Show that the set $z$ satisfying $|z-z_0|=rho|z-z_1|$ ($rho neq 1$) is a circle.
$begingroup$
Prove that for $rho ge 0$, $rho neq 1$ and fix $z_0,z_1 in Bbb C$. Show that the set $z in Bbb C$ satisfying $|z-z_0|=rho|z-z_1|$ is a circle.
From the given condition I have reached that $(1-rho^2)|z|^2 -2mathfrak{Re} (bar z (z_0-rho^2 z_1)) + |z_0|^2 -rho^2|z_1|^2=0$
But I do not get my desired result.
complex-analysis complex-numbers
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Prove that for $rho ge 0$, $rho neq 1$ and fix $z_0,z_1 in Bbb C$. Show that the set $z in Bbb C$ satisfying $|z-z_0|=rho|z-z_1|$ is a circle.
From the given condition I have reached that $(1-rho^2)|z|^2 -2mathfrak{Re} (bar z (z_0-rho^2 z_1)) + |z_0|^2 -rho^2|z_1|^2=0$
But I do not get my desired result.
complex-analysis complex-numbers
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why don't you tackle it geometrically? Draw a line from $z_0$ to $z_1$, draw the points on this line satisfying the equation (there must be two), then find the centre point between these two, the equation of that circle, and show all points satisfy the equation?
$endgroup$
– Colm Bhandal
Aug 5 '15 at 19:41
$begingroup$
Then I have to show that no other point satisfy that eqn. Will you do it elaborately and give me the answer? Because I think doing algebraic way will be shorter.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 19:44
$begingroup$
Have you already treated Möbius transformations?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer♦
Aug 5 '15 at 19:50
$begingroup$
No, I have not used it. This is first chapter problem in Gamelin's book and I want to do it in an elementary way.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 19:52
1
$begingroup$
Okay, then do it per pedes. So you found that the condition is equivalent to $alvert zrvert^2 - 2 operatorname{Re}(boverline{z}) + c = 0$ for some real $a,c$ with $a neq 0$ and $b in mathbb{C}$. When is that sort of equation the defining equation for a circle?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer♦
Aug 5 '15 at 19:55
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Prove that for $rho ge 0$, $rho neq 1$ and fix $z_0,z_1 in Bbb C$. Show that the set $z in Bbb C$ satisfying $|z-z_0|=rho|z-z_1|$ is a circle.
From the given condition I have reached that $(1-rho^2)|z|^2 -2mathfrak{Re} (bar z (z_0-rho^2 z_1)) + |z_0|^2 -rho^2|z_1|^2=0$
But I do not get my desired result.
complex-analysis complex-numbers
$endgroup$
Prove that for $rho ge 0$, $rho neq 1$ and fix $z_0,z_1 in Bbb C$. Show that the set $z in Bbb C$ satisfying $|z-z_0|=rho|z-z_1|$ is a circle.
From the given condition I have reached that $(1-rho^2)|z|^2 -2mathfrak{Re} (bar z (z_0-rho^2 z_1)) + |z_0|^2 -rho^2|z_1|^2=0$
But I do not get my desired result.
complex-analysis complex-numbers
complex-analysis complex-numbers
edited Aug 6 '15 at 11:40


mrf
37.5k54685
37.5k54685
asked Aug 5 '15 at 19:27
user152715user152715
1
1
$begingroup$
Why don't you tackle it geometrically? Draw a line from $z_0$ to $z_1$, draw the points on this line satisfying the equation (there must be two), then find the centre point between these two, the equation of that circle, and show all points satisfy the equation?
$endgroup$
– Colm Bhandal
Aug 5 '15 at 19:41
$begingroup$
Then I have to show that no other point satisfy that eqn. Will you do it elaborately and give me the answer? Because I think doing algebraic way will be shorter.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 19:44
$begingroup$
Have you already treated Möbius transformations?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer♦
Aug 5 '15 at 19:50
$begingroup$
No, I have not used it. This is first chapter problem in Gamelin's book and I want to do it in an elementary way.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 19:52
1
$begingroup$
Okay, then do it per pedes. So you found that the condition is equivalent to $alvert zrvert^2 - 2 operatorname{Re}(boverline{z}) + c = 0$ for some real $a,c$ with $a neq 0$ and $b in mathbb{C}$. When is that sort of equation the defining equation for a circle?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer♦
Aug 5 '15 at 19:55
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Why don't you tackle it geometrically? Draw a line from $z_0$ to $z_1$, draw the points on this line satisfying the equation (there must be two), then find the centre point between these two, the equation of that circle, and show all points satisfy the equation?
$endgroup$
– Colm Bhandal
Aug 5 '15 at 19:41
$begingroup$
Then I have to show that no other point satisfy that eqn. Will you do it elaborately and give me the answer? Because I think doing algebraic way will be shorter.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 19:44
$begingroup$
Have you already treated Möbius transformations?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer♦
Aug 5 '15 at 19:50
$begingroup$
No, I have not used it. This is first chapter problem in Gamelin's book and I want to do it in an elementary way.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 19:52
1
$begingroup$
Okay, then do it per pedes. So you found that the condition is equivalent to $alvert zrvert^2 - 2 operatorname{Re}(boverline{z}) + c = 0$ for some real $a,c$ with $a neq 0$ and $b in mathbb{C}$. When is that sort of equation the defining equation for a circle?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer♦
Aug 5 '15 at 19:55
$begingroup$
Why don't you tackle it geometrically? Draw a line from $z_0$ to $z_1$, draw the points on this line satisfying the equation (there must be two), then find the centre point between these two, the equation of that circle, and show all points satisfy the equation?
$endgroup$
– Colm Bhandal
Aug 5 '15 at 19:41
$begingroup$
Why don't you tackle it geometrically? Draw a line from $z_0$ to $z_1$, draw the points on this line satisfying the equation (there must be two), then find the centre point between these two, the equation of that circle, and show all points satisfy the equation?
$endgroup$
– Colm Bhandal
Aug 5 '15 at 19:41
$begingroup$
Then I have to show that no other point satisfy that eqn. Will you do it elaborately and give me the answer? Because I think doing algebraic way will be shorter.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 19:44
$begingroup$
Then I have to show that no other point satisfy that eqn. Will you do it elaborately and give me the answer? Because I think doing algebraic way will be shorter.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 19:44
$begingroup$
Have you already treated Möbius transformations?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer♦
Aug 5 '15 at 19:50
$begingroup$
Have you already treated Möbius transformations?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer♦
Aug 5 '15 at 19:50
$begingroup$
No, I have not used it. This is first chapter problem in Gamelin's book and I want to do it in an elementary way.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 19:52
$begingroup$
No, I have not used it. This is first chapter problem in Gamelin's book and I want to do it in an elementary way.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 19:52
1
1
$begingroup$
Okay, then do it per pedes. So you found that the condition is equivalent to $alvert zrvert^2 - 2 operatorname{Re}(boverline{z}) + c = 0$ for some real $a,c$ with $a neq 0$ and $b in mathbb{C}$. When is that sort of equation the defining equation for a circle?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer♦
Aug 5 '15 at 19:55
$begingroup$
Okay, then do it per pedes. So you found that the condition is equivalent to $alvert zrvert^2 - 2 operatorname{Re}(boverline{z}) + c = 0$ for some real $a,c$ with $a neq 0$ and $b in mathbb{C}$. When is that sort of equation the defining equation for a circle?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer♦
Aug 5 '15 at 19:55
|
show 2 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From where you left off
$$(1-rho^{2})|z|^{2}-lbrace z^{*}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})+z(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})^{*}rbrace=rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}$$
Dividing by $(1-rho^{2})$ and completing the square
$$|z-frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2}=frac{rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}}{1-rho^{2}}+|frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2} $$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
we have a winner.
$endgroup$
– James S. Cook
Aug 5 '15 at 20:19
$begingroup$
And you have to show that the RHS is non negative and it is true if $z_0 neq z_1$
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 20:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
WOLOG, we may assume $z_1 =0$. Then we are looking at $|z-z_0|=rho |z|$. Next, by rotation, we may assume that $a=z_0$ is real and positive.
Now, let $z=x+iy$ and square the equation to get
$(x-a)^2 +y^2=rho^2 (x^2 +y^2)$. When this is expanded, a conic section is obtained with equal coefficients for $x$ and $y$. This is a circle.
Alternatively, and using what you wrote, let $z=x+iy$ and find that the coefficients of $x^2$ and $y^2$ are the same, and there is $xy$ term. This gives a circle.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint..you can write $z=x+iy$, $z_0=a+ib$, $z_1=c+id$ for real $x,y,a,b,c,d$ and apply your condition so that you get$$(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2=rho^2[(x-c)^2+(y-d)^2]$$ which will lead to the equation of a circle
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is this a hint?? When I have done that calculation then there is no point saying me to put $z,z_0$ etc etc.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 20:02
$begingroup$
I think there should be an $x - c$ on the RHS instead of $-c$. Otherwise this seems like the most elegant, concise solution.
$endgroup$
– Colm Bhandal
Aug 5 '15 at 20:05
$begingroup$
@ColmBhandal: yes! Thanks
$endgroup$
– David Quinn
Aug 5 '15 at 20:06
$begingroup$
@user152715 it is only intended as a hint in the sense that this will lead to the solution but does not constitute the full solution
$endgroup$
– David Quinn
Aug 5 '15 at 20:12
$begingroup$
@DavidQuinn which are the radius and the center of the circle?
$endgroup$
– Maggie94
Jan 15 at 14:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Begin by noting that $langle x+iy,a+ib rangle = xa+yb = text{Re}left((x+iy)(a-ib)right)$ so if we think of $z$ and $w$ as two-dimensional vectors then the complex algebra permits a natural formulation of the Euclidean inner-product in the plane:
$$ langle v,w rangle = text{Re} (v bar{w}) $$
On the other hand, we have $|z|^2 = z bar{z}$ and the many wonderful properties of the complex conjugate. Suppose $|z-z_o| = rho|z-z_1|$ for some $rho>0$ (if I say $rho>0$ then it must be real !). Square the given condition and use properties of complex conjugation:
$$ (z-z_o)(bar{z}-bar{z_o}) = rho^2(z-z_1)(bar{z}-bar{z_1})$$
or
$$ zbar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+z_obar{z_o} = rho^2left( zbar{z}-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+z_1bar{z_1}right)$$
which gives
$$ |z|^2-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+|z_o|^2 = rho^2left( |z|^2-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+|z_1|^2right)$$
which we can rearrange to
$$ rho^2zbar{z_1}+rho^2z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
(rho^2-1)|z|^2 +rho^2|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
Ok, I'm tired of $rho$, I'm setting $rho=1$ in which case:
$$ zbar{z_1}+z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
which gives, using $text{Re}(z) = frac{1}{2}(z + bar{z})$,
$$ z(overline{z_1-z_o})+bar{z}(z_1-z_o) = 2text{Re}left(z(overline{z_1-z_o})right) = |z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
or,
$$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = frac{1}{2}left(|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2right) $$
Now, if we have $|z_o| = |z_1|$ then it follows:
$$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = 0 $$
which says $z$ points in a direction perpendicular to the line-segment from $z_0$ to $z_1$. In any event, you can use the things I've done here to find the answer.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
ok, so while I have not answered the question I at least showed you why $rho=1$ is not allowed.
$endgroup$
– James S. Cook
Aug 5 '15 at 20:20
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1385817%2fshow-that-the-set-z-satisfying-z-z-0-rhoz-z-1-rho-neq-1-is-a-circ%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From where you left off
$$(1-rho^{2})|z|^{2}-lbrace z^{*}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})+z(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})^{*}rbrace=rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}$$
Dividing by $(1-rho^{2})$ and completing the square
$$|z-frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2}=frac{rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}}{1-rho^{2}}+|frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2} $$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
we have a winner.
$endgroup$
– James S. Cook
Aug 5 '15 at 20:19
$begingroup$
And you have to show that the RHS is non negative and it is true if $z_0 neq z_1$
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 20:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From where you left off
$$(1-rho^{2})|z|^{2}-lbrace z^{*}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})+z(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})^{*}rbrace=rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}$$
Dividing by $(1-rho^{2})$ and completing the square
$$|z-frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2}=frac{rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}}{1-rho^{2}}+|frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2} $$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
we have a winner.
$endgroup$
– James S. Cook
Aug 5 '15 at 20:19
$begingroup$
And you have to show that the RHS is non negative and it is true if $z_0 neq z_1$
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 20:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From where you left off
$$(1-rho^{2})|z|^{2}-lbrace z^{*}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})+z(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})^{*}rbrace=rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}$$
Dividing by $(1-rho^{2})$ and completing the square
$$|z-frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2}=frac{rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}}{1-rho^{2}}+|frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2} $$
$endgroup$
From where you left off
$$(1-rho^{2})|z|^{2}-lbrace z^{*}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})+z(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})^{*}rbrace=rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}$$
Dividing by $(1-rho^{2})$ and completing the square
$$|z-frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2}=frac{rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}}{1-rho^{2}}+|frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2} $$
answered Aug 5 '15 at 20:15
TuckerTucker
1,510311
1,510311
$begingroup$
we have a winner.
$endgroup$
– James S. Cook
Aug 5 '15 at 20:19
$begingroup$
And you have to show that the RHS is non negative and it is true if $z_0 neq z_1$
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 20:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
we have a winner.
$endgroup$
– James S. Cook
Aug 5 '15 at 20:19
$begingroup$
And you have to show that the RHS is non negative and it is true if $z_0 neq z_1$
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 20:25
$begingroup$
we have a winner.
$endgroup$
– James S. Cook
Aug 5 '15 at 20:19
$begingroup$
we have a winner.
$endgroup$
– James S. Cook
Aug 5 '15 at 20:19
$begingroup$
And you have to show that the RHS is non negative and it is true if $z_0 neq z_1$
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 20:25
$begingroup$
And you have to show that the RHS is non negative and it is true if $z_0 neq z_1$
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 20:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
WOLOG, we may assume $z_1 =0$. Then we are looking at $|z-z_0|=rho |z|$. Next, by rotation, we may assume that $a=z_0$ is real and positive.
Now, let $z=x+iy$ and square the equation to get
$(x-a)^2 +y^2=rho^2 (x^2 +y^2)$. When this is expanded, a conic section is obtained with equal coefficients for $x$ and $y$. This is a circle.
Alternatively, and using what you wrote, let $z=x+iy$ and find that the coefficients of $x^2$ and $y^2$ are the same, and there is $xy$ term. This gives a circle.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
WOLOG, we may assume $z_1 =0$. Then we are looking at $|z-z_0|=rho |z|$. Next, by rotation, we may assume that $a=z_0$ is real and positive.
Now, let $z=x+iy$ and square the equation to get
$(x-a)^2 +y^2=rho^2 (x^2 +y^2)$. When this is expanded, a conic section is obtained with equal coefficients for $x$ and $y$. This is a circle.
Alternatively, and using what you wrote, let $z=x+iy$ and find that the coefficients of $x^2$ and $y^2$ are the same, and there is $xy$ term. This gives a circle.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
WOLOG, we may assume $z_1 =0$. Then we are looking at $|z-z_0|=rho |z|$. Next, by rotation, we may assume that $a=z_0$ is real and positive.
Now, let $z=x+iy$ and square the equation to get
$(x-a)^2 +y^2=rho^2 (x^2 +y^2)$. When this is expanded, a conic section is obtained with equal coefficients for $x$ and $y$. This is a circle.
Alternatively, and using what you wrote, let $z=x+iy$ and find that the coefficients of $x^2$ and $y^2$ are the same, and there is $xy$ term. This gives a circle.
$endgroup$
WOLOG, we may assume $z_1 =0$. Then we are looking at $|z-z_0|=rho |z|$. Next, by rotation, we may assume that $a=z_0$ is real and positive.
Now, let $z=x+iy$ and square the equation to get
$(x-a)^2 +y^2=rho^2 (x^2 +y^2)$. When this is expanded, a conic section is obtained with equal coefficients for $x$ and $y$. This is a circle.
Alternatively, and using what you wrote, let $z=x+iy$ and find that the coefficients of $x^2$ and $y^2$ are the same, and there is $xy$ term. This gives a circle.
answered Aug 5 '15 at 19:59
polymath257polymath257
141
141
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint..you can write $z=x+iy$, $z_0=a+ib$, $z_1=c+id$ for real $x,y,a,b,c,d$ and apply your condition so that you get$$(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2=rho^2[(x-c)^2+(y-d)^2]$$ which will lead to the equation of a circle
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is this a hint?? When I have done that calculation then there is no point saying me to put $z,z_0$ etc etc.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 20:02
$begingroup$
I think there should be an $x - c$ on the RHS instead of $-c$. Otherwise this seems like the most elegant, concise solution.
$endgroup$
– Colm Bhandal
Aug 5 '15 at 20:05
$begingroup$
@ColmBhandal: yes! Thanks
$endgroup$
– David Quinn
Aug 5 '15 at 20:06
$begingroup$
@user152715 it is only intended as a hint in the sense that this will lead to the solution but does not constitute the full solution
$endgroup$
– David Quinn
Aug 5 '15 at 20:12
$begingroup$
@DavidQuinn which are the radius and the center of the circle?
$endgroup$
– Maggie94
Jan 15 at 14:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint..you can write $z=x+iy$, $z_0=a+ib$, $z_1=c+id$ for real $x,y,a,b,c,d$ and apply your condition so that you get$$(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2=rho^2[(x-c)^2+(y-d)^2]$$ which will lead to the equation of a circle
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is this a hint?? When I have done that calculation then there is no point saying me to put $z,z_0$ etc etc.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 20:02
$begingroup$
I think there should be an $x - c$ on the RHS instead of $-c$. Otherwise this seems like the most elegant, concise solution.
$endgroup$
– Colm Bhandal
Aug 5 '15 at 20:05
$begingroup$
@ColmBhandal: yes! Thanks
$endgroup$
– David Quinn
Aug 5 '15 at 20:06
$begingroup$
@user152715 it is only intended as a hint in the sense that this will lead to the solution but does not constitute the full solution
$endgroup$
– David Quinn
Aug 5 '15 at 20:12
$begingroup$
@DavidQuinn which are the radius and the center of the circle?
$endgroup$
– Maggie94
Jan 15 at 14:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint..you can write $z=x+iy$, $z_0=a+ib$, $z_1=c+id$ for real $x,y,a,b,c,d$ and apply your condition so that you get$$(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2=rho^2[(x-c)^2+(y-d)^2]$$ which will lead to the equation of a circle
$endgroup$
Hint..you can write $z=x+iy$, $z_0=a+ib$, $z_1=c+id$ for real $x,y,a,b,c,d$ and apply your condition so that you get$$(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2=rho^2[(x-c)^2+(y-d)^2]$$ which will lead to the equation of a circle
edited Aug 5 '15 at 20:06
answered Aug 5 '15 at 19:58
David QuinnDavid Quinn
24k21141
24k21141
$begingroup$
Is this a hint?? When I have done that calculation then there is no point saying me to put $z,z_0$ etc etc.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 20:02
$begingroup$
I think there should be an $x - c$ on the RHS instead of $-c$. Otherwise this seems like the most elegant, concise solution.
$endgroup$
– Colm Bhandal
Aug 5 '15 at 20:05
$begingroup$
@ColmBhandal: yes! Thanks
$endgroup$
– David Quinn
Aug 5 '15 at 20:06
$begingroup$
@user152715 it is only intended as a hint in the sense that this will lead to the solution but does not constitute the full solution
$endgroup$
– David Quinn
Aug 5 '15 at 20:12
$begingroup$
@DavidQuinn which are the radius and the center of the circle?
$endgroup$
– Maggie94
Jan 15 at 14:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is this a hint?? When I have done that calculation then there is no point saying me to put $z,z_0$ etc etc.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 20:02
$begingroup$
I think there should be an $x - c$ on the RHS instead of $-c$. Otherwise this seems like the most elegant, concise solution.
$endgroup$
– Colm Bhandal
Aug 5 '15 at 20:05
$begingroup$
@ColmBhandal: yes! Thanks
$endgroup$
– David Quinn
Aug 5 '15 at 20:06
$begingroup$
@user152715 it is only intended as a hint in the sense that this will lead to the solution but does not constitute the full solution
$endgroup$
– David Quinn
Aug 5 '15 at 20:12
$begingroup$
@DavidQuinn which are the radius and the center of the circle?
$endgroup$
– Maggie94
Jan 15 at 14:48
$begingroup$
Is this a hint?? When I have done that calculation then there is no point saying me to put $z,z_0$ etc etc.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 20:02
$begingroup$
Is this a hint?? When I have done that calculation then there is no point saying me to put $z,z_0$ etc etc.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 20:02
$begingroup$
I think there should be an $x - c$ on the RHS instead of $-c$. Otherwise this seems like the most elegant, concise solution.
$endgroup$
– Colm Bhandal
Aug 5 '15 at 20:05
$begingroup$
I think there should be an $x - c$ on the RHS instead of $-c$. Otherwise this seems like the most elegant, concise solution.
$endgroup$
– Colm Bhandal
Aug 5 '15 at 20:05
$begingroup$
@ColmBhandal: yes! Thanks
$endgroup$
– David Quinn
Aug 5 '15 at 20:06
$begingroup$
@ColmBhandal: yes! Thanks
$endgroup$
– David Quinn
Aug 5 '15 at 20:06
$begingroup$
@user152715 it is only intended as a hint in the sense that this will lead to the solution but does not constitute the full solution
$endgroup$
– David Quinn
Aug 5 '15 at 20:12
$begingroup$
@user152715 it is only intended as a hint in the sense that this will lead to the solution but does not constitute the full solution
$endgroup$
– David Quinn
Aug 5 '15 at 20:12
$begingroup$
@DavidQuinn which are the radius and the center of the circle?
$endgroup$
– Maggie94
Jan 15 at 14:48
$begingroup$
@DavidQuinn which are the radius and the center of the circle?
$endgroup$
– Maggie94
Jan 15 at 14:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Begin by noting that $langle x+iy,a+ib rangle = xa+yb = text{Re}left((x+iy)(a-ib)right)$ so if we think of $z$ and $w$ as two-dimensional vectors then the complex algebra permits a natural formulation of the Euclidean inner-product in the plane:
$$ langle v,w rangle = text{Re} (v bar{w}) $$
On the other hand, we have $|z|^2 = z bar{z}$ and the many wonderful properties of the complex conjugate. Suppose $|z-z_o| = rho|z-z_1|$ for some $rho>0$ (if I say $rho>0$ then it must be real !). Square the given condition and use properties of complex conjugation:
$$ (z-z_o)(bar{z}-bar{z_o}) = rho^2(z-z_1)(bar{z}-bar{z_1})$$
or
$$ zbar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+z_obar{z_o} = rho^2left( zbar{z}-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+z_1bar{z_1}right)$$
which gives
$$ |z|^2-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+|z_o|^2 = rho^2left( |z|^2-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+|z_1|^2right)$$
which we can rearrange to
$$ rho^2zbar{z_1}+rho^2z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
(rho^2-1)|z|^2 +rho^2|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
Ok, I'm tired of $rho$, I'm setting $rho=1$ in which case:
$$ zbar{z_1}+z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
which gives, using $text{Re}(z) = frac{1}{2}(z + bar{z})$,
$$ z(overline{z_1-z_o})+bar{z}(z_1-z_o) = 2text{Re}left(z(overline{z_1-z_o})right) = |z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
or,
$$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = frac{1}{2}left(|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2right) $$
Now, if we have $|z_o| = |z_1|$ then it follows:
$$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = 0 $$
which says $z$ points in a direction perpendicular to the line-segment from $z_0$ to $z_1$. In any event, you can use the things I've done here to find the answer.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
ok, so while I have not answered the question I at least showed you why $rho=1$ is not allowed.
$endgroup$
– James S. Cook
Aug 5 '15 at 20:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Begin by noting that $langle x+iy,a+ib rangle = xa+yb = text{Re}left((x+iy)(a-ib)right)$ so if we think of $z$ and $w$ as two-dimensional vectors then the complex algebra permits a natural formulation of the Euclidean inner-product in the plane:
$$ langle v,w rangle = text{Re} (v bar{w}) $$
On the other hand, we have $|z|^2 = z bar{z}$ and the many wonderful properties of the complex conjugate. Suppose $|z-z_o| = rho|z-z_1|$ for some $rho>0$ (if I say $rho>0$ then it must be real !). Square the given condition and use properties of complex conjugation:
$$ (z-z_o)(bar{z}-bar{z_o}) = rho^2(z-z_1)(bar{z}-bar{z_1})$$
or
$$ zbar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+z_obar{z_o} = rho^2left( zbar{z}-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+z_1bar{z_1}right)$$
which gives
$$ |z|^2-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+|z_o|^2 = rho^2left( |z|^2-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+|z_1|^2right)$$
which we can rearrange to
$$ rho^2zbar{z_1}+rho^2z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
(rho^2-1)|z|^2 +rho^2|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
Ok, I'm tired of $rho$, I'm setting $rho=1$ in which case:
$$ zbar{z_1}+z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
which gives, using $text{Re}(z) = frac{1}{2}(z + bar{z})$,
$$ z(overline{z_1-z_o})+bar{z}(z_1-z_o) = 2text{Re}left(z(overline{z_1-z_o})right) = |z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
or,
$$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = frac{1}{2}left(|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2right) $$
Now, if we have $|z_o| = |z_1|$ then it follows:
$$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = 0 $$
which says $z$ points in a direction perpendicular to the line-segment from $z_0$ to $z_1$. In any event, you can use the things I've done here to find the answer.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
ok, so while I have not answered the question I at least showed you why $rho=1$ is not allowed.
$endgroup$
– James S. Cook
Aug 5 '15 at 20:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Begin by noting that $langle x+iy,a+ib rangle = xa+yb = text{Re}left((x+iy)(a-ib)right)$ so if we think of $z$ and $w$ as two-dimensional vectors then the complex algebra permits a natural formulation of the Euclidean inner-product in the plane:
$$ langle v,w rangle = text{Re} (v bar{w}) $$
On the other hand, we have $|z|^2 = z bar{z}$ and the many wonderful properties of the complex conjugate. Suppose $|z-z_o| = rho|z-z_1|$ for some $rho>0$ (if I say $rho>0$ then it must be real !). Square the given condition and use properties of complex conjugation:
$$ (z-z_o)(bar{z}-bar{z_o}) = rho^2(z-z_1)(bar{z}-bar{z_1})$$
or
$$ zbar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+z_obar{z_o} = rho^2left( zbar{z}-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+z_1bar{z_1}right)$$
which gives
$$ |z|^2-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+|z_o|^2 = rho^2left( |z|^2-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+|z_1|^2right)$$
which we can rearrange to
$$ rho^2zbar{z_1}+rho^2z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
(rho^2-1)|z|^2 +rho^2|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
Ok, I'm tired of $rho$, I'm setting $rho=1$ in which case:
$$ zbar{z_1}+z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
which gives, using $text{Re}(z) = frac{1}{2}(z + bar{z})$,
$$ z(overline{z_1-z_o})+bar{z}(z_1-z_o) = 2text{Re}left(z(overline{z_1-z_o})right) = |z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
or,
$$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = frac{1}{2}left(|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2right) $$
Now, if we have $|z_o| = |z_1|$ then it follows:
$$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = 0 $$
which says $z$ points in a direction perpendicular to the line-segment from $z_0$ to $z_1$. In any event, you can use the things I've done here to find the answer.
$endgroup$
Begin by noting that $langle x+iy,a+ib rangle = xa+yb = text{Re}left((x+iy)(a-ib)right)$ so if we think of $z$ and $w$ as two-dimensional vectors then the complex algebra permits a natural formulation of the Euclidean inner-product in the plane:
$$ langle v,w rangle = text{Re} (v bar{w}) $$
On the other hand, we have $|z|^2 = z bar{z}$ and the many wonderful properties of the complex conjugate. Suppose $|z-z_o| = rho|z-z_1|$ for some $rho>0$ (if I say $rho>0$ then it must be real !). Square the given condition and use properties of complex conjugation:
$$ (z-z_o)(bar{z}-bar{z_o}) = rho^2(z-z_1)(bar{z}-bar{z_1})$$
or
$$ zbar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+z_obar{z_o} = rho^2left( zbar{z}-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+z_1bar{z_1}right)$$
which gives
$$ |z|^2-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+|z_o|^2 = rho^2left( |z|^2-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+|z_1|^2right)$$
which we can rearrange to
$$ rho^2zbar{z_1}+rho^2z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
(rho^2-1)|z|^2 +rho^2|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
Ok, I'm tired of $rho$, I'm setting $rho=1$ in which case:
$$ zbar{z_1}+z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
which gives, using $text{Re}(z) = frac{1}{2}(z + bar{z})$,
$$ z(overline{z_1-z_o})+bar{z}(z_1-z_o) = 2text{Re}left(z(overline{z_1-z_o})right) = |z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
or,
$$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = frac{1}{2}left(|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2right) $$
Now, if we have $|z_o| = |z_1|$ then it follows:
$$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = 0 $$
which says $z$ points in a direction perpendicular to the line-segment from $z_0$ to $z_1$. In any event, you can use the things I've done here to find the answer.
answered Aug 5 '15 at 20:15


James S. CookJames S. Cook
13.1k22872
13.1k22872
$begingroup$
ok, so while I have not answered the question I at least showed you why $rho=1$ is not allowed.
$endgroup$
– James S. Cook
Aug 5 '15 at 20:20
add a comment |
$begingroup$
ok, so while I have not answered the question I at least showed you why $rho=1$ is not allowed.
$endgroup$
– James S. Cook
Aug 5 '15 at 20:20
$begingroup$
ok, so while I have not answered the question I at least showed you why $rho=1$ is not allowed.
$endgroup$
– James S. Cook
Aug 5 '15 at 20:20
$begingroup$
ok, so while I have not answered the question I at least showed you why $rho=1$ is not allowed.
$endgroup$
– James S. Cook
Aug 5 '15 at 20:20
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1385817%2fshow-that-the-set-z-satisfying-z-z-0-rhoz-z-1-rho-neq-1-is-a-circ%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Why don't you tackle it geometrically? Draw a line from $z_0$ to $z_1$, draw the points on this line satisfying the equation (there must be two), then find the centre point between these two, the equation of that circle, and show all points satisfy the equation?
$endgroup$
– Colm Bhandal
Aug 5 '15 at 19:41
$begingroup$
Then I have to show that no other point satisfy that eqn. Will you do it elaborately and give me the answer? Because I think doing algebraic way will be shorter.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 19:44
$begingroup$
Have you already treated Möbius transformations?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer♦
Aug 5 '15 at 19:50
$begingroup$
No, I have not used it. This is first chapter problem in Gamelin's book and I want to do it in an elementary way.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 19:52
1
$begingroup$
Okay, then do it per pedes. So you found that the condition is equivalent to $alvert zrvert^2 - 2 operatorname{Re}(boverline{z}) + c = 0$ for some real $a,c$ with $a neq 0$ and $b in mathbb{C}$. When is that sort of equation the defining equation for a circle?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer♦
Aug 5 '15 at 19:55