How to double the circle?
$begingroup$
I'm looking for a compass-and-straightedge method to construct a circle that has area twice of the area of another circle, with no prior knowledge of π, without knowledge of the formula for the area of the circle, without calculus and without any modern (post-1800) method.
I proved constructions like: doubling the inscribed square, but this requires the assumption that the are of the circle and the inscribed square are proportional, which I failed to prove.
In general, for all my constructions, the main problem that I'm facing is that I'm unable to prove that there's a linear relationship between the area of the circle and the square of its radius. I think that even without knowing what the constant of proportionality is, I should still be able to prove that such a constant exists.
I believe this problem is solvable, because it involves the construction of $sqrt{2}$, and because the ratio of the areas/radii are all constructible numbers. Any hints?
circle area geometric-construction
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm looking for a compass-and-straightedge method to construct a circle that has area twice of the area of another circle, with no prior knowledge of π, without knowledge of the formula for the area of the circle, without calculus and without any modern (post-1800) method.
I proved constructions like: doubling the inscribed square, but this requires the assumption that the are of the circle and the inscribed square are proportional, which I failed to prove.
In general, for all my constructions, the main problem that I'm facing is that I'm unable to prove that there's a linear relationship between the area of the circle and the square of its radius. I think that even without knowing what the constant of proportionality is, I should still be able to prove that such a constant exists.
I believe this problem is solvable, because it involves the construction of $sqrt{2}$, and because the ratio of the areas/radii are all constructible numbers. Any hints?
circle area geometric-construction
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In your restricted situation, how do you define the area of a circle?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 17 at 20:40
$begingroup$
@HagenvonEitzen: that's an interesting question, that I also asked myself. I would say "however Euclid would have defined it", but I think he never did, although the problem of squaring the circle was well known at the time
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 20:42
$begingroup$
Let $Delta ABC$ have the right angle in $A$, construct $D$ on $BC$ with $ADperp BC$. Now arrange that $BD,DC$ are $1,2$. What is $AD$?
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 17 at 20:47
$begingroup$
@dan_fulea: this requires the knowledge that $2 text{Area}(r) = text{Area}(sqrt{2} r)$. How to prove that?
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm looking for a compass-and-straightedge method to construct a circle that has area twice of the area of another circle, with no prior knowledge of π, without knowledge of the formula for the area of the circle, without calculus and without any modern (post-1800) method.
I proved constructions like: doubling the inscribed square, but this requires the assumption that the are of the circle and the inscribed square are proportional, which I failed to prove.
In general, for all my constructions, the main problem that I'm facing is that I'm unable to prove that there's a linear relationship between the area of the circle and the square of its radius. I think that even without knowing what the constant of proportionality is, I should still be able to prove that such a constant exists.
I believe this problem is solvable, because it involves the construction of $sqrt{2}$, and because the ratio of the areas/radii are all constructible numbers. Any hints?
circle area geometric-construction
$endgroup$
I'm looking for a compass-and-straightedge method to construct a circle that has area twice of the area of another circle, with no prior knowledge of π, without knowledge of the formula for the area of the circle, without calculus and without any modern (post-1800) method.
I proved constructions like: doubling the inscribed square, but this requires the assumption that the are of the circle and the inscribed square are proportional, which I failed to prove.
In general, for all my constructions, the main problem that I'm facing is that I'm unable to prove that there's a linear relationship between the area of the circle and the square of its radius. I think that even without knowing what the constant of proportionality is, I should still be able to prove that such a constant exists.
I believe this problem is solvable, because it involves the construction of $sqrt{2}$, and because the ratio of the areas/radii are all constructible numbers. Any hints?
circle area geometric-construction
circle area geometric-construction
asked Jan 17 at 20:37
LikkLikk
31
31
$begingroup$
In your restricted situation, how do you define the area of a circle?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 17 at 20:40
$begingroup$
@HagenvonEitzen: that's an interesting question, that I also asked myself. I would say "however Euclid would have defined it", but I think he never did, although the problem of squaring the circle was well known at the time
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 20:42
$begingroup$
Let $Delta ABC$ have the right angle in $A$, construct $D$ on $BC$ with $ADperp BC$. Now arrange that $BD,DC$ are $1,2$. What is $AD$?
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 17 at 20:47
$begingroup$
@dan_fulea: this requires the knowledge that $2 text{Area}(r) = text{Area}(sqrt{2} r)$. How to prove that?
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In your restricted situation, how do you define the area of a circle?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 17 at 20:40
$begingroup$
@HagenvonEitzen: that's an interesting question, that I also asked myself. I would say "however Euclid would have defined it", but I think he never did, although the problem of squaring the circle was well known at the time
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 20:42
$begingroup$
Let $Delta ABC$ have the right angle in $A$, construct $D$ on $BC$ with $ADperp BC$. Now arrange that $BD,DC$ are $1,2$. What is $AD$?
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 17 at 20:47
$begingroup$
@dan_fulea: this requires the knowledge that $2 text{Area}(r) = text{Area}(sqrt{2} r)$. How to prove that?
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:05
$begingroup$
In your restricted situation, how do you define the area of a circle?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 17 at 20:40
$begingroup$
In your restricted situation, how do you define the area of a circle?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 17 at 20:40
$begingroup$
@HagenvonEitzen: that's an interesting question, that I also asked myself. I would say "however Euclid would have defined it", but I think he never did, although the problem of squaring the circle was well known at the time
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 20:42
$begingroup$
@HagenvonEitzen: that's an interesting question, that I also asked myself. I would say "however Euclid would have defined it", but I think he never did, although the problem of squaring the circle was well known at the time
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 20:42
$begingroup$
Let $Delta ABC$ have the right angle in $A$, construct $D$ on $BC$ with $ADperp BC$. Now arrange that $BD,DC$ are $1,2$. What is $AD$?
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 17 at 20:47
$begingroup$
Let $Delta ABC$ have the right angle in $A$, construct $D$ on $BC$ with $ADperp BC$. Now arrange that $BD,DC$ are $1,2$. What is $AD$?
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 17 at 20:47
$begingroup$
@dan_fulea: this requires the knowledge that $2 text{Area}(r) = text{Area}(sqrt{2} r)$. How to prove that?
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:05
$begingroup$
@dan_fulea: this requires the knowledge that $2 text{Area}(r) = text{Area}(sqrt{2} r)$. How to prove that?
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:05
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Scaling by $sqrt 2$ doubles the area of a square (by assuming that congruent triangles have equal area and areas of shapes having at most edges in common can be added).
Then the same is true for scaling isosceles right triangles (=half-squares).
By combing this with shearing, we see that scaling any triangle by $sqrt 2$ doubles area.
As a consequence, arbitrary polygons (=unions of triangles) double their area when scaled by $sqrt 2$.
Now whatever the area of a circular disk is, we can inscribe and circumscribe high-order polygons to it and these differ by an arbitrarily small area (this sounds like modern epsilontics, but that's how Euclid would also tackle this). Scaling by $sqrt 2$ doubles the inscribed and circumscribed polygon's area (while preserving the inscribed/circumscribed property). It follows that the area of the scaled disk cannot be larger nor smaller than twice the original area.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I wasn't aware that Euclid used certain arguments involving "limits"! Do you have any examples of a similar argument from those times, maybe from the Elements?
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:03
$begingroup$
Finally found something: Archimedes, who indeed used the method of inscribed polygons to approximate π. I was so much focused on Euclid's Elements that I completely missed him. Thanks for your answer! You saved me a lot of time!
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:32
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077484%2fhow-to-double-the-circle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Scaling by $sqrt 2$ doubles the area of a square (by assuming that congruent triangles have equal area and areas of shapes having at most edges in common can be added).
Then the same is true for scaling isosceles right triangles (=half-squares).
By combing this with shearing, we see that scaling any triangle by $sqrt 2$ doubles area.
As a consequence, arbitrary polygons (=unions of triangles) double their area when scaled by $sqrt 2$.
Now whatever the area of a circular disk is, we can inscribe and circumscribe high-order polygons to it and these differ by an arbitrarily small area (this sounds like modern epsilontics, but that's how Euclid would also tackle this). Scaling by $sqrt 2$ doubles the inscribed and circumscribed polygon's area (while preserving the inscribed/circumscribed property). It follows that the area of the scaled disk cannot be larger nor smaller than twice the original area.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I wasn't aware that Euclid used certain arguments involving "limits"! Do you have any examples of a similar argument from those times, maybe from the Elements?
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:03
$begingroup$
Finally found something: Archimedes, who indeed used the method of inscribed polygons to approximate π. I was so much focused on Euclid's Elements that I completely missed him. Thanks for your answer! You saved me a lot of time!
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Scaling by $sqrt 2$ doubles the area of a square (by assuming that congruent triangles have equal area and areas of shapes having at most edges in common can be added).
Then the same is true for scaling isosceles right triangles (=half-squares).
By combing this with shearing, we see that scaling any triangle by $sqrt 2$ doubles area.
As a consequence, arbitrary polygons (=unions of triangles) double their area when scaled by $sqrt 2$.
Now whatever the area of a circular disk is, we can inscribe and circumscribe high-order polygons to it and these differ by an arbitrarily small area (this sounds like modern epsilontics, but that's how Euclid would also tackle this). Scaling by $sqrt 2$ doubles the inscribed and circumscribed polygon's area (while preserving the inscribed/circumscribed property). It follows that the area of the scaled disk cannot be larger nor smaller than twice the original area.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I wasn't aware that Euclid used certain arguments involving "limits"! Do you have any examples of a similar argument from those times, maybe from the Elements?
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:03
$begingroup$
Finally found something: Archimedes, who indeed used the method of inscribed polygons to approximate π. I was so much focused on Euclid's Elements that I completely missed him. Thanks for your answer! You saved me a lot of time!
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Scaling by $sqrt 2$ doubles the area of a square (by assuming that congruent triangles have equal area and areas of shapes having at most edges in common can be added).
Then the same is true for scaling isosceles right triangles (=half-squares).
By combing this with shearing, we see that scaling any triangle by $sqrt 2$ doubles area.
As a consequence, arbitrary polygons (=unions of triangles) double their area when scaled by $sqrt 2$.
Now whatever the area of a circular disk is, we can inscribe and circumscribe high-order polygons to it and these differ by an arbitrarily small area (this sounds like modern epsilontics, but that's how Euclid would also tackle this). Scaling by $sqrt 2$ doubles the inscribed and circumscribed polygon's area (while preserving the inscribed/circumscribed property). It follows that the area of the scaled disk cannot be larger nor smaller than twice the original area.
$endgroup$
Scaling by $sqrt 2$ doubles the area of a square (by assuming that congruent triangles have equal area and areas of shapes having at most edges in common can be added).
Then the same is true for scaling isosceles right triangles (=half-squares).
By combing this with shearing, we see that scaling any triangle by $sqrt 2$ doubles area.
As a consequence, arbitrary polygons (=unions of triangles) double their area when scaled by $sqrt 2$.
Now whatever the area of a circular disk is, we can inscribe and circumscribe high-order polygons to it and these differ by an arbitrarily small area (this sounds like modern epsilontics, but that's how Euclid would also tackle this). Scaling by $sqrt 2$ doubles the inscribed and circumscribed polygon's area (while preserving the inscribed/circumscribed property). It follows that the area of the scaled disk cannot be larger nor smaller than twice the original area.
answered Jan 17 at 20:48
Hagen von EitzenHagen von Eitzen
281k23272505
281k23272505
1
$begingroup$
I wasn't aware that Euclid used certain arguments involving "limits"! Do you have any examples of a similar argument from those times, maybe from the Elements?
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:03
$begingroup$
Finally found something: Archimedes, who indeed used the method of inscribed polygons to approximate π. I was so much focused on Euclid's Elements that I completely missed him. Thanks for your answer! You saved me a lot of time!
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:32
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I wasn't aware that Euclid used certain arguments involving "limits"! Do you have any examples of a similar argument from those times, maybe from the Elements?
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:03
$begingroup$
Finally found something: Archimedes, who indeed used the method of inscribed polygons to approximate π. I was so much focused on Euclid's Elements that I completely missed him. Thanks for your answer! You saved me a lot of time!
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:32
1
1
$begingroup$
I wasn't aware that Euclid used certain arguments involving "limits"! Do you have any examples of a similar argument from those times, maybe from the Elements?
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:03
$begingroup$
I wasn't aware that Euclid used certain arguments involving "limits"! Do you have any examples of a similar argument from those times, maybe from the Elements?
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:03
$begingroup$
Finally found something: Archimedes, who indeed used the method of inscribed polygons to approximate π. I was so much focused on Euclid's Elements that I completely missed him. Thanks for your answer! You saved me a lot of time!
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:32
$begingroup$
Finally found something: Archimedes, who indeed used the method of inscribed polygons to approximate π. I was so much focused on Euclid's Elements that I completely missed him. Thanks for your answer! You saved me a lot of time!
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:32
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077484%2fhow-to-double-the-circle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
In your restricted situation, how do you define the area of a circle?
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 17 at 20:40
$begingroup$
@HagenvonEitzen: that's an interesting question, that I also asked myself. I would say "however Euclid would have defined it", but I think he never did, although the problem of squaring the circle was well known at the time
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 20:42
$begingroup$
Let $Delta ABC$ have the right angle in $A$, construct $D$ on $BC$ with $ADperp BC$. Now arrange that $BD,DC$ are $1,2$. What is $AD$?
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
Jan 17 at 20:47
$begingroup$
@dan_fulea: this requires the knowledge that $2 text{Area}(r) = text{Area}(sqrt{2} r)$. How to prove that?
$endgroup$
– Likk
Jan 17 at 21:05