Proof that three element vector space cannot be constructed over $mathbb Z_5$
$begingroup$
I'm trying to show that a vector space $V$ with three elements cannot be constructed over the field $mathbb{Z}_5$. The elements of $V$ can be shown to be ${0,1,1^{-1}}$. I don't think the vector space is closed under scalar multiplication, but how do I show this? As far as I know, we could define an operator $cdot$ such that $alpha cdot 1 = beta cdot 1$ for $1 in V$ and $alpha, beta in V$. I need to prove this result using only the definitions of a vector space and of a field.
I appreciate the help.
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to show that a vector space $V$ with three elements cannot be constructed over the field $mathbb{Z}_5$. The elements of $V$ can be shown to be ${0,1,1^{-1}}$. I don't think the vector space is closed under scalar multiplication, but how do I show this? As far as I know, we could define an operator $cdot$ such that $alpha cdot 1 = beta cdot 1$ for $1 in V$ and $alpha, beta in V$. I need to prove this result using only the definitions of a vector space and of a field.
I appreciate the help.
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
A $k-$dimensional vector space over $mathbb{Z}_5$ has $5^k$ elements.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 31 at 16:39
$begingroup$
Yes, but I've yet to show this. I'm looking for a proof based only on the definitions of a vector space and a field.
$endgroup$
– Derek Adams
Jan 31 at 16:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to show that a vector space $V$ with three elements cannot be constructed over the field $mathbb{Z}_5$. The elements of $V$ can be shown to be ${0,1,1^{-1}}$. I don't think the vector space is closed under scalar multiplication, but how do I show this? As far as I know, we could define an operator $cdot$ such that $alpha cdot 1 = beta cdot 1$ for $1 in V$ and $alpha, beta in V$. I need to prove this result using only the definitions of a vector space and of a field.
I appreciate the help.
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
$endgroup$
I'm trying to show that a vector space $V$ with three elements cannot be constructed over the field $mathbb{Z}_5$. The elements of $V$ can be shown to be ${0,1,1^{-1}}$. I don't think the vector space is closed under scalar multiplication, but how do I show this? As far as I know, we could define an operator $cdot$ such that $alpha cdot 1 = beta cdot 1$ for $1 in V$ and $alpha, beta in V$. I need to prove this result using only the definitions of a vector space and of a field.
I appreciate the help.
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
linear-algebra abstract-algebra
edited Jan 31 at 21:32
J. W. Tanner
4,5391320
4,5391320
asked Jan 31 at 16:37
Derek AdamsDerek Adams
567414
567414
4
$begingroup$
A $k-$dimensional vector space over $mathbb{Z}_5$ has $5^k$ elements.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 31 at 16:39
$begingroup$
Yes, but I've yet to show this. I'm looking for a proof based only on the definitions of a vector space and a field.
$endgroup$
– Derek Adams
Jan 31 at 16:41
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
A $k-$dimensional vector space over $mathbb{Z}_5$ has $5^k$ elements.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 31 at 16:39
$begingroup$
Yes, but I've yet to show this. I'm looking for a proof based only on the definitions of a vector space and a field.
$endgroup$
– Derek Adams
Jan 31 at 16:41
4
4
$begingroup$
A $k-$dimensional vector space over $mathbb{Z}_5$ has $5^k$ elements.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 31 at 16:39
$begingroup$
A $k-$dimensional vector space over $mathbb{Z}_5$ has $5^k$ elements.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 31 at 16:39
$begingroup$
Yes, but I've yet to show this. I'm looking for a proof based only on the definitions of a vector space and a field.
$endgroup$
– Derek Adams
Jan 31 at 16:41
$begingroup$
Yes, but I've yet to show this. I'm looking for a proof based only on the definitions of a vector space and a field.
$endgroup$
– Derek Adams
Jan 31 at 16:41
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $Xne0$ be an element of the space. Let $a,binmathbb{Z}_5$ with $ane b$. If $aX=bX$ then $(a-b)X=0$ and multiplying both sides by $(a-b)^{-1}$ gives $X=0$ contrary to assumption.
Thus, $0, X, 2X, 3X, 4X$ are all distinct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3095110%2fproof-that-three-element-vector-space-cannot-be-constructed-over-mathbb-z-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $Xne0$ be an element of the space. Let $a,binmathbb{Z}_5$ with $ane b$. If $aX=bX$ then $(a-b)X=0$ and multiplying both sides by $(a-b)^{-1}$ gives $X=0$ contrary to assumption.
Thus, $0, X, 2X, 3X, 4X$ are all distinct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $Xne0$ be an element of the space. Let $a,binmathbb{Z}_5$ with $ane b$. If $aX=bX$ then $(a-b)X=0$ and multiplying both sides by $(a-b)^{-1}$ gives $X=0$ contrary to assumption.
Thus, $0, X, 2X, 3X, 4X$ are all distinct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $Xne0$ be an element of the space. Let $a,binmathbb{Z}_5$ with $ane b$. If $aX=bX$ then $(a-b)X=0$ and multiplying both sides by $(a-b)^{-1}$ gives $X=0$ contrary to assumption.
Thus, $0, X, 2X, 3X, 4X$ are all distinct.
$endgroup$
Let $Xne0$ be an element of the space. Let $a,binmathbb{Z}_5$ with $ane b$. If $aX=bX$ then $(a-b)X=0$ and multiplying both sides by $(a-b)^{-1}$ gives $X=0$ contrary to assumption.
Thus, $0, X, 2X, 3X, 4X$ are all distinct.
edited Jan 31 at 16:59
answered Jan 31 at 16:52
saulspatzsaulspatz
17.2k31435
17.2k31435
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3095110%2fproof-that-three-element-vector-space-cannot-be-constructed-over-mathbb-z-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
$begingroup$
A $k-$dimensional vector space over $mathbb{Z}_5$ has $5^k$ elements.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 31 at 16:39
$begingroup$
Yes, but I've yet to show this. I'm looking for a proof based only on the definitions of a vector space and a field.
$endgroup$
– Derek Adams
Jan 31 at 16:41