Scalar dot product with directional derivative












0












$begingroup$


I'm dealing with a problem of the form



$phi cdot left[(A cdot nabla)Bright]$



in which $phi$ is a scalar function and both $A$ and $B$ are vector functions.



Can I simply "distribute" the dot product with scalar function inside the expression to give



$ (C cdot nabla)B$



in which $C = phi cdot A$



Is this correct? I often get confused working with vector calculus operators.





On the side...



It seems that the parenthesis are important when reading the wikipedia identities. For example, would it be true that




  1. $A times (nabla times B) neq (A times nabla) times B$


Is there a "trick" to understanding how to manage the parenthesis?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For your first question, yes. If you find it always confusing, you may write down each component, e.g., $Acdotnabla=sum_iA_ifrac{partial}{partial x_i}$, and see if your proposal works. For your second question, well, $Atimes(nablatimes B)$ means $A$ cross the curl of $B$, which is a cross product between two vectors. By contrast, $(Atimesnabla)times B$ simply means some modified curl, if you would like to call it, of $B$ - there is no cross product anymore.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 11 at 2:32
















0












$begingroup$


I'm dealing with a problem of the form



$phi cdot left[(A cdot nabla)Bright]$



in which $phi$ is a scalar function and both $A$ and $B$ are vector functions.



Can I simply "distribute" the dot product with scalar function inside the expression to give



$ (C cdot nabla)B$



in which $C = phi cdot A$



Is this correct? I often get confused working with vector calculus operators.





On the side...



It seems that the parenthesis are important when reading the wikipedia identities. For example, would it be true that




  1. $A times (nabla times B) neq (A times nabla) times B$


Is there a "trick" to understanding how to manage the parenthesis?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For your first question, yes. If you find it always confusing, you may write down each component, e.g., $Acdotnabla=sum_iA_ifrac{partial}{partial x_i}$, and see if your proposal works. For your second question, well, $Atimes(nablatimes B)$ means $A$ cross the curl of $B$, which is a cross product between two vectors. By contrast, $(Atimesnabla)times B$ simply means some modified curl, if you would like to call it, of $B$ - there is no cross product anymore.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 11 at 2:32














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I'm dealing with a problem of the form



$phi cdot left[(A cdot nabla)Bright]$



in which $phi$ is a scalar function and both $A$ and $B$ are vector functions.



Can I simply "distribute" the dot product with scalar function inside the expression to give



$ (C cdot nabla)B$



in which $C = phi cdot A$



Is this correct? I often get confused working with vector calculus operators.





On the side...



It seems that the parenthesis are important when reading the wikipedia identities. For example, would it be true that




  1. $A times (nabla times B) neq (A times nabla) times B$


Is there a "trick" to understanding how to manage the parenthesis?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I'm dealing with a problem of the form



$phi cdot left[(A cdot nabla)Bright]$



in which $phi$ is a scalar function and both $A$ and $B$ are vector functions.



Can I simply "distribute" the dot product with scalar function inside the expression to give



$ (C cdot nabla)B$



in which $C = phi cdot A$



Is this correct? I often get confused working with vector calculus operators.





On the side...



It seems that the parenthesis are important when reading the wikipedia identities. For example, would it be true that




  1. $A times (nabla times B) neq (A times nabla) times B$


Is there a "trick" to understanding how to manage the parenthesis?







vector-analysis






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 11 at 2:21









ThatsRightJackThatsRightJack

350114




350114












  • $begingroup$
    For your first question, yes. If you find it always confusing, you may write down each component, e.g., $Acdotnabla=sum_iA_ifrac{partial}{partial x_i}$, and see if your proposal works. For your second question, well, $Atimes(nablatimes B)$ means $A$ cross the curl of $B$, which is a cross product between two vectors. By contrast, $(Atimesnabla)times B$ simply means some modified curl, if you would like to call it, of $B$ - there is no cross product anymore.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 11 at 2:32


















  • $begingroup$
    For your first question, yes. If you find it always confusing, you may write down each component, e.g., $Acdotnabla=sum_iA_ifrac{partial}{partial x_i}$, and see if your proposal works. For your second question, well, $Atimes(nablatimes B)$ means $A$ cross the curl of $B$, which is a cross product between two vectors. By contrast, $(Atimesnabla)times B$ simply means some modified curl, if you would like to call it, of $B$ - there is no cross product anymore.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 11 at 2:32
















$begingroup$
For your first question, yes. If you find it always confusing, you may write down each component, e.g., $Acdotnabla=sum_iA_ifrac{partial}{partial x_i}$, and see if your proposal works. For your second question, well, $Atimes(nablatimes B)$ means $A$ cross the curl of $B$, which is a cross product between two vectors. By contrast, $(Atimesnabla)times B$ simply means some modified curl, if you would like to call it, of $B$ - there is no cross product anymore.
$endgroup$
– hypernova
Jan 11 at 2:32




$begingroup$
For your first question, yes. If you find it always confusing, you may write down each component, e.g., $Acdotnabla=sum_iA_ifrac{partial}{partial x_i}$, and see if your proposal works. For your second question, well, $Atimes(nablatimes B)$ means $A$ cross the curl of $B$, which is a cross product between two vectors. By contrast, $(Atimesnabla)times B$ simply means some modified curl, if you would like to call it, of $B$ - there is no cross product anymore.
$endgroup$
– hypernova
Jan 11 at 2:32










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3069423%2fscalar-dot-product-with-directional-derivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3069423%2fscalar-dot-product-with-directional-derivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]