Different behavior with Ubuntu and Windows












0















I have cloned an app from Github onto a Ubuntu and a Windows machine separately. The app's package.json has in devDependencies, among lots of others:



"grunt": "^1.0.3",

"grunt-karma": "^3.0.0",

"karma": "^3.3.3"


One of the packages, grunt-karma has a package.json that specifies:



"peerDependencies": {

   "grunt": ">=0.4.x || ^1.0.0",

   "karma": "^0.13.0 || ^1.0.0"

}


When I run npm install at the app level, the Windows version (6.1.0) will say that:




npm WARN grunt-karma@3.0.0 requires a peer of karma@^0.13.0 || ^1.0.0 but none is installed. You must install peer dependencies yourself.




The Ubuntu version (5.6.0), however, does not have this warning. I checked inside the grunt-karma folder and there isn't a separate karma version (there isn't a node_modules sub-folder).



What is causing the two to behave differently? Will the Ubuntu version run properly without me taking further actions






npm npm-install







share|improve this question





























    0















    I have cloned an app from Github onto a Ubuntu and a Windows machine separately. The app's package.json has in devDependencies, among lots of others:



    "grunt": "^1.0.3",
    
"grunt-karma": "^3.0.0",
    
"karma": "^3.3.3"


    One of the packages, grunt-karma has a package.json that specifies:



    "peerDependencies": {
    
   "grunt": ">=0.4.x || ^1.0.0",
    
   "karma": "^0.13.0 || ^1.0.0"
    
}


    When I run npm install at the app level, the Windows version (6.1.0) will say that:




    npm WARN grunt-karma@3.0.0 requires a peer of karma@^0.13.0 || ^1.0.0 but none is installed. You must install peer dependencies yourself.




    The Ubuntu version (5.6.0), however, does not have this warning. I checked inside the grunt-karma folder and there isn't a separate karma version (there isn't a node_modules sub-folder).



    What is causing the two to behave differently? Will the Ubuntu version run properly without me taking further actions






    npm npm-install







    share|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0








      I have cloned an app from Github onto a Ubuntu and a Windows machine separately. The app's package.json has in devDependencies, among lots of others:



      "grunt": "^1.0.3",
      
"grunt-karma": "^3.0.0",
      
"karma": "^3.3.3"


      One of the packages, grunt-karma has a package.json that specifies:



      "peerDependencies": {
      
   "grunt": ">=0.4.x || ^1.0.0",
      
   "karma": "^0.13.0 || ^1.0.0"
      
}


      When I run npm install at the app level, the Windows version (6.1.0) will say that:




      npm WARN grunt-karma@3.0.0 requires a peer of karma@^0.13.0 || ^1.0.0 but none is installed. You must install peer dependencies yourself.




      The Ubuntu version (5.6.0), however, does not have this warning. I checked inside the grunt-karma folder and there isn't a separate karma version (there isn't a node_modules sub-folder).



      What is causing the two to behave differently? Will the Ubuntu version run properly without me taking further actions






      npm npm-install







      share|improve this question
















      I have cloned an app from Github onto a Ubuntu and a Windows machine separately. The app's package.json has in devDependencies, among lots of others:



      "grunt": "^1.0.3",
      
"grunt-karma": "^3.0.0",
      
"karma": "^3.3.3"


      One of the packages, grunt-karma has a package.json that specifies:



      "peerDependencies": {
      
   "grunt": ">=0.4.x || ^1.0.0",
      
   "karma": "^0.13.0 || ^1.0.0"
      
}


      When I run npm install at the app level, the Windows version (6.1.0) will say that:




      npm WARN grunt-karma@3.0.0 requires a peer of karma@^0.13.0 || ^1.0.0 but none is installed. You must install peer dependencies yourself.




      The Ubuntu version (5.6.0), however, does not have this warning. I checked inside the grunt-karma folder and there isn't a separate karma version (there isn't a node_modules sub-folder).



      What is causing the two to behave differently? Will the Ubuntu version run properly without me taking further actions






      npm npm-install




      npm npm-install






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 22 '18 at 7:47







      Old Geezer

















      asked Nov 21 '18 at 6:58









      Old GeezerOld Geezer

      3,8931150100




      3,8931150100
























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53406751%2fdifferent-behavior-with-ubuntu-and-windows%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53406751%2fdifferent-behavior-with-ubuntu-and-windows%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

          Image
          28 6 $begingroup$ Per the Font of Magic feature, sorcerer can use Flexible Casting to create 5th-level spell slots at level 7, even though they are not typically available until level 9. You can transform unexpended sorcery points into one spell slot as a bonus action on your turn. The Creating Spell Slots table shows the cost of creating a spell slot of [5th level is 7] If such a sorcerer levels up while still having this 5th-level spell slot, can they choose a 5th-level spell as the spell they gain upon levelling up? The Spellcasting feature states: Additionally, when you gain a level in this class, you can choose one of the sorcerer spells you know and replace it with another spell from the sorcerer spell list, which also must be of a level for which you have spell slots.
          Read more

          ts Property 'filter' does not exist on type '{}'

          Image
          1 I'm trying to follow Angular Material guide to create a custom filter for autocomplete input text https://material.angular.io/components/autocomplete/overview This is what I have TS import { Component, OnInit } from '@angular/core'; import { TemplateRef } from '@angular/core'; import { FormControl } from "@angular/forms"; import { Observable } from "rxjs"; import { map, startWith, filter } from 'rxjs/operators'; (...) export class AppComponent implements OnInit { title = 'Your Profile'; displayedColumns: string = ['selected', 'name', 'description', 'pnr']; dataSource = ELEMENT_DATA; myControl = new FormControl(); options: any = ['One', 'Two', 'Three']; filteredOptions:
          Read more

          mat-slide-toggle shouldn't change it's state when I click cancel in confirmation window

          Image
          1 When I checked the slide toggle it should work as expected. But when I try to uncheck it there is a confirmation window asking if you are sure. When I click cancel in that confirmation window, still the toggle changes to unchecked, which shouldn't happen. It should stay in the same state. Here is my Html and TS Code // html <mat-slide-toggle (change)="change($event)" [checked]="isChecked()" > To-pay </mat-slide-toggle> TS code: // ts change(e) { if(this.checked) { if(confirm("Are you sure")) { console.log("toggle") } else { e.stopPropagation(); console.log("toggle should not change if I click the cancel button") }
          Read more