A “multi-range” version of Banach-Steinhaus Theorem for Fréchet Spaces












0












$begingroup$


A general form of the infamous Banach-Steinhaus theorem for Banach spaces can be stated as follows:



Let $X$ be a Banach space, ${Y_alpha }_{alpha in Lambda}$ Be a collection of normed spaces. $T_alpha : X rightarrow Y_alpha $ be a collection of bounded (=continues) linear operators. Then if This collection is pointwise bounded, it is uniformly bounded, in the sense that there exists $M$ such that $forall alpha ; Vert T_alpha Vert < M$



Now a version which is still true for Fréchet spaces (or even barreled spaces) goes as follows: Let $X$ be a Fréchet space, Y be some topological vector space, $T_alpha : X rightarrow Y $ be a collection of continues linear operators. If this collection is pointwise bounded (in the TVS sense) then it is uniformly bounded. In the sense that for all $0 in W subset Y$ there exists $0 in V subset X$ such that $T_alpha (V) subset W$ for all $alpha$.



The main difference (to me) in the two theorems is that in the first one we also had the degree of freedom to choose different $Y_alpha$, and not just $Y$. I wonder whether the following statement is true:



Let $X$ be a Fréchet space, take ${Y_alpha }$ to be some collection of Frechet spaces, $T_alpha : X rightarrow Y_alpha $ a pointwise bounded collection of continues operators. Then for every choice of $r>0$ there exists $delta > 0$ such that $T_alpha(B_delta (0)) subset B_r(0)$ for all $alpha$. (of course I am referring to balls)



I am guessing it's true, but notice I took $Y_alpha$ to be Fréchet spaces, I am not sure how to generalize this to other TVSs.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    A general form of the infamous Banach-Steinhaus theorem for Banach spaces can be stated as follows:



    Let $X$ be a Banach space, ${Y_alpha }_{alpha in Lambda}$ Be a collection of normed spaces. $T_alpha : X rightarrow Y_alpha $ be a collection of bounded (=continues) linear operators. Then if This collection is pointwise bounded, it is uniformly bounded, in the sense that there exists $M$ such that $forall alpha ; Vert T_alpha Vert < M$



    Now a version which is still true for Fréchet spaces (or even barreled spaces) goes as follows: Let $X$ be a Fréchet space, Y be some topological vector space, $T_alpha : X rightarrow Y $ be a collection of continues linear operators. If this collection is pointwise bounded (in the TVS sense) then it is uniformly bounded. In the sense that for all $0 in W subset Y$ there exists $0 in V subset X$ such that $T_alpha (V) subset W$ for all $alpha$.



    The main difference (to me) in the two theorems is that in the first one we also had the degree of freedom to choose different $Y_alpha$, and not just $Y$. I wonder whether the following statement is true:



    Let $X$ be a Fréchet space, take ${Y_alpha }$ to be some collection of Frechet spaces, $T_alpha : X rightarrow Y_alpha $ a pointwise bounded collection of continues operators. Then for every choice of $r>0$ there exists $delta > 0$ such that $T_alpha(B_delta (0)) subset B_r(0)$ for all $alpha$. (of course I am referring to balls)



    I am guessing it's true, but notice I took $Y_alpha$ to be Fréchet spaces, I am not sure how to generalize this to other TVSs.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      A general form of the infamous Banach-Steinhaus theorem for Banach spaces can be stated as follows:



      Let $X$ be a Banach space, ${Y_alpha }_{alpha in Lambda}$ Be a collection of normed spaces. $T_alpha : X rightarrow Y_alpha $ be a collection of bounded (=continues) linear operators. Then if This collection is pointwise bounded, it is uniformly bounded, in the sense that there exists $M$ such that $forall alpha ; Vert T_alpha Vert < M$



      Now a version which is still true for Fréchet spaces (or even barreled spaces) goes as follows: Let $X$ be a Fréchet space, Y be some topological vector space, $T_alpha : X rightarrow Y $ be a collection of continues linear operators. If this collection is pointwise bounded (in the TVS sense) then it is uniformly bounded. In the sense that for all $0 in W subset Y$ there exists $0 in V subset X$ such that $T_alpha (V) subset W$ for all $alpha$.



      The main difference (to me) in the two theorems is that in the first one we also had the degree of freedom to choose different $Y_alpha$, and not just $Y$. I wonder whether the following statement is true:



      Let $X$ be a Fréchet space, take ${Y_alpha }$ to be some collection of Frechet spaces, $T_alpha : X rightarrow Y_alpha $ a pointwise bounded collection of continues operators. Then for every choice of $r>0$ there exists $delta > 0$ such that $T_alpha(B_delta (0)) subset B_r(0)$ for all $alpha$. (of course I am referring to balls)



      I am guessing it's true, but notice I took $Y_alpha$ to be Fréchet spaces, I am not sure how to generalize this to other TVSs.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      A general form of the infamous Banach-Steinhaus theorem for Banach spaces can be stated as follows:



      Let $X$ be a Banach space, ${Y_alpha }_{alpha in Lambda}$ Be a collection of normed spaces. $T_alpha : X rightarrow Y_alpha $ be a collection of bounded (=continues) linear operators. Then if This collection is pointwise bounded, it is uniformly bounded, in the sense that there exists $M$ such that $forall alpha ; Vert T_alpha Vert < M$



      Now a version which is still true for Fréchet spaces (or even barreled spaces) goes as follows: Let $X$ be a Fréchet space, Y be some topological vector space, $T_alpha : X rightarrow Y $ be a collection of continues linear operators. If this collection is pointwise bounded (in the TVS sense) then it is uniformly bounded. In the sense that for all $0 in W subset Y$ there exists $0 in V subset X$ such that $T_alpha (V) subset W$ for all $alpha$.



      The main difference (to me) in the two theorems is that in the first one we also had the degree of freedom to choose different $Y_alpha$, and not just $Y$. I wonder whether the following statement is true:



      Let $X$ be a Fréchet space, take ${Y_alpha }$ to be some collection of Frechet spaces, $T_alpha : X rightarrow Y_alpha $ a pointwise bounded collection of continues operators. Then for every choice of $r>0$ there exists $delta > 0$ such that $T_alpha(B_delta (0)) subset B_r(0)$ for all $alpha$. (of course I am referring to balls)



      I am guessing it's true, but notice I took $Y_alpha$ to be Fréchet spaces, I am not sure how to generalize this to other TVSs.







      functional-analysis banach-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 17 at 19:56









      Bernard

      121k740116




      121k740116










      asked Jan 17 at 19:37









      pitariverpitariver

      454113




      454113






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077417%2fa-multi-range-version-of-banach-steinhaus-theorem-for-fr%25c3%25a9chet-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077417%2fa-multi-range-version-of-banach-steinhaus-theorem-for-fr%25c3%25a9chet-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

          Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory