How to specify the library of the operator %+% such as pkg:: or pkg:::
The operator %+%
are used in two packages, i.e., ggplot2
and crayou
.
The function %+%
in crayon
sometimes not work, I think the operator %+%
are considered in ggplot2
. I try to identify by crayon::%+%
but this does not work.
cat(green(
'I am a green line ' %+%
blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') %+%
' that becomes green again!'
))
---- based on comments : I think the following error occur for my miss understanding--------
I try to run the following code using crayon::(backtick)%+%(backtick)
instead of %+%
cat(green(
'I am a green line ' crayon::`%+%`
blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') crayon::`%+%`
' that becomes green again!'
))
But the following error occurs:
> cat(green(
+ 'I am a green line ' crayon::`%+%`
Error: unexpected symbol in:
"cat(green(
'I am a green line ' crayon"
> blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') crayon::`%+%`
Error: unexpected symbol in " blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') crayon"
> ' that becomes green again!'
[1] " that becomes green again!"
> ))
Error: unexpected ')' in ")"
r ggplot2
add a comment |
The operator %+%
are used in two packages, i.e., ggplot2
and crayou
.
The function %+%
in crayon
sometimes not work, I think the operator %+%
are considered in ggplot2
. I try to identify by crayon::%+%
but this does not work.
cat(green(
'I am a green line ' %+%
blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') %+%
' that becomes green again!'
))
---- based on comments : I think the following error occur for my miss understanding--------
I try to run the following code using crayon::(backtick)%+%(backtick)
instead of %+%
cat(green(
'I am a green line ' crayon::`%+%`
blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') crayon::`%+%`
' that becomes green again!'
))
But the following error occurs:
> cat(green(
+ 'I am a green line ' crayon::`%+%`
Error: unexpected symbol in:
"cat(green(
'I am a green line ' crayon"
> blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') crayon::`%+%`
Error: unexpected symbol in " blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') crayon"
> ' that becomes green again!'
[1] " that becomes green again!"
> ))
Error: unexpected ')' in ")"
r ggplot2
3
try it with backticks, e.g. ggplot2::(backtick)%+%(backtick) -- unfortunately if I use backtick in comments it converts to code formating
– gfgm
Nov 21 '18 at 10:31
1
Theimport
package also has a mechanism to deal with this kind of situation, withimport::from(ggplot2, "+")
for example.
– meriops
Nov 21 '18 at 11:14
3
crayon::`%+%`
(just put backslashes before the backtick @gfgm)
– hrbrmstr
Nov 21 '18 at 12:42
Thank you @gfgm,and @hrbrmstr. I try the codecrayon::
%+%`, however it does not go well.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 0:30
Thank you @meriops, I develop some package, so I can understand what you say and I think#'@importFrom crayon %+%
may give the same solution ? Thank you for letting me the way uselibrary(import")
, I did not know this package.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 0:37
add a comment |
The operator %+%
are used in two packages, i.e., ggplot2
and crayou
.
The function %+%
in crayon
sometimes not work, I think the operator %+%
are considered in ggplot2
. I try to identify by crayon::%+%
but this does not work.
cat(green(
'I am a green line ' %+%
blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') %+%
' that becomes green again!'
))
---- based on comments : I think the following error occur for my miss understanding--------
I try to run the following code using crayon::(backtick)%+%(backtick)
instead of %+%
cat(green(
'I am a green line ' crayon::`%+%`
blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') crayon::`%+%`
' that becomes green again!'
))
But the following error occurs:
> cat(green(
+ 'I am a green line ' crayon::`%+%`
Error: unexpected symbol in:
"cat(green(
'I am a green line ' crayon"
> blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') crayon::`%+%`
Error: unexpected symbol in " blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') crayon"
> ' that becomes green again!'
[1] " that becomes green again!"
> ))
Error: unexpected ')' in ")"
r ggplot2
The operator %+%
are used in two packages, i.e., ggplot2
and crayou
.
The function %+%
in crayon
sometimes not work, I think the operator %+%
are considered in ggplot2
. I try to identify by crayon::%+%
but this does not work.
cat(green(
'I am a green line ' %+%
blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') %+%
' that becomes green again!'
))
---- based on comments : I think the following error occur for my miss understanding--------
I try to run the following code using crayon::(backtick)%+%(backtick)
instead of %+%
cat(green(
'I am a green line ' crayon::`%+%`
blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') crayon::`%+%`
' that becomes green again!'
))
But the following error occurs:
> cat(green(
+ 'I am a green line ' crayon::`%+%`
Error: unexpected symbol in:
"cat(green(
'I am a green line ' crayon"
> blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') crayon::`%+%`
Error: unexpected symbol in " blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') crayon"
> ' that becomes green again!'
[1] " that becomes green again!"
> ))
Error: unexpected ')' in ")"
r ggplot2
r ggplot2
edited Nov 22 '18 at 3:00
Camford Oxbridge
asked Nov 21 '18 at 10:20
Camford OxbridgeCamford Oxbridge
1019
1019
3
try it with backticks, e.g. ggplot2::(backtick)%+%(backtick) -- unfortunately if I use backtick in comments it converts to code formating
– gfgm
Nov 21 '18 at 10:31
1
Theimport
package also has a mechanism to deal with this kind of situation, withimport::from(ggplot2, "+")
for example.
– meriops
Nov 21 '18 at 11:14
3
crayon::`%+%`
(just put backslashes before the backtick @gfgm)
– hrbrmstr
Nov 21 '18 at 12:42
Thank you @gfgm,and @hrbrmstr. I try the codecrayon::
%+%`, however it does not go well.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 0:30
Thank you @meriops, I develop some package, so I can understand what you say and I think#'@importFrom crayon %+%
may give the same solution ? Thank you for letting me the way uselibrary(import")
, I did not know this package.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 0:37
add a comment |
3
try it with backticks, e.g. ggplot2::(backtick)%+%(backtick) -- unfortunately if I use backtick in comments it converts to code formating
– gfgm
Nov 21 '18 at 10:31
1
Theimport
package also has a mechanism to deal with this kind of situation, withimport::from(ggplot2, "+")
for example.
– meriops
Nov 21 '18 at 11:14
3
crayon::`%+%`
(just put backslashes before the backtick @gfgm)
– hrbrmstr
Nov 21 '18 at 12:42
Thank you @gfgm,and @hrbrmstr. I try the codecrayon::
%+%`, however it does not go well.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 0:30
Thank you @meriops, I develop some package, so I can understand what you say and I think#'@importFrom crayon %+%
may give the same solution ? Thank you for letting me the way uselibrary(import")
, I did not know this package.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 0:37
3
3
try it with backticks, e.g. ggplot2::(backtick)%+%(backtick) -- unfortunately if I use backtick in comments it converts to code formating
– gfgm
Nov 21 '18 at 10:31
try it with backticks, e.g. ggplot2::(backtick)%+%(backtick) -- unfortunately if I use backtick in comments it converts to code formating
– gfgm
Nov 21 '18 at 10:31
1
1
The
import
package also has a mechanism to deal with this kind of situation, with import::from(ggplot2, "+")
for example.– meriops
Nov 21 '18 at 11:14
The
import
package also has a mechanism to deal with this kind of situation, with import::from(ggplot2, "+")
for example.– meriops
Nov 21 '18 at 11:14
3
3
crayon::`%+%`
(just put backslashes before the backtick @gfgm)– hrbrmstr
Nov 21 '18 at 12:42
crayon::`%+%`
(just put backslashes before the backtick @gfgm)– hrbrmstr
Nov 21 '18 at 12:42
Thank you @gfgm,and @hrbrmstr. I try the code
crayon::
%+%`, however it does not go well.– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 0:30
Thank you @gfgm,and @hrbrmstr. I try the code
crayon::
%+%`, however it does not go well.– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 0:30
Thank you @meriops, I develop some package, so I can understand what you say and I think
#'@importFrom crayon %+%
may give the same solution ? Thank you for letting me the way use library(import")
, I did not know this package.– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 0:37
Thank you @meriops, I develop some package, so I can understand what you say and I think
#'@importFrom crayon %+%
may give the same solution ? Thank you for letting me the way use library(import")
, I did not know this package.– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 0:37
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
One option is to not library(crayon)
or requireNamespace(crayon)
and fully qualify all crayon
references:
cat(crayon::green(
'I am a green line ' %c+%
crayon::blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') crayon::`%+%`
' that becomes green again!'
))
That's annoying, though. So, you can also hand-import and rename things you need without the need for a separate, non-core package:
`%c+%` <- getFromNamespace("%+%", "crayon") # changed to not break other things
green <- getFromNamespace("green", "crayon")
blue <- getFromNamespace("blue", "crayon")
cat(green(
'I am a green line ' %c+%
blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') %c+%
' that becomes green again!'
))
I can’t think of such good codes. Allow me to use your code in my package.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 0:47
Note that the first code of@hrbrmstr
's does not go well ( even if after fixing from $%c+%$ to $%+%$. So, as I said in above comment,crayon::(backtick)%+%(backtick)
does not go well.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 1:15
You are doing something amiss then
– hrbrmstr
Nov 22 '18 at 2:49
So many people suggest the codecrayon::(backtick)%+%(backtick)
, it would go well in their PC. I think I am somthing wrong, but I cannot come up.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 2:58
I guess I'd also add "what are these superfluous colors adding to your message that plaintext can't convey?" but ultra-sensitive SO moderators might interpret that as being mean (so I can't "win" either way)
– hrbrmstr
Nov 22 '18 at 3:07
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53409877%2fhow-to-specify-the-library-of-the-operator-such-as-pkg-or-pkg%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
One option is to not library(crayon)
or requireNamespace(crayon)
and fully qualify all crayon
references:
cat(crayon::green(
'I am a green line ' %c+%
crayon::blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') crayon::`%+%`
' that becomes green again!'
))
That's annoying, though. So, you can also hand-import and rename things you need without the need for a separate, non-core package:
`%c+%` <- getFromNamespace("%+%", "crayon") # changed to not break other things
green <- getFromNamespace("green", "crayon")
blue <- getFromNamespace("blue", "crayon")
cat(green(
'I am a green line ' %c+%
blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') %c+%
' that becomes green again!'
))
I can’t think of such good codes. Allow me to use your code in my package.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 0:47
Note that the first code of@hrbrmstr
's does not go well ( even if after fixing from $%c+%$ to $%+%$. So, as I said in above comment,crayon::(backtick)%+%(backtick)
does not go well.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 1:15
You are doing something amiss then
– hrbrmstr
Nov 22 '18 at 2:49
So many people suggest the codecrayon::(backtick)%+%(backtick)
, it would go well in their PC. I think I am somthing wrong, but I cannot come up.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 2:58
I guess I'd also add "what are these superfluous colors adding to your message that plaintext can't convey?" but ultra-sensitive SO moderators might interpret that as being mean (so I can't "win" either way)
– hrbrmstr
Nov 22 '18 at 3:07
|
show 1 more comment
One option is to not library(crayon)
or requireNamespace(crayon)
and fully qualify all crayon
references:
cat(crayon::green(
'I am a green line ' %c+%
crayon::blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') crayon::`%+%`
' that becomes green again!'
))
That's annoying, though. So, you can also hand-import and rename things you need without the need for a separate, non-core package:
`%c+%` <- getFromNamespace("%+%", "crayon") # changed to not break other things
green <- getFromNamespace("green", "crayon")
blue <- getFromNamespace("blue", "crayon")
cat(green(
'I am a green line ' %c+%
blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') %c+%
' that becomes green again!'
))
I can’t think of such good codes. Allow me to use your code in my package.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 0:47
Note that the first code of@hrbrmstr
's does not go well ( even if after fixing from $%c+%$ to $%+%$. So, as I said in above comment,crayon::(backtick)%+%(backtick)
does not go well.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 1:15
You are doing something amiss then
– hrbrmstr
Nov 22 '18 at 2:49
So many people suggest the codecrayon::(backtick)%+%(backtick)
, it would go well in their PC. I think I am somthing wrong, but I cannot come up.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 2:58
I guess I'd also add "what are these superfluous colors adding to your message that plaintext can't convey?" but ultra-sensitive SO moderators might interpret that as being mean (so I can't "win" either way)
– hrbrmstr
Nov 22 '18 at 3:07
|
show 1 more comment
One option is to not library(crayon)
or requireNamespace(crayon)
and fully qualify all crayon
references:
cat(crayon::green(
'I am a green line ' %c+%
crayon::blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') crayon::`%+%`
' that becomes green again!'
))
That's annoying, though. So, you can also hand-import and rename things you need without the need for a separate, non-core package:
`%c+%` <- getFromNamespace("%+%", "crayon") # changed to not break other things
green <- getFromNamespace("green", "crayon")
blue <- getFromNamespace("blue", "crayon")
cat(green(
'I am a green line ' %c+%
blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') %c+%
' that becomes green again!'
))
One option is to not library(crayon)
or requireNamespace(crayon)
and fully qualify all crayon
references:
cat(crayon::green(
'I am a green line ' %c+%
crayon::blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') crayon::`%+%`
' that becomes green again!'
))
That's annoying, though. So, you can also hand-import and rename things you need without the need for a separate, non-core package:
`%c+%` <- getFromNamespace("%+%", "crayon") # changed to not break other things
green <- getFromNamespace("green", "crayon")
blue <- getFromNamespace("blue", "crayon")
cat(green(
'I am a green line ' %c+%
blue$underline$bold('with a blue substring') %c+%
' that becomes green again!'
))
answered Nov 21 '18 at 12:49
hrbrmstrhrbrmstr
60.9k688150
60.9k688150
I can’t think of such good codes. Allow me to use your code in my package.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 0:47
Note that the first code of@hrbrmstr
's does not go well ( even if after fixing from $%c+%$ to $%+%$. So, as I said in above comment,crayon::(backtick)%+%(backtick)
does not go well.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 1:15
You are doing something amiss then
– hrbrmstr
Nov 22 '18 at 2:49
So many people suggest the codecrayon::(backtick)%+%(backtick)
, it would go well in their PC. I think I am somthing wrong, but I cannot come up.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 2:58
I guess I'd also add "what are these superfluous colors adding to your message that plaintext can't convey?" but ultra-sensitive SO moderators might interpret that as being mean (so I can't "win" either way)
– hrbrmstr
Nov 22 '18 at 3:07
|
show 1 more comment
I can’t think of such good codes. Allow me to use your code in my package.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 0:47
Note that the first code of@hrbrmstr
's does not go well ( even if after fixing from $%c+%$ to $%+%$. So, as I said in above comment,crayon::(backtick)%+%(backtick)
does not go well.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 1:15
You are doing something amiss then
– hrbrmstr
Nov 22 '18 at 2:49
So many people suggest the codecrayon::(backtick)%+%(backtick)
, it would go well in their PC. I think I am somthing wrong, but I cannot come up.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 2:58
I guess I'd also add "what are these superfluous colors adding to your message that plaintext can't convey?" but ultra-sensitive SO moderators might interpret that as being mean (so I can't "win" either way)
– hrbrmstr
Nov 22 '18 at 3:07
I can’t think of such good codes. Allow me to use your code in my package.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 0:47
I can’t think of such good codes. Allow me to use your code in my package.
– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 0:47
Note that the first code of
@hrbrmstr
's does not go well ( even if after fixing from $%c+%$ to $%+%$. So, as I said in above comment, crayon::(backtick)%+%(backtick)
does not go well.– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 1:15
Note that the first code of
@hrbrmstr
's does not go well ( even if after fixing from $%c+%$ to $%+%$. So, as I said in above comment, crayon::(backtick)%+%(backtick)
does not go well.– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 1:15
You are doing something amiss then
– hrbrmstr
Nov 22 '18 at 2:49
You are doing something amiss then
– hrbrmstr
Nov 22 '18 at 2:49
So many people suggest the code
crayon::(backtick)%+%(backtick)
, it would go well in their PC. I think I am somthing wrong, but I cannot come up.– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 2:58
So many people suggest the code
crayon::(backtick)%+%(backtick)
, it would go well in their PC. I think I am somthing wrong, but I cannot come up.– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 2:58
I guess I'd also add "what are these superfluous colors adding to your message that plaintext can't convey?" but ultra-sensitive SO moderators might interpret that as being mean (so I can't "win" either way)
– hrbrmstr
Nov 22 '18 at 3:07
I guess I'd also add "what are these superfluous colors adding to your message that plaintext can't convey?" but ultra-sensitive SO moderators might interpret that as being mean (so I can't "win" either way)
– hrbrmstr
Nov 22 '18 at 3:07
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53409877%2fhow-to-specify-the-library-of-the-operator-such-as-pkg-or-pkg%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
try it with backticks, e.g. ggplot2::(backtick)%+%(backtick) -- unfortunately if I use backtick in comments it converts to code formating
– gfgm
Nov 21 '18 at 10:31
1
The
import
package also has a mechanism to deal with this kind of situation, withimport::from(ggplot2, "+")
for example.– meriops
Nov 21 '18 at 11:14
3
crayon::`%+%`
(just put backslashes before the backtick @gfgm)– hrbrmstr
Nov 21 '18 at 12:42
Thank you @gfgm,and @hrbrmstr. I try the code
crayon::
%+%`, however it does not go well.– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 0:30
Thank you @meriops, I develop some package, so I can understand what you say and I think
#'@importFrom crayon %+%
may give the same solution ? Thank you for letting me the way uselibrary(import")
, I did not know this package.– Camford Oxbridge
Nov 22 '18 at 0:37