We break a unit length stick at two randomly chosen points
$begingroup$
We break a unit length stick at two randomly chosen points.
(a) Describe the natural probability space for this experiment.
(b) Consider the event that one of the resulting three sticks is larger than $frac{1}{2}.$ Give a description of this event in the sample space of your probability space.
(c) Find the probability of the event in (b).
First we note that the stick can be model by the unit interval $[0,1].$
For part (a), I constructed the following probability space
$$Omega={ omega=[0,x_1]cup[x_1,x_2]cup[x_2,1] : 0leq x_{i}<x_{i+1}leq 1 space text{for} space i=1}.$$
For part (b), we call our event $A$. Then we have that
$$A={ [0,x_1]cup[x_1,x_2]cup[x_2,1]: |x_1-0|>frac{1}{2} space text{or} space |x_1-x_2|>frac{1}{2} space text{or} space |1-x_2|>frac{1}{2} }.$$
For part (c), we can consider the complement, which is the event where all three resulting sticks have length smaller than $frac{1}{2}.$
I'm having difficulty conceptualizing this case. I think we it is easier to deal the complement, and then use the axioms, but I do not see how we could write the complement as a union of disjoint sets.
Any help is appreciated.
Is the approach in (a) and (b) above correct?
probability probability-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We break a unit length stick at two randomly chosen points.
(a) Describe the natural probability space for this experiment.
(b) Consider the event that one of the resulting three sticks is larger than $frac{1}{2}.$ Give a description of this event in the sample space of your probability space.
(c) Find the probability of the event in (b).
First we note that the stick can be model by the unit interval $[0,1].$
For part (a), I constructed the following probability space
$$Omega={ omega=[0,x_1]cup[x_1,x_2]cup[x_2,1] : 0leq x_{i}<x_{i+1}leq 1 space text{for} space i=1}.$$
For part (b), we call our event $A$. Then we have that
$$A={ [0,x_1]cup[x_1,x_2]cup[x_2,1]: |x_1-0|>frac{1}{2} space text{or} space |x_1-x_2|>frac{1}{2} space text{or} space |1-x_2|>frac{1}{2} }.$$
For part (c), we can consider the complement, which is the event where all three resulting sticks have length smaller than $frac{1}{2}.$
I'm having difficulty conceptualizing this case. I think we it is easier to deal the complement, and then use the axioms, but I do not see how we could write the complement as a union of disjoint sets.
Any help is appreciated.
Is the approach in (a) and (b) above correct?
probability probability-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I would probably model the two cuts as a uniformly chosen point in $[0,1]times[0,1]$.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Feb 1 at 7:28
$begingroup$
I would model it with X~U[0,1] and you have samples $X_1$ and $X_2$. Than b is calculating $P(X_1<frac{1}{2} wedge X_2 <frac{1}{2}) + P(X_1>frac{1}{2} wedge X_2 >frac{1}{2}) + P(|X_1-X_2|>frac{1}{2})$ Note you can sum them because 2 events cannot happen together
$endgroup$
– Shaq
Feb 1 at 7:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We break a unit length stick at two randomly chosen points.
(a) Describe the natural probability space for this experiment.
(b) Consider the event that one of the resulting three sticks is larger than $frac{1}{2}.$ Give a description of this event in the sample space of your probability space.
(c) Find the probability of the event in (b).
First we note that the stick can be model by the unit interval $[0,1].$
For part (a), I constructed the following probability space
$$Omega={ omega=[0,x_1]cup[x_1,x_2]cup[x_2,1] : 0leq x_{i}<x_{i+1}leq 1 space text{for} space i=1}.$$
For part (b), we call our event $A$. Then we have that
$$A={ [0,x_1]cup[x_1,x_2]cup[x_2,1]: |x_1-0|>frac{1}{2} space text{or} space |x_1-x_2|>frac{1}{2} space text{or} space |1-x_2|>frac{1}{2} }.$$
For part (c), we can consider the complement, which is the event where all three resulting sticks have length smaller than $frac{1}{2}.$
I'm having difficulty conceptualizing this case. I think we it is easier to deal the complement, and then use the axioms, but I do not see how we could write the complement as a union of disjoint sets.
Any help is appreciated.
Is the approach in (a) and (b) above correct?
probability probability-theory
$endgroup$
We break a unit length stick at two randomly chosen points.
(a) Describe the natural probability space for this experiment.
(b) Consider the event that one of the resulting three sticks is larger than $frac{1}{2}.$ Give a description of this event in the sample space of your probability space.
(c) Find the probability of the event in (b).
First we note that the stick can be model by the unit interval $[0,1].$
For part (a), I constructed the following probability space
$$Omega={ omega=[0,x_1]cup[x_1,x_2]cup[x_2,1] : 0leq x_{i}<x_{i+1}leq 1 space text{for} space i=1}.$$
For part (b), we call our event $A$. Then we have that
$$A={ [0,x_1]cup[x_1,x_2]cup[x_2,1]: |x_1-0|>frac{1}{2} space text{or} space |x_1-x_2|>frac{1}{2} space text{or} space |1-x_2|>frac{1}{2} }.$$
For part (c), we can consider the complement, which is the event where all three resulting sticks have length smaller than $frac{1}{2}.$
I'm having difficulty conceptualizing this case. I think we it is easier to deal the complement, and then use the axioms, but I do not see how we could write the complement as a union of disjoint sets.
Any help is appreciated.
Is the approach in (a) and (b) above correct?
probability probability-theory
probability probability-theory
edited Feb 1 at 7:28
Gaby Alfonso
asked Feb 1 at 7:06
Gaby AlfonsoGaby Alfonso
1,1951418
1,1951418
$begingroup$
I would probably model the two cuts as a uniformly chosen point in $[0,1]times[0,1]$.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Feb 1 at 7:28
$begingroup$
I would model it with X~U[0,1] and you have samples $X_1$ and $X_2$. Than b is calculating $P(X_1<frac{1}{2} wedge X_2 <frac{1}{2}) + P(X_1>frac{1}{2} wedge X_2 >frac{1}{2}) + P(|X_1-X_2|>frac{1}{2})$ Note you can sum them because 2 events cannot happen together
$endgroup$
– Shaq
Feb 1 at 7:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would probably model the two cuts as a uniformly chosen point in $[0,1]times[0,1]$.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Feb 1 at 7:28
$begingroup$
I would model it with X~U[0,1] and you have samples $X_1$ and $X_2$. Than b is calculating $P(X_1<frac{1}{2} wedge X_2 <frac{1}{2}) + P(X_1>frac{1}{2} wedge X_2 >frac{1}{2}) + P(|X_1-X_2|>frac{1}{2})$ Note you can sum them because 2 events cannot happen together
$endgroup$
– Shaq
Feb 1 at 7:35
$begingroup$
I would probably model the two cuts as a uniformly chosen point in $[0,1]times[0,1]$.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Feb 1 at 7:28
$begingroup$
I would probably model the two cuts as a uniformly chosen point in $[0,1]times[0,1]$.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Feb 1 at 7:28
$begingroup$
I would model it with X~U[0,1] and you have samples $X_1$ and $X_2$. Than b is calculating $P(X_1<frac{1}{2} wedge X_2 <frac{1}{2}) + P(X_1>frac{1}{2} wedge X_2 >frac{1}{2}) + P(|X_1-X_2|>frac{1}{2})$ Note you can sum them because 2 events cannot happen together
$endgroup$
– Shaq
Feb 1 at 7:35
$begingroup$
I would model it with X~U[0,1] and you have samples $X_1$ and $X_2$. Than b is calculating $P(X_1<frac{1}{2} wedge X_2 <frac{1}{2}) + P(X_1>frac{1}{2} wedge X_2 >frac{1}{2}) + P(|X_1-X_2|>frac{1}{2})$ Note you can sum them because 2 events cannot happen together
$endgroup$
– Shaq
Feb 1 at 7:35
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
(a)
$$
(Omega,mathcal{F},mathsf{P})=([0,1]^2,mathcal{B}([0,1]^2),lambdaotimeslambda),
$$
where $lambda$ is the Lebesgue measure on $[0,1]$.
(b) Letting $omega_{(1)}=omega_1wedgeomega_2$ and $omega_{(2)}=omega_1veeomega_2$, the required event is
$$
A=A_1cup A_2cup A_3,
$$
where
begin{align}
A_1&={omegainOmega:omega_{(1)}>1/2},\
A_2&={omegainOmega:omega_{(2)}<1/2}, quadtext{and} \
A_3&={omegainOmega:omega_{(2)}-omega_{(1)}>1/2}.
end{align}
(c) Since $A_1$, $A_2$, and $A_3$ are disjoint,
begin{align}
mathsf{P}(A)&=mathsf{P}(A_1)+mathsf{P}(A_2)+mathsf{P}(A_3) \
&=(1/2)^2+(1/2)^2+(1/2)^2=3/4.
end{align}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3095919%2fwe-break-a-unit-length-stick-at-two-randomly-chosen-points%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
(a)
$$
(Omega,mathcal{F},mathsf{P})=([0,1]^2,mathcal{B}([0,1]^2),lambdaotimeslambda),
$$
where $lambda$ is the Lebesgue measure on $[0,1]$.
(b) Letting $omega_{(1)}=omega_1wedgeomega_2$ and $omega_{(2)}=omega_1veeomega_2$, the required event is
$$
A=A_1cup A_2cup A_3,
$$
where
begin{align}
A_1&={omegainOmega:omega_{(1)}>1/2},\
A_2&={omegainOmega:omega_{(2)}<1/2}, quadtext{and} \
A_3&={omegainOmega:omega_{(2)}-omega_{(1)}>1/2}.
end{align}
(c) Since $A_1$, $A_2$, and $A_3$ are disjoint,
begin{align}
mathsf{P}(A)&=mathsf{P}(A_1)+mathsf{P}(A_2)+mathsf{P}(A_3) \
&=(1/2)^2+(1/2)^2+(1/2)^2=3/4.
end{align}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(a)
$$
(Omega,mathcal{F},mathsf{P})=([0,1]^2,mathcal{B}([0,1]^2),lambdaotimeslambda),
$$
where $lambda$ is the Lebesgue measure on $[0,1]$.
(b) Letting $omega_{(1)}=omega_1wedgeomega_2$ and $omega_{(2)}=omega_1veeomega_2$, the required event is
$$
A=A_1cup A_2cup A_3,
$$
where
begin{align}
A_1&={omegainOmega:omega_{(1)}>1/2},\
A_2&={omegainOmega:omega_{(2)}<1/2}, quadtext{and} \
A_3&={omegainOmega:omega_{(2)}-omega_{(1)}>1/2}.
end{align}
(c) Since $A_1$, $A_2$, and $A_3$ are disjoint,
begin{align}
mathsf{P}(A)&=mathsf{P}(A_1)+mathsf{P}(A_2)+mathsf{P}(A_3) \
&=(1/2)^2+(1/2)^2+(1/2)^2=3/4.
end{align}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
(a)
$$
(Omega,mathcal{F},mathsf{P})=([0,1]^2,mathcal{B}([0,1]^2),lambdaotimeslambda),
$$
where $lambda$ is the Lebesgue measure on $[0,1]$.
(b) Letting $omega_{(1)}=omega_1wedgeomega_2$ and $omega_{(2)}=omega_1veeomega_2$, the required event is
$$
A=A_1cup A_2cup A_3,
$$
where
begin{align}
A_1&={omegainOmega:omega_{(1)}>1/2},\
A_2&={omegainOmega:omega_{(2)}<1/2}, quadtext{and} \
A_3&={omegainOmega:omega_{(2)}-omega_{(1)}>1/2}.
end{align}
(c) Since $A_1$, $A_2$, and $A_3$ are disjoint,
begin{align}
mathsf{P}(A)&=mathsf{P}(A_1)+mathsf{P}(A_2)+mathsf{P}(A_3) \
&=(1/2)^2+(1/2)^2+(1/2)^2=3/4.
end{align}
$endgroup$
(a)
$$
(Omega,mathcal{F},mathsf{P})=([0,1]^2,mathcal{B}([0,1]^2),lambdaotimeslambda),
$$
where $lambda$ is the Lebesgue measure on $[0,1]$.
(b) Letting $omega_{(1)}=omega_1wedgeomega_2$ and $omega_{(2)}=omega_1veeomega_2$, the required event is
$$
A=A_1cup A_2cup A_3,
$$
where
begin{align}
A_1&={omegainOmega:omega_{(1)}>1/2},\
A_2&={omegainOmega:omega_{(2)}<1/2}, quadtext{and} \
A_3&={omegainOmega:omega_{(2)}-omega_{(1)}>1/2}.
end{align}
(c) Since $A_1$, $A_2$, and $A_3$ are disjoint,
begin{align}
mathsf{P}(A)&=mathsf{P}(A_1)+mathsf{P}(A_2)+mathsf{P}(A_3) \
&=(1/2)^2+(1/2)^2+(1/2)^2=3/4.
end{align}
edited Feb 1 at 10:16
answered Feb 1 at 10:08


d.k.o.d.k.o.
10.6k730
10.6k730
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3095919%2fwe-break-a-unit-length-stick-at-two-randomly-chosen-points%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
I would probably model the two cuts as a uniformly chosen point in $[0,1]times[0,1]$.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Feb 1 at 7:28
$begingroup$
I would model it with X~U[0,1] and you have samples $X_1$ and $X_2$. Than b is calculating $P(X_1<frac{1}{2} wedge X_2 <frac{1}{2}) + P(X_1>frac{1}{2} wedge X_2 >frac{1}{2}) + P(|X_1-X_2|>frac{1}{2})$ Note you can sum them because 2 events cannot happen together
$endgroup$
– Shaq
Feb 1 at 7:35