Cartan-Killing metric and Lie-groups
$begingroup$
We defined the Cartan-Killing metric of a Lie-Group $G$ as $$g_{ab}equiv C_{acd}C_{bdc},$$
where $C_{abc}$ are the structure constants of the Lie-algebra $mathfrak{g}$. According to my professor it is possible to show that
$$operatorname{tr}(A_aA_b)=g_{ab},$$
where $A_i$ denote the generators in the adjoint representation.
I'm honestly having a really hard time on trying to show that. As far as I understand we have
$$A_a=left.frac{partial tau_A(g)}{partial alpha_a}right|_{g=e},$$
where $tau_A$ is the adjoint representation and $e$ the unit-element of $G$. I know that one can write $|A_a|_{bc}=C_{abc}$. This would then imply that
$$g_{ab}=C_{acd}C_{bdc}= sum_{c,d=1}^3|A_a|_{cd}|A_{b}|_{dc}.$$
The problem is that I don't really see what this has to do with the trace of the two matrices $A_a$ and $A_b$.
lie-groups lie-algebras
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We defined the Cartan-Killing metric of a Lie-Group $G$ as $$g_{ab}equiv C_{acd}C_{bdc},$$
where $C_{abc}$ are the structure constants of the Lie-algebra $mathfrak{g}$. According to my professor it is possible to show that
$$operatorname{tr}(A_aA_b)=g_{ab},$$
where $A_i$ denote the generators in the adjoint representation.
I'm honestly having a really hard time on trying to show that. As far as I understand we have
$$A_a=left.frac{partial tau_A(g)}{partial alpha_a}right|_{g=e},$$
where $tau_A$ is the adjoint representation and $e$ the unit-element of $G$. I know that one can write $|A_a|_{bc}=C_{abc}$. This would then imply that
$$g_{ab}=C_{acd}C_{bdc}= sum_{c,d=1}^3|A_a|_{cd}|A_{b}|_{dc}.$$
The problem is that I don't really see what this has to do with the trace of the two matrices $A_a$ and $A_b$.
lie-groups lie-algebras
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Hint: What is your definition of the structure constants? Also, forget about the group, think only about the Lie algebra.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Feb 2 at 15:11
$begingroup$
@MoisheCohen We defined the structure constants over $[A_a, A_b]= C_{abc}A_c$. Thanks for the hint, will think about it...
$endgroup$
– Sito
Feb 2 at 15:15
$begingroup$
@MoisheCohen Alright, I thought about it now for some time, but I just can't figure out what the trick is supposed to be... To make use of the definition of the structure constants I would need to multiply $g_{ab}$ with $A_c$ and $A_d$, which doesn't seem to lead anywhere... Could you maybe help a little more..
$endgroup$
– Sito
Feb 2 at 18:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We defined the Cartan-Killing metric of a Lie-Group $G$ as $$g_{ab}equiv C_{acd}C_{bdc},$$
where $C_{abc}$ are the structure constants of the Lie-algebra $mathfrak{g}$. According to my professor it is possible to show that
$$operatorname{tr}(A_aA_b)=g_{ab},$$
where $A_i$ denote the generators in the adjoint representation.
I'm honestly having a really hard time on trying to show that. As far as I understand we have
$$A_a=left.frac{partial tau_A(g)}{partial alpha_a}right|_{g=e},$$
where $tau_A$ is the adjoint representation and $e$ the unit-element of $G$. I know that one can write $|A_a|_{bc}=C_{abc}$. This would then imply that
$$g_{ab}=C_{acd}C_{bdc}= sum_{c,d=1}^3|A_a|_{cd}|A_{b}|_{dc}.$$
The problem is that I don't really see what this has to do with the trace of the two matrices $A_a$ and $A_b$.
lie-groups lie-algebras
$endgroup$
We defined the Cartan-Killing metric of a Lie-Group $G$ as $$g_{ab}equiv C_{acd}C_{bdc},$$
where $C_{abc}$ are the structure constants of the Lie-algebra $mathfrak{g}$. According to my professor it is possible to show that
$$operatorname{tr}(A_aA_b)=g_{ab},$$
where $A_i$ denote the generators in the adjoint representation.
I'm honestly having a really hard time on trying to show that. As far as I understand we have
$$A_a=left.frac{partial tau_A(g)}{partial alpha_a}right|_{g=e},$$
where $tau_A$ is the adjoint representation and $e$ the unit-element of $G$. I know that one can write $|A_a|_{bc}=C_{abc}$. This would then imply that
$$g_{ab}=C_{acd}C_{bdc}= sum_{c,d=1}^3|A_a|_{cd}|A_{b}|_{dc}.$$
The problem is that I don't really see what this has to do with the trace of the two matrices $A_a$ and $A_b$.
lie-groups lie-algebras
lie-groups lie-algebras
asked Feb 2 at 15:04
SitoSito
19417
19417
1
$begingroup$
Hint: What is your definition of the structure constants? Also, forget about the group, think only about the Lie algebra.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Feb 2 at 15:11
$begingroup$
@MoisheCohen We defined the structure constants over $[A_a, A_b]= C_{abc}A_c$. Thanks for the hint, will think about it...
$endgroup$
– Sito
Feb 2 at 15:15
$begingroup$
@MoisheCohen Alright, I thought about it now for some time, but I just can't figure out what the trick is supposed to be... To make use of the definition of the structure constants I would need to multiply $g_{ab}$ with $A_c$ and $A_d$, which doesn't seem to lead anywhere... Could you maybe help a little more..
$endgroup$
– Sito
Feb 2 at 18:51
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Hint: What is your definition of the structure constants? Also, forget about the group, think only about the Lie algebra.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Feb 2 at 15:11
$begingroup$
@MoisheCohen We defined the structure constants over $[A_a, A_b]= C_{abc}A_c$. Thanks for the hint, will think about it...
$endgroup$
– Sito
Feb 2 at 15:15
$begingroup$
@MoisheCohen Alright, I thought about it now for some time, but I just can't figure out what the trick is supposed to be... To make use of the definition of the structure constants I would need to multiply $g_{ab}$ with $A_c$ and $A_d$, which doesn't seem to lead anywhere... Could you maybe help a little more..
$endgroup$
– Sito
Feb 2 at 18:51
1
1
$begingroup$
Hint: What is your definition of the structure constants? Also, forget about the group, think only about the Lie algebra.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Feb 2 at 15:11
$begingroup$
Hint: What is your definition of the structure constants? Also, forget about the group, think only about the Lie algebra.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Feb 2 at 15:11
$begingroup$
@MoisheCohen We defined the structure constants over $[A_a, A_b]= C_{abc}A_c$. Thanks for the hint, will think about it...
$endgroup$
– Sito
Feb 2 at 15:15
$begingroup$
@MoisheCohen We defined the structure constants over $[A_a, A_b]= C_{abc}A_c$. Thanks for the hint, will think about it...
$endgroup$
– Sito
Feb 2 at 15:15
$begingroup$
@MoisheCohen Alright, I thought about it now for some time, but I just can't figure out what the trick is supposed to be... To make use of the definition of the structure constants I would need to multiply $g_{ab}$ with $A_c$ and $A_d$, which doesn't seem to lead anywhere... Could you maybe help a little more..
$endgroup$
– Sito
Feb 2 at 18:51
$begingroup$
@MoisheCohen Alright, I thought about it now for some time, but I just can't figure out what the trick is supposed to be... To make use of the definition of the structure constants I would need to multiply $g_{ab}$ with $A_c$ and $A_d$, which doesn't seem to lead anywhere... Could you maybe help a little more..
$endgroup$
– Sito
Feb 2 at 18:51
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I will write a solution using the notation for structural constants that I prefer:
If $e_1,...,e_N$ is a basis of the Lie algebra ${mathfrak g}$, then
$$
[e_i,e_j]=sum_{l} c^l_{ij} e_l.
$$
Now, $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)(x)= [e_i, [e_j, x]]$ for $xin {mathfrak g}$. If $x=e_k$ then
$$
[e_i, [e_j, e_k]] = [e_i, sum_{l} c^l_{jk} e_l]= sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m.
$$
Thus, the linear map $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)$ sends
$$
e_kmapsto sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m
$$
Computing the trace of this map means setting $k=m$ and taking the sum over $k=1,...N$:
$$
tr(ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j))= sum_{l,k} c^l_{jk} c^k_{il}.
$$
That's your professor's formula.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097374%2fcartan-killing-metric-and-lie-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I will write a solution using the notation for structural constants that I prefer:
If $e_1,...,e_N$ is a basis of the Lie algebra ${mathfrak g}$, then
$$
[e_i,e_j]=sum_{l} c^l_{ij} e_l.
$$
Now, $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)(x)= [e_i, [e_j, x]]$ for $xin {mathfrak g}$. If $x=e_k$ then
$$
[e_i, [e_j, e_k]] = [e_i, sum_{l} c^l_{jk} e_l]= sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m.
$$
Thus, the linear map $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)$ sends
$$
e_kmapsto sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m
$$
Computing the trace of this map means setting $k=m$ and taking the sum over $k=1,...N$:
$$
tr(ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j))= sum_{l,k} c^l_{jk} c^k_{il}.
$$
That's your professor's formula.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I will write a solution using the notation for structural constants that I prefer:
If $e_1,...,e_N$ is a basis of the Lie algebra ${mathfrak g}$, then
$$
[e_i,e_j]=sum_{l} c^l_{ij} e_l.
$$
Now, $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)(x)= [e_i, [e_j, x]]$ for $xin {mathfrak g}$. If $x=e_k$ then
$$
[e_i, [e_j, e_k]] = [e_i, sum_{l} c^l_{jk} e_l]= sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m.
$$
Thus, the linear map $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)$ sends
$$
e_kmapsto sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m
$$
Computing the trace of this map means setting $k=m$ and taking the sum over $k=1,...N$:
$$
tr(ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j))= sum_{l,k} c^l_{jk} c^k_{il}.
$$
That's your professor's formula.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I will write a solution using the notation for structural constants that I prefer:
If $e_1,...,e_N$ is a basis of the Lie algebra ${mathfrak g}$, then
$$
[e_i,e_j]=sum_{l} c^l_{ij} e_l.
$$
Now, $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)(x)= [e_i, [e_j, x]]$ for $xin {mathfrak g}$. If $x=e_k$ then
$$
[e_i, [e_j, e_k]] = [e_i, sum_{l} c^l_{jk} e_l]= sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m.
$$
Thus, the linear map $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)$ sends
$$
e_kmapsto sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m
$$
Computing the trace of this map means setting $k=m$ and taking the sum over $k=1,...N$:
$$
tr(ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j))= sum_{l,k} c^l_{jk} c^k_{il}.
$$
That's your professor's formula.
$endgroup$
I will write a solution using the notation for structural constants that I prefer:
If $e_1,...,e_N$ is a basis of the Lie algebra ${mathfrak g}$, then
$$
[e_i,e_j]=sum_{l} c^l_{ij} e_l.
$$
Now, $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)(x)= [e_i, [e_j, x]]$ for $xin {mathfrak g}$. If $x=e_k$ then
$$
[e_i, [e_j, e_k]] = [e_i, sum_{l} c^l_{jk} e_l]= sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m.
$$
Thus, the linear map $ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j)$ sends
$$
e_kmapsto sum_{l,m} c^l_{jk} c^m_{il} e_m
$$
Computing the trace of this map means setting $k=m$ and taking the sum over $k=1,...N$:
$$
tr(ad(e_i)circ ad(e_j))= sum_{l,k} c^l_{jk} c^k_{il}.
$$
That's your professor's formula.
answered Feb 3 at 2:11
Moishe KohanMoishe Kohan
48.7k344111
48.7k344111
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097374%2fcartan-killing-metric-and-lie-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Hint: What is your definition of the structure constants? Also, forget about the group, think only about the Lie algebra.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
Feb 2 at 15:11
$begingroup$
@MoisheCohen We defined the structure constants over $[A_a, A_b]= C_{abc}A_c$. Thanks for the hint, will think about it...
$endgroup$
– Sito
Feb 2 at 15:15
$begingroup$
@MoisheCohen Alright, I thought about it now for some time, but I just can't figure out what the trick is supposed to be... To make use of the definition of the structure constants I would need to multiply $g_{ab}$ with $A_c$ and $A_d$, which doesn't seem to lead anywhere... Could you maybe help a little more..
$endgroup$
– Sito
Feb 2 at 18:51