Confused at to why $prod_{g in G}g^2=e$












3












$begingroup$


Let $(G, circ)$ be a finite abelian group with neutral element $e$.



$1.$ Show that in general $prod_{g in G}g^nneq e$ for $n=1$



My idea:



I used $mathbb Z/2mathbb Z$, it follows that $prod_{g in G}g=[0]+[1]neq[0] in mathbb Z/2mathbb Z$



$2.$ Show that there exists an $n in mathbb N$ so that $prod_{g in G}g^n=e$



I found a solution but I do not understand it. It states



$prod_{g in G}g^2=prod_{g in G}(gcdot g^{-1})$



I do not understand this step... Why is $g^{2}=gcdot g^{-1}$?



Thank for your help










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The group is abelian so you can rearrange the order of the products. Than in a group an element has a unique inverse (which can be also itself). Try using these two properties to show the equality that you need...
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Jan 31 at 14:35












  • $begingroup$
    Note that the solution does not claim that for each $gin G$, $g^2 = gcdot g^{-1}$. It only claims that the two products are equal.
    $endgroup$
    – rogerl
    Jan 31 at 14:36










  • $begingroup$
    It is not true in general that $g^2=g cdot g^{-1}$, but if you take the product of all elements twice you will have each element and its inverse.
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Jan 31 at 14:36










  • $begingroup$
    Note that the second question can be answered easily by taking $n=|G|$ and applying Lagrange's theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Jan 31 at 14:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Or even more easily by taking $n = prod_{g in G} mathrm{ord}(g)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 31 at 15:25
















3












$begingroup$


Let $(G, circ)$ be a finite abelian group with neutral element $e$.



$1.$ Show that in general $prod_{g in G}g^nneq e$ for $n=1$



My idea:



I used $mathbb Z/2mathbb Z$, it follows that $prod_{g in G}g=[0]+[1]neq[0] in mathbb Z/2mathbb Z$



$2.$ Show that there exists an $n in mathbb N$ so that $prod_{g in G}g^n=e$



I found a solution but I do not understand it. It states



$prod_{g in G}g^2=prod_{g in G}(gcdot g^{-1})$



I do not understand this step... Why is $g^{2}=gcdot g^{-1}$?



Thank for your help










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The group is abelian so you can rearrange the order of the products. Than in a group an element has a unique inverse (which can be also itself). Try using these two properties to show the equality that you need...
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Jan 31 at 14:35












  • $begingroup$
    Note that the solution does not claim that for each $gin G$, $g^2 = gcdot g^{-1}$. It only claims that the two products are equal.
    $endgroup$
    – rogerl
    Jan 31 at 14:36










  • $begingroup$
    It is not true in general that $g^2=g cdot g^{-1}$, but if you take the product of all elements twice you will have each element and its inverse.
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Jan 31 at 14:36










  • $begingroup$
    Note that the second question can be answered easily by taking $n=|G|$ and applying Lagrange's theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Jan 31 at 14:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Or even more easily by taking $n = prod_{g in G} mathrm{ord}(g)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 31 at 15:25














3












3








3


2



$begingroup$


Let $(G, circ)$ be a finite abelian group with neutral element $e$.



$1.$ Show that in general $prod_{g in G}g^nneq e$ for $n=1$



My idea:



I used $mathbb Z/2mathbb Z$, it follows that $prod_{g in G}g=[0]+[1]neq[0] in mathbb Z/2mathbb Z$



$2.$ Show that there exists an $n in mathbb N$ so that $prod_{g in G}g^n=e$



I found a solution but I do not understand it. It states



$prod_{g in G}g^2=prod_{g in G}(gcdot g^{-1})$



I do not understand this step... Why is $g^{2}=gcdot g^{-1}$?



Thank for your help










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $(G, circ)$ be a finite abelian group with neutral element $e$.



$1.$ Show that in general $prod_{g in G}g^nneq e$ for $n=1$



My idea:



I used $mathbb Z/2mathbb Z$, it follows that $prod_{g in G}g=[0]+[1]neq[0] in mathbb Z/2mathbb Z$



$2.$ Show that there exists an $n in mathbb N$ so that $prod_{g in G}g^n=e$



I found a solution but I do not understand it. It states



$prod_{g in G}g^2=prod_{g in G}(gcdot g^{-1})$



I do not understand this step... Why is $g^{2}=gcdot g^{-1}$?



Thank for your help







group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 31 at 16:00









Shaun

10.3k113686




10.3k113686










asked Jan 31 at 14:31









MinaThumaMinaThuma

2709




2709












  • $begingroup$
    The group is abelian so you can rearrange the order of the products. Than in a group an element has a unique inverse (which can be also itself). Try using these two properties to show the equality that you need...
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Jan 31 at 14:35












  • $begingroup$
    Note that the solution does not claim that for each $gin G$, $g^2 = gcdot g^{-1}$. It only claims that the two products are equal.
    $endgroup$
    – rogerl
    Jan 31 at 14:36










  • $begingroup$
    It is not true in general that $g^2=g cdot g^{-1}$, but if you take the product of all elements twice you will have each element and its inverse.
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Jan 31 at 14:36










  • $begingroup$
    Note that the second question can be answered easily by taking $n=|G|$ and applying Lagrange's theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Jan 31 at 14:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Or even more easily by taking $n = prod_{g in G} mathrm{ord}(g)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 31 at 15:25


















  • $begingroup$
    The group is abelian so you can rearrange the order of the products. Than in a group an element has a unique inverse (which can be also itself). Try using these two properties to show the equality that you need...
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas
    Jan 31 at 14:35












  • $begingroup$
    Note that the solution does not claim that for each $gin G$, $g^2 = gcdot g^{-1}$. It only claims that the two products are equal.
    $endgroup$
    – rogerl
    Jan 31 at 14:36










  • $begingroup$
    It is not true in general that $g^2=g cdot g^{-1}$, but if you take the product of all elements twice you will have each element and its inverse.
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Jan 31 at 14:36










  • $begingroup$
    Note that the second question can be answered easily by taking $n=|G|$ and applying Lagrange's theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Jan 31 at 14:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Or even more easily by taking $n = prod_{g in G} mathrm{ord}(g)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 31 at 15:25
















$begingroup$
The group is abelian so you can rearrange the order of the products. Than in a group an element has a unique inverse (which can be also itself). Try using these two properties to show the equality that you need...
$endgroup$
– Thomas
Jan 31 at 14:35






$begingroup$
The group is abelian so you can rearrange the order of the products. Than in a group an element has a unique inverse (which can be also itself). Try using these two properties to show the equality that you need...
$endgroup$
– Thomas
Jan 31 at 14:35














$begingroup$
Note that the solution does not claim that for each $gin G$, $g^2 = gcdot g^{-1}$. It only claims that the two products are equal.
$endgroup$
– rogerl
Jan 31 at 14:36




$begingroup$
Note that the solution does not claim that for each $gin G$, $g^2 = gcdot g^{-1}$. It only claims that the two products are equal.
$endgroup$
– rogerl
Jan 31 at 14:36












$begingroup$
It is not true in general that $g^2=g cdot g^{-1}$, but if you take the product of all elements twice you will have each element and its inverse.
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Jan 31 at 14:36




$begingroup$
It is not true in general that $g^2=g cdot g^{-1}$, but if you take the product of all elements twice you will have each element and its inverse.
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Jan 31 at 14:36












$begingroup$
Note that the second question can be answered easily by taking $n=|G|$ and applying Lagrange's theorem.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Jan 31 at 14:47




$begingroup$
Note that the second question can be answered easily by taking $n=|G|$ and applying Lagrange's theorem.
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Jan 31 at 14:47




1




1




$begingroup$
Or even more easily by taking $n = prod_{g in G} mathrm{ord}(g)$.
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
Jan 31 at 15:25




$begingroup$
Or even more easily by taking $n = prod_{g in G} mathrm{ord}(g)$.
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
Jan 31 at 15:25










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

It is not true that $g^2 = g circ g^{-1}$. Rather, each element $g$ appears in the product twice, so we let every element "appear once as itself" and "appear once as an inverse, namely its inverse's inverse". For example we can write
begin{align}
prod_{g in G} g^2 &= prod_{g in G}g circ (g^{-1})^{-1}\
&= prod_{g in G} g times prod_{g in G} (g^{-1})^{-1} \
&= prod_{g in G} g times prod_{h in G} h^{-1} \
&= prod_{g in G} g times prod_{g in G} g^{-1} \
&= prod_{g in G}g circ g^{-1}.
end{align}






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    @MinaThuma, in the second final step I am reordering the product to put the two products back together (and arguably I am changing the ordering in step three or four, although that is hidden in the notation; really $prod_{g in G} g$ does not even make sense for non-abelian groups without fixing an ordering on $G$).
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 31 at 15:26












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3094945%2fconfused-at-to-why-prod-g-in-gg2-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8












$begingroup$

It is not true that $g^2 = g circ g^{-1}$. Rather, each element $g$ appears in the product twice, so we let every element "appear once as itself" and "appear once as an inverse, namely its inverse's inverse". For example we can write
begin{align}
prod_{g in G} g^2 &= prod_{g in G}g circ (g^{-1})^{-1}\
&= prod_{g in G} g times prod_{g in G} (g^{-1})^{-1} \
&= prod_{g in G} g times prod_{h in G} h^{-1} \
&= prod_{g in G} g times prod_{g in G} g^{-1} \
&= prod_{g in G}g circ g^{-1}.
end{align}






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    @MinaThuma, in the second final step I am reordering the product to put the two products back together (and arguably I am changing the ordering in step three or four, although that is hidden in the notation; really $prod_{g in G} g$ does not even make sense for non-abelian groups without fixing an ordering on $G$).
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 31 at 15:26
















8












$begingroup$

It is not true that $g^2 = g circ g^{-1}$. Rather, each element $g$ appears in the product twice, so we let every element "appear once as itself" and "appear once as an inverse, namely its inverse's inverse". For example we can write
begin{align}
prod_{g in G} g^2 &= prod_{g in G}g circ (g^{-1})^{-1}\
&= prod_{g in G} g times prod_{g in G} (g^{-1})^{-1} \
&= prod_{g in G} g times prod_{h in G} h^{-1} \
&= prod_{g in G} g times prod_{g in G} g^{-1} \
&= prod_{g in G}g circ g^{-1}.
end{align}






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    @MinaThuma, in the second final step I am reordering the product to put the two products back together (and arguably I am changing the ordering in step three or four, although that is hidden in the notation; really $prod_{g in G} g$ does not even make sense for non-abelian groups without fixing an ordering on $G$).
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 31 at 15:26














8












8








8





$begingroup$

It is not true that $g^2 = g circ g^{-1}$. Rather, each element $g$ appears in the product twice, so we let every element "appear once as itself" and "appear once as an inverse, namely its inverse's inverse". For example we can write
begin{align}
prod_{g in G} g^2 &= prod_{g in G}g circ (g^{-1})^{-1}\
&= prod_{g in G} g times prod_{g in G} (g^{-1})^{-1} \
&= prod_{g in G} g times prod_{h in G} h^{-1} \
&= prod_{g in G} g times prod_{g in G} g^{-1} \
&= prod_{g in G}g circ g^{-1}.
end{align}






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



It is not true that $g^2 = g circ g^{-1}$. Rather, each element $g$ appears in the product twice, so we let every element "appear once as itself" and "appear once as an inverse, namely its inverse's inverse". For example we can write
begin{align}
prod_{g in G} g^2 &= prod_{g in G}g circ (g^{-1})^{-1}\
&= prod_{g in G} g times prod_{g in G} (g^{-1})^{-1} \
&= prod_{g in G} g times prod_{h in G} h^{-1} \
&= prod_{g in G} g times prod_{g in G} g^{-1} \
&= prod_{g in G}g circ g^{-1}.
end{align}







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 31 at 15:57









Shaun

10.3k113686




10.3k113686










answered Jan 31 at 14:37









Mees de VriesMees de Vries

17.6k13060




17.6k13060












  • $begingroup$
    @MinaThuma, in the second final step I am reordering the product to put the two products back together (and arguably I am changing the ordering in step three or four, although that is hidden in the notation; really $prod_{g in G} g$ does not even make sense for non-abelian groups without fixing an ordering on $G$).
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 31 at 15:26


















  • $begingroup$
    @MinaThuma, in the second final step I am reordering the product to put the two products back together (and arguably I am changing the ordering in step three or four, although that is hidden in the notation; really $prod_{g in G} g$ does not even make sense for non-abelian groups without fixing an ordering on $G$).
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 31 at 15:26
















$begingroup$
@MinaThuma, in the second final step I am reordering the product to put the two products back together (and arguably I am changing the ordering in step three or four, although that is hidden in the notation; really $prod_{g in G} g$ does not even make sense for non-abelian groups without fixing an ordering on $G$).
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
Jan 31 at 15:26




$begingroup$
@MinaThuma, in the second final step I am reordering the product to put the two products back together (and arguably I am changing the ordering in step three or four, although that is hidden in the notation; really $prod_{g in G} g$ does not even make sense for non-abelian groups without fixing an ordering on $G$).
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
Jan 31 at 15:26


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3094945%2fconfused-at-to-why-prod-g-in-gg2-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith