How to match on type OR method annotation only once
I want to have a Guice interceptor that intercepts calls either to a class that is annotated, or a method that is annotated. I'd like to be able to combine both, ie. override the class annotation with a method annotation with different properties.
I have this working like this:
// Intercept all METHODS annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.any(),
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
new TracingInterceptor());
// Intercept all methods in CLASSES annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
Matchers.any(),
new TracingInterceptor());
However when I annotate a class like this:
@MyAnnotation
class MyClass {
@MyAnnotation
public void myMethod() {}
}
The interceptor gets called twice, which is bad!
Is there any way to avoid triggering the interceptor twice, but having the same behaviour?
aop guice interceptor
add a comment |
I want to have a Guice interceptor that intercepts calls either to a class that is annotated, or a method that is annotated. I'd like to be able to combine both, ie. override the class annotation with a method annotation with different properties.
I have this working like this:
// Intercept all METHODS annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.any(),
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
new TracingInterceptor());
// Intercept all methods in CLASSES annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
Matchers.any(),
new TracingInterceptor());
However when I annotate a class like this:
@MyAnnotation
class MyClass {
@MyAnnotation
public void myMethod() {}
}
The interceptor gets called twice, which is bad!
Is there any way to avoid triggering the interceptor twice, but having the same behaviour?
aop guice interceptor
add a comment |
I want to have a Guice interceptor that intercepts calls either to a class that is annotated, or a method that is annotated. I'd like to be able to combine both, ie. override the class annotation with a method annotation with different properties.
I have this working like this:
// Intercept all METHODS annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.any(),
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
new TracingInterceptor());
// Intercept all methods in CLASSES annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
Matchers.any(),
new TracingInterceptor());
However when I annotate a class like this:
@MyAnnotation
class MyClass {
@MyAnnotation
public void myMethod() {}
}
The interceptor gets called twice, which is bad!
Is there any way to avoid triggering the interceptor twice, but having the same behaviour?
aop guice interceptor
I want to have a Guice interceptor that intercepts calls either to a class that is annotated, or a method that is annotated. I'd like to be able to combine both, ie. override the class annotation with a method annotation with different properties.
I have this working like this:
// Intercept all METHODS annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.any(),
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
new TracingInterceptor());
// Intercept all methods in CLASSES annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
Matchers.any(),
new TracingInterceptor());
However when I annotate a class like this:
@MyAnnotation
class MyClass {
@MyAnnotation
public void myMethod() {}
}
The interceptor gets called twice, which is bad!
Is there any way to avoid triggering the interceptor twice, but having the same behaviour?
aop guice interceptor
aop guice interceptor
asked Nov 21 '18 at 11:31
Dieter Van de WalleDieter Van de Walle
10516
10516
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You can achieve this by making your binders mutually exclusive, like this:
// Intercept all METHODS annotated with @MyAnnotation in classes not annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.not(Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation)),
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
new TracingInterceptor());
// Intercept all methods not annotated with @MyAnnotation in CLASSES annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
Matchers.not(Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation)),
new TracingInterceptor());
// Intercept all METHODS not annotated with @MyAnnotation in CLASSES annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
new TracingInterceptor());
A bit cumbersome, but it gets the job done! Thanks!
– Dieter Van de Walle
Nov 22 '18 at 1:18
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53411162%2fhow-to-match-on-type-or-method-annotation-only-once%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can achieve this by making your binders mutually exclusive, like this:
// Intercept all METHODS annotated with @MyAnnotation in classes not annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.not(Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation)),
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
new TracingInterceptor());
// Intercept all methods not annotated with @MyAnnotation in CLASSES annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
Matchers.not(Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation)),
new TracingInterceptor());
// Intercept all METHODS not annotated with @MyAnnotation in CLASSES annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
new TracingInterceptor());
A bit cumbersome, but it gets the job done! Thanks!
– Dieter Van de Walle
Nov 22 '18 at 1:18
add a comment |
You can achieve this by making your binders mutually exclusive, like this:
// Intercept all METHODS annotated with @MyAnnotation in classes not annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.not(Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation)),
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
new TracingInterceptor());
// Intercept all methods not annotated with @MyAnnotation in CLASSES annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
Matchers.not(Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation)),
new TracingInterceptor());
// Intercept all METHODS not annotated with @MyAnnotation in CLASSES annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
new TracingInterceptor());
A bit cumbersome, but it gets the job done! Thanks!
– Dieter Van de Walle
Nov 22 '18 at 1:18
add a comment |
You can achieve this by making your binders mutually exclusive, like this:
// Intercept all METHODS annotated with @MyAnnotation in classes not annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.not(Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation)),
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
new TracingInterceptor());
// Intercept all methods not annotated with @MyAnnotation in CLASSES annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
Matchers.not(Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation)),
new TracingInterceptor());
// Intercept all METHODS not annotated with @MyAnnotation in CLASSES annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
new TracingInterceptor());
You can achieve this by making your binders mutually exclusive, like this:
// Intercept all METHODS annotated with @MyAnnotation in classes not annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.not(Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation)),
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
new TracingInterceptor());
// Intercept all methods not annotated with @MyAnnotation in CLASSES annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
Matchers.not(Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation)),
new TracingInterceptor());
// Intercept all METHODS not annotated with @MyAnnotation in CLASSES annotated with @MyAnnotation
bindInterceptor(
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
Matchers.annotatedWith(company.MyAnnotation),
new TracingInterceptor());
edited Nov 21 '18 at 22:49
answered Nov 21 '18 at 21:13
Matthew PopeMatthew Pope
1,4771612
1,4771612
A bit cumbersome, but it gets the job done! Thanks!
– Dieter Van de Walle
Nov 22 '18 at 1:18
add a comment |
A bit cumbersome, but it gets the job done! Thanks!
– Dieter Van de Walle
Nov 22 '18 at 1:18
A bit cumbersome, but it gets the job done! Thanks!
– Dieter Van de Walle
Nov 22 '18 at 1:18
A bit cumbersome, but it gets the job done! Thanks!
– Dieter Van de Walle
Nov 22 '18 at 1:18
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53411162%2fhow-to-match-on-type-or-method-annotation-only-once%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown