What function satisfies $F'(x) = F(2x)$?












19












$begingroup$


The exponential generating function counting the number of graphs on $n$ labeled vertices satisfies (and is defined by) the equations
$$
F'(x) = F(2x) ; ; ; ; ; F(0) = 1
$$
Is there some closed form or other nice description of this function?
Does it have a name?





Of course, the series itself does not converge for any nonzero $x$, but like the Lambert W function (counting trees) it has combinatorial meaning. And the Lambert W function has a nice description as the inverse of $x e^x$; maybe there is a similar description of $F$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well, if the function is analytic at $0$, then its Maclaurin series is $$sum frac{2^{n(n-1)/2}}{n!},$$from repeated differentiation at $x = 0$, but I'm guessing you knew this.
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    Jul 18 '15 at 7:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes I did. I've been making little errors like this all week :-(
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    Jul 18 '15 at 7:44






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    the power series's radius of convergence is zero though.
    $endgroup$
    – mercio
    Jul 18 '15 at 8:20






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Hmm.. if we set $H(t)=F(frac{1}{log 2}2^{-t})$ then $H$ satisfies the delay differential equation $H'(t)=-2^{-t}H(t-1)$, which looks like it has many different solutions with $lim_{ttoinfty}H(t)=1$
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 18 '15 at 10:37








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @6005: I don't. I just have the heuristic argument that you can choose $H$ freely on, say, the interval $[1,2]$ making sure the $H'(2)=-frac12H(1)$, and then integrate the values of $H(t)$ up to $t=infty$ numerically. Because of the $2^{-t}$ factor it should end up with a horizontal asymptote, which will be nonzero unless you're pretty unlucky. Then scale everything such that the limit is $1$ instead (the equation is linear after all).
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 18 '15 at 20:02


















19












$begingroup$


The exponential generating function counting the number of graphs on $n$ labeled vertices satisfies (and is defined by) the equations
$$
F'(x) = F(2x) ; ; ; ; ; F(0) = 1
$$
Is there some closed form or other nice description of this function?
Does it have a name?





Of course, the series itself does not converge for any nonzero $x$, but like the Lambert W function (counting trees) it has combinatorial meaning. And the Lambert W function has a nice description as the inverse of $x e^x$; maybe there is a similar description of $F$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well, if the function is analytic at $0$, then its Maclaurin series is $$sum frac{2^{n(n-1)/2}}{n!},$$from repeated differentiation at $x = 0$, but I'm guessing you knew this.
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    Jul 18 '15 at 7:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes I did. I've been making little errors like this all week :-(
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    Jul 18 '15 at 7:44






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    the power series's radius of convergence is zero though.
    $endgroup$
    – mercio
    Jul 18 '15 at 8:20






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Hmm.. if we set $H(t)=F(frac{1}{log 2}2^{-t})$ then $H$ satisfies the delay differential equation $H'(t)=-2^{-t}H(t-1)$, which looks like it has many different solutions with $lim_{ttoinfty}H(t)=1$
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 18 '15 at 10:37








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @6005: I don't. I just have the heuristic argument that you can choose $H$ freely on, say, the interval $[1,2]$ making sure the $H'(2)=-frac12H(1)$, and then integrate the values of $H(t)$ up to $t=infty$ numerically. Because of the $2^{-t}$ factor it should end up with a horizontal asymptote, which will be nonzero unless you're pretty unlucky. Then scale everything such that the limit is $1$ instead (the equation is linear after all).
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 18 '15 at 20:02
















19












19








19


6



$begingroup$


The exponential generating function counting the number of graphs on $n$ labeled vertices satisfies (and is defined by) the equations
$$
F'(x) = F(2x) ; ; ; ; ; F(0) = 1
$$
Is there some closed form or other nice description of this function?
Does it have a name?





Of course, the series itself does not converge for any nonzero $x$, but like the Lambert W function (counting trees) it has combinatorial meaning. And the Lambert W function has a nice description as the inverse of $x e^x$; maybe there is a similar description of $F$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The exponential generating function counting the number of graphs on $n$ labeled vertices satisfies (and is defined by) the equations
$$
F'(x) = F(2x) ; ; ; ; ; F(0) = 1
$$
Is there some closed form or other nice description of this function?
Does it have a name?





Of course, the series itself does not converge for any nonzero $x$, but like the Lambert W function (counting trees) it has combinatorial meaning. And the Lambert W function has a nice description as the inverse of $x e^x$; maybe there is a similar description of $F$?







combinatorics reference-request generating-functions delay-differential-equations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 19 '15 at 4:53









Michael Galuza

3,96221536




3,96221536










asked Jul 18 '15 at 7:04









60056005

36.2k751125




36.2k751125








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well, if the function is analytic at $0$, then its Maclaurin series is $$sum frac{2^{n(n-1)/2}}{n!},$$from repeated differentiation at $x = 0$, but I'm guessing you knew this.
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    Jul 18 '15 at 7:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes I did. I've been making little errors like this all week :-(
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    Jul 18 '15 at 7:44






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    the power series's radius of convergence is zero though.
    $endgroup$
    – mercio
    Jul 18 '15 at 8:20






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Hmm.. if we set $H(t)=F(frac{1}{log 2}2^{-t})$ then $H$ satisfies the delay differential equation $H'(t)=-2^{-t}H(t-1)$, which looks like it has many different solutions with $lim_{ttoinfty}H(t)=1$
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 18 '15 at 10:37








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @6005: I don't. I just have the heuristic argument that you can choose $H$ freely on, say, the interval $[1,2]$ making sure the $H'(2)=-frac12H(1)$, and then integrate the values of $H(t)$ up to $t=infty$ numerically. Because of the $2^{-t}$ factor it should end up with a horizontal asymptote, which will be nonzero unless you're pretty unlucky. Then scale everything such that the limit is $1$ instead (the equation is linear after all).
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 18 '15 at 20:02
















  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Well, if the function is analytic at $0$, then its Maclaurin series is $$sum frac{2^{n(n-1)/2}}{n!},$$from repeated differentiation at $x = 0$, but I'm guessing you knew this.
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    Jul 18 '15 at 7:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes I did. I've been making little errors like this all week :-(
    $endgroup$
    – Theo Bendit
    Jul 18 '15 at 7:44






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    the power series's radius of convergence is zero though.
    $endgroup$
    – mercio
    Jul 18 '15 at 8:20






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Hmm.. if we set $H(t)=F(frac{1}{log 2}2^{-t})$ then $H$ satisfies the delay differential equation $H'(t)=-2^{-t}H(t-1)$, which looks like it has many different solutions with $lim_{ttoinfty}H(t)=1$
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 18 '15 at 10:37








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @6005: I don't. I just have the heuristic argument that you can choose $H$ freely on, say, the interval $[1,2]$ making sure the $H'(2)=-frac12H(1)$, and then integrate the values of $H(t)$ up to $t=infty$ numerically. Because of the $2^{-t}$ factor it should end up with a horizontal asymptote, which will be nonzero unless you're pretty unlucky. Then scale everything such that the limit is $1$ instead (the equation is linear after all).
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Jul 18 '15 at 20:02










2




2




$begingroup$
Well, if the function is analytic at $0$, then its Maclaurin series is $$sum frac{2^{n(n-1)/2}}{n!},$$from repeated differentiation at $x = 0$, but I'm guessing you knew this.
$endgroup$
– Theo Bendit
Jul 18 '15 at 7:28




$begingroup$
Well, if the function is analytic at $0$, then its Maclaurin series is $$sum frac{2^{n(n-1)/2}}{n!},$$from repeated differentiation at $x = 0$, but I'm guessing you knew this.
$endgroup$
– Theo Bendit
Jul 18 '15 at 7:28




1




1




$begingroup$
Yes I did. I've been making little errors like this all week :-(
$endgroup$
– Theo Bendit
Jul 18 '15 at 7:44




$begingroup$
Yes I did. I've been making little errors like this all week :-(
$endgroup$
– Theo Bendit
Jul 18 '15 at 7:44




3




3




$begingroup$
the power series's radius of convergence is zero though.
$endgroup$
– mercio
Jul 18 '15 at 8:20




$begingroup$
the power series's radius of convergence is zero though.
$endgroup$
– mercio
Jul 18 '15 at 8:20




3




3




$begingroup$
Hmm.. if we set $H(t)=F(frac{1}{log 2}2^{-t})$ then $H$ satisfies the delay differential equation $H'(t)=-2^{-t}H(t-1)$, which looks like it has many different solutions with $lim_{ttoinfty}H(t)=1$
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jul 18 '15 at 10:37






$begingroup$
Hmm.. if we set $H(t)=F(frac{1}{log 2}2^{-t})$ then $H$ satisfies the delay differential equation $H'(t)=-2^{-t}H(t-1)$, which looks like it has many different solutions with $lim_{ttoinfty}H(t)=1$
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jul 18 '15 at 10:37






1




1




$begingroup$
@6005: I don't. I just have the heuristic argument that you can choose $H$ freely on, say, the interval $[1,2]$ making sure the $H'(2)=-frac12H(1)$, and then integrate the values of $H(t)$ up to $t=infty$ numerically. Because of the $2^{-t}$ factor it should end up with a horizontal asymptote, which will be nonzero unless you're pretty unlucky. Then scale everything such that the limit is $1$ instead (the equation is linear after all).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jul 18 '15 at 20:02






$begingroup$
@6005: I don't. I just have the heuristic argument that you can choose $H$ freely on, say, the interval $[1,2]$ making sure the $H'(2)=-frac12H(1)$, and then integrate the values of $H(t)$ up to $t=infty$ numerically. Because of the $2^{-t}$ factor it should end up with a horizontal asymptote, which will be nonzero unless you're pretty unlucky. Then scale everything such that the limit is $1$ instead (the equation is linear after all).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jul 18 '15 at 20:02












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















16












$begingroup$

There are infinitely many differentiable functions $Fcolon [0,infty)tomathbb{R}$ that satisfy
$$
F'(x)=F(2x)qquadtext{and}qquad F(0)=1.
$$

We will follow the argument outlined by @HenningMakholm in the comments. First, consider the substitution $G(x) = Fleft(dfrac{2^x}{log 2}right)$. Plugging this into the above equation gives
$$
G,'(x) = 2^x G(x+1)qquadtext{and}qquad lim_{xto-infty} G(x)=1.
$$

This delay differential equation has a large number of solutions. Roughly speaking, one can choose any function for $G$ on $[0,1]$, and then define
$$
G(x) = 2^{1-x}G,'(x-1)tag*{(1)}
$$

recursively for $x> 1$, and
$$
G(x) = G(0) - int_{x+1}^1 2^{u-1} G(u),dutag*{(2)}
$$

recursively for $x<0$. (See this question for a simpler example of this kind of solution.)



Obstacles and Boundary Conditions



There are two obstacles to this construction:




  1. If $G$ is $C^n$ on the interval $(0,1)$, then $G$ will be $C^{n-1}$ on $(1,2)$ by equation (1), and then $C^{n-2}$ on $(2,3)$, and so forth. Thus, if we want $G$ to be everywhere defined, we must start with a $C^infty$ function on $[0,1]$.


  2. If we start with an arbitrary $C^infty$ function on $[0,1]$ and then switch to definition (1) for $x>1$, we must make sure that $G$ is $C^infty$ at $x=1$, i.e. the the left and right hand derivatives of every order match up at this point.



For the second obstacle, repeatedly differentiating the equation $G(x+1)=2^{-x}G,'(x)$ gives the sequence of equations
$$
G^{(n)}(x+1) ;=; sum_{i=0}^n binom{n}{i}(-log 2)^{n-i},2^{-x}, G^{(i+1)}(x)
$$

and plugging in $x=0$ yields
$$
G^{(n)}(1) ;=; sum_{i=0}^n binom{n}{i}(-log 2)^{n-i}, G^{(i+1)}(0).
$$

These are the boundary conditions that $G$ must satisfy on the interval $[0,1]$, but it is not hard to find $C^infty$ functions that satisfy these, e.g. any bump function that satisfies
$$
G^{(n)}(0) = G^{(n)}(1) = 0;;text{ for all }ngeq 1
qquadtext{and}qquad
G(1)=0.
$$




The Limit as $xto-infty$



For negative values of $x$, the function $G(x)$ is defined by the integral equation
$$
G(x) = G(0) - int_{x+1}^1 2^{u-1} G(u),dutag*{(2)}
$$

If we assume that $G(x)geq 0$ for $xin [0,1]$ and, say, that
$$
int_0^1 2^{u-1} G(u),du ;<; frac{G(0)}{10}
$$

then $frac{9}{10}G(0) leq G(x) leq G(0)$ for all $xin[-1,0]$. It follows recursively that
$$
G(0) ;geq; G(x) ;geq; left(frac{9}{10} - frac{1}{log 4}right)G(0) ;>; 0
$$

for all $x<-1$, since
begin{align*}
G(x) ;&=; G(0)-int_{x+1}^1 2^{u-1}G(u),du \
&=; G(0) - int_0^1 2^{u-1}G(u),du - int_{x+1}^0 2^{u-1}G(u),du \
&geq; G(0) - frac{G(0)}{10} - int_{-infty}^0 2^{u-1}G(0),du \
&=; left(frac{9}{10} - frac{1}{log 4}right)G(0).
end{align*}

Then $G$ is monotone on $(-infty,0)$, so $displaystylelim_{xto-infty} G(x)$ exists and is positive. Scaling $G$ linearly, we can arrange for this limit to be $1$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1365327%2fwhat-function-satisfies-fx-f2x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    16












    $begingroup$

    There are infinitely many differentiable functions $Fcolon [0,infty)tomathbb{R}$ that satisfy
    $$
    F'(x)=F(2x)qquadtext{and}qquad F(0)=1.
    $$

    We will follow the argument outlined by @HenningMakholm in the comments. First, consider the substitution $G(x) = Fleft(dfrac{2^x}{log 2}right)$. Plugging this into the above equation gives
    $$
    G,'(x) = 2^x G(x+1)qquadtext{and}qquad lim_{xto-infty} G(x)=1.
    $$

    This delay differential equation has a large number of solutions. Roughly speaking, one can choose any function for $G$ on $[0,1]$, and then define
    $$
    G(x) = 2^{1-x}G,'(x-1)tag*{(1)}
    $$

    recursively for $x> 1$, and
    $$
    G(x) = G(0) - int_{x+1}^1 2^{u-1} G(u),dutag*{(2)}
    $$

    recursively for $x<0$. (See this question for a simpler example of this kind of solution.)



    Obstacles and Boundary Conditions



    There are two obstacles to this construction:




    1. If $G$ is $C^n$ on the interval $(0,1)$, then $G$ will be $C^{n-1}$ on $(1,2)$ by equation (1), and then $C^{n-2}$ on $(2,3)$, and so forth. Thus, if we want $G$ to be everywhere defined, we must start with a $C^infty$ function on $[0,1]$.


    2. If we start with an arbitrary $C^infty$ function on $[0,1]$ and then switch to definition (1) for $x>1$, we must make sure that $G$ is $C^infty$ at $x=1$, i.e. the the left and right hand derivatives of every order match up at this point.



    For the second obstacle, repeatedly differentiating the equation $G(x+1)=2^{-x}G,'(x)$ gives the sequence of equations
    $$
    G^{(n)}(x+1) ;=; sum_{i=0}^n binom{n}{i}(-log 2)^{n-i},2^{-x}, G^{(i+1)}(x)
    $$

    and plugging in $x=0$ yields
    $$
    G^{(n)}(1) ;=; sum_{i=0}^n binom{n}{i}(-log 2)^{n-i}, G^{(i+1)}(0).
    $$

    These are the boundary conditions that $G$ must satisfy on the interval $[0,1]$, but it is not hard to find $C^infty$ functions that satisfy these, e.g. any bump function that satisfies
    $$
    G^{(n)}(0) = G^{(n)}(1) = 0;;text{ for all }ngeq 1
    qquadtext{and}qquad
    G(1)=0.
    $$




    The Limit as $xto-infty$



    For negative values of $x$, the function $G(x)$ is defined by the integral equation
    $$
    G(x) = G(0) - int_{x+1}^1 2^{u-1} G(u),dutag*{(2)}
    $$

    If we assume that $G(x)geq 0$ for $xin [0,1]$ and, say, that
    $$
    int_0^1 2^{u-1} G(u),du ;<; frac{G(0)}{10}
    $$

    then $frac{9}{10}G(0) leq G(x) leq G(0)$ for all $xin[-1,0]$. It follows recursively that
    $$
    G(0) ;geq; G(x) ;geq; left(frac{9}{10} - frac{1}{log 4}right)G(0) ;>; 0
    $$

    for all $x<-1$, since
    begin{align*}
    G(x) ;&=; G(0)-int_{x+1}^1 2^{u-1}G(u),du \
    &=; G(0) - int_0^1 2^{u-1}G(u),du - int_{x+1}^0 2^{u-1}G(u),du \
    &geq; G(0) - frac{G(0)}{10} - int_{-infty}^0 2^{u-1}G(0),du \
    &=; left(frac{9}{10} - frac{1}{log 4}right)G(0).
    end{align*}

    Then $G$ is monotone on $(-infty,0)$, so $displaystylelim_{xto-infty} G(x)$ exists and is positive. Scaling $G$ linearly, we can arrange for this limit to be $1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      16












      $begingroup$

      There are infinitely many differentiable functions $Fcolon [0,infty)tomathbb{R}$ that satisfy
      $$
      F'(x)=F(2x)qquadtext{and}qquad F(0)=1.
      $$

      We will follow the argument outlined by @HenningMakholm in the comments. First, consider the substitution $G(x) = Fleft(dfrac{2^x}{log 2}right)$. Plugging this into the above equation gives
      $$
      G,'(x) = 2^x G(x+1)qquadtext{and}qquad lim_{xto-infty} G(x)=1.
      $$

      This delay differential equation has a large number of solutions. Roughly speaking, one can choose any function for $G$ on $[0,1]$, and then define
      $$
      G(x) = 2^{1-x}G,'(x-1)tag*{(1)}
      $$

      recursively for $x> 1$, and
      $$
      G(x) = G(0) - int_{x+1}^1 2^{u-1} G(u),dutag*{(2)}
      $$

      recursively for $x<0$. (See this question for a simpler example of this kind of solution.)



      Obstacles and Boundary Conditions



      There are two obstacles to this construction:




      1. If $G$ is $C^n$ on the interval $(0,1)$, then $G$ will be $C^{n-1}$ on $(1,2)$ by equation (1), and then $C^{n-2}$ on $(2,3)$, and so forth. Thus, if we want $G$ to be everywhere defined, we must start with a $C^infty$ function on $[0,1]$.


      2. If we start with an arbitrary $C^infty$ function on $[0,1]$ and then switch to definition (1) for $x>1$, we must make sure that $G$ is $C^infty$ at $x=1$, i.e. the the left and right hand derivatives of every order match up at this point.



      For the second obstacle, repeatedly differentiating the equation $G(x+1)=2^{-x}G,'(x)$ gives the sequence of equations
      $$
      G^{(n)}(x+1) ;=; sum_{i=0}^n binom{n}{i}(-log 2)^{n-i},2^{-x}, G^{(i+1)}(x)
      $$

      and plugging in $x=0$ yields
      $$
      G^{(n)}(1) ;=; sum_{i=0}^n binom{n}{i}(-log 2)^{n-i}, G^{(i+1)}(0).
      $$

      These are the boundary conditions that $G$ must satisfy on the interval $[0,1]$, but it is not hard to find $C^infty$ functions that satisfy these, e.g. any bump function that satisfies
      $$
      G^{(n)}(0) = G^{(n)}(1) = 0;;text{ for all }ngeq 1
      qquadtext{and}qquad
      G(1)=0.
      $$




      The Limit as $xto-infty$



      For negative values of $x$, the function $G(x)$ is defined by the integral equation
      $$
      G(x) = G(0) - int_{x+1}^1 2^{u-1} G(u),dutag*{(2)}
      $$

      If we assume that $G(x)geq 0$ for $xin [0,1]$ and, say, that
      $$
      int_0^1 2^{u-1} G(u),du ;<; frac{G(0)}{10}
      $$

      then $frac{9}{10}G(0) leq G(x) leq G(0)$ for all $xin[-1,0]$. It follows recursively that
      $$
      G(0) ;geq; G(x) ;geq; left(frac{9}{10} - frac{1}{log 4}right)G(0) ;>; 0
      $$

      for all $x<-1$, since
      begin{align*}
      G(x) ;&=; G(0)-int_{x+1}^1 2^{u-1}G(u),du \
      &=; G(0) - int_0^1 2^{u-1}G(u),du - int_{x+1}^0 2^{u-1}G(u),du \
      &geq; G(0) - frac{G(0)}{10} - int_{-infty}^0 2^{u-1}G(0),du \
      &=; left(frac{9}{10} - frac{1}{log 4}right)G(0).
      end{align*}

      Then $G$ is monotone on $(-infty,0)$, so $displaystylelim_{xto-infty} G(x)$ exists and is positive. Scaling $G$ linearly, we can arrange for this limit to be $1$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        16












        16








        16





        $begingroup$

        There are infinitely many differentiable functions $Fcolon [0,infty)tomathbb{R}$ that satisfy
        $$
        F'(x)=F(2x)qquadtext{and}qquad F(0)=1.
        $$

        We will follow the argument outlined by @HenningMakholm in the comments. First, consider the substitution $G(x) = Fleft(dfrac{2^x}{log 2}right)$. Plugging this into the above equation gives
        $$
        G,'(x) = 2^x G(x+1)qquadtext{and}qquad lim_{xto-infty} G(x)=1.
        $$

        This delay differential equation has a large number of solutions. Roughly speaking, one can choose any function for $G$ on $[0,1]$, and then define
        $$
        G(x) = 2^{1-x}G,'(x-1)tag*{(1)}
        $$

        recursively for $x> 1$, and
        $$
        G(x) = G(0) - int_{x+1}^1 2^{u-1} G(u),dutag*{(2)}
        $$

        recursively for $x<0$. (See this question for a simpler example of this kind of solution.)



        Obstacles and Boundary Conditions



        There are two obstacles to this construction:




        1. If $G$ is $C^n$ on the interval $(0,1)$, then $G$ will be $C^{n-1}$ on $(1,2)$ by equation (1), and then $C^{n-2}$ on $(2,3)$, and so forth. Thus, if we want $G$ to be everywhere defined, we must start with a $C^infty$ function on $[0,1]$.


        2. If we start with an arbitrary $C^infty$ function on $[0,1]$ and then switch to definition (1) for $x>1$, we must make sure that $G$ is $C^infty$ at $x=1$, i.e. the the left and right hand derivatives of every order match up at this point.



        For the second obstacle, repeatedly differentiating the equation $G(x+1)=2^{-x}G,'(x)$ gives the sequence of equations
        $$
        G^{(n)}(x+1) ;=; sum_{i=0}^n binom{n}{i}(-log 2)^{n-i},2^{-x}, G^{(i+1)}(x)
        $$

        and plugging in $x=0$ yields
        $$
        G^{(n)}(1) ;=; sum_{i=0}^n binom{n}{i}(-log 2)^{n-i}, G^{(i+1)}(0).
        $$

        These are the boundary conditions that $G$ must satisfy on the interval $[0,1]$, but it is not hard to find $C^infty$ functions that satisfy these, e.g. any bump function that satisfies
        $$
        G^{(n)}(0) = G^{(n)}(1) = 0;;text{ for all }ngeq 1
        qquadtext{and}qquad
        G(1)=0.
        $$




        The Limit as $xto-infty$



        For negative values of $x$, the function $G(x)$ is defined by the integral equation
        $$
        G(x) = G(0) - int_{x+1}^1 2^{u-1} G(u),dutag*{(2)}
        $$

        If we assume that $G(x)geq 0$ for $xin [0,1]$ and, say, that
        $$
        int_0^1 2^{u-1} G(u),du ;<; frac{G(0)}{10}
        $$

        then $frac{9}{10}G(0) leq G(x) leq G(0)$ for all $xin[-1,0]$. It follows recursively that
        $$
        G(0) ;geq; G(x) ;geq; left(frac{9}{10} - frac{1}{log 4}right)G(0) ;>; 0
        $$

        for all $x<-1$, since
        begin{align*}
        G(x) ;&=; G(0)-int_{x+1}^1 2^{u-1}G(u),du \
        &=; G(0) - int_0^1 2^{u-1}G(u),du - int_{x+1}^0 2^{u-1}G(u),du \
        &geq; G(0) - frac{G(0)}{10} - int_{-infty}^0 2^{u-1}G(0),du \
        &=; left(frac{9}{10} - frac{1}{log 4}right)G(0).
        end{align*}

        Then $G$ is monotone on $(-infty,0)$, so $displaystylelim_{xto-infty} G(x)$ exists and is positive. Scaling $G$ linearly, we can arrange for this limit to be $1$.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        There are infinitely many differentiable functions $Fcolon [0,infty)tomathbb{R}$ that satisfy
        $$
        F'(x)=F(2x)qquadtext{and}qquad F(0)=1.
        $$

        We will follow the argument outlined by @HenningMakholm in the comments. First, consider the substitution $G(x) = Fleft(dfrac{2^x}{log 2}right)$. Plugging this into the above equation gives
        $$
        G,'(x) = 2^x G(x+1)qquadtext{and}qquad lim_{xto-infty} G(x)=1.
        $$

        This delay differential equation has a large number of solutions. Roughly speaking, one can choose any function for $G$ on $[0,1]$, and then define
        $$
        G(x) = 2^{1-x}G,'(x-1)tag*{(1)}
        $$

        recursively for $x> 1$, and
        $$
        G(x) = G(0) - int_{x+1}^1 2^{u-1} G(u),dutag*{(2)}
        $$

        recursively for $x<0$. (See this question for a simpler example of this kind of solution.)



        Obstacles and Boundary Conditions



        There are two obstacles to this construction:




        1. If $G$ is $C^n$ on the interval $(0,1)$, then $G$ will be $C^{n-1}$ on $(1,2)$ by equation (1), and then $C^{n-2}$ on $(2,3)$, and so forth. Thus, if we want $G$ to be everywhere defined, we must start with a $C^infty$ function on $[0,1]$.


        2. If we start with an arbitrary $C^infty$ function on $[0,1]$ and then switch to definition (1) for $x>1$, we must make sure that $G$ is $C^infty$ at $x=1$, i.e. the the left and right hand derivatives of every order match up at this point.



        For the second obstacle, repeatedly differentiating the equation $G(x+1)=2^{-x}G,'(x)$ gives the sequence of equations
        $$
        G^{(n)}(x+1) ;=; sum_{i=0}^n binom{n}{i}(-log 2)^{n-i},2^{-x}, G^{(i+1)}(x)
        $$

        and plugging in $x=0$ yields
        $$
        G^{(n)}(1) ;=; sum_{i=0}^n binom{n}{i}(-log 2)^{n-i}, G^{(i+1)}(0).
        $$

        These are the boundary conditions that $G$ must satisfy on the interval $[0,1]$, but it is not hard to find $C^infty$ functions that satisfy these, e.g. any bump function that satisfies
        $$
        G^{(n)}(0) = G^{(n)}(1) = 0;;text{ for all }ngeq 1
        qquadtext{and}qquad
        G(1)=0.
        $$




        The Limit as $xto-infty$



        For negative values of $x$, the function $G(x)$ is defined by the integral equation
        $$
        G(x) = G(0) - int_{x+1}^1 2^{u-1} G(u),dutag*{(2)}
        $$

        If we assume that $G(x)geq 0$ for $xin [0,1]$ and, say, that
        $$
        int_0^1 2^{u-1} G(u),du ;<; frac{G(0)}{10}
        $$

        then $frac{9}{10}G(0) leq G(x) leq G(0)$ for all $xin[-1,0]$. It follows recursively that
        $$
        G(0) ;geq; G(x) ;geq; left(frac{9}{10} - frac{1}{log 4}right)G(0) ;>; 0
        $$

        for all $x<-1$, since
        begin{align*}
        G(x) ;&=; G(0)-int_{x+1}^1 2^{u-1}G(u),du \
        &=; G(0) - int_0^1 2^{u-1}G(u),du - int_{x+1}^0 2^{u-1}G(u),du \
        &geq; G(0) - frac{G(0)}{10} - int_{-infty}^0 2^{u-1}G(0),du \
        &=; left(frac{9}{10} - frac{1}{log 4}right)G(0).
        end{align*}

        Then $G$ is monotone on $(-infty,0)$, so $displaystylelim_{xto-infty} G(x)$ exists and is positive. Scaling $G$ linearly, we can arrange for this limit to be $1$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 12 at 12:26

























        answered Jul 19 '15 at 4:09









        Jim BelkJim Belk

        37.6k286152




        37.6k286152






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1365327%2fwhat-function-satisfies-fx-f2x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith