A caveau can be flooded for two reasons: slip or activation of fire extinguisher












1












$begingroup$


A caveau can be flooded for two reasons: slip or activation of fire extinguisher. If during the night no slip occurred, then for some reasons the fire extinguisher activate themself with probability $theta$. The split occurs with probability $0.01$



I want to find the probability that the slip occurred given that the caveau is flooded.



This is how I did it:



$$ mathbb{P}[text{"Slip occured"} vert text{"Caveau flooded"}] = 0.01(1-theta) $$



This is just my intuition: the slip occurred but the fire extinguishers dint go off.



However I tried doing it using Bayes theorem, but I find a different result:



$$ mathbb{P}[text{"Slip occured"} vert text{"Caveau flooded"}] = $$
$$ = frac{mathbb{P}[text{"Slip occured"}cap text{"Caveau flooded"}]}{mathbb{P}[text{"Caveau flooded"}]} = $$
$$ = frac{0.01}{0.01 + theta}$$



Can you help me finding my mistake?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    A caveau can be flooded for two reasons: slip or activation of fire extinguisher. If during the night no slip occurred, then for some reasons the fire extinguisher activate themself with probability $theta$. The split occurs with probability $0.01$



    I want to find the probability that the slip occurred given that the caveau is flooded.



    This is how I did it:



    $$ mathbb{P}[text{"Slip occured"} vert text{"Caveau flooded"}] = 0.01(1-theta) $$



    This is just my intuition: the slip occurred but the fire extinguishers dint go off.



    However I tried doing it using Bayes theorem, but I find a different result:



    $$ mathbb{P}[text{"Slip occured"} vert text{"Caveau flooded"}] = $$
    $$ = frac{mathbb{P}[text{"Slip occured"}cap text{"Caveau flooded"}]}{mathbb{P}[text{"Caveau flooded"}]} = $$
    $$ = frac{0.01}{0.01 + theta}$$



    Can you help me finding my mistake?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      A caveau can be flooded for two reasons: slip or activation of fire extinguisher. If during the night no slip occurred, then for some reasons the fire extinguisher activate themself with probability $theta$. The split occurs with probability $0.01$



      I want to find the probability that the slip occurred given that the caveau is flooded.



      This is how I did it:



      $$ mathbb{P}[text{"Slip occured"} vert text{"Caveau flooded"}] = 0.01(1-theta) $$



      This is just my intuition: the slip occurred but the fire extinguishers dint go off.



      However I tried doing it using Bayes theorem, but I find a different result:



      $$ mathbb{P}[text{"Slip occured"} vert text{"Caveau flooded"}] = $$
      $$ = frac{mathbb{P}[text{"Slip occured"}cap text{"Caveau flooded"}]}{mathbb{P}[text{"Caveau flooded"}]} = $$
      $$ = frac{0.01}{0.01 + theta}$$



      Can you help me finding my mistake?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      A caveau can be flooded for two reasons: slip or activation of fire extinguisher. If during the night no slip occurred, then for some reasons the fire extinguisher activate themself with probability $theta$. The split occurs with probability $0.01$



      I want to find the probability that the slip occurred given that the caveau is flooded.



      This is how I did it:



      $$ mathbb{P}[text{"Slip occured"} vert text{"Caveau flooded"}] = 0.01(1-theta) $$



      This is just my intuition: the slip occurred but the fire extinguishers dint go off.



      However I tried doing it using Bayes theorem, but I find a different result:



      $$ mathbb{P}[text{"Slip occured"} vert text{"Caveau flooded"}] = $$
      $$ = frac{mathbb{P}[text{"Slip occured"}cap text{"Caveau flooded"}]}{mathbb{P}[text{"Caveau flooded"}]} = $$
      $$ = frac{0.01}{0.01 + theta}$$



      Can you help me finding my mistake?







      probability






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 15 at 18:37









      qcc101qcc101

      622213




      622213






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Your mistake lies in the calculation of the total probability of caveau flooding. There are two ways the caveau can be flooded. Either a slip occurs or no slip occurs and the fire extinguishers start themselves. So



          $$E_1 - text{A slip occurs}$$
          $$E_2 - text{No slip occurs and the fire extinguishers start themselves}$$



          As you correctly calculated



          $$P(E_1) = 0.01$$



          But the second one will be



          $$P(E_2) = (1-0.01)theta$$
          First terms is as no slip occurs and the second is the probability that fire extinguishers will autostart.



          So the probability that slip occurred given that caveau is flooded (using Bayes theorem)



          $$P= frac{0.01}{0.01 + 0.99theta}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you! I have a follow up question: I need to build a confidence interval of 95% for the probability that slip occurred without knowing that there is flood. I also now know that $theta = 0.53$ I need to use Wald standard interval, which is: $$ overline{X} pm Z_{frac{alpha}{2}} frac{sigma}{sqrt{n}}$$ However what are the $overline{X}$ and $sigma$ in this case?
            $endgroup$
            – qcc101
            Jan 15 at 19:06












          • $begingroup$
            @qcc101 - You'd need random sampling and based on that you will be estimating the parameter(probability that slip occurred). The terms $bar{X}$ and $sigma$ come from there. Also, this is an entirely separate question in itself. As is the policy of MSE, please ask the question separately.
            $endgroup$
            – Sauhard Sharma
            Jan 15 at 19:21










          • $begingroup$
            I see, I will try to work it out myself with your hint and then post again If I don't succeed. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – qcc101
            Jan 15 at 19:26











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3074768%2fa-caveau-can-be-flooded-for-two-reasons-slip-or-activation-of-fire-extinguisher%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          Your mistake lies in the calculation of the total probability of caveau flooding. There are two ways the caveau can be flooded. Either a slip occurs or no slip occurs and the fire extinguishers start themselves. So



          $$E_1 - text{A slip occurs}$$
          $$E_2 - text{No slip occurs and the fire extinguishers start themselves}$$



          As you correctly calculated



          $$P(E_1) = 0.01$$



          But the second one will be



          $$P(E_2) = (1-0.01)theta$$
          First terms is as no slip occurs and the second is the probability that fire extinguishers will autostart.



          So the probability that slip occurred given that caveau is flooded (using Bayes theorem)



          $$P= frac{0.01}{0.01 + 0.99theta}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you! I have a follow up question: I need to build a confidence interval of 95% for the probability that slip occurred without knowing that there is flood. I also now know that $theta = 0.53$ I need to use Wald standard interval, which is: $$ overline{X} pm Z_{frac{alpha}{2}} frac{sigma}{sqrt{n}}$$ However what are the $overline{X}$ and $sigma$ in this case?
            $endgroup$
            – qcc101
            Jan 15 at 19:06












          • $begingroup$
            @qcc101 - You'd need random sampling and based on that you will be estimating the parameter(probability that slip occurred). The terms $bar{X}$ and $sigma$ come from there. Also, this is an entirely separate question in itself. As is the policy of MSE, please ask the question separately.
            $endgroup$
            – Sauhard Sharma
            Jan 15 at 19:21










          • $begingroup$
            I see, I will try to work it out myself with your hint and then post again If I don't succeed. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – qcc101
            Jan 15 at 19:26
















          1












          $begingroup$

          Your mistake lies in the calculation of the total probability of caveau flooding. There are two ways the caveau can be flooded. Either a slip occurs or no slip occurs and the fire extinguishers start themselves. So



          $$E_1 - text{A slip occurs}$$
          $$E_2 - text{No slip occurs and the fire extinguishers start themselves}$$



          As you correctly calculated



          $$P(E_1) = 0.01$$



          But the second one will be



          $$P(E_2) = (1-0.01)theta$$
          First terms is as no slip occurs and the second is the probability that fire extinguishers will autostart.



          So the probability that slip occurred given that caveau is flooded (using Bayes theorem)



          $$P= frac{0.01}{0.01 + 0.99theta}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you! I have a follow up question: I need to build a confidence interval of 95% for the probability that slip occurred without knowing that there is flood. I also now know that $theta = 0.53$ I need to use Wald standard interval, which is: $$ overline{X} pm Z_{frac{alpha}{2}} frac{sigma}{sqrt{n}}$$ However what are the $overline{X}$ and $sigma$ in this case?
            $endgroup$
            – qcc101
            Jan 15 at 19:06












          • $begingroup$
            @qcc101 - You'd need random sampling and based on that you will be estimating the parameter(probability that slip occurred). The terms $bar{X}$ and $sigma$ come from there. Also, this is an entirely separate question in itself. As is the policy of MSE, please ask the question separately.
            $endgroup$
            – Sauhard Sharma
            Jan 15 at 19:21










          • $begingroup$
            I see, I will try to work it out myself with your hint and then post again If I don't succeed. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – qcc101
            Jan 15 at 19:26














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Your mistake lies in the calculation of the total probability of caveau flooding. There are two ways the caveau can be flooded. Either a slip occurs or no slip occurs and the fire extinguishers start themselves. So



          $$E_1 - text{A slip occurs}$$
          $$E_2 - text{No slip occurs and the fire extinguishers start themselves}$$



          As you correctly calculated



          $$P(E_1) = 0.01$$



          But the second one will be



          $$P(E_2) = (1-0.01)theta$$
          First terms is as no slip occurs and the second is the probability that fire extinguishers will autostart.



          So the probability that slip occurred given that caveau is flooded (using Bayes theorem)



          $$P= frac{0.01}{0.01 + 0.99theta}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Your mistake lies in the calculation of the total probability of caveau flooding. There are two ways the caveau can be flooded. Either a slip occurs or no slip occurs and the fire extinguishers start themselves. So



          $$E_1 - text{A slip occurs}$$
          $$E_2 - text{No slip occurs and the fire extinguishers start themselves}$$



          As you correctly calculated



          $$P(E_1) = 0.01$$



          But the second one will be



          $$P(E_2) = (1-0.01)theta$$
          First terms is as no slip occurs and the second is the probability that fire extinguishers will autostart.



          So the probability that slip occurred given that caveau is flooded (using Bayes theorem)



          $$P= frac{0.01}{0.01 + 0.99theta}$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 15 at 18:56









          Sauhard SharmaSauhard Sharma

          953318




          953318












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you! I have a follow up question: I need to build a confidence interval of 95% for the probability that slip occurred without knowing that there is flood. I also now know that $theta = 0.53$ I need to use Wald standard interval, which is: $$ overline{X} pm Z_{frac{alpha}{2}} frac{sigma}{sqrt{n}}$$ However what are the $overline{X}$ and $sigma$ in this case?
            $endgroup$
            – qcc101
            Jan 15 at 19:06












          • $begingroup$
            @qcc101 - You'd need random sampling and based on that you will be estimating the parameter(probability that slip occurred). The terms $bar{X}$ and $sigma$ come from there. Also, this is an entirely separate question in itself. As is the policy of MSE, please ask the question separately.
            $endgroup$
            – Sauhard Sharma
            Jan 15 at 19:21










          • $begingroup$
            I see, I will try to work it out myself with your hint and then post again If I don't succeed. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – qcc101
            Jan 15 at 19:26


















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you! I have a follow up question: I need to build a confidence interval of 95% for the probability that slip occurred without knowing that there is flood. I also now know that $theta = 0.53$ I need to use Wald standard interval, which is: $$ overline{X} pm Z_{frac{alpha}{2}} frac{sigma}{sqrt{n}}$$ However what are the $overline{X}$ and $sigma$ in this case?
            $endgroup$
            – qcc101
            Jan 15 at 19:06












          • $begingroup$
            @qcc101 - You'd need random sampling and based on that you will be estimating the parameter(probability that slip occurred). The terms $bar{X}$ and $sigma$ come from there. Also, this is an entirely separate question in itself. As is the policy of MSE, please ask the question separately.
            $endgroup$
            – Sauhard Sharma
            Jan 15 at 19:21










          • $begingroup$
            I see, I will try to work it out myself with your hint and then post again If I don't succeed. Thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – qcc101
            Jan 15 at 19:26
















          $begingroup$
          Thank you! I have a follow up question: I need to build a confidence interval of 95% for the probability that slip occurred without knowing that there is flood. I also now know that $theta = 0.53$ I need to use Wald standard interval, which is: $$ overline{X} pm Z_{frac{alpha}{2}} frac{sigma}{sqrt{n}}$$ However what are the $overline{X}$ and $sigma$ in this case?
          $endgroup$
          – qcc101
          Jan 15 at 19:06






          $begingroup$
          Thank you! I have a follow up question: I need to build a confidence interval of 95% for the probability that slip occurred without knowing that there is flood. I also now know that $theta = 0.53$ I need to use Wald standard interval, which is: $$ overline{X} pm Z_{frac{alpha}{2}} frac{sigma}{sqrt{n}}$$ However what are the $overline{X}$ and $sigma$ in this case?
          $endgroup$
          – qcc101
          Jan 15 at 19:06














          $begingroup$
          @qcc101 - You'd need random sampling and based on that you will be estimating the parameter(probability that slip occurred). The terms $bar{X}$ and $sigma$ come from there. Also, this is an entirely separate question in itself. As is the policy of MSE, please ask the question separately.
          $endgroup$
          – Sauhard Sharma
          Jan 15 at 19:21




          $begingroup$
          @qcc101 - You'd need random sampling and based on that you will be estimating the parameter(probability that slip occurred). The terms $bar{X}$ and $sigma$ come from there. Also, this is an entirely separate question in itself. As is the policy of MSE, please ask the question separately.
          $endgroup$
          – Sauhard Sharma
          Jan 15 at 19:21












          $begingroup$
          I see, I will try to work it out myself with your hint and then post again If I don't succeed. Thank you!
          $endgroup$
          – qcc101
          Jan 15 at 19:26




          $begingroup$
          I see, I will try to work it out myself with your hint and then post again If I don't succeed. Thank you!
          $endgroup$
          – qcc101
          Jan 15 at 19:26


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3074768%2fa-caveau-can-be-flooded-for-two-reasons-slip-or-activation-of-fire-extinguisher%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

          in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith