SQL statement unique ID and then grouping by unique ID and counting a distinct other ID group












1















I want to make a query that makes the unique ID concatenate and then group by this unique ID and then count another field by distinct. I get the output but the count is off. I verified through another source.



SELECT 
CONCAT(x, y, z, a) AS 'uniqueid',
COUNT(DISTINCT id) AS 'count'
FROM bv
GROUP BY
x, y, z, a









share|improve this question

























  • What is the sql that was used to verify through another source? Please show the other source's sql. What is the timing of these two counts?? same instant?? or some time lag? Are all counts higher/mixed/lower? Please share some data, and above count and another source count...!!

    – donPablo
    Nov 20 '18 at 23:22













  • The other source being used is tableau unfortunately I can't share the data. Tableau makes the calculated field similar to the concatenate and then counts the id file and gives me 8k more records compared to the SQL query. The id number can be used several times that's why we want to count by Id. At the end we want to filter it by distinct id = 1

    – funSizes
    Nov 20 '18 at 23:25











  • I simply don't understand what count is off. Can you give an example of what you mean?

    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 20 '18 at 23:44











  • Which DBMS product are you using? "SQL" is just a query language, not the name of a specific database product (and your query is invalid standard SQL). Please add a tag for the database product you are using

    – a_horse_with_no_name
    Nov 21 '18 at 6:49











  • It seems that 'uniqueid' and 'id' are separate columns. Yet they (probably) have different values. And Tableau has a "SIMILAR Field" yet not exactly the same field? If different from concatenate, no wonder different results are being gotten? Also, does tableau count(id) or count(distinct id)?

    – donPablo
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:46
















1















I want to make a query that makes the unique ID concatenate and then group by this unique ID and then count another field by distinct. I get the output but the count is off. I verified through another source.



SELECT 
CONCAT(x, y, z, a) AS 'uniqueid',
COUNT(DISTINCT id) AS 'count'
FROM bv
GROUP BY
x, y, z, a









share|improve this question

























  • What is the sql that was used to verify through another source? Please show the other source's sql. What is the timing of these two counts?? same instant?? or some time lag? Are all counts higher/mixed/lower? Please share some data, and above count and another source count...!!

    – donPablo
    Nov 20 '18 at 23:22













  • The other source being used is tableau unfortunately I can't share the data. Tableau makes the calculated field similar to the concatenate and then counts the id file and gives me 8k more records compared to the SQL query. The id number can be used several times that's why we want to count by Id. At the end we want to filter it by distinct id = 1

    – funSizes
    Nov 20 '18 at 23:25











  • I simply don't understand what count is off. Can you give an example of what you mean?

    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 20 '18 at 23:44











  • Which DBMS product are you using? "SQL" is just a query language, not the name of a specific database product (and your query is invalid standard SQL). Please add a tag for the database product you are using

    – a_horse_with_no_name
    Nov 21 '18 at 6:49











  • It seems that 'uniqueid' and 'id' are separate columns. Yet they (probably) have different values. And Tableau has a "SIMILAR Field" yet not exactly the same field? If different from concatenate, no wonder different results are being gotten? Also, does tableau count(id) or count(distinct id)?

    – donPablo
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:46














1












1








1








I want to make a query that makes the unique ID concatenate and then group by this unique ID and then count another field by distinct. I get the output but the count is off. I verified through another source.



SELECT 
CONCAT(x, y, z, a) AS 'uniqueid',
COUNT(DISTINCT id) AS 'count'
FROM bv
GROUP BY
x, y, z, a









share|improve this question
















I want to make a query that makes the unique ID concatenate and then group by this unique ID and then count another field by distinct. I get the output but the count is off. I verified through another source.



SELECT 
CONCAT(x, y, z, a) AS 'uniqueid',
COUNT(DISTINCT id) AS 'count'
FROM bv
GROUP BY
x, y, z, a






sql






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 21 '18 at 5:26









marc_s

575k12811101257




575k12811101257










asked Nov 20 '18 at 23:14









funSizesfunSizes

277




277













  • What is the sql that was used to verify through another source? Please show the other source's sql. What is the timing of these two counts?? same instant?? or some time lag? Are all counts higher/mixed/lower? Please share some data, and above count and another source count...!!

    – donPablo
    Nov 20 '18 at 23:22













  • The other source being used is tableau unfortunately I can't share the data. Tableau makes the calculated field similar to the concatenate and then counts the id file and gives me 8k more records compared to the SQL query. The id number can be used several times that's why we want to count by Id. At the end we want to filter it by distinct id = 1

    – funSizes
    Nov 20 '18 at 23:25











  • I simply don't understand what count is off. Can you give an example of what you mean?

    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 20 '18 at 23:44











  • Which DBMS product are you using? "SQL" is just a query language, not the name of a specific database product (and your query is invalid standard SQL). Please add a tag for the database product you are using

    – a_horse_with_no_name
    Nov 21 '18 at 6:49











  • It seems that 'uniqueid' and 'id' are separate columns. Yet they (probably) have different values. And Tableau has a "SIMILAR Field" yet not exactly the same field? If different from concatenate, no wonder different results are being gotten? Also, does tableau count(id) or count(distinct id)?

    – donPablo
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:46



















  • What is the sql that was used to verify through another source? Please show the other source's sql. What is the timing of these two counts?? same instant?? or some time lag? Are all counts higher/mixed/lower? Please share some data, and above count and another source count...!!

    – donPablo
    Nov 20 '18 at 23:22













  • The other source being used is tableau unfortunately I can't share the data. Tableau makes the calculated field similar to the concatenate and then counts the id file and gives me 8k more records compared to the SQL query. The id number can be used several times that's why we want to count by Id. At the end we want to filter it by distinct id = 1

    – funSizes
    Nov 20 '18 at 23:25











  • I simply don't understand what count is off. Can you give an example of what you mean?

    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 20 '18 at 23:44











  • Which DBMS product are you using? "SQL" is just a query language, not the name of a specific database product (and your query is invalid standard SQL). Please add a tag for the database product you are using

    – a_horse_with_no_name
    Nov 21 '18 at 6:49











  • It seems that 'uniqueid' and 'id' are separate columns. Yet they (probably) have different values. And Tableau has a "SIMILAR Field" yet not exactly the same field? If different from concatenate, no wonder different results are being gotten? Also, does tableau count(id) or count(distinct id)?

    – donPablo
    Nov 22 '18 at 0:46

















What is the sql that was used to verify through another source? Please show the other source's sql. What is the timing of these two counts?? same instant?? or some time lag? Are all counts higher/mixed/lower? Please share some data, and above count and another source count...!!

– donPablo
Nov 20 '18 at 23:22







What is the sql that was used to verify through another source? Please show the other source's sql. What is the timing of these two counts?? same instant?? or some time lag? Are all counts higher/mixed/lower? Please share some data, and above count and another source count...!!

– donPablo
Nov 20 '18 at 23:22















The other source being used is tableau unfortunately I can't share the data. Tableau makes the calculated field similar to the concatenate and then counts the id file and gives me 8k more records compared to the SQL query. The id number can be used several times that's why we want to count by Id. At the end we want to filter it by distinct id = 1

– funSizes
Nov 20 '18 at 23:25





The other source being used is tableau unfortunately I can't share the data. Tableau makes the calculated field similar to the concatenate and then counts the id file and gives me 8k more records compared to the SQL query. The id number can be used several times that's why we want to count by Id. At the end we want to filter it by distinct id = 1

– funSizes
Nov 20 '18 at 23:25













I simply don't understand what count is off. Can you give an example of what you mean?

– Gordon Linoff
Nov 20 '18 at 23:44





I simply don't understand what count is off. Can you give an example of what you mean?

– Gordon Linoff
Nov 20 '18 at 23:44













Which DBMS product are you using? "SQL" is just a query language, not the name of a specific database product (and your query is invalid standard SQL). Please add a tag for the database product you are using

– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 21 '18 at 6:49





Which DBMS product are you using? "SQL" is just a query language, not the name of a specific database product (and your query is invalid standard SQL). Please add a tag for the database product you are using

– a_horse_with_no_name
Nov 21 '18 at 6:49













It seems that 'uniqueid' and 'id' are separate columns. Yet they (probably) have different values. And Tableau has a "SIMILAR Field" yet not exactly the same field? If different from concatenate, no wonder different results are being gotten? Also, does tableau count(id) or count(distinct id)?

– donPablo
Nov 22 '18 at 0:46





It seems that 'uniqueid' and 'id' are separate columns. Yet they (probably) have different values. And Tableau has a "SIMILAR Field" yet not exactly the same field? If different from concatenate, no wonder different results are being gotten? Also, does tableau count(id) or count(distinct id)?

– donPablo
Nov 22 '18 at 0:46












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














You need to group on the same non-aggregated fields (or composite fields in this case) as you have in your SELECT list. You should be able to use the query below to get what you're looking for:



SELECT 
CONCAT(x,y,z,a) AS 'uniqueid'
,COUNT(DISTINCT id) AS 'count'
FROM bv
GROUP BY CONCAT(x,y,z,a)





share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53403035%2fsql-statement-unique-id-and-then-grouping-by-unique-id-and-counting-a-distinct-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    You need to group on the same non-aggregated fields (or composite fields in this case) as you have in your SELECT list. You should be able to use the query below to get what you're looking for:



    SELECT 
    CONCAT(x,y,z,a) AS 'uniqueid'
    ,COUNT(DISTINCT id) AS 'count'
    FROM bv
    GROUP BY CONCAT(x,y,z,a)





    share|improve this answer




























      0














      You need to group on the same non-aggregated fields (or composite fields in this case) as you have in your SELECT list. You should be able to use the query below to get what you're looking for:



      SELECT 
      CONCAT(x,y,z,a) AS 'uniqueid'
      ,COUNT(DISTINCT id) AS 'count'
      FROM bv
      GROUP BY CONCAT(x,y,z,a)





      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0







        You need to group on the same non-aggregated fields (or composite fields in this case) as you have in your SELECT list. You should be able to use the query below to get what you're looking for:



        SELECT 
        CONCAT(x,y,z,a) AS 'uniqueid'
        ,COUNT(DISTINCT id) AS 'count'
        FROM bv
        GROUP BY CONCAT(x,y,z,a)





        share|improve this answer













        You need to group on the same non-aggregated fields (or composite fields in this case) as you have in your SELECT list. You should be able to use the query below to get what you're looking for:



        SELECT 
        CONCAT(x,y,z,a) AS 'uniqueid'
        ,COUNT(DISTINCT id) AS 'count'
        FROM bv
        GROUP BY CONCAT(x,y,z,a)






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 20 '18 at 23:33









        digital.aarondigital.aaron

        3,2131330




        3,2131330






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53403035%2fsql-statement-unique-id-and-then-grouping-by-unique-id-and-counting-a-distinct-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter