Likelihood Ratio tests












-1












$begingroup$


I am trying to figure out how to calculate an LRT for a question, but my problem seems to start with the fact that I have no idea how this is possible:



$$ln L1 = ln(100/63) + 63 ln(1/2) +(100-63)ln(1-1/2) = -5.92.$$



Regardless of which calculator I send it to, I do not get this answer.
What am I doing wrong, I am at a complete loss.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The expression does not equal $-5.92$ so the error must be somewhere else. Without further information, it is difficult to help you.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    Jan 17 at 21:19










  • $begingroup$
    The assignment is to calculate a likelihood ratio test. In our scenario, our coin lands on heads 63 times out of 100. The equation given to us to solve this was: LRT = -2(lnL1 - lnL2) For L1 the above equation was supplied to solve its value. Thanks for trying to help btw.
    $endgroup$
    – Someone
    Jan 17 at 21:30
















-1












$begingroup$


I am trying to figure out how to calculate an LRT for a question, but my problem seems to start with the fact that I have no idea how this is possible:



$$ln L1 = ln(100/63) + 63 ln(1/2) +(100-63)ln(1-1/2) = -5.92.$$



Regardless of which calculator I send it to, I do not get this answer.
What am I doing wrong, I am at a complete loss.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The expression does not equal $-5.92$ so the error must be somewhere else. Without further information, it is difficult to help you.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    Jan 17 at 21:19










  • $begingroup$
    The assignment is to calculate a likelihood ratio test. In our scenario, our coin lands on heads 63 times out of 100. The equation given to us to solve this was: LRT = -2(lnL1 - lnL2) For L1 the above equation was supplied to solve its value. Thanks for trying to help btw.
    $endgroup$
    – Someone
    Jan 17 at 21:30














-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$


I am trying to figure out how to calculate an LRT for a question, but my problem seems to start with the fact that I have no idea how this is possible:



$$ln L1 = ln(100/63) + 63 ln(1/2) +(100-63)ln(1-1/2) = -5.92.$$



Regardless of which calculator I send it to, I do not get this answer.
What am I doing wrong, I am at a complete loss.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am trying to figure out how to calculate an LRT for a question, but my problem seems to start with the fact that I have no idea how this is possible:



$$ln L1 = ln(100/63) + 63 ln(1/2) +(100-63)ln(1-1/2) = -5.92.$$



Regardless of which calculator I send it to, I do not get this answer.
What am I doing wrong, I am at a complete loss.







maximum-likelihood






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 17 at 21:33









Dog_69

6421523




6421523










asked Jan 17 at 21:12









SomeoneSomeone

11




11












  • $begingroup$
    The expression does not equal $-5.92$ so the error must be somewhere else. Without further information, it is difficult to help you.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    Jan 17 at 21:19










  • $begingroup$
    The assignment is to calculate a likelihood ratio test. In our scenario, our coin lands on heads 63 times out of 100. The equation given to us to solve this was: LRT = -2(lnL1 - lnL2) For L1 the above equation was supplied to solve its value. Thanks for trying to help btw.
    $endgroup$
    – Someone
    Jan 17 at 21:30


















  • $begingroup$
    The expression does not equal $-5.92$ so the error must be somewhere else. Without further information, it is difficult to help you.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    Jan 17 at 21:19










  • $begingroup$
    The assignment is to calculate a likelihood ratio test. In our scenario, our coin lands on heads 63 times out of 100. The equation given to us to solve this was: LRT = -2(lnL1 - lnL2) For L1 the above equation was supplied to solve its value. Thanks for trying to help btw.
    $endgroup$
    – Someone
    Jan 17 at 21:30
















$begingroup$
The expression does not equal $-5.92$ so the error must be somewhere else. Without further information, it is difficult to help you.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 17 at 21:19




$begingroup$
The expression does not equal $-5.92$ so the error must be somewhere else. Without further information, it is difficult to help you.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 17 at 21:19












$begingroup$
The assignment is to calculate a likelihood ratio test. In our scenario, our coin lands on heads 63 times out of 100. The equation given to us to solve this was: LRT = -2(lnL1 - lnL2) For L1 the above equation was supplied to solve its value. Thanks for trying to help btw.
$endgroup$
– Someone
Jan 17 at 21:30




$begingroup$
The assignment is to calculate a likelihood ratio test. In our scenario, our coin lands on heads 63 times out of 100. The equation given to us to solve this was: LRT = -2(lnL1 - lnL2) For L1 the above equation was supplied to solve its value. Thanks for trying to help btw.
$endgroup$
– Someone
Jan 17 at 21:30










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

What is the probability that you get exactly $63$ heads in $100$ flips of a fair coin? [Then take the logarithm.] For some reason you thought it was $frac{63}{100} (1/2)^{63} (1/2)^{100-63}$ or something, which is wrong.




$$ln L_1 = ln left(binom{100}{63} 2^{-100}right) = - 100 ln 2 + sum_{k=64}^{100} ln(k) - sum_{k=1}^{37} ln(k) = -5.92$$







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Hi thank you!!! I copied it straight out of our textbook in exactly the same format. I would love to post a screenshot. Additionally, none of us in this class are math majors and the examples are not explained, so we are kind of drifting. Thank you very much for clearing that up!!!
    $endgroup$
    – Someone
    Jan 17 at 21:42










  • $begingroup$
    @DormantPerson I now see the confusion: you mistook $binom{100}{63}$ for $left(frac{100}{63}right)$. If you are not familiar with this notation, read about the binomial coefficient.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    Jan 17 at 22:00










  • $begingroup$
    I just checked the original text to make sure I was not confusing things as you suggested. The text says (100/63) with a division line. Is there any reason why a text book would display the equation in this incorrect format?
    $endgroup$
    – Someone
    Jan 20 at 17:39










  • $begingroup$
    @Someone Must be a typo then.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    Jan 20 at 17:50











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077512%2flikelihood-ratio-tests%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

What is the probability that you get exactly $63$ heads in $100$ flips of a fair coin? [Then take the logarithm.] For some reason you thought it was $frac{63}{100} (1/2)^{63} (1/2)^{100-63}$ or something, which is wrong.




$$ln L_1 = ln left(binom{100}{63} 2^{-100}right) = - 100 ln 2 + sum_{k=64}^{100} ln(k) - sum_{k=1}^{37} ln(k) = -5.92$$







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Hi thank you!!! I copied it straight out of our textbook in exactly the same format. I would love to post a screenshot. Additionally, none of us in this class are math majors and the examples are not explained, so we are kind of drifting. Thank you very much for clearing that up!!!
    $endgroup$
    – Someone
    Jan 17 at 21:42










  • $begingroup$
    @DormantPerson I now see the confusion: you mistook $binom{100}{63}$ for $left(frac{100}{63}right)$. If you are not familiar with this notation, read about the binomial coefficient.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    Jan 17 at 22:00










  • $begingroup$
    I just checked the original text to make sure I was not confusing things as you suggested. The text says (100/63) with a division line. Is there any reason why a text book would display the equation in this incorrect format?
    $endgroup$
    – Someone
    Jan 20 at 17:39










  • $begingroup$
    @Someone Must be a typo then.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    Jan 20 at 17:50
















1












$begingroup$

What is the probability that you get exactly $63$ heads in $100$ flips of a fair coin? [Then take the logarithm.] For some reason you thought it was $frac{63}{100} (1/2)^{63} (1/2)^{100-63}$ or something, which is wrong.




$$ln L_1 = ln left(binom{100}{63} 2^{-100}right) = - 100 ln 2 + sum_{k=64}^{100} ln(k) - sum_{k=1}^{37} ln(k) = -5.92$$







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Hi thank you!!! I copied it straight out of our textbook in exactly the same format. I would love to post a screenshot. Additionally, none of us in this class are math majors and the examples are not explained, so we are kind of drifting. Thank you very much for clearing that up!!!
    $endgroup$
    – Someone
    Jan 17 at 21:42










  • $begingroup$
    @DormantPerson I now see the confusion: you mistook $binom{100}{63}$ for $left(frac{100}{63}right)$. If you are not familiar with this notation, read about the binomial coefficient.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    Jan 17 at 22:00










  • $begingroup$
    I just checked the original text to make sure I was not confusing things as you suggested. The text says (100/63) with a division line. Is there any reason why a text book would display the equation in this incorrect format?
    $endgroup$
    – Someone
    Jan 20 at 17:39










  • $begingroup$
    @Someone Must be a typo then.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    Jan 20 at 17:50














1












1








1





$begingroup$

What is the probability that you get exactly $63$ heads in $100$ flips of a fair coin? [Then take the logarithm.] For some reason you thought it was $frac{63}{100} (1/2)^{63} (1/2)^{100-63}$ or something, which is wrong.




$$ln L_1 = ln left(binom{100}{63} 2^{-100}right) = - 100 ln 2 + sum_{k=64}^{100} ln(k) - sum_{k=1}^{37} ln(k) = -5.92$$







share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



What is the probability that you get exactly $63$ heads in $100$ flips of a fair coin? [Then take the logarithm.] For some reason you thought it was $frac{63}{100} (1/2)^{63} (1/2)^{100-63}$ or something, which is wrong.




$$ln L_1 = ln left(binom{100}{63} 2^{-100}right) = - 100 ln 2 + sum_{k=64}^{100} ln(k) - sum_{k=1}^{37} ln(k) = -5.92$$








share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 17 at 21:38









angryavianangryavian

41.7k23381




41.7k23381












  • $begingroup$
    Hi thank you!!! I copied it straight out of our textbook in exactly the same format. I would love to post a screenshot. Additionally, none of us in this class are math majors and the examples are not explained, so we are kind of drifting. Thank you very much for clearing that up!!!
    $endgroup$
    – Someone
    Jan 17 at 21:42










  • $begingroup$
    @DormantPerson I now see the confusion: you mistook $binom{100}{63}$ for $left(frac{100}{63}right)$. If you are not familiar with this notation, read about the binomial coefficient.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    Jan 17 at 22:00










  • $begingroup$
    I just checked the original text to make sure I was not confusing things as you suggested. The text says (100/63) with a division line. Is there any reason why a text book would display the equation in this incorrect format?
    $endgroup$
    – Someone
    Jan 20 at 17:39










  • $begingroup$
    @Someone Must be a typo then.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    Jan 20 at 17:50


















  • $begingroup$
    Hi thank you!!! I copied it straight out of our textbook in exactly the same format. I would love to post a screenshot. Additionally, none of us in this class are math majors and the examples are not explained, so we are kind of drifting. Thank you very much for clearing that up!!!
    $endgroup$
    – Someone
    Jan 17 at 21:42










  • $begingroup$
    @DormantPerson I now see the confusion: you mistook $binom{100}{63}$ for $left(frac{100}{63}right)$. If you are not familiar with this notation, read about the binomial coefficient.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    Jan 17 at 22:00










  • $begingroup$
    I just checked the original text to make sure I was not confusing things as you suggested. The text says (100/63) with a division line. Is there any reason why a text book would display the equation in this incorrect format?
    $endgroup$
    – Someone
    Jan 20 at 17:39










  • $begingroup$
    @Someone Must be a typo then.
    $endgroup$
    – angryavian
    Jan 20 at 17:50
















$begingroup$
Hi thank you!!! I copied it straight out of our textbook in exactly the same format. I would love to post a screenshot. Additionally, none of us in this class are math majors and the examples are not explained, so we are kind of drifting. Thank you very much for clearing that up!!!
$endgroup$
– Someone
Jan 17 at 21:42




$begingroup$
Hi thank you!!! I copied it straight out of our textbook in exactly the same format. I would love to post a screenshot. Additionally, none of us in this class are math majors and the examples are not explained, so we are kind of drifting. Thank you very much for clearing that up!!!
$endgroup$
– Someone
Jan 17 at 21:42












$begingroup$
@DormantPerson I now see the confusion: you mistook $binom{100}{63}$ for $left(frac{100}{63}right)$. If you are not familiar with this notation, read about the binomial coefficient.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 17 at 22:00




$begingroup$
@DormantPerson I now see the confusion: you mistook $binom{100}{63}$ for $left(frac{100}{63}right)$. If you are not familiar with this notation, read about the binomial coefficient.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 17 at 22:00












$begingroup$
I just checked the original text to make sure I was not confusing things as you suggested. The text says (100/63) with a division line. Is there any reason why a text book would display the equation in this incorrect format?
$endgroup$
– Someone
Jan 20 at 17:39




$begingroup$
I just checked the original text to make sure I was not confusing things as you suggested. The text says (100/63) with a division line. Is there any reason why a text book would display the equation in this incorrect format?
$endgroup$
– Someone
Jan 20 at 17:39












$begingroup$
@Someone Must be a typo then.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 20 at 17:50




$begingroup$
@Someone Must be a typo then.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 20 at 17:50


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077512%2flikelihood-ratio-tests%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$