If $Csubsetmathbb{R}^n$ is closed, then $C=f^{-1}(0)$ for some smooth $f:mathbb{R}^ntomathbb{R}$.
$begingroup$
Let $Csubset mathbb{R}^n$ closed. Prove that there is a smooth function $f:mathbb{R}^ntomathbb{R}$ such that $C=f^{-1}(0)$.
I've found this solution in the internet: take a cover of balls ${B_i}_i$ of $mathbb{R}^nsetminus C$ and a partition of unity ${f_i}_i$ subordinate to ${B_i}_i$ and define $f:=sum_{i=1}^infty frac{f_i}{2^iM_i}$, where:
$$M_i:=supleft{frac{partial^kf_i}{partial x_{j_1}cdots partial x_{j_k}}(p)mid 1leq j_1<...<j_kleq n,, kleq i,,pin B_iright}$$
My question is: why do we need to define these $M_i$'s?
Why can't we just define $f=sum_{i=1}^infty frac{f_i}{2^i}$ for example?
In that case, since ${B_i}_i$ can be considered locally finite, then for $pinmathbb{R}^n$, there is some open $Usubsetmathbb{R}^nsetminus C$ containing $p$ such that $f_i|_Uequiv 0$ for all but finitely many $i$ (say $i_1,...,i_k$), so $f|_U=frac{f_{i_1}}{2^{i_1}}+...+frac{f_{i_k}}{2^{i_k}}$, which is obviously smooth.
What am I missing?
real-analysis smooth-functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $Csubset mathbb{R}^n$ closed. Prove that there is a smooth function $f:mathbb{R}^ntomathbb{R}$ such that $C=f^{-1}(0)$.
I've found this solution in the internet: take a cover of balls ${B_i}_i$ of $mathbb{R}^nsetminus C$ and a partition of unity ${f_i}_i$ subordinate to ${B_i}_i$ and define $f:=sum_{i=1}^infty frac{f_i}{2^iM_i}$, where:
$$M_i:=supleft{frac{partial^kf_i}{partial x_{j_1}cdots partial x_{j_k}}(p)mid 1leq j_1<...<j_kleq n,, kleq i,,pin B_iright}$$
My question is: why do we need to define these $M_i$'s?
Why can't we just define $f=sum_{i=1}^infty frac{f_i}{2^i}$ for example?
In that case, since ${B_i}_i$ can be considered locally finite, then for $pinmathbb{R}^n$, there is some open $Usubsetmathbb{R}^nsetminus C$ containing $p$ such that $f_i|_Uequiv 0$ for all but finitely many $i$ (say $i_1,...,i_k$), so $f|_U=frac{f_{i_1}}{2^{i_1}}+...+frac{f_{i_k}}{2^{i_k}}$, which is obviously smooth.
What am I missing?
real-analysis smooth-functions
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
i'm not certain, but what if $pin C$ in your last paragraph? the $B_i$ are only locally finite at points outside of C, right?
$endgroup$
– Tim kinsella
Feb 2 at 19:05
$begingroup$
You're right @Timkinsella, I should have said $Usubset mathbb{R}^nsetminus C$. I've corrected it
$endgroup$
– rmdmc89
Feb 2 at 19:38
$begingroup$
if $pin C$ then there is no such $U$
$endgroup$
– Tim kinsella
Feb 2 at 22:53
1
$begingroup$
my point (of which, as i say, i'm not certain) is that the $M_i$ are there to guarantee smoothness at points of $C$ somehow.
$endgroup$
– Tim kinsella
Feb 2 at 22:55
$begingroup$
Oh, I see what you mean. I'll think about it
$endgroup$
– rmdmc89
Feb 3 at 12:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $Csubset mathbb{R}^n$ closed. Prove that there is a smooth function $f:mathbb{R}^ntomathbb{R}$ such that $C=f^{-1}(0)$.
I've found this solution in the internet: take a cover of balls ${B_i}_i$ of $mathbb{R}^nsetminus C$ and a partition of unity ${f_i}_i$ subordinate to ${B_i}_i$ and define $f:=sum_{i=1}^infty frac{f_i}{2^iM_i}$, where:
$$M_i:=supleft{frac{partial^kf_i}{partial x_{j_1}cdots partial x_{j_k}}(p)mid 1leq j_1<...<j_kleq n,, kleq i,,pin B_iright}$$
My question is: why do we need to define these $M_i$'s?
Why can't we just define $f=sum_{i=1}^infty frac{f_i}{2^i}$ for example?
In that case, since ${B_i}_i$ can be considered locally finite, then for $pinmathbb{R}^n$, there is some open $Usubsetmathbb{R}^nsetminus C$ containing $p$ such that $f_i|_Uequiv 0$ for all but finitely many $i$ (say $i_1,...,i_k$), so $f|_U=frac{f_{i_1}}{2^{i_1}}+...+frac{f_{i_k}}{2^{i_k}}$, which is obviously smooth.
What am I missing?
real-analysis smooth-functions
$endgroup$
Let $Csubset mathbb{R}^n$ closed. Prove that there is a smooth function $f:mathbb{R}^ntomathbb{R}$ such that $C=f^{-1}(0)$.
I've found this solution in the internet: take a cover of balls ${B_i}_i$ of $mathbb{R}^nsetminus C$ and a partition of unity ${f_i}_i$ subordinate to ${B_i}_i$ and define $f:=sum_{i=1}^infty frac{f_i}{2^iM_i}$, where:
$$M_i:=supleft{frac{partial^kf_i}{partial x_{j_1}cdots partial x_{j_k}}(p)mid 1leq j_1<...<j_kleq n,, kleq i,,pin B_iright}$$
My question is: why do we need to define these $M_i$'s?
Why can't we just define $f=sum_{i=1}^infty frac{f_i}{2^i}$ for example?
In that case, since ${B_i}_i$ can be considered locally finite, then for $pinmathbb{R}^n$, there is some open $Usubsetmathbb{R}^nsetminus C$ containing $p$ such that $f_i|_Uequiv 0$ for all but finitely many $i$ (say $i_1,...,i_k$), so $f|_U=frac{f_{i_1}}{2^{i_1}}+...+frac{f_{i_k}}{2^{i_k}}$, which is obviously smooth.
What am I missing?
real-analysis smooth-functions
real-analysis smooth-functions
edited Feb 2 at 19:36
rmdmc89
asked Feb 2 at 17:16
rmdmc89rmdmc89
2,2421923
2,2421923
1
$begingroup$
i'm not certain, but what if $pin C$ in your last paragraph? the $B_i$ are only locally finite at points outside of C, right?
$endgroup$
– Tim kinsella
Feb 2 at 19:05
$begingroup$
You're right @Timkinsella, I should have said $Usubset mathbb{R}^nsetminus C$. I've corrected it
$endgroup$
– rmdmc89
Feb 2 at 19:38
$begingroup$
if $pin C$ then there is no such $U$
$endgroup$
– Tim kinsella
Feb 2 at 22:53
1
$begingroup$
my point (of which, as i say, i'm not certain) is that the $M_i$ are there to guarantee smoothness at points of $C$ somehow.
$endgroup$
– Tim kinsella
Feb 2 at 22:55
$begingroup$
Oh, I see what you mean. I'll think about it
$endgroup$
– rmdmc89
Feb 3 at 12:04
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
i'm not certain, but what if $pin C$ in your last paragraph? the $B_i$ are only locally finite at points outside of C, right?
$endgroup$
– Tim kinsella
Feb 2 at 19:05
$begingroup$
You're right @Timkinsella, I should have said $Usubset mathbb{R}^nsetminus C$. I've corrected it
$endgroup$
– rmdmc89
Feb 2 at 19:38
$begingroup$
if $pin C$ then there is no such $U$
$endgroup$
– Tim kinsella
Feb 2 at 22:53
1
$begingroup$
my point (of which, as i say, i'm not certain) is that the $M_i$ are there to guarantee smoothness at points of $C$ somehow.
$endgroup$
– Tim kinsella
Feb 2 at 22:55
$begingroup$
Oh, I see what you mean. I'll think about it
$endgroup$
– rmdmc89
Feb 3 at 12:04
1
1
$begingroup$
i'm not certain, but what if $pin C$ in your last paragraph? the $B_i$ are only locally finite at points outside of C, right?
$endgroup$
– Tim kinsella
Feb 2 at 19:05
$begingroup$
i'm not certain, but what if $pin C$ in your last paragraph? the $B_i$ are only locally finite at points outside of C, right?
$endgroup$
– Tim kinsella
Feb 2 at 19:05
$begingroup$
You're right @Timkinsella, I should have said $Usubset mathbb{R}^nsetminus C$. I've corrected it
$endgroup$
– rmdmc89
Feb 2 at 19:38
$begingroup$
You're right @Timkinsella, I should have said $Usubset mathbb{R}^nsetminus C$. I've corrected it
$endgroup$
– rmdmc89
Feb 2 at 19:38
$begingroup$
if $pin C$ then there is no such $U$
$endgroup$
– Tim kinsella
Feb 2 at 22:53
$begingroup$
if $pin C$ then there is no such $U$
$endgroup$
– Tim kinsella
Feb 2 at 22:53
1
1
$begingroup$
my point (of which, as i say, i'm not certain) is that the $M_i$ are there to guarantee smoothness at points of $C$ somehow.
$endgroup$
– Tim kinsella
Feb 2 at 22:55
$begingroup$
my point (of which, as i say, i'm not certain) is that the $M_i$ are there to guarantee smoothness at points of $C$ somehow.
$endgroup$
– Tim kinsella
Feb 2 at 22:55
$begingroup$
Oh, I see what you mean. I'll think about it
$endgroup$
– rmdmc89
Feb 3 at 12:04
$begingroup$
Oh, I see what you mean. I'll think about it
$endgroup$
– rmdmc89
Feb 3 at 12:04
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097527%2fif-c-subset-mathbbrn-is-closed-then-c-f-10-for-some-smooth-f-math%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097527%2fif-c-subset-mathbbrn-is-closed-then-c-f-10-for-some-smooth-f-math%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
i'm not certain, but what if $pin C$ in your last paragraph? the $B_i$ are only locally finite at points outside of C, right?
$endgroup$
– Tim kinsella
Feb 2 at 19:05
$begingroup$
You're right @Timkinsella, I should have said $Usubset mathbb{R}^nsetminus C$. I've corrected it
$endgroup$
– rmdmc89
Feb 2 at 19:38
$begingroup$
if $pin C$ then there is no such $U$
$endgroup$
– Tim kinsella
Feb 2 at 22:53
1
$begingroup$
my point (of which, as i say, i'm not certain) is that the $M_i$ are there to guarantee smoothness at points of $C$ somehow.
$endgroup$
– Tim kinsella
Feb 2 at 22:55
$begingroup$
Oh, I see what you mean. I'll think about it
$endgroup$
– rmdmc89
Feb 3 at 12:04