Matrix norm for two matrices simultaneously close to spectral radius












2












$begingroup$


Suppose $A$ and $B$ have the same spectral radius $rho$. We can find a norm $|| cdot ||_A $ s.t. $||A||_A - epsilon < rho$. We can likewise find a another norm s.t. $||B||_B - epsilon < rho$. Under what conditions can we find a norm $||cdot||_*$ s.t. both $$||A||_* - epsilon < rho $$ and $$||B||_* - epsilon < rho. $$ Having done some digging it would seem one sufficient condition would be for $A$ and $B$ to be normal and another for the matrices to be simultaneously diagonalizable. Is there a necessary and sufficient condition?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It is also sufficient for $A$ and $B$ to be simultaneously upper triangularizable, but if normality is enough then this isn't a necessary condition.
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 11 at 6:08












  • $begingroup$
    Do you know if there exists a pair $A,B$ where there is no such norm? Off the top of my head, I would think that $$ pmatrix{0&1\0&0}, quad pmatrix{0&0\1&0} $$ might be such a pair
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 11 at 6:10








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Notably, any norm satisfies $|AB| leq |A| , |B|$, so we must have $$ |B| geq frac{|AB|}{|A|} geq frac{rho(AB)}{rho + epsilon} $$ it follows that $rho(AB) leq rho^2$ is a necessary condition, but I don't know if this condition is also sufficient.
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 11 at 6:18
















2












$begingroup$


Suppose $A$ and $B$ have the same spectral radius $rho$. We can find a norm $|| cdot ||_A $ s.t. $||A||_A - epsilon < rho$. We can likewise find a another norm s.t. $||B||_B - epsilon < rho$. Under what conditions can we find a norm $||cdot||_*$ s.t. both $$||A||_* - epsilon < rho $$ and $$||B||_* - epsilon < rho. $$ Having done some digging it would seem one sufficient condition would be for $A$ and $B$ to be normal and another for the matrices to be simultaneously diagonalizable. Is there a necessary and sufficient condition?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It is also sufficient for $A$ and $B$ to be simultaneously upper triangularizable, but if normality is enough then this isn't a necessary condition.
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 11 at 6:08












  • $begingroup$
    Do you know if there exists a pair $A,B$ where there is no such norm? Off the top of my head, I would think that $$ pmatrix{0&1\0&0}, quad pmatrix{0&0\1&0} $$ might be such a pair
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 11 at 6:10








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Notably, any norm satisfies $|AB| leq |A| , |B|$, so we must have $$ |B| geq frac{|AB|}{|A|} geq frac{rho(AB)}{rho + epsilon} $$ it follows that $rho(AB) leq rho^2$ is a necessary condition, but I don't know if this condition is also sufficient.
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 11 at 6:18














2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


Suppose $A$ and $B$ have the same spectral radius $rho$. We can find a norm $|| cdot ||_A $ s.t. $||A||_A - epsilon < rho$. We can likewise find a another norm s.t. $||B||_B - epsilon < rho$. Under what conditions can we find a norm $||cdot||_*$ s.t. both $$||A||_* - epsilon < rho $$ and $$||B||_* - epsilon < rho. $$ Having done some digging it would seem one sufficient condition would be for $A$ and $B$ to be normal and another for the matrices to be simultaneously diagonalizable. Is there a necessary and sufficient condition?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Suppose $A$ and $B$ have the same spectral radius $rho$. We can find a norm $|| cdot ||_A $ s.t. $||A||_A - epsilon < rho$. We can likewise find a another norm s.t. $||B||_B - epsilon < rho$. Under what conditions can we find a norm $||cdot||_*$ s.t. both $$||A||_* - epsilon < rho $$ and $$||B||_* - epsilon < rho. $$ Having done some digging it would seem one sufficient condition would be for $A$ and $B$ to be normal and another for the matrices to be simultaneously diagonalizable. Is there a necessary and sufficient condition?







linear-algebra matrix-norms






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 11 at 2:53









JaMcJaMc

112




112












  • $begingroup$
    It is also sufficient for $A$ and $B$ to be simultaneously upper triangularizable, but if normality is enough then this isn't a necessary condition.
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 11 at 6:08












  • $begingroup$
    Do you know if there exists a pair $A,B$ where there is no such norm? Off the top of my head, I would think that $$ pmatrix{0&1\0&0}, quad pmatrix{0&0\1&0} $$ might be such a pair
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 11 at 6:10








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Notably, any norm satisfies $|AB| leq |A| , |B|$, so we must have $$ |B| geq frac{|AB|}{|A|} geq frac{rho(AB)}{rho + epsilon} $$ it follows that $rho(AB) leq rho^2$ is a necessary condition, but I don't know if this condition is also sufficient.
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 11 at 6:18


















  • $begingroup$
    It is also sufficient for $A$ and $B$ to be simultaneously upper triangularizable, but if normality is enough then this isn't a necessary condition.
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 11 at 6:08












  • $begingroup$
    Do you know if there exists a pair $A,B$ where there is no such norm? Off the top of my head, I would think that $$ pmatrix{0&1\0&0}, quad pmatrix{0&0\1&0} $$ might be such a pair
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 11 at 6:10








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Notably, any norm satisfies $|AB| leq |A| , |B|$, so we must have $$ |B| geq frac{|AB|}{|A|} geq frac{rho(AB)}{rho + epsilon} $$ it follows that $rho(AB) leq rho^2$ is a necessary condition, but I don't know if this condition is also sufficient.
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 11 at 6:18
















$begingroup$
It is also sufficient for $A$ and $B$ to be simultaneously upper triangularizable, but if normality is enough then this isn't a necessary condition.
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Jan 11 at 6:08






$begingroup$
It is also sufficient for $A$ and $B$ to be simultaneously upper triangularizable, but if normality is enough then this isn't a necessary condition.
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Jan 11 at 6:08














$begingroup$
Do you know if there exists a pair $A,B$ where there is no such norm? Off the top of my head, I would think that $$ pmatrix{0&1\0&0}, quad pmatrix{0&0\1&0} $$ might be such a pair
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Jan 11 at 6:10






$begingroup$
Do you know if there exists a pair $A,B$ where there is no such norm? Off the top of my head, I would think that $$ pmatrix{0&1\0&0}, quad pmatrix{0&0\1&0} $$ might be such a pair
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Jan 11 at 6:10






1




1




$begingroup$
Notably, any norm satisfies $|AB| leq |A| , |B|$, so we must have $$ |B| geq frac{|AB|}{|A|} geq frac{rho(AB)}{rho + epsilon} $$ it follows that $rho(AB) leq rho^2$ is a necessary condition, but I don't know if this condition is also sufficient.
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Jan 11 at 6:18




$begingroup$
Notably, any norm satisfies $|AB| leq |A| , |B|$, so we must have $$ |B| geq frac{|AB|}{|A|} geq frac{rho(AB)}{rho + epsilon} $$ it follows that $rho(AB) leq rho^2$ is a necessary condition, but I don't know if this condition is also sufficient.
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Jan 11 at 6:18










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3069435%2fmatrix-norm-for-two-matrices-simultaneously-close-to-spectral-radius%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3069435%2fmatrix-norm-for-two-matrices-simultaneously-close-to-spectral-radius%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

ts Property 'filter' does not exist on type '{}'

Notepad++ export/extract a list of installed plugins