Why is the inverse function of a monotonous function $f:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}$ the reflection on the...












1












$begingroup$


Every monotonous function $f:mathbb{R}rightarrowmathbb{R}$ is injective, therefore $f:mathbb{R}rightarrow f(mathbb{R})$ is bijective. I.e. it is invertible. The function $bar{f}:f(mathbb{R})rightarrowmathbb{R}$ is the inversefunction. Where is the Connection with the reflection on the diagonal intersecting $0$ of the coordinate System, or also the $id$ function.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Because if $(x,y) in Gr_{f}$ then $(y,x) in Gr_{f^{-1}}$ and vice-versa, it's not too difficult to show this.
    $endgroup$
    – rtybase
    Jan 12 at 13:31


















1












$begingroup$


Every monotonous function $f:mathbb{R}rightarrowmathbb{R}$ is injective, therefore $f:mathbb{R}rightarrow f(mathbb{R})$ is bijective. I.e. it is invertible. The function $bar{f}:f(mathbb{R})rightarrowmathbb{R}$ is the inversefunction. Where is the Connection with the reflection on the diagonal intersecting $0$ of the coordinate System, or also the $id$ function.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Because if $(x,y) in Gr_{f}$ then $(y,x) in Gr_{f^{-1}}$ and vice-versa, it's not too difficult to show this.
    $endgroup$
    – rtybase
    Jan 12 at 13:31
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


Every monotonous function $f:mathbb{R}rightarrowmathbb{R}$ is injective, therefore $f:mathbb{R}rightarrow f(mathbb{R})$ is bijective. I.e. it is invertible. The function $bar{f}:f(mathbb{R})rightarrowmathbb{R}$ is the inversefunction. Where is the Connection with the reflection on the diagonal intersecting $0$ of the coordinate System, or also the $id$ function.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Every monotonous function $f:mathbb{R}rightarrowmathbb{R}$ is injective, therefore $f:mathbb{R}rightarrow f(mathbb{R})$ is bijective. I.e. it is invertible. The function $bar{f}:f(mathbb{R})rightarrowmathbb{R}$ is the inversefunction. Where is the Connection with the reflection on the diagonal intersecting $0$ of the coordinate System, or also the $id$ function.







real-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 12 at 13:49









mwt

943416




943416










asked Jan 12 at 13:20









RM777RM777

41112




41112












  • $begingroup$
    Because if $(x,y) in Gr_{f}$ then $(y,x) in Gr_{f^{-1}}$ and vice-versa, it's not too difficult to show this.
    $endgroup$
    – rtybase
    Jan 12 at 13:31




















  • $begingroup$
    Because if $(x,y) in Gr_{f}$ then $(y,x) in Gr_{f^{-1}}$ and vice-versa, it's not too difficult to show this.
    $endgroup$
    – rtybase
    Jan 12 at 13:31


















$begingroup$
Because if $(x,y) in Gr_{f}$ then $(y,x) in Gr_{f^{-1}}$ and vice-versa, it's not too difficult to show this.
$endgroup$
– rtybase
Jan 12 at 13:31






$begingroup$
Because if $(x,y) in Gr_{f}$ then $(y,x) in Gr_{f^{-1}}$ and vice-versa, it's not too difficult to show this.
$endgroup$
– rtybase
Jan 12 at 13:31












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

As per my comment, let's define $Gr_f =left{(x,y)in mathbb{R}^2 mid f(x)=yright}$ (from Graphic).



Now, if $(x,y)in Gr_f iff f(x)=y iff f^{-1}(y)=x iff (y,x) in Gr_{f^{-1}}$, $f^{-1}$ is the notation for the $f$'s inverse. As a result




$(x,y) in Gr_f iff (y,x) in Gr_{f^{-1}}$




But $(x,y)$ and $(y,x)$ are symmetric to each other with respect to $id_{mathbb{R}}$








share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070890%2fwhy-is-the-inverse-function-of-a-monotonous-function-f-mathbbr-rightarrow-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    As per my comment, let's define $Gr_f =left{(x,y)in mathbb{R}^2 mid f(x)=yright}$ (from Graphic).



    Now, if $(x,y)in Gr_f iff f(x)=y iff f^{-1}(y)=x iff (y,x) in Gr_{f^{-1}}$, $f^{-1}$ is the notation for the $f$'s inverse. As a result




    $(x,y) in Gr_f iff (y,x) in Gr_{f^{-1}}$




    But $(x,y)$ and $(y,x)$ are symmetric to each other with respect to $id_{mathbb{R}}$








    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      As per my comment, let's define $Gr_f =left{(x,y)in mathbb{R}^2 mid f(x)=yright}$ (from Graphic).



      Now, if $(x,y)in Gr_f iff f(x)=y iff f^{-1}(y)=x iff (y,x) in Gr_{f^{-1}}$, $f^{-1}$ is the notation for the $f$'s inverse. As a result




      $(x,y) in Gr_f iff (y,x) in Gr_{f^{-1}}$




      But $(x,y)$ and $(y,x)$ are symmetric to each other with respect to $id_{mathbb{R}}$








      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        As per my comment, let's define $Gr_f =left{(x,y)in mathbb{R}^2 mid f(x)=yright}$ (from Graphic).



        Now, if $(x,y)in Gr_f iff f(x)=y iff f^{-1}(y)=x iff (y,x) in Gr_{f^{-1}}$, $f^{-1}$ is the notation for the $f$'s inverse. As a result




        $(x,y) in Gr_f iff (y,x) in Gr_{f^{-1}}$




        But $(x,y)$ and $(y,x)$ are symmetric to each other with respect to $id_{mathbb{R}}$








        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        As per my comment, let's define $Gr_f =left{(x,y)in mathbb{R}^2 mid f(x)=yright}$ (from Graphic).



        Now, if $(x,y)in Gr_f iff f(x)=y iff f^{-1}(y)=x iff (y,x) in Gr_{f^{-1}}$, $f^{-1}$ is the notation for the $f$'s inverse. As a result




        $(x,y) in Gr_f iff (y,x) in Gr_{f^{-1}}$




        But $(x,y)$ and $(y,x)$ are symmetric to each other with respect to $id_{mathbb{R}}$









        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 12 at 14:14









        rtybasertybase

        10.9k21533




        10.9k21533






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070890%2fwhy-is-the-inverse-function-of-a-monotonous-function-f-mathbbr-rightarrow-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith