Object of a Category $C$ acts as Functor
$begingroup$
I have a question about a notation used in following paper: https://etale.site/writing/stax-seminar-talk.pdf (see page 4):
We take a category $C$ and consider a pair $(X_0,X_1)$ of two objects $X_1, X_1 in C$ satisfying identities between maps $s, t , epsilon, i $ and $m$ as described in the article above.
Then we define a new category in following way:
We take a $U in C$ and define a category ${X_0(U)/X_1(U)}$ such that:
The objects are defined via $ob({X_0(U)/X_1(U)}):= X_0(U)$.
And exactly this is the problem: What is exactly $X_0(U)$? Especially how $X_0$ "acts" on $U in C$?
Is $X_0$ concretely an element in $C$ or a functor $X_0:C to (Set)$, $U mapsto X_0(U)$?
algebraic-geometry category-theory groupoids algebraic-stacks
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a question about a notation used in following paper: https://etale.site/writing/stax-seminar-talk.pdf (see page 4):
We take a category $C$ and consider a pair $(X_0,X_1)$ of two objects $X_1, X_1 in C$ satisfying identities between maps $s, t , epsilon, i $ and $m$ as described in the article above.
Then we define a new category in following way:
We take a $U in C$ and define a category ${X_0(U)/X_1(U)}$ such that:
The objects are defined via $ob({X_0(U)/X_1(U)}):= X_0(U)$.
And exactly this is the problem: What is exactly $X_0(U)$? Especially how $X_0$ "acts" on $U in C$?
Is $X_0$ concretely an element in $C$ or a functor $X_0:C to (Set)$, $U mapsto X_0(U)$?
algebraic-geometry category-theory groupoids algebraic-stacks
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I assume that $X_0(U)=operatorname{Hom}(U,X_0)$. That's fairly typical notation in AG (identify an object with its functor of points).
$endgroup$
– jgon
Feb 2 at 17:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a question about a notation used in following paper: https://etale.site/writing/stax-seminar-talk.pdf (see page 4):
We take a category $C$ and consider a pair $(X_0,X_1)$ of two objects $X_1, X_1 in C$ satisfying identities between maps $s, t , epsilon, i $ and $m$ as described in the article above.
Then we define a new category in following way:
We take a $U in C$ and define a category ${X_0(U)/X_1(U)}$ such that:
The objects are defined via $ob({X_0(U)/X_1(U)}):= X_0(U)$.
And exactly this is the problem: What is exactly $X_0(U)$? Especially how $X_0$ "acts" on $U in C$?
Is $X_0$ concretely an element in $C$ or a functor $X_0:C to (Set)$, $U mapsto X_0(U)$?
algebraic-geometry category-theory groupoids algebraic-stacks
$endgroup$
I have a question about a notation used in following paper: https://etale.site/writing/stax-seminar-talk.pdf (see page 4):
We take a category $C$ and consider a pair $(X_0,X_1)$ of two objects $X_1, X_1 in C$ satisfying identities between maps $s, t , epsilon, i $ and $m$ as described in the article above.
Then we define a new category in following way:
We take a $U in C$ and define a category ${X_0(U)/X_1(U)}$ such that:
The objects are defined via $ob({X_0(U)/X_1(U)}):= X_0(U)$.
And exactly this is the problem: What is exactly $X_0(U)$? Especially how $X_0$ "acts" on $U in C$?
Is $X_0$ concretely an element in $C$ or a functor $X_0:C to (Set)$, $U mapsto X_0(U)$?
algebraic-geometry category-theory groupoids algebraic-stacks
algebraic-geometry category-theory groupoids algebraic-stacks
asked Feb 2 at 17:02
KarlPeterKarlPeter
6841416
6841416
2
$begingroup$
I assume that $X_0(U)=operatorname{Hom}(U,X_0)$. That's fairly typical notation in AG (identify an object with its functor of points).
$endgroup$
– jgon
Feb 2 at 17:23
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
I assume that $X_0(U)=operatorname{Hom}(U,X_0)$. That's fairly typical notation in AG (identify an object with its functor of points).
$endgroup$
– jgon
Feb 2 at 17:23
2
2
$begingroup$
I assume that $X_0(U)=operatorname{Hom}(U,X_0)$. That's fairly typical notation in AG (identify an object with its functor of points).
$endgroup$
– jgon
Feb 2 at 17:23
$begingroup$
I assume that $X_0(U)=operatorname{Hom}(U,X_0)$. That's fairly typical notation in AG (identify an object with its functor of points).
$endgroup$
– jgon
Feb 2 at 17:23
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
To expand on my comment, $X_0(U)=newcommandHom{operatorname{Hom}}Hom(U,X_0)$. That is, we identify objects of a category with their functors of points.
To rephrase the definition here, $X_0$ and $X_1$ are objects in $C$ parametrizing objects and morphisms of the groupoid respectively. Applying the functor $Hom(U,-)$ to our groupoid, we see that for all $U$, $X_0(U)$ and $X_1(U)$ together with $s,t,epsilon,i,m$ determine a groupoid in $mathbf{Set}$. This is the category ${X_0(U)/X_1(U)}$. Since $Hom(U,-)$ is also functorial in $U$, for morphisms $f:Vto U$, we get pullback maps $f^* : {X_0(U)/X_1(U)}to {X_0(V)/X_1(V)}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
so essentially this is the Yoneda embedding?
$endgroup$
– KarlPeter
Feb 4 at 0:45
$begingroup$
@KarlPeter, yes exactly
$endgroup$
– jgon
Feb 4 at 0:55
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097509%2fobject-of-a-category-c-acts-as-functor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
To expand on my comment, $X_0(U)=newcommandHom{operatorname{Hom}}Hom(U,X_0)$. That is, we identify objects of a category with their functors of points.
To rephrase the definition here, $X_0$ and $X_1$ are objects in $C$ parametrizing objects and morphisms of the groupoid respectively. Applying the functor $Hom(U,-)$ to our groupoid, we see that for all $U$, $X_0(U)$ and $X_1(U)$ together with $s,t,epsilon,i,m$ determine a groupoid in $mathbf{Set}$. This is the category ${X_0(U)/X_1(U)}$. Since $Hom(U,-)$ is also functorial in $U$, for morphisms $f:Vto U$, we get pullback maps $f^* : {X_0(U)/X_1(U)}to {X_0(V)/X_1(V)}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
so essentially this is the Yoneda embedding?
$endgroup$
– KarlPeter
Feb 4 at 0:45
$begingroup$
@KarlPeter, yes exactly
$endgroup$
– jgon
Feb 4 at 0:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To expand on my comment, $X_0(U)=newcommandHom{operatorname{Hom}}Hom(U,X_0)$. That is, we identify objects of a category with their functors of points.
To rephrase the definition here, $X_0$ and $X_1$ are objects in $C$ parametrizing objects and morphisms of the groupoid respectively. Applying the functor $Hom(U,-)$ to our groupoid, we see that for all $U$, $X_0(U)$ and $X_1(U)$ together with $s,t,epsilon,i,m$ determine a groupoid in $mathbf{Set}$. This is the category ${X_0(U)/X_1(U)}$. Since $Hom(U,-)$ is also functorial in $U$, for morphisms $f:Vto U$, we get pullback maps $f^* : {X_0(U)/X_1(U)}to {X_0(V)/X_1(V)}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
so essentially this is the Yoneda embedding?
$endgroup$
– KarlPeter
Feb 4 at 0:45
$begingroup$
@KarlPeter, yes exactly
$endgroup$
– jgon
Feb 4 at 0:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To expand on my comment, $X_0(U)=newcommandHom{operatorname{Hom}}Hom(U,X_0)$. That is, we identify objects of a category with their functors of points.
To rephrase the definition here, $X_0$ and $X_1$ are objects in $C$ parametrizing objects and morphisms of the groupoid respectively. Applying the functor $Hom(U,-)$ to our groupoid, we see that for all $U$, $X_0(U)$ and $X_1(U)$ together with $s,t,epsilon,i,m$ determine a groupoid in $mathbf{Set}$. This is the category ${X_0(U)/X_1(U)}$. Since $Hom(U,-)$ is also functorial in $U$, for morphisms $f:Vto U$, we get pullback maps $f^* : {X_0(U)/X_1(U)}to {X_0(V)/X_1(V)}$.
$endgroup$
To expand on my comment, $X_0(U)=newcommandHom{operatorname{Hom}}Hom(U,X_0)$. That is, we identify objects of a category with their functors of points.
To rephrase the definition here, $X_0$ and $X_1$ are objects in $C$ parametrizing objects and morphisms of the groupoid respectively. Applying the functor $Hom(U,-)$ to our groupoid, we see that for all $U$, $X_0(U)$ and $X_1(U)$ together with $s,t,epsilon,i,m$ determine a groupoid in $mathbf{Set}$. This is the category ${X_0(U)/X_1(U)}$. Since $Hom(U,-)$ is also functorial in $U$, for morphisms $f:Vto U$, we get pullback maps $f^* : {X_0(U)/X_1(U)}to {X_0(V)/X_1(V)}$.
answered Feb 2 at 17:33
jgonjgon
16.6k32143
16.6k32143
$begingroup$
so essentially this is the Yoneda embedding?
$endgroup$
– KarlPeter
Feb 4 at 0:45
$begingroup$
@KarlPeter, yes exactly
$endgroup$
– jgon
Feb 4 at 0:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
so essentially this is the Yoneda embedding?
$endgroup$
– KarlPeter
Feb 4 at 0:45
$begingroup$
@KarlPeter, yes exactly
$endgroup$
– jgon
Feb 4 at 0:55
$begingroup$
so essentially this is the Yoneda embedding?
$endgroup$
– KarlPeter
Feb 4 at 0:45
$begingroup$
so essentially this is the Yoneda embedding?
$endgroup$
– KarlPeter
Feb 4 at 0:45
$begingroup$
@KarlPeter, yes exactly
$endgroup$
– jgon
Feb 4 at 0:55
$begingroup$
@KarlPeter, yes exactly
$endgroup$
– jgon
Feb 4 at 0:55
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3097509%2fobject-of-a-category-c-acts-as-functor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
I assume that $X_0(U)=operatorname{Hom}(U,X_0)$. That's fairly typical notation in AG (identify an object with its functor of points).
$endgroup$
– jgon
Feb 2 at 17:23