Can a sequence of functions converge to $0$ in only one $L_p$ space?
Let $1<p<infty$, and suppose that $f_n$ converges to $0$ in the $L_q$ norm for all $qneq p$ where $1leq q<infty$? My question is, is it possible for $f_n$ to not converge to $0$ in the $L_p$ norm?
If there doesn't exist such a sequence of functions, does there at least a sequence of functions which does not converges to $0$ in some $L_p$ for $1leq p<infty$ but converges to $0$ in every $L_q$ for $1<q<p$, and another sequence of functions which does not converge to $0$ in $L_p$ but converges to $0$ in every $L_q$ for $q>p$?
measure-theory lebesgue-integral lp-spaces
add a comment |
Let $1<p<infty$, and suppose that $f_n$ converges to $0$ in the $L_q$ norm for all $qneq p$ where $1leq q<infty$? My question is, is it possible for $f_n$ to not converge to $0$ in the $L_p$ norm?
If there doesn't exist such a sequence of functions, does there at least a sequence of functions which does not converges to $0$ in some $L_p$ for $1leq p<infty$ but converges to $0$ in every $L_q$ for $1<q<p$, and another sequence of functions which does not converge to $0$ in $L_p$ but converges to $0$ in every $L_q$ for $q>p$?
measure-theory lebesgue-integral lp-spaces
add a comment |
Let $1<p<infty$, and suppose that $f_n$ converges to $0$ in the $L_q$ norm for all $qneq p$ where $1leq q<infty$? My question is, is it possible for $f_n$ to not converge to $0$ in the $L_p$ norm?
If there doesn't exist such a sequence of functions, does there at least a sequence of functions which does not converges to $0$ in some $L_p$ for $1leq p<infty$ but converges to $0$ in every $L_q$ for $1<q<p$, and another sequence of functions which does not converge to $0$ in $L_p$ but converges to $0$ in every $L_q$ for $q>p$?
measure-theory lebesgue-integral lp-spaces
Let $1<p<infty$, and suppose that $f_n$ converges to $0$ in the $L_q$ norm for all $qneq p$ where $1leq q<infty$? My question is, is it possible for $f_n$ to not converge to $0$ in the $L_p$ norm?
If there doesn't exist such a sequence of functions, does there at least a sequence of functions which does not converges to $0$ in some $L_p$ for $1leq p<infty$ but converges to $0$ in every $L_q$ for $1<q<p$, and another sequence of functions which does not converge to $0$ in $L_p$ but converges to $0$ in every $L_q$ for $q>p$?
measure-theory lebesgue-integral lp-spaces
measure-theory lebesgue-integral lp-spaces
edited Nov 20 '18 at 5:22
asked Nov 20 '18 at 5:09


Keshav Srinivasan
2,09111441
2,09111441
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
No such sequence exists by Hölder's inequality. This is in Folland's book.
For the second question, you can do something analogous to what I did in my previous answer.
Thanks for your answer, but I was hoping for something with $L_q$'s on both sides. That is, I want $p$ to be greater than $1$ and to have the sequence converge for all $L_q$ where $q$ can be either less than or greater than $p$ (but still gretar than or equal to 1). I'll modify my question to change greater than or equal to greater than.
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:20
@KeshavSrinivasan ok I changed my answer
– mathworker21
Nov 20 '18 at 5:25
OK, so there's no $L_p$ with $L_q$'s on both sides with the property I want. But your previous answer at least addressed the case where it converges to $0$ in all $L_q$'s for $q>1$ but not for $L_1$. But now what about the opposite case, a sequence of functions which converges to $0$ in all $L_q$'s $q$ between $1$ and $p$ (where $p$>1), but doesn't converge to $0$ in $L_p$?
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:32
$n1_{[0,frac{1}{n}]}$ I think does the job
– mathworker21
Nov 20 '18 at 5:51
What is the $p$ it does the job for?
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:57
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005964%2fcan-a-sequence-of-functions-converge-to-0-in-only-one-l-p-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No such sequence exists by Hölder's inequality. This is in Folland's book.
For the second question, you can do something analogous to what I did in my previous answer.
Thanks for your answer, but I was hoping for something with $L_q$'s on both sides. That is, I want $p$ to be greater than $1$ and to have the sequence converge for all $L_q$ where $q$ can be either less than or greater than $p$ (but still gretar than or equal to 1). I'll modify my question to change greater than or equal to greater than.
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:20
@KeshavSrinivasan ok I changed my answer
– mathworker21
Nov 20 '18 at 5:25
OK, so there's no $L_p$ with $L_q$'s on both sides with the property I want. But your previous answer at least addressed the case where it converges to $0$ in all $L_q$'s for $q>1$ but not for $L_1$. But now what about the opposite case, a sequence of functions which converges to $0$ in all $L_q$'s $q$ between $1$ and $p$ (where $p$>1), but doesn't converge to $0$ in $L_p$?
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:32
$n1_{[0,frac{1}{n}]}$ I think does the job
– mathworker21
Nov 20 '18 at 5:51
What is the $p$ it does the job for?
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:57
|
show 1 more comment
No such sequence exists by Hölder's inequality. This is in Folland's book.
For the second question, you can do something analogous to what I did in my previous answer.
Thanks for your answer, but I was hoping for something with $L_q$'s on both sides. That is, I want $p$ to be greater than $1$ and to have the sequence converge for all $L_q$ where $q$ can be either less than or greater than $p$ (but still gretar than or equal to 1). I'll modify my question to change greater than or equal to greater than.
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:20
@KeshavSrinivasan ok I changed my answer
– mathworker21
Nov 20 '18 at 5:25
OK, so there's no $L_p$ with $L_q$'s on both sides with the property I want. But your previous answer at least addressed the case where it converges to $0$ in all $L_q$'s for $q>1$ but not for $L_1$. But now what about the opposite case, a sequence of functions which converges to $0$ in all $L_q$'s $q$ between $1$ and $p$ (where $p$>1), but doesn't converge to $0$ in $L_p$?
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:32
$n1_{[0,frac{1}{n}]}$ I think does the job
– mathworker21
Nov 20 '18 at 5:51
What is the $p$ it does the job for?
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:57
|
show 1 more comment
No such sequence exists by Hölder's inequality. This is in Folland's book.
For the second question, you can do something analogous to what I did in my previous answer.
No such sequence exists by Hölder's inequality. This is in Folland's book.
For the second question, you can do something analogous to what I did in my previous answer.
edited Nov 20 '18 at 5:25
answered Nov 20 '18 at 5:15


mathworker21
8,6371928
8,6371928
Thanks for your answer, but I was hoping for something with $L_q$'s on both sides. That is, I want $p$ to be greater than $1$ and to have the sequence converge for all $L_q$ where $q$ can be either less than or greater than $p$ (but still gretar than or equal to 1). I'll modify my question to change greater than or equal to greater than.
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:20
@KeshavSrinivasan ok I changed my answer
– mathworker21
Nov 20 '18 at 5:25
OK, so there's no $L_p$ with $L_q$'s on both sides with the property I want. But your previous answer at least addressed the case where it converges to $0$ in all $L_q$'s for $q>1$ but not for $L_1$. But now what about the opposite case, a sequence of functions which converges to $0$ in all $L_q$'s $q$ between $1$ and $p$ (where $p$>1), but doesn't converge to $0$ in $L_p$?
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:32
$n1_{[0,frac{1}{n}]}$ I think does the job
– mathworker21
Nov 20 '18 at 5:51
What is the $p$ it does the job for?
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:57
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for your answer, but I was hoping for something with $L_q$'s on both sides. That is, I want $p$ to be greater than $1$ and to have the sequence converge for all $L_q$ where $q$ can be either less than or greater than $p$ (but still gretar than or equal to 1). I'll modify my question to change greater than or equal to greater than.
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:20
@KeshavSrinivasan ok I changed my answer
– mathworker21
Nov 20 '18 at 5:25
OK, so there's no $L_p$ with $L_q$'s on both sides with the property I want. But your previous answer at least addressed the case where it converges to $0$ in all $L_q$'s for $q>1$ but not for $L_1$. But now what about the opposite case, a sequence of functions which converges to $0$ in all $L_q$'s $q$ between $1$ and $p$ (where $p$>1), but doesn't converge to $0$ in $L_p$?
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:32
$n1_{[0,frac{1}{n}]}$ I think does the job
– mathworker21
Nov 20 '18 at 5:51
What is the $p$ it does the job for?
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:57
Thanks for your answer, but I was hoping for something with $L_q$'s on both sides. That is, I want $p$ to be greater than $1$ and to have the sequence converge for all $L_q$ where $q$ can be either less than or greater than $p$ (but still gretar than or equal to 1). I'll modify my question to change greater than or equal to greater than.
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:20
Thanks for your answer, but I was hoping for something with $L_q$'s on both sides. That is, I want $p$ to be greater than $1$ and to have the sequence converge for all $L_q$ where $q$ can be either less than or greater than $p$ (but still gretar than or equal to 1). I'll modify my question to change greater than or equal to greater than.
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:20
@KeshavSrinivasan ok I changed my answer
– mathworker21
Nov 20 '18 at 5:25
@KeshavSrinivasan ok I changed my answer
– mathworker21
Nov 20 '18 at 5:25
OK, so there's no $L_p$ with $L_q$'s on both sides with the property I want. But your previous answer at least addressed the case where it converges to $0$ in all $L_q$'s for $q>1$ but not for $L_1$. But now what about the opposite case, a sequence of functions which converges to $0$ in all $L_q$'s $q$ between $1$ and $p$ (where $p$>1), but doesn't converge to $0$ in $L_p$?
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:32
OK, so there's no $L_p$ with $L_q$'s on both sides with the property I want. But your previous answer at least addressed the case where it converges to $0$ in all $L_q$'s for $q>1$ but not for $L_1$. But now what about the opposite case, a sequence of functions which converges to $0$ in all $L_q$'s $q$ between $1$ and $p$ (where $p$>1), but doesn't converge to $0$ in $L_p$?
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:32
$n1_{[0,frac{1}{n}]}$ I think does the job
– mathworker21
Nov 20 '18 at 5:51
$n1_{[0,frac{1}{n}]}$ I think does the job
– mathworker21
Nov 20 '18 at 5:51
What is the $p$ it does the job for?
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:57
What is the $p$ it does the job for?
– Keshav Srinivasan
Nov 20 '18 at 5:57
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3005964%2fcan-a-sequence-of-functions-converge-to-0-in-only-one-l-p-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown