Show that the set $z$ satisfying $|z-z_0|=rho|z-z_1|$ ($rho neq 1$) is a circle.












1












$begingroup$


Prove that for $rho ge 0$, $rho neq 1$ and fix $z_0,z_1 in Bbb C$. Show that the set $z in Bbb C$ satisfying $|z-z_0|=rho|z-z_1|$ is a circle.



From the given condition I have reached that $(1-rho^2)|z|^2 -2mathfrak{Re} (bar z (z_0-rho^2 z_1)) + |z_0|^2 -rho^2|z_1|^2=0$
But I do not get my desired result.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Why don't you tackle it geometrically? Draw a line from $z_0$ to $z_1$, draw the points on this line satisfying the equation (there must be two), then find the centre point between these two, the equation of that circle, and show all points satisfy the equation?
    $endgroup$
    – Colm Bhandal
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:41










  • $begingroup$
    Then I have to show that no other point satisfy that eqn. Will you do it elaborately and give me the answer? Because I think doing algebraic way will be shorter.
    $endgroup$
    – user152715
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:44












  • $begingroup$
    Have you already treated Möbius transformations?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:50










  • $begingroup$
    No, I have not used it. This is first chapter problem in Gamelin's book and I want to do it in an elementary way.
    $endgroup$
    – user152715
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Okay, then do it per pedes. So you found that the condition is equivalent to $alvert zrvert^2 - 2 operatorname{Re}(boverline{z}) + c = 0$ for some real $a,c$ with $a neq 0$ and $b in mathbb{C}$. When is that sort of equation the defining equation for a circle?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:55
















1












$begingroup$


Prove that for $rho ge 0$, $rho neq 1$ and fix $z_0,z_1 in Bbb C$. Show that the set $z in Bbb C$ satisfying $|z-z_0|=rho|z-z_1|$ is a circle.



From the given condition I have reached that $(1-rho^2)|z|^2 -2mathfrak{Re} (bar z (z_0-rho^2 z_1)) + |z_0|^2 -rho^2|z_1|^2=0$
But I do not get my desired result.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Why don't you tackle it geometrically? Draw a line from $z_0$ to $z_1$, draw the points on this line satisfying the equation (there must be two), then find the centre point between these two, the equation of that circle, and show all points satisfy the equation?
    $endgroup$
    – Colm Bhandal
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:41










  • $begingroup$
    Then I have to show that no other point satisfy that eqn. Will you do it elaborately and give me the answer? Because I think doing algebraic way will be shorter.
    $endgroup$
    – user152715
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:44












  • $begingroup$
    Have you already treated Möbius transformations?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:50










  • $begingroup$
    No, I have not used it. This is first chapter problem in Gamelin's book and I want to do it in an elementary way.
    $endgroup$
    – user152715
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Okay, then do it per pedes. So you found that the condition is equivalent to $alvert zrvert^2 - 2 operatorname{Re}(boverline{z}) + c = 0$ for some real $a,c$ with $a neq 0$ and $b in mathbb{C}$. When is that sort of equation the defining equation for a circle?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:55














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


Prove that for $rho ge 0$, $rho neq 1$ and fix $z_0,z_1 in Bbb C$. Show that the set $z in Bbb C$ satisfying $|z-z_0|=rho|z-z_1|$ is a circle.



From the given condition I have reached that $(1-rho^2)|z|^2 -2mathfrak{Re} (bar z (z_0-rho^2 z_1)) + |z_0|^2 -rho^2|z_1|^2=0$
But I do not get my desired result.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Prove that for $rho ge 0$, $rho neq 1$ and fix $z_0,z_1 in Bbb C$. Show that the set $z in Bbb C$ satisfying $|z-z_0|=rho|z-z_1|$ is a circle.



From the given condition I have reached that $(1-rho^2)|z|^2 -2mathfrak{Re} (bar z (z_0-rho^2 z_1)) + |z_0|^2 -rho^2|z_1|^2=0$
But I do not get my desired result.







complex-analysis complex-numbers






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 6 '15 at 11:40









mrf

37.5k54685




37.5k54685










asked Aug 5 '15 at 19:27









user152715user152715

1




1












  • $begingroup$
    Why don't you tackle it geometrically? Draw a line from $z_0$ to $z_1$, draw the points on this line satisfying the equation (there must be two), then find the centre point between these two, the equation of that circle, and show all points satisfy the equation?
    $endgroup$
    – Colm Bhandal
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:41










  • $begingroup$
    Then I have to show that no other point satisfy that eqn. Will you do it elaborately and give me the answer? Because I think doing algebraic way will be shorter.
    $endgroup$
    – user152715
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:44












  • $begingroup$
    Have you already treated Möbius transformations?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:50










  • $begingroup$
    No, I have not used it. This is first chapter problem in Gamelin's book and I want to do it in an elementary way.
    $endgroup$
    – user152715
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Okay, then do it per pedes. So you found that the condition is equivalent to $alvert zrvert^2 - 2 operatorname{Re}(boverline{z}) + c = 0$ for some real $a,c$ with $a neq 0$ and $b in mathbb{C}$. When is that sort of equation the defining equation for a circle?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:55


















  • $begingroup$
    Why don't you tackle it geometrically? Draw a line from $z_0$ to $z_1$, draw the points on this line satisfying the equation (there must be two), then find the centre point between these two, the equation of that circle, and show all points satisfy the equation?
    $endgroup$
    – Colm Bhandal
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:41










  • $begingroup$
    Then I have to show that no other point satisfy that eqn. Will you do it elaborately and give me the answer? Because I think doing algebraic way will be shorter.
    $endgroup$
    – user152715
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:44












  • $begingroup$
    Have you already treated Möbius transformations?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:50










  • $begingroup$
    No, I have not used it. This is first chapter problem in Gamelin's book and I want to do it in an elementary way.
    $endgroup$
    – user152715
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Okay, then do it per pedes. So you found that the condition is equivalent to $alvert zrvert^2 - 2 operatorname{Re}(boverline{z}) + c = 0$ for some real $a,c$ with $a neq 0$ and $b in mathbb{C}$. When is that sort of equation the defining equation for a circle?
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Fischer
    Aug 5 '15 at 19:55
















$begingroup$
Why don't you tackle it geometrically? Draw a line from $z_0$ to $z_1$, draw the points on this line satisfying the equation (there must be two), then find the centre point between these two, the equation of that circle, and show all points satisfy the equation?
$endgroup$
– Colm Bhandal
Aug 5 '15 at 19:41




$begingroup$
Why don't you tackle it geometrically? Draw a line from $z_0$ to $z_1$, draw the points on this line satisfying the equation (there must be two), then find the centre point between these two, the equation of that circle, and show all points satisfy the equation?
$endgroup$
– Colm Bhandal
Aug 5 '15 at 19:41












$begingroup$
Then I have to show that no other point satisfy that eqn. Will you do it elaborately and give me the answer? Because I think doing algebraic way will be shorter.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 19:44






$begingroup$
Then I have to show that no other point satisfy that eqn. Will you do it elaborately and give me the answer? Because I think doing algebraic way will be shorter.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 19:44














$begingroup$
Have you already treated Möbius transformations?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer
Aug 5 '15 at 19:50




$begingroup$
Have you already treated Möbius transformations?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer
Aug 5 '15 at 19:50












$begingroup$
No, I have not used it. This is first chapter problem in Gamelin's book and I want to do it in an elementary way.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 19:52




$begingroup$
No, I have not used it. This is first chapter problem in Gamelin's book and I want to do it in an elementary way.
$endgroup$
– user152715
Aug 5 '15 at 19:52




1




1




$begingroup$
Okay, then do it per pedes. So you found that the condition is equivalent to $alvert zrvert^2 - 2 operatorname{Re}(boverline{z}) + c = 0$ for some real $a,c$ with $a neq 0$ and $b in mathbb{C}$. When is that sort of equation the defining equation for a circle?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer
Aug 5 '15 at 19:55




$begingroup$
Okay, then do it per pedes. So you found that the condition is equivalent to $alvert zrvert^2 - 2 operatorname{Re}(boverline{z}) + c = 0$ for some real $a,c$ with $a neq 0$ and $b in mathbb{C}$. When is that sort of equation the defining equation for a circle?
$endgroup$
– Daniel Fischer
Aug 5 '15 at 19:55










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

From where you left off



$$(1-rho^{2})|z|^{2}-lbrace z^{*}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})+z(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})^{*}rbrace=rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}$$



Dividing by $(1-rho^{2})$ and completing the square



$$|z-frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2}=frac{rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}}{1-rho^{2}}+|frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2} $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    we have a winner.
    $endgroup$
    – James S. Cook
    Aug 5 '15 at 20:19










  • $begingroup$
    And you have to show that the RHS is non negative and it is true if $z_0 neq z_1$
    $endgroup$
    – user152715
    Aug 5 '15 at 20:25



















0












$begingroup$

WOLOG, we may assume $z_1 =0$. Then we are looking at $|z-z_0|=rho |z|$. Next, by rotation, we may assume that $a=z_0$ is real and positive.



Now, let $z=x+iy$ and square the equation to get
$(x-a)^2 +y^2=rho^2 (x^2 +y^2)$. When this is expanded, a conic section is obtained with equal coefficients for $x$ and $y$. This is a circle.



Alternatively, and using what you wrote, let $z=x+iy$ and find that the coefficients of $x^2$ and $y^2$ are the same, and there is $xy$ term. This gives a circle.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    Hint..you can write $z=x+iy$, $z_0=a+ib$, $z_1=c+id$ for real $x,y,a,b,c,d$ and apply your condition so that you get$$(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2=rho^2[(x-c)^2+(y-d)^2]$$ which will lead to the equation of a circle






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Is this a hint?? When I have done that calculation then there is no point saying me to put $z,z_0$ etc etc.
      $endgroup$
      – user152715
      Aug 5 '15 at 20:02










    • $begingroup$
      I think there should be an $x - c$ on the RHS instead of $-c$. Otherwise this seems like the most elegant, concise solution.
      $endgroup$
      – Colm Bhandal
      Aug 5 '15 at 20:05












    • $begingroup$
      @ColmBhandal: yes! Thanks
      $endgroup$
      – David Quinn
      Aug 5 '15 at 20:06










    • $begingroup$
      @user152715 it is only intended as a hint in the sense that this will lead to the solution but does not constitute the full solution
      $endgroup$
      – David Quinn
      Aug 5 '15 at 20:12










    • $begingroup$
      @DavidQuinn which are the radius and the center of the circle?
      $endgroup$
      – Maggie94
      Jan 15 at 14:48



















    0












    $begingroup$

    Begin by noting that $langle x+iy,a+ib rangle = xa+yb = text{Re}left((x+iy)(a-ib)right)$ so if we think of $z$ and $w$ as two-dimensional vectors then the complex algebra permits a natural formulation of the Euclidean inner-product in the plane:
    $$ langle v,w rangle = text{Re} (v bar{w}) $$
    On the other hand, we have $|z|^2 = z bar{z}$ and the many wonderful properties of the complex conjugate. Suppose $|z-z_o| = rho|z-z_1|$ for some $rho>0$ (if I say $rho>0$ then it must be real !). Square the given condition and use properties of complex conjugation:
    $$ (z-z_o)(bar{z}-bar{z_o}) = rho^2(z-z_1)(bar{z}-bar{z_1})$$
    or
    $$ zbar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+z_obar{z_o} = rho^2left( zbar{z}-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+z_1bar{z_1}right)$$
    which gives
    $$ |z|^2-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+|z_o|^2 = rho^2left( |z|^2-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+|z_1|^2right)$$
    which we can rearrange to
    $$ rho^2zbar{z_1}+rho^2z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
    (rho^2-1)|z|^2 +rho^2|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
    Ok, I'm tired of $rho$, I'm setting $rho=1$ in which case:
    $$ zbar{z_1}+z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
    |z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
    which gives, using $text{Re}(z) = frac{1}{2}(z + bar{z})$,
    $$ z(overline{z_1-z_o})+bar{z}(z_1-z_o) = 2text{Re}left(z(overline{z_1-z_o})right) = |z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
    or,
    $$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = frac{1}{2}left(|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2right) $$
    Now, if we have $|z_o| = |z_1|$ then it follows:
    $$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = 0 $$
    which says $z$ points in a direction perpendicular to the line-segment from $z_0$ to $z_1$. In any event, you can use the things I've done here to find the answer.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      ok, so while I have not answered the question I at least showed you why $rho=1$ is not allowed.
      $endgroup$
      – James S. Cook
      Aug 5 '15 at 20:20











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1385817%2fshow-that-the-set-z-satisfying-z-z-0-rhoz-z-1-rho-neq-1-is-a-circ%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    From where you left off



    $$(1-rho^{2})|z|^{2}-lbrace z^{*}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})+z(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})^{*}rbrace=rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}$$



    Dividing by $(1-rho^{2})$ and completing the square



    $$|z-frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2}=frac{rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}}{1-rho^{2}}+|frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2} $$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      we have a winner.
      $endgroup$
      – James S. Cook
      Aug 5 '15 at 20:19










    • $begingroup$
      And you have to show that the RHS is non negative and it is true if $z_0 neq z_1$
      $endgroup$
      – user152715
      Aug 5 '15 at 20:25
















    2












    $begingroup$

    From where you left off



    $$(1-rho^{2})|z|^{2}-lbrace z^{*}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})+z(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})^{*}rbrace=rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}$$



    Dividing by $(1-rho^{2})$ and completing the square



    $$|z-frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2}=frac{rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}}{1-rho^{2}}+|frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2} $$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      we have a winner.
      $endgroup$
      – James S. Cook
      Aug 5 '15 at 20:19










    • $begingroup$
      And you have to show that the RHS is non negative and it is true if $z_0 neq z_1$
      $endgroup$
      – user152715
      Aug 5 '15 at 20:25














    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    From where you left off



    $$(1-rho^{2})|z|^{2}-lbrace z^{*}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})+z(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})^{*}rbrace=rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}$$



    Dividing by $(1-rho^{2})$ and completing the square



    $$|z-frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2}=frac{rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}}{1-rho^{2}}+|frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2} $$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    From where you left off



    $$(1-rho^{2})|z|^{2}-lbrace z^{*}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})+z(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})^{*}rbrace=rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}$$



    Dividing by $(1-rho^{2})$ and completing the square



    $$|z-frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2}=frac{rho^{2}|z_{1}|^{2}-|z_{0}|^{2}}{1-rho^{2}}+|frac{1}{(1-rho^{2})}(z_{0}-rho^{2}z_{1})|^{2} $$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Aug 5 '15 at 20:15









    TuckerTucker

    1,510311




    1,510311












    • $begingroup$
      we have a winner.
      $endgroup$
      – James S. Cook
      Aug 5 '15 at 20:19










    • $begingroup$
      And you have to show that the RHS is non negative and it is true if $z_0 neq z_1$
      $endgroup$
      – user152715
      Aug 5 '15 at 20:25


















    • $begingroup$
      we have a winner.
      $endgroup$
      – James S. Cook
      Aug 5 '15 at 20:19










    • $begingroup$
      And you have to show that the RHS is non negative and it is true if $z_0 neq z_1$
      $endgroup$
      – user152715
      Aug 5 '15 at 20:25
















    $begingroup$
    we have a winner.
    $endgroup$
    – James S. Cook
    Aug 5 '15 at 20:19




    $begingroup$
    we have a winner.
    $endgroup$
    – James S. Cook
    Aug 5 '15 at 20:19












    $begingroup$
    And you have to show that the RHS is non negative and it is true if $z_0 neq z_1$
    $endgroup$
    – user152715
    Aug 5 '15 at 20:25




    $begingroup$
    And you have to show that the RHS is non negative and it is true if $z_0 neq z_1$
    $endgroup$
    – user152715
    Aug 5 '15 at 20:25











    0












    $begingroup$

    WOLOG, we may assume $z_1 =0$. Then we are looking at $|z-z_0|=rho |z|$. Next, by rotation, we may assume that $a=z_0$ is real and positive.



    Now, let $z=x+iy$ and square the equation to get
    $(x-a)^2 +y^2=rho^2 (x^2 +y^2)$. When this is expanded, a conic section is obtained with equal coefficients for $x$ and $y$. This is a circle.



    Alternatively, and using what you wrote, let $z=x+iy$ and find that the coefficients of $x^2$ and $y^2$ are the same, and there is $xy$ term. This gives a circle.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      WOLOG, we may assume $z_1 =0$. Then we are looking at $|z-z_0|=rho |z|$. Next, by rotation, we may assume that $a=z_0$ is real and positive.



      Now, let $z=x+iy$ and square the equation to get
      $(x-a)^2 +y^2=rho^2 (x^2 +y^2)$. When this is expanded, a conic section is obtained with equal coefficients for $x$ and $y$. This is a circle.



      Alternatively, and using what you wrote, let $z=x+iy$ and find that the coefficients of $x^2$ and $y^2$ are the same, and there is $xy$ term. This gives a circle.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        WOLOG, we may assume $z_1 =0$. Then we are looking at $|z-z_0|=rho |z|$. Next, by rotation, we may assume that $a=z_0$ is real and positive.



        Now, let $z=x+iy$ and square the equation to get
        $(x-a)^2 +y^2=rho^2 (x^2 +y^2)$. When this is expanded, a conic section is obtained with equal coefficients for $x$ and $y$. This is a circle.



        Alternatively, and using what you wrote, let $z=x+iy$ and find that the coefficients of $x^2$ and $y^2$ are the same, and there is $xy$ term. This gives a circle.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        WOLOG, we may assume $z_1 =0$. Then we are looking at $|z-z_0|=rho |z|$. Next, by rotation, we may assume that $a=z_0$ is real and positive.



        Now, let $z=x+iy$ and square the equation to get
        $(x-a)^2 +y^2=rho^2 (x^2 +y^2)$. When this is expanded, a conic section is obtained with equal coefficients for $x$ and $y$. This is a circle.



        Alternatively, and using what you wrote, let $z=x+iy$ and find that the coefficients of $x^2$ and $y^2$ are the same, and there is $xy$ term. This gives a circle.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Aug 5 '15 at 19:59









        polymath257polymath257

        141




        141























            0












            $begingroup$

            Hint..you can write $z=x+iy$, $z_0=a+ib$, $z_1=c+id$ for real $x,y,a,b,c,d$ and apply your condition so that you get$$(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2=rho^2[(x-c)^2+(y-d)^2]$$ which will lead to the equation of a circle






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Is this a hint?? When I have done that calculation then there is no point saying me to put $z,z_0$ etc etc.
              $endgroup$
              – user152715
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:02










            • $begingroup$
              I think there should be an $x - c$ on the RHS instead of $-c$. Otherwise this seems like the most elegant, concise solution.
              $endgroup$
              – Colm Bhandal
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:05












            • $begingroup$
              @ColmBhandal: yes! Thanks
              $endgroup$
              – David Quinn
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:06










            • $begingroup$
              @user152715 it is only intended as a hint in the sense that this will lead to the solution but does not constitute the full solution
              $endgroup$
              – David Quinn
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:12










            • $begingroup$
              @DavidQuinn which are the radius and the center of the circle?
              $endgroup$
              – Maggie94
              Jan 15 at 14:48
















            0












            $begingroup$

            Hint..you can write $z=x+iy$, $z_0=a+ib$, $z_1=c+id$ for real $x,y,a,b,c,d$ and apply your condition so that you get$$(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2=rho^2[(x-c)^2+(y-d)^2]$$ which will lead to the equation of a circle






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Is this a hint?? When I have done that calculation then there is no point saying me to put $z,z_0$ etc etc.
              $endgroup$
              – user152715
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:02










            • $begingroup$
              I think there should be an $x - c$ on the RHS instead of $-c$. Otherwise this seems like the most elegant, concise solution.
              $endgroup$
              – Colm Bhandal
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:05












            • $begingroup$
              @ColmBhandal: yes! Thanks
              $endgroup$
              – David Quinn
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:06










            • $begingroup$
              @user152715 it is only intended as a hint in the sense that this will lead to the solution but does not constitute the full solution
              $endgroup$
              – David Quinn
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:12










            • $begingroup$
              @DavidQuinn which are the radius and the center of the circle?
              $endgroup$
              – Maggie94
              Jan 15 at 14:48














            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Hint..you can write $z=x+iy$, $z_0=a+ib$, $z_1=c+id$ for real $x,y,a,b,c,d$ and apply your condition so that you get$$(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2=rho^2[(x-c)^2+(y-d)^2]$$ which will lead to the equation of a circle






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Hint..you can write $z=x+iy$, $z_0=a+ib$, $z_1=c+id$ for real $x,y,a,b,c,d$ and apply your condition so that you get$$(x-a)^2+(y-b)^2=rho^2[(x-c)^2+(y-d)^2]$$ which will lead to the equation of a circle







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Aug 5 '15 at 20:06

























            answered Aug 5 '15 at 19:58









            David QuinnDavid Quinn

            24k21141




            24k21141












            • $begingroup$
              Is this a hint?? When I have done that calculation then there is no point saying me to put $z,z_0$ etc etc.
              $endgroup$
              – user152715
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:02










            • $begingroup$
              I think there should be an $x - c$ on the RHS instead of $-c$. Otherwise this seems like the most elegant, concise solution.
              $endgroup$
              – Colm Bhandal
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:05












            • $begingroup$
              @ColmBhandal: yes! Thanks
              $endgroup$
              – David Quinn
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:06










            • $begingroup$
              @user152715 it is only intended as a hint in the sense that this will lead to the solution but does not constitute the full solution
              $endgroup$
              – David Quinn
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:12










            • $begingroup$
              @DavidQuinn which are the radius and the center of the circle?
              $endgroup$
              – Maggie94
              Jan 15 at 14:48


















            • $begingroup$
              Is this a hint?? When I have done that calculation then there is no point saying me to put $z,z_0$ etc etc.
              $endgroup$
              – user152715
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:02










            • $begingroup$
              I think there should be an $x - c$ on the RHS instead of $-c$. Otherwise this seems like the most elegant, concise solution.
              $endgroup$
              – Colm Bhandal
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:05












            • $begingroup$
              @ColmBhandal: yes! Thanks
              $endgroup$
              – David Quinn
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:06










            • $begingroup$
              @user152715 it is only intended as a hint in the sense that this will lead to the solution but does not constitute the full solution
              $endgroup$
              – David Quinn
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:12










            • $begingroup$
              @DavidQuinn which are the radius and the center of the circle?
              $endgroup$
              – Maggie94
              Jan 15 at 14:48
















            $begingroup$
            Is this a hint?? When I have done that calculation then there is no point saying me to put $z,z_0$ etc etc.
            $endgroup$
            – user152715
            Aug 5 '15 at 20:02




            $begingroup$
            Is this a hint?? When I have done that calculation then there is no point saying me to put $z,z_0$ etc etc.
            $endgroup$
            – user152715
            Aug 5 '15 at 20:02












            $begingroup$
            I think there should be an $x - c$ on the RHS instead of $-c$. Otherwise this seems like the most elegant, concise solution.
            $endgroup$
            – Colm Bhandal
            Aug 5 '15 at 20:05






            $begingroup$
            I think there should be an $x - c$ on the RHS instead of $-c$. Otherwise this seems like the most elegant, concise solution.
            $endgroup$
            – Colm Bhandal
            Aug 5 '15 at 20:05














            $begingroup$
            @ColmBhandal: yes! Thanks
            $endgroup$
            – David Quinn
            Aug 5 '15 at 20:06




            $begingroup$
            @ColmBhandal: yes! Thanks
            $endgroup$
            – David Quinn
            Aug 5 '15 at 20:06












            $begingroup$
            @user152715 it is only intended as a hint in the sense that this will lead to the solution but does not constitute the full solution
            $endgroup$
            – David Quinn
            Aug 5 '15 at 20:12




            $begingroup$
            @user152715 it is only intended as a hint in the sense that this will lead to the solution but does not constitute the full solution
            $endgroup$
            – David Quinn
            Aug 5 '15 at 20:12












            $begingroup$
            @DavidQuinn which are the radius and the center of the circle?
            $endgroup$
            – Maggie94
            Jan 15 at 14:48




            $begingroup$
            @DavidQuinn which are the radius and the center of the circle?
            $endgroup$
            – Maggie94
            Jan 15 at 14:48











            0












            $begingroup$

            Begin by noting that $langle x+iy,a+ib rangle = xa+yb = text{Re}left((x+iy)(a-ib)right)$ so if we think of $z$ and $w$ as two-dimensional vectors then the complex algebra permits a natural formulation of the Euclidean inner-product in the plane:
            $$ langle v,w rangle = text{Re} (v bar{w}) $$
            On the other hand, we have $|z|^2 = z bar{z}$ and the many wonderful properties of the complex conjugate. Suppose $|z-z_o| = rho|z-z_1|$ for some $rho>0$ (if I say $rho>0$ then it must be real !). Square the given condition and use properties of complex conjugation:
            $$ (z-z_o)(bar{z}-bar{z_o}) = rho^2(z-z_1)(bar{z}-bar{z_1})$$
            or
            $$ zbar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+z_obar{z_o} = rho^2left( zbar{z}-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+z_1bar{z_1}right)$$
            which gives
            $$ |z|^2-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+|z_o|^2 = rho^2left( |z|^2-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+|z_1|^2right)$$
            which we can rearrange to
            $$ rho^2zbar{z_1}+rho^2z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
            (rho^2-1)|z|^2 +rho^2|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
            Ok, I'm tired of $rho$, I'm setting $rho=1$ in which case:
            $$ zbar{z_1}+z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
            |z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
            which gives, using $text{Re}(z) = frac{1}{2}(z + bar{z})$,
            $$ z(overline{z_1-z_o})+bar{z}(z_1-z_o) = 2text{Re}left(z(overline{z_1-z_o})right) = |z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
            or,
            $$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = frac{1}{2}left(|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2right) $$
            Now, if we have $|z_o| = |z_1|$ then it follows:
            $$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = 0 $$
            which says $z$ points in a direction perpendicular to the line-segment from $z_0$ to $z_1$. In any event, you can use the things I've done here to find the answer.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              ok, so while I have not answered the question I at least showed you why $rho=1$ is not allowed.
              $endgroup$
              – James S. Cook
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:20
















            0












            $begingroup$

            Begin by noting that $langle x+iy,a+ib rangle = xa+yb = text{Re}left((x+iy)(a-ib)right)$ so if we think of $z$ and $w$ as two-dimensional vectors then the complex algebra permits a natural formulation of the Euclidean inner-product in the plane:
            $$ langle v,w rangle = text{Re} (v bar{w}) $$
            On the other hand, we have $|z|^2 = z bar{z}$ and the many wonderful properties of the complex conjugate. Suppose $|z-z_o| = rho|z-z_1|$ for some $rho>0$ (if I say $rho>0$ then it must be real !). Square the given condition and use properties of complex conjugation:
            $$ (z-z_o)(bar{z}-bar{z_o}) = rho^2(z-z_1)(bar{z}-bar{z_1})$$
            or
            $$ zbar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+z_obar{z_o} = rho^2left( zbar{z}-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+z_1bar{z_1}right)$$
            which gives
            $$ |z|^2-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+|z_o|^2 = rho^2left( |z|^2-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+|z_1|^2right)$$
            which we can rearrange to
            $$ rho^2zbar{z_1}+rho^2z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
            (rho^2-1)|z|^2 +rho^2|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
            Ok, I'm tired of $rho$, I'm setting $rho=1$ in which case:
            $$ zbar{z_1}+z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
            |z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
            which gives, using $text{Re}(z) = frac{1}{2}(z + bar{z})$,
            $$ z(overline{z_1-z_o})+bar{z}(z_1-z_o) = 2text{Re}left(z(overline{z_1-z_o})right) = |z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
            or,
            $$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = frac{1}{2}left(|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2right) $$
            Now, if we have $|z_o| = |z_1|$ then it follows:
            $$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = 0 $$
            which says $z$ points in a direction perpendicular to the line-segment from $z_0$ to $z_1$. In any event, you can use the things I've done here to find the answer.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              ok, so while I have not answered the question I at least showed you why $rho=1$ is not allowed.
              $endgroup$
              – James S. Cook
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:20














            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Begin by noting that $langle x+iy,a+ib rangle = xa+yb = text{Re}left((x+iy)(a-ib)right)$ so if we think of $z$ and $w$ as two-dimensional vectors then the complex algebra permits a natural formulation of the Euclidean inner-product in the plane:
            $$ langle v,w rangle = text{Re} (v bar{w}) $$
            On the other hand, we have $|z|^2 = z bar{z}$ and the many wonderful properties of the complex conjugate. Suppose $|z-z_o| = rho|z-z_1|$ for some $rho>0$ (if I say $rho>0$ then it must be real !). Square the given condition and use properties of complex conjugation:
            $$ (z-z_o)(bar{z}-bar{z_o}) = rho^2(z-z_1)(bar{z}-bar{z_1})$$
            or
            $$ zbar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+z_obar{z_o} = rho^2left( zbar{z}-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+z_1bar{z_1}right)$$
            which gives
            $$ |z|^2-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+|z_o|^2 = rho^2left( |z|^2-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+|z_1|^2right)$$
            which we can rearrange to
            $$ rho^2zbar{z_1}+rho^2z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
            (rho^2-1)|z|^2 +rho^2|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
            Ok, I'm tired of $rho$, I'm setting $rho=1$ in which case:
            $$ zbar{z_1}+z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
            |z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
            which gives, using $text{Re}(z) = frac{1}{2}(z + bar{z})$,
            $$ z(overline{z_1-z_o})+bar{z}(z_1-z_o) = 2text{Re}left(z(overline{z_1-z_o})right) = |z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
            or,
            $$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = frac{1}{2}left(|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2right) $$
            Now, if we have $|z_o| = |z_1|$ then it follows:
            $$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = 0 $$
            which says $z$ points in a direction perpendicular to the line-segment from $z_0$ to $z_1$. In any event, you can use the things I've done here to find the answer.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Begin by noting that $langle x+iy,a+ib rangle = xa+yb = text{Re}left((x+iy)(a-ib)right)$ so if we think of $z$ and $w$ as two-dimensional vectors then the complex algebra permits a natural formulation of the Euclidean inner-product in the plane:
            $$ langle v,w rangle = text{Re} (v bar{w}) $$
            On the other hand, we have $|z|^2 = z bar{z}$ and the many wonderful properties of the complex conjugate. Suppose $|z-z_o| = rho|z-z_1|$ for some $rho>0$ (if I say $rho>0$ then it must be real !). Square the given condition and use properties of complex conjugation:
            $$ (z-z_o)(bar{z}-bar{z_o}) = rho^2(z-z_1)(bar{z}-bar{z_1})$$
            or
            $$ zbar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+z_obar{z_o} = rho^2left( zbar{z}-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+z_1bar{z_1}right)$$
            which gives
            $$ |z|^2-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z}+|z_o|^2 = rho^2left( |z|^2-zbar{z_1}-z_1bar{z}+|z_1|^2right)$$
            which we can rearrange to
            $$ rho^2zbar{z_1}+rho^2z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
            (rho^2-1)|z|^2 +rho^2|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
            Ok, I'm tired of $rho$, I'm setting $rho=1$ in which case:
            $$ zbar{z_1}+z_1bar{z}-zbar{z_o}-z_obar{z} =
            |z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
            which gives, using $text{Re}(z) = frac{1}{2}(z + bar{z})$,
            $$ z(overline{z_1-z_o})+bar{z}(z_1-z_o) = 2text{Re}left(z(overline{z_1-z_o})right) = |z_1|^2- |z_o|^2$$
            or,
            $$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = frac{1}{2}left(|z_1|^2- |z_o|^2right) $$
            Now, if we have $|z_o| = |z_1|$ then it follows:
            $$ langle z, z_1-z_o rangle = 0 $$
            which says $z$ points in a direction perpendicular to the line-segment from $z_0$ to $z_1$. In any event, you can use the things I've done here to find the answer.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Aug 5 '15 at 20:15









            James S. CookJames S. Cook

            13.1k22872




            13.1k22872












            • $begingroup$
              ok, so while I have not answered the question I at least showed you why $rho=1$ is not allowed.
              $endgroup$
              – James S. Cook
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:20


















            • $begingroup$
              ok, so while I have not answered the question I at least showed you why $rho=1$ is not allowed.
              $endgroup$
              – James S. Cook
              Aug 5 '15 at 20:20
















            $begingroup$
            ok, so while I have not answered the question I at least showed you why $rho=1$ is not allowed.
            $endgroup$
            – James S. Cook
            Aug 5 '15 at 20:20




            $begingroup$
            ok, so while I have not answered the question I at least showed you why $rho=1$ is not allowed.
            $endgroup$
            – James S. Cook
            Aug 5 '15 at 20:20


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1385817%2fshow-that-the-set-z-satisfying-z-z-0-rhoz-z-1-rho-neq-1-is-a-circ%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter