Why doesn't the code after await run right away? Isn't it supposed to be non-blocking?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
Hi guys i have a hard time understanding how async and await works behind the scenes. I know we have promises which make our non blocking code by using the "then" function we can place all the work we need to do after the promise is resolved. and the work we want to do parallel to promise we just write it outside our then function. Hence the code becomes non blocking. However i don't understand how the async
await
makes non-blocking code.
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
let data = await myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
// It will not run this line until it resolves await.
let result = 2 + 2;
return data;
}catch (ex){
return ex;
}
}
See the above code. I cannot move forward until the API call is resolved. If it makes my code blocking code, how is it any better then promises? Or is there something I missed about async
and await
? Where do i put my code that is not dependent to the await call? so it can keep on working without await holding the execution?
I am adding a Promise code that i would like to replicate in an async await example.
function myPromiseAPI() {
myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1')
.then(function (data) {
// data
});
// runs parallel
let result = 2 + 2;
}
javascript async-await es6-promise ecmascript-2017
add a comment |
Hi guys i have a hard time understanding how async and await works behind the scenes. I know we have promises which make our non blocking code by using the "then" function we can place all the work we need to do after the promise is resolved. and the work we want to do parallel to promise we just write it outside our then function. Hence the code becomes non blocking. However i don't understand how the async
await
makes non-blocking code.
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
let data = await myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
// It will not run this line until it resolves await.
let result = 2 + 2;
return data;
}catch (ex){
return ex;
}
}
See the above code. I cannot move forward until the API call is resolved. If it makes my code blocking code, how is it any better then promises? Or is there something I missed about async
and await
? Where do i put my code that is not dependent to the await call? so it can keep on working without await holding the execution?
I am adding a Promise code that i would like to replicate in an async await example.
function myPromiseAPI() {
myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1')
.then(function (data) {
// data
});
// runs parallel
let result = 2 + 2;
}
javascript async-await es6-promise ecmascript-2017
AFAIK, await requires that the thing it's awaiting be a promise. So it's not really a either/or.
– Paul
Apr 9 '17 at 3:01
It's sort of as if the lines after your "until it resolves" comment are inside a.then()
. And your whole function is itself async, so whatever calls it doesn't have to wait for it.
– nnnnnn
Apr 9 '17 at 3:06
@Paul it also converts the expression in promise if it is not a promise. that what i read in a blog
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:07
@nnnnnn Yes. its like i put that in .then(). but how do i put it outside a then() in async await scenario
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:09
@RohailNajam Right, my point was about async calls, though. Using a function that expects a callback in place of that promise would not work.
– Paul
Apr 9 '17 at 3:12
add a comment |
Hi guys i have a hard time understanding how async and await works behind the scenes. I know we have promises which make our non blocking code by using the "then" function we can place all the work we need to do after the promise is resolved. and the work we want to do parallel to promise we just write it outside our then function. Hence the code becomes non blocking. However i don't understand how the async
await
makes non-blocking code.
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
let data = await myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
// It will not run this line until it resolves await.
let result = 2 + 2;
return data;
}catch (ex){
return ex;
}
}
See the above code. I cannot move forward until the API call is resolved. If it makes my code blocking code, how is it any better then promises? Or is there something I missed about async
and await
? Where do i put my code that is not dependent to the await call? so it can keep on working without await holding the execution?
I am adding a Promise code that i would like to replicate in an async await example.
function myPromiseAPI() {
myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1')
.then(function (data) {
// data
});
// runs parallel
let result = 2 + 2;
}
javascript async-await es6-promise ecmascript-2017
Hi guys i have a hard time understanding how async and await works behind the scenes. I know we have promises which make our non blocking code by using the "then" function we can place all the work we need to do after the promise is resolved. and the work we want to do parallel to promise we just write it outside our then function. Hence the code becomes non blocking. However i don't understand how the async
await
makes non-blocking code.
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
let data = await myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
// It will not run this line until it resolves await.
let result = 2 + 2;
return data;
}catch (ex){
return ex;
}
}
See the above code. I cannot move forward until the API call is resolved. If it makes my code blocking code, how is it any better then promises? Or is there something I missed about async
and await
? Where do i put my code that is not dependent to the await call? so it can keep on working without await holding the execution?
I am adding a Promise code that i would like to replicate in an async await example.
function myPromiseAPI() {
myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1')
.then(function (data) {
// data
});
// runs parallel
let result = 2 + 2;
}
javascript async-await es6-promise ecmascript-2017
javascript async-await es6-promise ecmascript-2017
edited Nov 3 '17 at 15:31


JLRishe
77.4k1180119
77.4k1180119
asked Apr 9 '17 at 2:58
Rohail NajamRohail Najam
421410
421410
AFAIK, await requires that the thing it's awaiting be a promise. So it's not really a either/or.
– Paul
Apr 9 '17 at 3:01
It's sort of as if the lines after your "until it resolves" comment are inside a.then()
. And your whole function is itself async, so whatever calls it doesn't have to wait for it.
– nnnnnn
Apr 9 '17 at 3:06
@Paul it also converts the expression in promise if it is not a promise. that what i read in a blog
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:07
@nnnnnn Yes. its like i put that in .then(). but how do i put it outside a then() in async await scenario
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:09
@RohailNajam Right, my point was about async calls, though. Using a function that expects a callback in place of that promise would not work.
– Paul
Apr 9 '17 at 3:12
add a comment |
AFAIK, await requires that the thing it's awaiting be a promise. So it's not really a either/or.
– Paul
Apr 9 '17 at 3:01
It's sort of as if the lines after your "until it resolves" comment are inside a.then()
. And your whole function is itself async, so whatever calls it doesn't have to wait for it.
– nnnnnn
Apr 9 '17 at 3:06
@Paul it also converts the expression in promise if it is not a promise. that what i read in a blog
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:07
@nnnnnn Yes. its like i put that in .then(). but how do i put it outside a then() in async await scenario
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:09
@RohailNajam Right, my point was about async calls, though. Using a function that expects a callback in place of that promise would not work.
– Paul
Apr 9 '17 at 3:12
AFAIK, await requires that the thing it's awaiting be a promise. So it's not really a either/or.
– Paul
Apr 9 '17 at 3:01
AFAIK, await requires that the thing it's awaiting be a promise. So it's not really a either/or.
– Paul
Apr 9 '17 at 3:01
It's sort of as if the lines after your "until it resolves" comment are inside a
.then()
. And your whole function is itself async, so whatever calls it doesn't have to wait for it.– nnnnnn
Apr 9 '17 at 3:06
It's sort of as if the lines after your "until it resolves" comment are inside a
.then()
. And your whole function is itself async, so whatever calls it doesn't have to wait for it.– nnnnnn
Apr 9 '17 at 3:06
@Paul it also converts the expression in promise if it is not a promise. that what i read in a blog
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:07
@Paul it also converts the expression in promise if it is not a promise. that what i read in a blog
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:07
@nnnnnn Yes. its like i put that in .then(). but how do i put it outside a then() in async await scenario
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:09
@nnnnnn Yes. its like i put that in .then(). but how do i put it outside a then() in async await scenario
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:09
@RohailNajam Right, my point was about async calls, though. Using a function that expects a callback in place of that promise would not work.
– Paul
Apr 9 '17 at 3:12
@RohailNajam Right, my point was about async calls, though. Using a function that expects a callback in place of that promise would not work.
– Paul
Apr 9 '17 at 3:12
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Just as its name implies, the await
keyword will cause the function to "wait" until its promise resolves before executing the next line.
The difference between this and blocking code is that the world outside the function will continue to go on executing while the function is waiting for the asynchronous operations to finish.
async
and await
are just syntactic sugar on top of promises. They allow you to write code that looks a lot like ordinary synchronous code even though it uses promises under the covers. If we translated your example there to something that explicitly worked with the promises, it would look something like:
function myAsyncFunction() {
return myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1')
.then(function (data) {
let result = 2 + 2;
return data;
})
.catch(function (ex) {
return ex;
});
}
As we can see here, the let result = 2 + 2;
line is inside a .then()
handler, which means it's not going to execute until myAPICall()
has resolved. It's the same when you use await
. await
just abstracts away the .then()
for you.
One thing to bear in mind (and I think the point you're looking for) is that you don't have to use await
right away. If you wrote your function like this, then you could execute your let result = 2 + 2;
line right away:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// just starting the API call and storing the promise for now. not waiting yet
let dataP = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
let result = 2 + 2;
// Executes right away
console.log(result);
let data = await dataP;
// Executes after one second
console.log(data);
return data;
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
After some clarification, I can see that what you really wanted to know about is how to avoid having to wait for two async operations one by one and instead have them execute in parallel. Indeed, if you use one await
after the other, the second won't start executing until the first has finished:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
let data1 = await myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
let data2 = await myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2');
// logs after one more second
console.log(data1);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
To avoid this, what you can do is start both async operations by executing them without awaiting them, assigning their promises to some variables. Then you can await both promises:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// both lines execute right away
let dataP1 = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
let dataP2 = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2');
let data1 = await dataP1;
let data2 = await dataP2;
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
console.log(data2);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
One alternative way to do this is to use Promise.all()
with some array decomposition:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
console.log('myAPICall called');
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// both myAPICall invocations execute right away
const [data1, data2] = await Promise.all([
myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1'),
myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2'),
]);
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
console.log(data2);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
I understand this. what my point is that if we want to run anything in parallel to this api call we will just put it next to the then function like i did in my edited question. How will i achieve this "Parallelism" in async await
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:20
@RohailNajam Please see my update. You can "start" as many promises in parallel as you want. Once you useawait
, the function will start waiting on their result.
– JLRishe
Apr 9 '17 at 3:25
oh i did not knew that. Thanks.
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:27
2
@RohailNajam Yes, that's correct. I've modified my answer to show how you can use array decomposition to split it into its respective values.
– JLRishe
Apr 9 '17 at 11:37
1
"the world outside the function will continue to go on executing while this function is doing its thing" The "world outside" will go on while the function is not doing anything.
– a better oliver
Apr 12 '17 at 8:14
|
show 3 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f43302584%2fwhy-doesnt-the-code-after-await-run-right-away-isnt-it-supposed-to-be-non-blo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Just as its name implies, the await
keyword will cause the function to "wait" until its promise resolves before executing the next line.
The difference between this and blocking code is that the world outside the function will continue to go on executing while the function is waiting for the asynchronous operations to finish.
async
and await
are just syntactic sugar on top of promises. They allow you to write code that looks a lot like ordinary synchronous code even though it uses promises under the covers. If we translated your example there to something that explicitly worked with the promises, it would look something like:
function myAsyncFunction() {
return myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1')
.then(function (data) {
let result = 2 + 2;
return data;
})
.catch(function (ex) {
return ex;
});
}
As we can see here, the let result = 2 + 2;
line is inside a .then()
handler, which means it's not going to execute until myAPICall()
has resolved. It's the same when you use await
. await
just abstracts away the .then()
for you.
One thing to bear in mind (and I think the point you're looking for) is that you don't have to use await
right away. If you wrote your function like this, then you could execute your let result = 2 + 2;
line right away:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// just starting the API call and storing the promise for now. not waiting yet
let dataP = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
let result = 2 + 2;
// Executes right away
console.log(result);
let data = await dataP;
// Executes after one second
console.log(data);
return data;
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
After some clarification, I can see that what you really wanted to know about is how to avoid having to wait for two async operations one by one and instead have them execute in parallel. Indeed, if you use one await
after the other, the second won't start executing until the first has finished:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
let data1 = await myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
let data2 = await myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2');
// logs after one more second
console.log(data1);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
To avoid this, what you can do is start both async operations by executing them without awaiting them, assigning their promises to some variables. Then you can await both promises:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// both lines execute right away
let dataP1 = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
let dataP2 = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2');
let data1 = await dataP1;
let data2 = await dataP2;
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
console.log(data2);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
One alternative way to do this is to use Promise.all()
with some array decomposition:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
console.log('myAPICall called');
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// both myAPICall invocations execute right away
const [data1, data2] = await Promise.all([
myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1'),
myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2'),
]);
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
console.log(data2);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
I understand this. what my point is that if we want to run anything in parallel to this api call we will just put it next to the then function like i did in my edited question. How will i achieve this "Parallelism" in async await
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:20
@RohailNajam Please see my update. You can "start" as many promises in parallel as you want. Once you useawait
, the function will start waiting on their result.
– JLRishe
Apr 9 '17 at 3:25
oh i did not knew that. Thanks.
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:27
2
@RohailNajam Yes, that's correct. I've modified my answer to show how you can use array decomposition to split it into its respective values.
– JLRishe
Apr 9 '17 at 11:37
1
"the world outside the function will continue to go on executing while this function is doing its thing" The "world outside" will go on while the function is not doing anything.
– a better oliver
Apr 12 '17 at 8:14
|
show 3 more comments
Just as its name implies, the await
keyword will cause the function to "wait" until its promise resolves before executing the next line.
The difference between this and blocking code is that the world outside the function will continue to go on executing while the function is waiting for the asynchronous operations to finish.
async
and await
are just syntactic sugar on top of promises. They allow you to write code that looks a lot like ordinary synchronous code even though it uses promises under the covers. If we translated your example there to something that explicitly worked with the promises, it would look something like:
function myAsyncFunction() {
return myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1')
.then(function (data) {
let result = 2 + 2;
return data;
})
.catch(function (ex) {
return ex;
});
}
As we can see here, the let result = 2 + 2;
line is inside a .then()
handler, which means it's not going to execute until myAPICall()
has resolved. It's the same when you use await
. await
just abstracts away the .then()
for you.
One thing to bear in mind (and I think the point you're looking for) is that you don't have to use await
right away. If you wrote your function like this, then you could execute your let result = 2 + 2;
line right away:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// just starting the API call and storing the promise for now. not waiting yet
let dataP = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
let result = 2 + 2;
// Executes right away
console.log(result);
let data = await dataP;
// Executes after one second
console.log(data);
return data;
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
After some clarification, I can see that what you really wanted to know about is how to avoid having to wait for two async operations one by one and instead have them execute in parallel. Indeed, if you use one await
after the other, the second won't start executing until the first has finished:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
let data1 = await myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
let data2 = await myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2');
// logs after one more second
console.log(data1);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
To avoid this, what you can do is start both async operations by executing them without awaiting them, assigning their promises to some variables. Then you can await both promises:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// both lines execute right away
let dataP1 = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
let dataP2 = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2');
let data1 = await dataP1;
let data2 = await dataP2;
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
console.log(data2);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
One alternative way to do this is to use Promise.all()
with some array decomposition:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
console.log('myAPICall called');
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// both myAPICall invocations execute right away
const [data1, data2] = await Promise.all([
myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1'),
myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2'),
]);
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
console.log(data2);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
I understand this. what my point is that if we want to run anything in parallel to this api call we will just put it next to the then function like i did in my edited question. How will i achieve this "Parallelism" in async await
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:20
@RohailNajam Please see my update. You can "start" as many promises in parallel as you want. Once you useawait
, the function will start waiting on their result.
– JLRishe
Apr 9 '17 at 3:25
oh i did not knew that. Thanks.
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:27
2
@RohailNajam Yes, that's correct. I've modified my answer to show how you can use array decomposition to split it into its respective values.
– JLRishe
Apr 9 '17 at 11:37
1
"the world outside the function will continue to go on executing while this function is doing its thing" The "world outside" will go on while the function is not doing anything.
– a better oliver
Apr 12 '17 at 8:14
|
show 3 more comments
Just as its name implies, the await
keyword will cause the function to "wait" until its promise resolves before executing the next line.
The difference between this and blocking code is that the world outside the function will continue to go on executing while the function is waiting for the asynchronous operations to finish.
async
and await
are just syntactic sugar on top of promises. They allow you to write code that looks a lot like ordinary synchronous code even though it uses promises under the covers. If we translated your example there to something that explicitly worked with the promises, it would look something like:
function myAsyncFunction() {
return myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1')
.then(function (data) {
let result = 2 + 2;
return data;
})
.catch(function (ex) {
return ex;
});
}
As we can see here, the let result = 2 + 2;
line is inside a .then()
handler, which means it's not going to execute until myAPICall()
has resolved. It's the same when you use await
. await
just abstracts away the .then()
for you.
One thing to bear in mind (and I think the point you're looking for) is that you don't have to use await
right away. If you wrote your function like this, then you could execute your let result = 2 + 2;
line right away:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// just starting the API call and storing the promise for now. not waiting yet
let dataP = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
let result = 2 + 2;
// Executes right away
console.log(result);
let data = await dataP;
// Executes after one second
console.log(data);
return data;
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
After some clarification, I can see that what you really wanted to know about is how to avoid having to wait for two async operations one by one and instead have them execute in parallel. Indeed, if you use one await
after the other, the second won't start executing until the first has finished:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
let data1 = await myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
let data2 = await myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2');
// logs after one more second
console.log(data1);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
To avoid this, what you can do is start both async operations by executing them without awaiting them, assigning their promises to some variables. Then you can await both promises:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// both lines execute right away
let dataP1 = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
let dataP2 = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2');
let data1 = await dataP1;
let data2 = await dataP2;
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
console.log(data2);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
One alternative way to do this is to use Promise.all()
with some array decomposition:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
console.log('myAPICall called');
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// both myAPICall invocations execute right away
const [data1, data2] = await Promise.all([
myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1'),
myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2'),
]);
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
console.log(data2);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
Just as its name implies, the await
keyword will cause the function to "wait" until its promise resolves before executing the next line.
The difference between this and blocking code is that the world outside the function will continue to go on executing while the function is waiting for the asynchronous operations to finish.
async
and await
are just syntactic sugar on top of promises. They allow you to write code that looks a lot like ordinary synchronous code even though it uses promises under the covers. If we translated your example there to something that explicitly worked with the promises, it would look something like:
function myAsyncFunction() {
return myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1')
.then(function (data) {
let result = 2 + 2;
return data;
})
.catch(function (ex) {
return ex;
});
}
As we can see here, the let result = 2 + 2;
line is inside a .then()
handler, which means it's not going to execute until myAPICall()
has resolved. It's the same when you use await
. await
just abstracts away the .then()
for you.
One thing to bear in mind (and I think the point you're looking for) is that you don't have to use await
right away. If you wrote your function like this, then you could execute your let result = 2 + 2;
line right away:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// just starting the API call and storing the promise for now. not waiting yet
let dataP = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
let result = 2 + 2;
// Executes right away
console.log(result);
let data = await dataP;
// Executes after one second
console.log(data);
return data;
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
After some clarification, I can see that what you really wanted to know about is how to avoid having to wait for two async operations one by one and instead have them execute in parallel. Indeed, if you use one await
after the other, the second won't start executing until the first has finished:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
let data1 = await myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
let data2 = await myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2');
// logs after one more second
console.log(data1);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
To avoid this, what you can do is start both async operations by executing them without awaiting them, assigning their promises to some variables. Then you can await both promises:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// both lines execute right away
let dataP1 = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
let dataP2 = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2');
let data1 = await dataP1;
let data2 = await dataP2;
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
console.log(data2);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
One alternative way to do this is to use Promise.all()
with some array decomposition:
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
console.log('myAPICall called');
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// both myAPICall invocations execute right away
const [data1, data2] = await Promise.all([
myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1'),
myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2'),
]);
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
console.log(data2);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// just starting the API call and storing the promise for now. not waiting yet
let dataP = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
let result = 2 + 2;
// Executes right away
console.log(result);
let data = await dataP;
// Executes after one second
console.log(data);
return data;
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// just starting the API call and storing the promise for now. not waiting yet
let dataP = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
let result = 2 + 2;
// Executes right away
console.log(result);
let data = await dataP;
// Executes after one second
console.log(data);
return data;
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
let data1 = await myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
let data2 = await myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2');
// logs after one more second
console.log(data1);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
let data1 = await myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
let data2 = await myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2');
// logs after one more second
console.log(data1);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// both lines execute right away
let dataP1 = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
let dataP2 = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2');
let data1 = await dataP1;
let data2 = await dataP2;
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
console.log(data2);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// both lines execute right away
let dataP1 = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1');
let dataP2 = myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2');
let data1 = await dataP1;
let data2 = await dataP2;
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
console.log(data2);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
console.log('myAPICall called');
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// both myAPICall invocations execute right away
const [data1, data2] = await Promise.all([
myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1'),
myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2'),
]);
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
console.log(data2);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
function myAPICall() {
// simulate 1 second wait time
console.log('myAPICall called');
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
.then(() => 'success');
}
async function myAsyncFunction() {
try {
console.log('starting');
// both myAPICall invocations execute right away
const [data1, data2] = await Promise.all([
myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1'),
myAPICall('https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/2'),
]);
// logs after one second
console.log(data1);
console.log(data2);
} catch (ex) {
return ex;
}
}
myAsyncFunction();
edited Jan 3 at 15:53
answered Apr 9 '17 at 3:15


JLRisheJLRishe
77.4k1180119
77.4k1180119
I understand this. what my point is that if we want to run anything in parallel to this api call we will just put it next to the then function like i did in my edited question. How will i achieve this "Parallelism" in async await
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:20
@RohailNajam Please see my update. You can "start" as many promises in parallel as you want. Once you useawait
, the function will start waiting on their result.
– JLRishe
Apr 9 '17 at 3:25
oh i did not knew that. Thanks.
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:27
2
@RohailNajam Yes, that's correct. I've modified my answer to show how you can use array decomposition to split it into its respective values.
– JLRishe
Apr 9 '17 at 11:37
1
"the world outside the function will continue to go on executing while this function is doing its thing" The "world outside" will go on while the function is not doing anything.
– a better oliver
Apr 12 '17 at 8:14
|
show 3 more comments
I understand this. what my point is that if we want to run anything in parallel to this api call we will just put it next to the then function like i did in my edited question. How will i achieve this "Parallelism" in async await
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:20
@RohailNajam Please see my update. You can "start" as many promises in parallel as you want. Once you useawait
, the function will start waiting on their result.
– JLRishe
Apr 9 '17 at 3:25
oh i did not knew that. Thanks.
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:27
2
@RohailNajam Yes, that's correct. I've modified my answer to show how you can use array decomposition to split it into its respective values.
– JLRishe
Apr 9 '17 at 11:37
1
"the world outside the function will continue to go on executing while this function is doing its thing" The "world outside" will go on while the function is not doing anything.
– a better oliver
Apr 12 '17 at 8:14
I understand this. what my point is that if we want to run anything in parallel to this api call we will just put it next to the then function like i did in my edited question. How will i achieve this "Parallelism" in async await
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:20
I understand this. what my point is that if we want to run anything in parallel to this api call we will just put it next to the then function like i did in my edited question. How will i achieve this "Parallelism" in async await
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:20
@RohailNajam Please see my update. You can "start" as many promises in parallel as you want. Once you use
await
, the function will start waiting on their result.– JLRishe
Apr 9 '17 at 3:25
@RohailNajam Please see my update. You can "start" as many promises in parallel as you want. Once you use
await
, the function will start waiting on their result.– JLRishe
Apr 9 '17 at 3:25
oh i did not knew that. Thanks.
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:27
oh i did not knew that. Thanks.
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:27
2
2
@RohailNajam Yes, that's correct. I've modified my answer to show how you can use array decomposition to split it into its respective values.
– JLRishe
Apr 9 '17 at 11:37
@RohailNajam Yes, that's correct. I've modified my answer to show how you can use array decomposition to split it into its respective values.
– JLRishe
Apr 9 '17 at 11:37
1
1
"the world outside the function will continue to go on executing while this function is doing its thing" The "world outside" will go on while the function is not doing anything.
– a better oliver
Apr 12 '17 at 8:14
"the world outside the function will continue to go on executing while this function is doing its thing" The "world outside" will go on while the function is not doing anything.
– a better oliver
Apr 12 '17 at 8:14
|
show 3 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f43302584%2fwhy-doesnt-the-code-after-await-run-right-away-isnt-it-supposed-to-be-non-blo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
AFAIK, await requires that the thing it's awaiting be a promise. So it's not really a either/or.
– Paul
Apr 9 '17 at 3:01
It's sort of as if the lines after your "until it resolves" comment are inside a
.then()
. And your whole function is itself async, so whatever calls it doesn't have to wait for it.– nnnnnn
Apr 9 '17 at 3:06
@Paul it also converts the expression in promise if it is not a promise. that what i read in a blog
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:07
@nnnnnn Yes. its like i put that in .then(). but how do i put it outside a then() in async await scenario
– Rohail Najam
Apr 9 '17 at 3:09
@RohailNajam Right, my point was about async calls, though. Using a function that expects a callback in place of that promise would not work.
– Paul
Apr 9 '17 at 3:12