Differentiation the form $frac{dy}{dt}$ with respect to y.












0












$begingroup$


It's been awhile since I took differential equations, so I am unsure if my manipulation is correct. Isn't it true that if we set $h(t,y)=y,$ then $h_{ty}=h_{yt}$? This would imply $$dfrac{partial}{partial y}dfrac{partial y}{partial t}=dfrac{partial}{partial t}dfrac{partial y}{partial y}=dfrac{partial}{partial t}0=0.$$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure that I understand your notation. Is y a function? Is it a function of t? Is $h_{ty}$ the derivative of h with respect to t and y? Is $h_{yt}$ the derivative of h with respect to y and t? With your notation, what would the definition of $h_y$ be?
    $endgroup$
    – NicNic8
    Jan 13 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    The variable $y$ is function of $t$, and $t$ alone. The notation $h_{ty}$ is $dfrac{partial }{partial t}dfrac{partial }{partial y}h$. Similarly for $h_{yt},$ we just swap the order of the differential operators.
    $endgroup$
    – Melody
    Jan 13 at 23:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is given in the problem? Is $h(t,y)=y$ and $h_{ty}=h_{yt}$ both given?
    $endgroup$
    – NicNic8
    Jan 13 at 23:51










  • $begingroup$
    @NicNic8 Setting $h(t,y)=y$ was for convenience. We're not given that $h_{ty}=h_{yt},$ I just thought that the mixed partials were always equivalent. It's been years since I learned this stuff. We're given that $f=dy/dt$ and $f$ is smooth in $y$ as well as $t$. We're also given that $y$ is smooth. No other details are given.
    $endgroup$
    – Melody
    Jan 14 at 0:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    My attempt would be to go via the inverse function, $frac{dy}{dt} = frac{1}{frac{dt}{dy}}$, and to differentiate that with respect to $y$.
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Jan 14 at 2:39


















0












$begingroup$


It's been awhile since I took differential equations, so I am unsure if my manipulation is correct. Isn't it true that if we set $h(t,y)=y,$ then $h_{ty}=h_{yt}$? This would imply $$dfrac{partial}{partial y}dfrac{partial y}{partial t}=dfrac{partial}{partial t}dfrac{partial y}{partial y}=dfrac{partial}{partial t}0=0.$$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure that I understand your notation. Is y a function? Is it a function of t? Is $h_{ty}$ the derivative of h with respect to t and y? Is $h_{yt}$ the derivative of h with respect to y and t? With your notation, what would the definition of $h_y$ be?
    $endgroup$
    – NicNic8
    Jan 13 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    The variable $y$ is function of $t$, and $t$ alone. The notation $h_{ty}$ is $dfrac{partial }{partial t}dfrac{partial }{partial y}h$. Similarly for $h_{yt},$ we just swap the order of the differential operators.
    $endgroup$
    – Melody
    Jan 13 at 23:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is given in the problem? Is $h(t,y)=y$ and $h_{ty}=h_{yt}$ both given?
    $endgroup$
    – NicNic8
    Jan 13 at 23:51










  • $begingroup$
    @NicNic8 Setting $h(t,y)=y$ was for convenience. We're not given that $h_{ty}=h_{yt},$ I just thought that the mixed partials were always equivalent. It's been years since I learned this stuff. We're given that $f=dy/dt$ and $f$ is smooth in $y$ as well as $t$. We're also given that $y$ is smooth. No other details are given.
    $endgroup$
    – Melody
    Jan 14 at 0:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    My attempt would be to go via the inverse function, $frac{dy}{dt} = frac{1}{frac{dt}{dy}}$, and to differentiate that with respect to $y$.
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Jan 14 at 2:39
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


It's been awhile since I took differential equations, so I am unsure if my manipulation is correct. Isn't it true that if we set $h(t,y)=y,$ then $h_{ty}=h_{yt}$? This would imply $$dfrac{partial}{partial y}dfrac{partial y}{partial t}=dfrac{partial}{partial t}dfrac{partial y}{partial y}=dfrac{partial}{partial t}0=0.$$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




It's been awhile since I took differential equations, so I am unsure if my manipulation is correct. Isn't it true that if we set $h(t,y)=y,$ then $h_{ty}=h_{yt}$? This would imply $$dfrac{partial}{partial y}dfrac{partial y}{partial t}=dfrac{partial}{partial t}dfrac{partial y}{partial y}=dfrac{partial}{partial t}0=0.$$







calculus pde partial-derivative






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 13 at 23:03









MelodyMelody

80012




80012








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure that I understand your notation. Is y a function? Is it a function of t? Is $h_{ty}$ the derivative of h with respect to t and y? Is $h_{yt}$ the derivative of h with respect to y and t? With your notation, what would the definition of $h_y$ be?
    $endgroup$
    – NicNic8
    Jan 13 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    The variable $y$ is function of $t$, and $t$ alone. The notation $h_{ty}$ is $dfrac{partial }{partial t}dfrac{partial }{partial y}h$. Similarly for $h_{yt},$ we just swap the order of the differential operators.
    $endgroup$
    – Melody
    Jan 13 at 23:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is given in the problem? Is $h(t,y)=y$ and $h_{ty}=h_{yt}$ both given?
    $endgroup$
    – NicNic8
    Jan 13 at 23:51










  • $begingroup$
    @NicNic8 Setting $h(t,y)=y$ was for convenience. We're not given that $h_{ty}=h_{yt},$ I just thought that the mixed partials were always equivalent. It's been years since I learned this stuff. We're given that $f=dy/dt$ and $f$ is smooth in $y$ as well as $t$. We're also given that $y$ is smooth. No other details are given.
    $endgroup$
    – Melody
    Jan 14 at 0:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    My attempt would be to go via the inverse function, $frac{dy}{dt} = frac{1}{frac{dt}{dy}}$, and to differentiate that with respect to $y$.
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Jan 14 at 2:39
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure that I understand your notation. Is y a function? Is it a function of t? Is $h_{ty}$ the derivative of h with respect to t and y? Is $h_{yt}$ the derivative of h with respect to y and t? With your notation, what would the definition of $h_y$ be?
    $endgroup$
    – NicNic8
    Jan 13 at 23:06










  • $begingroup$
    The variable $y$ is function of $t$, and $t$ alone. The notation $h_{ty}$ is $dfrac{partial }{partial t}dfrac{partial }{partial y}h$. Similarly for $h_{yt},$ we just swap the order of the differential operators.
    $endgroup$
    – Melody
    Jan 13 at 23:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is given in the problem? Is $h(t,y)=y$ and $h_{ty}=h_{yt}$ both given?
    $endgroup$
    – NicNic8
    Jan 13 at 23:51










  • $begingroup$
    @NicNic8 Setting $h(t,y)=y$ was for convenience. We're not given that $h_{ty}=h_{yt},$ I just thought that the mixed partials were always equivalent. It's been years since I learned this stuff. We're given that $f=dy/dt$ and $f$ is smooth in $y$ as well as $t$. We're also given that $y$ is smooth. No other details are given.
    $endgroup$
    – Melody
    Jan 14 at 0:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    My attempt would be to go via the inverse function, $frac{dy}{dt} = frac{1}{frac{dt}{dy}}$, and to differentiate that with respect to $y$.
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Jan 14 at 2:39










1




1




$begingroup$
I'm not sure that I understand your notation. Is y a function? Is it a function of t? Is $h_{ty}$ the derivative of h with respect to t and y? Is $h_{yt}$ the derivative of h with respect to y and t? With your notation, what would the definition of $h_y$ be?
$endgroup$
– NicNic8
Jan 13 at 23:06




$begingroup$
I'm not sure that I understand your notation. Is y a function? Is it a function of t? Is $h_{ty}$ the derivative of h with respect to t and y? Is $h_{yt}$ the derivative of h with respect to y and t? With your notation, what would the definition of $h_y$ be?
$endgroup$
– NicNic8
Jan 13 at 23:06












$begingroup$
The variable $y$ is function of $t$, and $t$ alone. The notation $h_{ty}$ is $dfrac{partial }{partial t}dfrac{partial }{partial y}h$. Similarly for $h_{yt},$ we just swap the order of the differential operators.
$endgroup$
– Melody
Jan 13 at 23:18




$begingroup$
The variable $y$ is function of $t$, and $t$ alone. The notation $h_{ty}$ is $dfrac{partial }{partial t}dfrac{partial }{partial y}h$. Similarly for $h_{yt},$ we just swap the order of the differential operators.
$endgroup$
– Melody
Jan 13 at 23:18




1




1




$begingroup$
What is given in the problem? Is $h(t,y)=y$ and $h_{ty}=h_{yt}$ both given?
$endgroup$
– NicNic8
Jan 13 at 23:51




$begingroup$
What is given in the problem? Is $h(t,y)=y$ and $h_{ty}=h_{yt}$ both given?
$endgroup$
– NicNic8
Jan 13 at 23:51












$begingroup$
@NicNic8 Setting $h(t,y)=y$ was for convenience. We're not given that $h_{ty}=h_{yt},$ I just thought that the mixed partials were always equivalent. It's been years since I learned this stuff. We're given that $f=dy/dt$ and $f$ is smooth in $y$ as well as $t$. We're also given that $y$ is smooth. No other details are given.
$endgroup$
– Melody
Jan 14 at 0:50




$begingroup$
@NicNic8 Setting $h(t,y)=y$ was for convenience. We're not given that $h_{ty}=h_{yt},$ I just thought that the mixed partials were always equivalent. It's been years since I learned this stuff. We're given that $f=dy/dt$ and $f$ is smooth in $y$ as well as $t$. We're also given that $y$ is smooth. No other details are given.
$endgroup$
– Melody
Jan 14 at 0:50




1




1




$begingroup$
My attempt would be to go via the inverse function, $frac{dy}{dt} = frac{1}{frac{dt}{dy}}$, and to differentiate that with respect to $y$.
$endgroup$
– Christoph
Jan 14 at 2:39






$begingroup$
My attempt would be to go via the inverse function, $frac{dy}{dt} = frac{1}{frac{dt}{dy}}$, and to differentiate that with respect to $y$.
$endgroup$
– Christoph
Jan 14 at 2:39












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Without following your calculus, a straightforward method is :
$$frac{d}{dy}left(frac{dy}{dt}right)=frac{d}{dy}left(frac{1}{frac{dt}{dy}}right)=-frac{frac{d^2t}{dy^2}}{left(frac{dt}{dy}right)^2}$$
because to differentiate wrt $y$ we have to define which function of $y$ (not of $t$) must be considered. Thus it is not $frac{dy}{dt}$ because this is a function of $t$. It is $left(frac{dt}{dy}right)^{-1}$ which is a function of $y$ as required.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    Setting h(t,y) to y appears bogus.

    When y is a function of t, one usually writes y = y(t).

    Then $y_y = 1$, not the zero you claim, though $y_{yt}$ = 0.
    $y_t = y'$ since y is a function of t.
    $y_{ty} = y'_y$ doesn't happen because y' is not a function of y.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Why is it bogus to write $h(t,y)=y$? I see the mistake of setting $y_y=0.$ If $y'$ is not a function of $y$, then how do you differentiate it with respect to y? My professor claims we can do this for homework.
      $endgroup$
      – Melody
      Jan 14 at 0:44










    • $begingroup$
      @Melody. h = y + 0t.
      $endgroup$
      – William Elliot
      Jan 14 at 5:51












    • $begingroup$
      @Melody. d/dy dy/dt = d$^2$y/dt$^2$ × dt/dy.
      $endgroup$
      – William Elliot
      Jan 14 at 6:02













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072641%2fdifferentiation-the-form-fracdydt-with-respect-to-y%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Without following your calculus, a straightforward method is :
    $$frac{d}{dy}left(frac{dy}{dt}right)=frac{d}{dy}left(frac{1}{frac{dt}{dy}}right)=-frac{frac{d^2t}{dy^2}}{left(frac{dt}{dy}right)^2}$$
    because to differentiate wrt $y$ we have to define which function of $y$ (not of $t$) must be considered. Thus it is not $frac{dy}{dt}$ because this is a function of $t$. It is $left(frac{dt}{dy}right)^{-1}$ which is a function of $y$ as required.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Without following your calculus, a straightforward method is :
      $$frac{d}{dy}left(frac{dy}{dt}right)=frac{d}{dy}left(frac{1}{frac{dt}{dy}}right)=-frac{frac{d^2t}{dy^2}}{left(frac{dt}{dy}right)^2}$$
      because to differentiate wrt $y$ we have to define which function of $y$ (not of $t$) must be considered. Thus it is not $frac{dy}{dt}$ because this is a function of $t$. It is $left(frac{dt}{dy}right)^{-1}$ which is a function of $y$ as required.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Without following your calculus, a straightforward method is :
        $$frac{d}{dy}left(frac{dy}{dt}right)=frac{d}{dy}left(frac{1}{frac{dt}{dy}}right)=-frac{frac{d^2t}{dy^2}}{left(frac{dt}{dy}right)^2}$$
        because to differentiate wrt $y$ we have to define which function of $y$ (not of $t$) must be considered. Thus it is not $frac{dy}{dt}$ because this is a function of $t$. It is $left(frac{dt}{dy}right)^{-1}$ which is a function of $y$ as required.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Without following your calculus, a straightforward method is :
        $$frac{d}{dy}left(frac{dy}{dt}right)=frac{d}{dy}left(frac{1}{frac{dt}{dy}}right)=-frac{frac{d^2t}{dy^2}}{left(frac{dt}{dy}right)^2}$$
        because to differentiate wrt $y$ we have to define which function of $y$ (not of $t$) must be considered. Thus it is not $frac{dy}{dt}$ because this is a function of $t$. It is $left(frac{dt}{dy}right)^{-1}$ which is a function of $y$ as required.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 14 at 6:28









        JJacquelinJJacquelin

        43.9k21853




        43.9k21853























            2












            $begingroup$

            Setting h(t,y) to y appears bogus.

            When y is a function of t, one usually writes y = y(t).

            Then $y_y = 1$, not the zero you claim, though $y_{yt}$ = 0.
            $y_t = y'$ since y is a function of t.
            $y_{ty} = y'_y$ doesn't happen because y' is not a function of y.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Why is it bogus to write $h(t,y)=y$? I see the mistake of setting $y_y=0.$ If $y'$ is not a function of $y$, then how do you differentiate it with respect to y? My professor claims we can do this for homework.
              $endgroup$
              – Melody
              Jan 14 at 0:44










            • $begingroup$
              @Melody. h = y + 0t.
              $endgroup$
              – William Elliot
              Jan 14 at 5:51












            • $begingroup$
              @Melody. d/dy dy/dt = d$^2$y/dt$^2$ × dt/dy.
              $endgroup$
              – William Elliot
              Jan 14 at 6:02


















            2












            $begingroup$

            Setting h(t,y) to y appears bogus.

            When y is a function of t, one usually writes y = y(t).

            Then $y_y = 1$, not the zero you claim, though $y_{yt}$ = 0.
            $y_t = y'$ since y is a function of t.
            $y_{ty} = y'_y$ doesn't happen because y' is not a function of y.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Why is it bogus to write $h(t,y)=y$? I see the mistake of setting $y_y=0.$ If $y'$ is not a function of $y$, then how do you differentiate it with respect to y? My professor claims we can do this for homework.
              $endgroup$
              – Melody
              Jan 14 at 0:44










            • $begingroup$
              @Melody. h = y + 0t.
              $endgroup$
              – William Elliot
              Jan 14 at 5:51












            • $begingroup$
              @Melody. d/dy dy/dt = d$^2$y/dt$^2$ × dt/dy.
              $endgroup$
              – William Elliot
              Jan 14 at 6:02
















            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Setting h(t,y) to y appears bogus.

            When y is a function of t, one usually writes y = y(t).

            Then $y_y = 1$, not the zero you claim, though $y_{yt}$ = 0.
            $y_t = y'$ since y is a function of t.
            $y_{ty} = y'_y$ doesn't happen because y' is not a function of y.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Setting h(t,y) to y appears bogus.

            When y is a function of t, one usually writes y = y(t).

            Then $y_y = 1$, not the zero you claim, though $y_{yt}$ = 0.
            $y_t = y'$ since y is a function of t.
            $y_{ty} = y'_y$ doesn't happen because y' is not a function of y.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Jan 14 at 0:05

























            answered Jan 14 at 0:00









            William ElliotWilliam Elliot

            8,1212720




            8,1212720








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Why is it bogus to write $h(t,y)=y$? I see the mistake of setting $y_y=0.$ If $y'$ is not a function of $y$, then how do you differentiate it with respect to y? My professor claims we can do this for homework.
              $endgroup$
              – Melody
              Jan 14 at 0:44










            • $begingroup$
              @Melody. h = y + 0t.
              $endgroup$
              – William Elliot
              Jan 14 at 5:51












            • $begingroup$
              @Melody. d/dy dy/dt = d$^2$y/dt$^2$ × dt/dy.
              $endgroup$
              – William Elliot
              Jan 14 at 6:02
















            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Why is it bogus to write $h(t,y)=y$? I see the mistake of setting $y_y=0.$ If $y'$ is not a function of $y$, then how do you differentiate it with respect to y? My professor claims we can do this for homework.
              $endgroup$
              – Melody
              Jan 14 at 0:44










            • $begingroup$
              @Melody. h = y + 0t.
              $endgroup$
              – William Elliot
              Jan 14 at 5:51












            • $begingroup$
              @Melody. d/dy dy/dt = d$^2$y/dt$^2$ × dt/dy.
              $endgroup$
              – William Elliot
              Jan 14 at 6:02










            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Why is it bogus to write $h(t,y)=y$? I see the mistake of setting $y_y=0.$ If $y'$ is not a function of $y$, then how do you differentiate it with respect to y? My professor claims we can do this for homework.
            $endgroup$
            – Melody
            Jan 14 at 0:44




            $begingroup$
            Why is it bogus to write $h(t,y)=y$? I see the mistake of setting $y_y=0.$ If $y'$ is not a function of $y$, then how do you differentiate it with respect to y? My professor claims we can do this for homework.
            $endgroup$
            – Melody
            Jan 14 at 0:44












            $begingroup$
            @Melody. h = y + 0t.
            $endgroup$
            – William Elliot
            Jan 14 at 5:51






            $begingroup$
            @Melody. h = y + 0t.
            $endgroup$
            – William Elliot
            Jan 14 at 5:51














            $begingroup$
            @Melody. d/dy dy/dt = d$^2$y/dt$^2$ × dt/dy.
            $endgroup$
            – William Elliot
            Jan 14 at 6:02






            $begingroup$
            @Melody. d/dy dy/dt = d$^2$y/dt$^2$ × dt/dy.
            $endgroup$
            – William Elliot
            Jan 14 at 6:02




















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072641%2fdifferentiation-the-form-fracdydt-with-respect-to-y%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith