Is my proof that $ limlimits_{x to 2} left(x^2 - 3xright) = -2 $ correct?
$begingroup$
My proof: take $x$ such that $|{x - 2}| < 1$. Since $|{x}| -|{2}| < |{x - 2}|$, then $|{x}| < 3$.
Now we want to find a number $n$ such that $|{x - 2}| <1 leq frac{epsilon}{n} $ or $|{x - 2}| < frac{epsilon}{n} leq 1 $ and also so that $|{x - 1}| < n$, and since $|{x}| - |{1}| < |{x - 1}|$ we have that $|{x}| < n + 1$ so we can choose $n = 2$ and by definition of limit, for all $epsilon$ we have at least one $delta$ equal to the smaller between 1 and $frac{epsilon}{2}$ such that $|{x - 2}| < delta$ implies $|{x - 1}||{x - 2}| = |{x^2 - 3x - (-2)}| < frac{delta}{2} = epsilon$.
calculus limits functions proof-verification epsilon-delta
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My proof: take $x$ such that $|{x - 2}| < 1$. Since $|{x}| -|{2}| < |{x - 2}|$, then $|{x}| < 3$.
Now we want to find a number $n$ such that $|{x - 2}| <1 leq frac{epsilon}{n} $ or $|{x - 2}| < frac{epsilon}{n} leq 1 $ and also so that $|{x - 1}| < n$, and since $|{x}| - |{1}| < |{x - 1}|$ we have that $|{x}| < n + 1$ so we can choose $n = 2$ and by definition of limit, for all $epsilon$ we have at least one $delta$ equal to the smaller between 1 and $frac{epsilon}{2}$ such that $|{x - 2}| < delta$ implies $|{x - 1}||{x - 2}| = |{x^2 - 3x - (-2)}| < frac{delta}{2} = epsilon$.
calculus limits functions proof-verification epsilon-delta
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My proof: take $x$ such that $|{x - 2}| < 1$. Since $|{x}| -|{2}| < |{x - 2}|$, then $|{x}| < 3$.
Now we want to find a number $n$ such that $|{x - 2}| <1 leq frac{epsilon}{n} $ or $|{x - 2}| < frac{epsilon}{n} leq 1 $ and also so that $|{x - 1}| < n$, and since $|{x}| - |{1}| < |{x - 1}|$ we have that $|{x}| < n + 1$ so we can choose $n = 2$ and by definition of limit, for all $epsilon$ we have at least one $delta$ equal to the smaller between 1 and $frac{epsilon}{2}$ such that $|{x - 2}| < delta$ implies $|{x - 1}||{x - 2}| = |{x^2 - 3x - (-2)}| < frac{delta}{2} = epsilon$.
calculus limits functions proof-verification epsilon-delta
$endgroup$
My proof: take $x$ such that $|{x - 2}| < 1$. Since $|{x}| -|{2}| < |{x - 2}|$, then $|{x}| < 3$.
Now we want to find a number $n$ such that $|{x - 2}| <1 leq frac{epsilon}{n} $ or $|{x - 2}| < frac{epsilon}{n} leq 1 $ and also so that $|{x - 1}| < n$, and since $|{x}| - |{1}| < |{x - 1}|$ we have that $|{x}| < n + 1$ so we can choose $n = 2$ and by definition of limit, for all $epsilon$ we have at least one $delta$ equal to the smaller between 1 and $frac{epsilon}{2}$ such that $|{x - 2}| < delta$ implies $|{x - 1}||{x - 2}| = |{x^2 - 3x - (-2)}| < frac{delta}{2} = epsilon$.
calculus limits functions proof-verification epsilon-delta
calculus limits functions proof-verification epsilon-delta
edited Jan 12 at 17:37
rtybase
10.9k21533
10.9k21533
asked Jan 12 at 17:26
ArielKArielK
386
386
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, it is not correct. In the first place, you start talking about a number $n$ without saying what that number is. And then you state that, by definition of limit, a certain $delta$ must exist. But the goal is to prove that such a $delta$ exists. And how do you know that $1leqslantfracvarepsilon n$?
You can do it as follows: start assuming that $lvert x-2rvert<1$. It follows from this that $lvert x-1rvert<2$. Now, given $varepsilon>0$, take $delta=minleft{fracvarepsilon2,1right}$. Then, since $x^2-3x-(-2)=(x-1)(x-2)$, assuming that $lvert x-2rvert<delta$, you havebegin{align}lvert x^2-3x-(-2)rvert&=bigllvert(x-1)(x-2)bigrrvert\&=lvert x-1rvert.lvert x-2rvert\&<2timesfracvarepsilon2\&=varepsilon.end{align}
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you José :) , that was what I meant actually but I didn't knew how to write it properly in English
$endgroup$
– ArielK
Jan 12 at 17:44
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071145%2fis-my-proof-that-lim-limits-x-to-2-leftx2-3x-right-2-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, it is not correct. In the first place, you start talking about a number $n$ without saying what that number is. And then you state that, by definition of limit, a certain $delta$ must exist. But the goal is to prove that such a $delta$ exists. And how do you know that $1leqslantfracvarepsilon n$?
You can do it as follows: start assuming that $lvert x-2rvert<1$. It follows from this that $lvert x-1rvert<2$. Now, given $varepsilon>0$, take $delta=minleft{fracvarepsilon2,1right}$. Then, since $x^2-3x-(-2)=(x-1)(x-2)$, assuming that $lvert x-2rvert<delta$, you havebegin{align}lvert x^2-3x-(-2)rvert&=bigllvert(x-1)(x-2)bigrrvert\&=lvert x-1rvert.lvert x-2rvert\&<2timesfracvarepsilon2\&=varepsilon.end{align}
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you José :) , that was what I meant actually but I didn't knew how to write it properly in English
$endgroup$
– ArielK
Jan 12 at 17:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, it is not correct. In the first place, you start talking about a number $n$ without saying what that number is. And then you state that, by definition of limit, a certain $delta$ must exist. But the goal is to prove that such a $delta$ exists. And how do you know that $1leqslantfracvarepsilon n$?
You can do it as follows: start assuming that $lvert x-2rvert<1$. It follows from this that $lvert x-1rvert<2$. Now, given $varepsilon>0$, take $delta=minleft{fracvarepsilon2,1right}$. Then, since $x^2-3x-(-2)=(x-1)(x-2)$, assuming that $lvert x-2rvert<delta$, you havebegin{align}lvert x^2-3x-(-2)rvert&=bigllvert(x-1)(x-2)bigrrvert\&=lvert x-1rvert.lvert x-2rvert\&<2timesfracvarepsilon2\&=varepsilon.end{align}
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you José :) , that was what I meant actually but I didn't knew how to write it properly in English
$endgroup$
– ArielK
Jan 12 at 17:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, it is not correct. In the first place, you start talking about a number $n$ without saying what that number is. And then you state that, by definition of limit, a certain $delta$ must exist. But the goal is to prove that such a $delta$ exists. And how do you know that $1leqslantfracvarepsilon n$?
You can do it as follows: start assuming that $lvert x-2rvert<1$. It follows from this that $lvert x-1rvert<2$. Now, given $varepsilon>0$, take $delta=minleft{fracvarepsilon2,1right}$. Then, since $x^2-3x-(-2)=(x-1)(x-2)$, assuming that $lvert x-2rvert<delta$, you havebegin{align}lvert x^2-3x-(-2)rvert&=bigllvert(x-1)(x-2)bigrrvert\&=lvert x-1rvert.lvert x-2rvert\&<2timesfracvarepsilon2\&=varepsilon.end{align}
$endgroup$
No, it is not correct. In the first place, you start talking about a number $n$ without saying what that number is. And then you state that, by definition of limit, a certain $delta$ must exist. But the goal is to prove that such a $delta$ exists. And how do you know that $1leqslantfracvarepsilon n$?
You can do it as follows: start assuming that $lvert x-2rvert<1$. It follows from this that $lvert x-1rvert<2$. Now, given $varepsilon>0$, take $delta=minleft{fracvarepsilon2,1right}$. Then, since $x^2-3x-(-2)=(x-1)(x-2)$, assuming that $lvert x-2rvert<delta$, you havebegin{align}lvert x^2-3x-(-2)rvert&=bigllvert(x-1)(x-2)bigrrvert\&=lvert x-1rvert.lvert x-2rvert\&<2timesfracvarepsilon2\&=varepsilon.end{align}
answered Jan 12 at 17:36
José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos
160k22127232
160k22127232
$begingroup$
Thank you José :) , that was what I meant actually but I didn't knew how to write it properly in English
$endgroup$
– ArielK
Jan 12 at 17:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you José :) , that was what I meant actually but I didn't knew how to write it properly in English
$endgroup$
– ArielK
Jan 12 at 17:44
$begingroup$
Thank you José :) , that was what I meant actually but I didn't knew how to write it properly in English
$endgroup$
– ArielK
Jan 12 at 17:44
$begingroup$
Thank you José :) , that was what I meant actually but I didn't knew how to write it properly in English
$endgroup$
– ArielK
Jan 12 at 17:44
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071145%2fis-my-proof-that-lim-limits-x-to-2-leftx2-3x-right-2-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown