How to verify the rank-nullity theorem for the linear application $frac{d}{dx}in...












1












$begingroup$


I know that the rank-nullity theorem states that let $T: Vrightarrow W$ be a linear transformation, then:



$$ operatorname{Rank}(T)+ operatorname{Nullity}(T)=dim(V)$$



But since $frac{d}{dx}in operatorname{End}(mathbb{K}[x]_2)$ is also a linear transformation, I want to verify the rank-nullity theorem with this particular situation.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What exactly do you mean by $Bbb K[x]_2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Lewis
    Jan 17 at 20:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Clarification question, is $mathbb{K}[x]_2$ the ring of polynomials of $mathbb{K}$ localized at the ideal $2$ or is $mathbb{K}$ the field with 2 elements?
    $endgroup$
    – Sheel Stueber
    Jan 17 at 20:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $mathbb{K}[x]_2$ is the ring of polynomials of 𝕂 localized at the ideal 2 $(ax^2+bx+c)$
    $endgroup$
    – Kevin
    Jan 17 at 21:01












  • $begingroup$
    You can just take a proof of the abstract theorem and then substitute everything there with your example.
    $endgroup$
    – user635162
    Jan 17 at 21:11


















1












$begingroup$


I know that the rank-nullity theorem states that let $T: Vrightarrow W$ be a linear transformation, then:



$$ operatorname{Rank}(T)+ operatorname{Nullity}(T)=dim(V)$$



But since $frac{d}{dx}in operatorname{End}(mathbb{K}[x]_2)$ is also a linear transformation, I want to verify the rank-nullity theorem with this particular situation.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What exactly do you mean by $Bbb K[x]_2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Lewis
    Jan 17 at 20:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Clarification question, is $mathbb{K}[x]_2$ the ring of polynomials of $mathbb{K}$ localized at the ideal $2$ or is $mathbb{K}$ the field with 2 elements?
    $endgroup$
    – Sheel Stueber
    Jan 17 at 20:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $mathbb{K}[x]_2$ is the ring of polynomials of 𝕂 localized at the ideal 2 $(ax^2+bx+c)$
    $endgroup$
    – Kevin
    Jan 17 at 21:01












  • $begingroup$
    You can just take a proof of the abstract theorem and then substitute everything there with your example.
    $endgroup$
    – user635162
    Jan 17 at 21:11
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


I know that the rank-nullity theorem states that let $T: Vrightarrow W$ be a linear transformation, then:



$$ operatorname{Rank}(T)+ operatorname{Nullity}(T)=dim(V)$$



But since $frac{d}{dx}in operatorname{End}(mathbb{K}[x]_2)$ is also a linear transformation, I want to verify the rank-nullity theorem with this particular situation.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I know that the rank-nullity theorem states that let $T: Vrightarrow W$ be a linear transformation, then:



$$ operatorname{Rank}(T)+ operatorname{Nullity}(T)=dim(V)$$



But since $frac{d}{dx}in operatorname{End}(mathbb{K}[x]_2)$ is also a linear transformation, I want to verify the rank-nullity theorem with this particular situation.







linear-algebra linear-transformations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 17 at 20:55









Bernard

121k740116




121k740116










asked Jan 17 at 20:52









KevinKevin

13311




13311












  • $begingroup$
    What exactly do you mean by $Bbb K[x]_2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Lewis
    Jan 17 at 20:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Clarification question, is $mathbb{K}[x]_2$ the ring of polynomials of $mathbb{K}$ localized at the ideal $2$ or is $mathbb{K}$ the field with 2 elements?
    $endgroup$
    – Sheel Stueber
    Jan 17 at 20:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $mathbb{K}[x]_2$ is the ring of polynomials of 𝕂 localized at the ideal 2 $(ax^2+bx+c)$
    $endgroup$
    – Kevin
    Jan 17 at 21:01












  • $begingroup$
    You can just take a proof of the abstract theorem and then substitute everything there with your example.
    $endgroup$
    – user635162
    Jan 17 at 21:11




















  • $begingroup$
    What exactly do you mean by $Bbb K[x]_2$?
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Lewis
    Jan 17 at 20:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Clarification question, is $mathbb{K}[x]_2$ the ring of polynomials of $mathbb{K}$ localized at the ideal $2$ or is $mathbb{K}$ the field with 2 elements?
    $endgroup$
    – Sheel Stueber
    Jan 17 at 20:58






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $mathbb{K}[x]_2$ is the ring of polynomials of 𝕂 localized at the ideal 2 $(ax^2+bx+c)$
    $endgroup$
    – Kevin
    Jan 17 at 21:01












  • $begingroup$
    You can just take a proof of the abstract theorem and then substitute everything there with your example.
    $endgroup$
    – user635162
    Jan 17 at 21:11


















$begingroup$
What exactly do you mean by $Bbb K[x]_2$?
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Jan 17 at 20:58




$begingroup$
What exactly do you mean by $Bbb K[x]_2$?
$endgroup$
– Robert Lewis
Jan 17 at 20:58




1




1




$begingroup$
Clarification question, is $mathbb{K}[x]_2$ the ring of polynomials of $mathbb{K}$ localized at the ideal $2$ or is $mathbb{K}$ the field with 2 elements?
$endgroup$
– Sheel Stueber
Jan 17 at 20:58




$begingroup$
Clarification question, is $mathbb{K}[x]_2$ the ring of polynomials of $mathbb{K}$ localized at the ideal $2$ or is $mathbb{K}$ the field with 2 elements?
$endgroup$
– Sheel Stueber
Jan 17 at 20:58




1




1




$begingroup$
$mathbb{K}[x]_2$ is the ring of polynomials of 𝕂 localized at the ideal 2 $(ax^2+bx+c)$
$endgroup$
– Kevin
Jan 17 at 21:01






$begingroup$
$mathbb{K}[x]_2$ is the ring of polynomials of 𝕂 localized at the ideal 2 $(ax^2+bx+c)$
$endgroup$
– Kevin
Jan 17 at 21:01














$begingroup$
You can just take a proof of the abstract theorem and then substitute everything there with your example.
$endgroup$
– user635162
Jan 17 at 21:11






$begingroup$
You can just take a proof of the abstract theorem and then substitute everything there with your example.
$endgroup$
– user635162
Jan 17 at 21:11












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077496%2fhow-to-verify-the-rank-nullity-theorem-for-the-linear-application-fracddx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077496%2fhow-to-verify-the-rank-nullity-theorem-for-the-linear-application-fracddx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]