Proof that three element vector space cannot be constructed over $mathbb Z_5$












0












$begingroup$


I'm trying to show that a vector space $V$ with three elements cannot be constructed over the field $mathbb{Z}_5$. The elements of $V$ can be shown to be ${0,1,1^{-1}}$. I don't think the vector space is closed under scalar multiplication, but how do I show this? As far as I know, we could define an operator $cdot$ such that $alpha cdot 1 = beta cdot 1$ for $1 in V$ and $alpha, beta in V$. I need to prove this result using only the definitions of a vector space and of a field.



I appreciate the help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    A $k-$dimensional vector space over $mathbb{Z}_5$ has $5^k$ elements.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    Jan 31 at 16:39










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, but I've yet to show this. I'm looking for a proof based only on the definitions of a vector space and a field.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Adams
    Jan 31 at 16:41
















0












$begingroup$


I'm trying to show that a vector space $V$ with three elements cannot be constructed over the field $mathbb{Z}_5$. The elements of $V$ can be shown to be ${0,1,1^{-1}}$. I don't think the vector space is closed under scalar multiplication, but how do I show this? As far as I know, we could define an operator $cdot$ such that $alpha cdot 1 = beta cdot 1$ for $1 in V$ and $alpha, beta in V$. I need to prove this result using only the definitions of a vector space and of a field.



I appreciate the help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    A $k-$dimensional vector space over $mathbb{Z}_5$ has $5^k$ elements.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    Jan 31 at 16:39










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, but I've yet to show this. I'm looking for a proof based only on the definitions of a vector space and a field.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Adams
    Jan 31 at 16:41














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I'm trying to show that a vector space $V$ with three elements cannot be constructed over the field $mathbb{Z}_5$. The elements of $V$ can be shown to be ${0,1,1^{-1}}$. I don't think the vector space is closed under scalar multiplication, but how do I show this? As far as I know, we could define an operator $cdot$ such that $alpha cdot 1 = beta cdot 1$ for $1 in V$ and $alpha, beta in V$. I need to prove this result using only the definitions of a vector space and of a field.



I appreciate the help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm trying to show that a vector space $V$ with three elements cannot be constructed over the field $mathbb{Z}_5$. The elements of $V$ can be shown to be ${0,1,1^{-1}}$. I don't think the vector space is closed under scalar multiplication, but how do I show this? As far as I know, we could define an operator $cdot$ such that $alpha cdot 1 = beta cdot 1$ for $1 in V$ and $alpha, beta in V$. I need to prove this result using only the definitions of a vector space and of a field.



I appreciate the help.







linear-algebra abstract-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 31 at 21:32









J. W. Tanner

4,5391320




4,5391320










asked Jan 31 at 16:37









Derek AdamsDerek Adams

567414




567414








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    A $k-$dimensional vector space over $mathbb{Z}_5$ has $5^k$ elements.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    Jan 31 at 16:39










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, but I've yet to show this. I'm looking for a proof based only on the definitions of a vector space and a field.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Adams
    Jan 31 at 16:41














  • 4




    $begingroup$
    A $k-$dimensional vector space over $mathbb{Z}_5$ has $5^k$ elements.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    Jan 31 at 16:39










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, but I've yet to show this. I'm looking for a proof based only on the definitions of a vector space and a field.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Adams
    Jan 31 at 16:41








4




4




$begingroup$
A $k-$dimensional vector space over $mathbb{Z}_5$ has $5^k$ elements.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 31 at 16:39




$begingroup$
A $k-$dimensional vector space over $mathbb{Z}_5$ has $5^k$ elements.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Jan 31 at 16:39












$begingroup$
Yes, but I've yet to show this. I'm looking for a proof based only on the definitions of a vector space and a field.
$endgroup$
– Derek Adams
Jan 31 at 16:41




$begingroup$
Yes, but I've yet to show this. I'm looking for a proof based only on the definitions of a vector space and a field.
$endgroup$
– Derek Adams
Jan 31 at 16:41










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Let $Xne0$ be an element of the space. Let $a,binmathbb{Z}_5$ with $ane b$. If $aX=bX$ then $(a-b)X=0$ and multiplying both sides by $(a-b)^{-1}$ gives $X=0$ contrary to assumption.



Thus, $0, X, 2X, 3X, 4X$ are all distinct.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3095110%2fproof-that-three-element-vector-space-cannot-be-constructed-over-mathbb-z-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    Let $Xne0$ be an element of the space. Let $a,binmathbb{Z}_5$ with $ane b$. If $aX=bX$ then $(a-b)X=0$ and multiplying both sides by $(a-b)^{-1}$ gives $X=0$ contrary to assumption.



    Thus, $0, X, 2X, 3X, 4X$ are all distinct.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      Let $Xne0$ be an element of the space. Let $a,binmathbb{Z}_5$ with $ane b$. If $aX=bX$ then $(a-b)X=0$ and multiplying both sides by $(a-b)^{-1}$ gives $X=0$ contrary to assumption.



      Thus, $0, X, 2X, 3X, 4X$ are all distinct.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Let $Xne0$ be an element of the space. Let $a,binmathbb{Z}_5$ with $ane b$. If $aX=bX$ then $(a-b)X=0$ and multiplying both sides by $(a-b)^{-1}$ gives $X=0$ contrary to assumption.



        Thus, $0, X, 2X, 3X, 4X$ are all distinct.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Let $Xne0$ be an element of the space. Let $a,binmathbb{Z}_5$ with $ane b$. If $aX=bX$ then $(a-b)X=0$ and multiplying both sides by $(a-b)^{-1}$ gives $X=0$ contrary to assumption.



        Thus, $0, X, 2X, 3X, 4X$ are all distinct.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 31 at 16:59

























        answered Jan 31 at 16:52









        saulspatzsaulspatz

        17.2k31435




        17.2k31435






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3095110%2fproof-that-three-element-vector-space-cannot-be-constructed-over-mathbb-z-5%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

            android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

            WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]