
The problem is that I don't really see what this has to do with the trace of the two matrices $A_a$ and $A_b$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hint: What is your definition of the structure constants? Also, forget about the group, think only about the Lie algebra.
    $endgroup$
    – Moishe Kohan
    Feb 2 at 15:11










  • $begingroup$
    @MoisheCohen We defined the structure constants over $[A_a, A_b]= C_{abc}A_c$. Thanks for the hint, will think about it...
    $endgroup$
    – Sito
    Feb 2 at 15:15












  • $begingroup$
    @MoisheCohen Alright, I thought about it now for some time, but I just can't figure out what the trick is supposed to be... To make use of the definition of the structure constants I would need to multiply $g_{ab}$ with $A_c$ and $A_d$, which doesn't seem to lead anywhere... Could you maybe help a little more..
    $endgroup$
    – Sito
    Feb 2 at 18:51
















2












$begingroup$


We defined the Cartan-Killing metric of a Lie-Group $G$ as $$g_{ab}equiv C_{acd}C_{bdc},$$
where $C_{abc}$ are the structure constants of the Lie-algebra $mathfrak{g}$. According to my professor it is possible to show that
$$operatorname{tr}(A_aA_b)=g_{ab},$$
where $A_i$ denote the generators in the adjoint representation.



I'm honestly having a really hard time on trying to show that. As far as I understand we have
$$A_a=left.frac{partial tau_A(g)}{partial alpha_a}right|_{g=e},$$
where $tau_A$ is the adjoint representation and $e$ the unit-element of $G$. I know that one can write $|A_a|_{bc}=C_{abc}$. This would then imply that
$$g_{ab}=C_{acd}C_{bdc}= sum_{c,d=1}^3|A_a|_{cd}|A_{b}|_{dc}.$$
The problem is that I don't really see what this has to do with the trace of the two matrices $A_a$ and $A_b$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hint: What is your definition of the structure constants? Also, forget about the group, think only about the Lie algebra.
    $endgroup$
    – Moishe Kohan
    Feb 2 at 15:11










  • $begingroup$
    @MoisheCohen We defined the structure constants over $[A_a, A_b]= C_{abc}A_c$. Thanks for the hint, will think about it...
    $endgroup$
    – Sito
    Feb 2 at 15:15












  • $begingroup$
    @MoisheCohen Alright, I thought about it now for some time, but I just can't figure out what the trick is supposed to be... To make use of the definition of the structure constants I would need to multiply $g_{ab}$ with $A_c$ and $A_d$, which doesn't seem to lead anywhere... Could you maybe help a little more..
    $endgroup$
    – Sito
    Feb 2 at 18:51














2












2








2





$begingroup$


We defined the Cartan-Killing metric of a Lie-Group $G$ as $$g_{ab}equiv C_{acd}C_{bdc},$$
where $C_{abc}$ are the structure constants of the Lie-algebra $mathfrak{g}$. According to my professor it is possible to show that
$$operatorname{tr}(A_aA_b)=g_{ab},$$
where $A_i$ denote the generators in the adjoint representation.



I'm honestly having a really hard time on trying to show that. As far as I understand we have
$$A_a=left.frac{partial tau_A(g)}{partial alpha_a}right|_{g=e},$$
where $tau_A$ is the adjoint representation and $e$ the unit-element of $G$. I know that one can write $|A_a|_{bc}=C_{abc}$. This would then imply that
$$g_{ab}=C_{acd}C_{bdc}= sum_{c,d=1}^3|A_a|_{cd}|A_{b}|_{dc}.$$
The problem is that I don't really see what this has to do with the trace of the two matrices $A_a$ and $A_b$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




We defined the Cartan-Killing metric of a Lie-Group $G$ as $$g_{ab}equiv C_{acd}C_{bdc},$$
where $C_{abc}$ are the structure constants of the Lie-algebra $mathfrak{g}$. According to my professor it is possible to show that
$$operatorname{tr}(A_aA_b)=g_{ab},$$
where $A_i$ denote the generators in the adjoint representation.



I'm honestly having a really hard time on trying to show that. As far as I understand we have
$$A_a=left.frac{partial tau_A(g)}{partial alpha_a}right|_{g=e},$$
where $tau_A$ is the adjoint representation and $e$ the unit-element of $G$. I know that one can write $|A_a|_{bc}=C_{abc}$. This would then imply that
$$g_{ab}=C_{acd}C_{bdc}= sum_{c,d=1}^3|A_a|_{cd}|A_{b}|_{dc}.$$
The problem is that I don't really see what this has to do with the trace of the two matrices $A_a$ and $A_b$.







lie-groups lie-algebras






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Feb 2 at 15:04









SitoSito

19417




19417








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hint: What is your definition of the structure constants? Also, forget about the group, think only about the Lie algebra.
    $endgroup$
    – Moishe Kohan
    Feb 2 at 15:11










  • $begingroup$
    @MoisheCohen We defined the structure constants over $[A_a, A_b]= C_{abc}A_c$. Thanks for the hint, will think about it...
    $endgroup$
    – Sito
    Feb 2 at 15:15












  • $begingroup$
    @MoisheCohen Alright, I thought about it now for some time, but I just can't figure out what the trick is supposed to be... To make use of the definition of the structure constants I would need to multiply $g_{ab}$ with $A_c$ and $A_d$, which doesn't seem to lead anywhere... Could you maybe help a little more..
    $endgroup$
    – Sito
    Feb 2 at 18:51














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hint: What is your definition of the structure constants? Also, forget about the group, think only about the Lie algebra.
    $endgroup$
    – Moishe Kohan
    Feb 2 at 15:11










  • $begingroup$
    @MoisheCohen We defined the structure constants over $[A_a, A_b]= C_{abc}A_c$. Thanks for the hint, will think about it...
    $endgroup$
    – Sito
    Feb 2 at 15:15












  • $begingroup$
    @MoisheCohen Alright, I thought about it now for some time, but I just can't figure out what the trick is supposed to be... To make use of the definition of the structure constants I would need to multiply $g_{ab}$ with $A_c$ and $A_d$, which doesn't seem to lead anywhere... Could you maybe help a little more..
    $endgroup$
    – Sito
    Feb 2 at 18:51








1




1




$begingroup$
Hint: What is your definition of the structure constants? Also, forget about the group, think only about the Lie algebra.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Feb 2 at 15:11




$begingroup$
Hint: What is your definition of the structure constants? Also, forget about the group, think only about the Lie algebra.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Feb 2 at 15:11












$begingroup$
@MoisheCohen We defined the structure constants over $[A_a, A_b]= C_{abc}A_c$. Thanks for the hint, will think about it...
$endgroup$
– Sito
Feb 2 at 15:15






$begingroup$
@MoisheCohen We defined the structure constants over $[A_a, A_b]= C_{abc}A_c$. Thanks for the hint, will think about it...
$endgroup$
– Sito
Feb 2 at 15:15














$begingroup$
@MoisheCohen Alright, I thought about it now for some time, but I just can't figure out what the trick is supposed to be... To make use of the definition of the structure constants I would need to multiply $g_{ab}$ with $A_c$ and $A_d$, which doesn't seem to lead anywhere... Could you maybe help a little more..
$endgroup$
– Sito
Feb 2 at 18:51




$begingroup$
@MoisheCohen Alright, I thought about it now for some time, but I just can't figure out what the trick is supposed to be... To make use of the definition of the structure constants I would need to multiply $g_{ab}$ with $A_c$ and $A_d$, which doesn't seem to lead anywhere... Could you maybe help a little more..
$endgroup$
– Sito
Feb 2 at 18:51










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

I will write a solution using the notation for structural constants that I prefer:



If $e_1,...,e_N$ is a basis of the Lie algebra ${mathfrak g}$, then
$$
[e_i,e_j]=sum_{l} c^l_{ij} e_l.
$$

Now, $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)(x)= [e_i, [e_j, x]]$ for $xin {mathfrak g}$. If $x=e_k$ then
$$
[e_i, [e_j, e_k]] = [e_i, sum_{l} c^l_{jk} e_l]= sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m.
$$

Thus, the linear map $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)$ sends
$$
e_kmapsto sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m
$$

Computing the trace of this map means setting $k=m$ and taking the sum over $k=1,...N$:
$$
tr(ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j))= sum_{l,k} c^l_{jk} c^k_{il}.
$$

That's your professor's formula.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097374%2fcartan-killing-metric-and-lie-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    I will write a solution using the notation for structural constants that I prefer:



    If $e_1,...,e_N$ is a basis of the Lie algebra ${mathfrak g}$, then
    $$
    [e_i,e_j]=sum_{l} c^l_{ij} e_l.
    $$

    Now, $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)(x)= [e_i, [e_j, x]]$ for $xin {mathfrak g}$. If $x=e_k$ then
    $$
    [e_i, [e_j, e_k]] = [e_i, sum_{l} c^l_{jk} e_l]= sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m.
    $$

    Thus, the linear map $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)$ sends
    $$
    e_kmapsto sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m
    $$

    Computing the trace of this map means setting $k=m$ and taking the sum over $k=1,...N$:
    $$
    tr(ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j))= sum_{l,k} c^l_{jk} c^k_{il}.
    $$

    That's your professor's formula.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      I will write a solution using the notation for structural constants that I prefer:



      If $e_1,...,e_N$ is a basis of the Lie algebra ${mathfrak g}$, then
      $$
      [e_i,e_j]=sum_{l} c^l_{ij} e_l.
      $$

      Now, $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)(x)= [e_i, [e_j, x]]$ for $xin {mathfrak g}$. If $x=e_k$ then
      $$
      [e_i, [e_j, e_k]] = [e_i, sum_{l} c^l_{jk} e_l]= sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m.
      $$

      Thus, the linear map $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)$ sends
      $$
      e_kmapsto sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m
      $$

      Computing the trace of this map means setting $k=m$ and taking the sum over $k=1,...N$:
      $$
      tr(ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j))= sum_{l,k} c^l_{jk} c^k_{il}.
      $$

      That's your professor's formula.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        I will write a solution using the notation for structural constants that I prefer:



        If $e_1,...,e_N$ is a basis of the Lie algebra ${mathfrak g}$, then
        $$
        [e_i,e_j]=sum_{l} c^l_{ij} e_l.
        $$

        Now, $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)(x)= [e_i, [e_j, x]]$ for $xin {mathfrak g}$. If $x=e_k$ then
        $$
        [e_i, [e_j, e_k]] = [e_i, sum_{l} c^l_{jk} e_l]= sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m.
        $$

        Thus, the linear map $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)$ sends
        $$
        e_kmapsto sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m
        $$

        Computing the trace of this map means setting $k=m$ and taking the sum over $k=1,...N$:
        $$
        tr(ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j))= sum_{l,k} c^l_{jk} c^k_{il}.
        $$

        That's your professor's formula.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        I will write a solution using the notation for structural constants that I prefer:



        If $e_1,...,e_N$ is a basis of the Lie algebra ${mathfrak g}$, then
        $$
        [e_i,e_j]=sum_{l} c^l_{ij} e_l.
        $$

        Now, $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)(x)= [e_i, [e_j, x]]$ for $xin {mathfrak g}$. If $x=e_k$ then
        $$
        [e_i, [e_j, e_k]] = [e_i, sum_{l} c^l_{jk} e_l]= sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m.
        $$

        Thus, the linear map $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)$ sends
        $$
        e_kmapsto sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m
        $$

        Computing the trace of this map means setting $k=m$ and taking the sum over $k=1,...N$:
        $$
        tr(ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j))= sum_{l,k} c^l_{jk} c^k_{il}.
        $$

        That's your professor's formula.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Feb 3 at 2:11









        Moishe KohanMoishe Kohan

        48.7k344111




        48.7k344111






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097374%2fcartan-killing-metric-and-lie-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith