Average of all 3 digit numbers with distinct digits












0












$begingroup$


I tried adding up all the digits in each digits place and average them, but I got some decimals.



I don't know if I am doing it correctly



Can someone please explain this to me










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you to average the numbers? Then not relevant to average the digits. Also question doesn't say answer should come out a whole number, maybe it's a fraction.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    Jan 25 at 2:20












  • $begingroup$
    how else would i do it???? It would be tedious to add all the numbers up and average them
    $endgroup$
    – semicolon822
    Jan 25 at 2:22










  • $begingroup$
    wait so your telling me to add up all the 648 numbers...
    $endgroup$
    – semicolon822
    Jan 25 at 2:26










  • $begingroup$
    I see no other way to average them, but maybe there's a trick to adding them up. The now deleted answer didn't restrict to numbers having distinct digits.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    Jan 25 at 2:28










  • $begingroup$
    So show us what you got, semicolon.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Jan 25 at 3:07
















0












$begingroup$


I tried adding up all the digits in each digits place and average them, but I got some decimals.



I don't know if I am doing it correctly



Can someone please explain this to me










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you to average the numbers? Then not relevant to average the digits. Also question doesn't say answer should come out a whole number, maybe it's a fraction.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    Jan 25 at 2:20












  • $begingroup$
    how else would i do it???? It would be tedious to add all the numbers up and average them
    $endgroup$
    – semicolon822
    Jan 25 at 2:22










  • $begingroup$
    wait so your telling me to add up all the 648 numbers...
    $endgroup$
    – semicolon822
    Jan 25 at 2:26










  • $begingroup$
    I see no other way to average them, but maybe there's a trick to adding them up. The now deleted answer didn't restrict to numbers having distinct digits.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    Jan 25 at 2:28










  • $begingroup$
    So show us what you got, semicolon.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Jan 25 at 3:07














0












0








0


0



$begingroup$


I tried adding up all the digits in each digits place and average them, but I got some decimals.



I don't know if I am doing it correctly



Can someone please explain this to me










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I tried adding up all the digits in each digits place and average them, but I got some decimals.



I don't know if I am doing it correctly



Can someone please explain this to me







elementary-number-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 25 at 2:14









semicolon822semicolon822

51




51








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you to average the numbers? Then not relevant to average the digits. Also question doesn't say answer should come out a whole number, maybe it's a fraction.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    Jan 25 at 2:20












  • $begingroup$
    how else would i do it???? It would be tedious to add all the numbers up and average them
    $endgroup$
    – semicolon822
    Jan 25 at 2:22










  • $begingroup$
    wait so your telling me to add up all the 648 numbers...
    $endgroup$
    – semicolon822
    Jan 25 at 2:26










  • $begingroup$
    I see no other way to average them, but maybe there's a trick to adding them up. The now deleted answer didn't restrict to numbers having distinct digits.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    Jan 25 at 2:28










  • $begingroup$
    So show us what you got, semicolon.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Jan 25 at 3:07














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you to average the numbers? Then not relevant to average the digits. Also question doesn't say answer should come out a whole number, maybe it's a fraction.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    Jan 25 at 2:20












  • $begingroup$
    how else would i do it???? It would be tedious to add all the numbers up and average them
    $endgroup$
    – semicolon822
    Jan 25 at 2:22










  • $begingroup$
    wait so your telling me to add up all the 648 numbers...
    $endgroup$
    – semicolon822
    Jan 25 at 2:26










  • $begingroup$
    I see no other way to average them, but maybe there's a trick to adding them up. The now deleted answer didn't restrict to numbers having distinct digits.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    Jan 25 at 2:28










  • $begingroup$
    So show us what you got, semicolon.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Jan 25 at 3:07








1




1




$begingroup$
Are you to average the numbers? Then not relevant to average the digits. Also question doesn't say answer should come out a whole number, maybe it's a fraction.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
Jan 25 at 2:20






$begingroup$
Are you to average the numbers? Then not relevant to average the digits. Also question doesn't say answer should come out a whole number, maybe it's a fraction.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
Jan 25 at 2:20














$begingroup$
how else would i do it???? It would be tedious to add all the numbers up and average them
$endgroup$
– semicolon822
Jan 25 at 2:22




$begingroup$
how else would i do it???? It would be tedious to add all the numbers up and average them
$endgroup$
– semicolon822
Jan 25 at 2:22












$begingroup$
wait so your telling me to add up all the 648 numbers...
$endgroup$
– semicolon822
Jan 25 at 2:26




$begingroup$
wait so your telling me to add up all the 648 numbers...
$endgroup$
– semicolon822
Jan 25 at 2:26












$begingroup$
I see no other way to average them, but maybe there's a trick to adding them up. The now deleted answer didn't restrict to numbers having distinct digits.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
Jan 25 at 2:28




$begingroup$
I see no other way to average them, but maybe there's a trick to adding them up. The now deleted answer didn't restrict to numbers having distinct digits.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
Jan 25 at 2:28












$begingroup$
So show us what you got, semicolon.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 25 at 3:07




$begingroup$
So show us what you got, semicolon.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jan 25 at 3:07










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The only thing that makes this hard is that the numbers can't start with $0.$ If they were allowed to start with $0,$ it would be easy, so let's do the problem on the assumption that numbers are allowed to start with $0,$ and then adjust the result.



If numbers can start with $0$, there are $10cdot9cdot8=720$ nunbers with distinct digits. By symmetry, each of the digits appears the same number of times $(72)$ in each column, and since the sum of the numbers from $0$ t $9$ is $45,$ the sum of the numbers is $$72cdot45cdot111=359640,$$ where the $111$ comes from the fact that we are summing the ones, tens, and hundreds columns.



Now we just have to subtract out the sum of the numbers that started with $0$. There are $9cdot8=72$ of these, since the last two digits must be distinct, and neither can be $0.$ So, to finish this off, we need to subtract the sum of the two-digit numbers with distinct non-zero digits, and divide by $648(720-72).$



I'll leave that to you.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    can you verify my answer I got 548.888 (repeating)
    $endgroup$
    – semicolon822
    Jan 25 at 22:16











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086622%2faverage-of-all-3-digit-numbers-with-distinct-digits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

The only thing that makes this hard is that the numbers can't start with $0.$ If they were allowed to start with $0,$ it would be easy, so let's do the problem on the assumption that numbers are allowed to start with $0,$ and then adjust the result.



If numbers can start with $0$, there are $10cdot9cdot8=720$ nunbers with distinct digits. By symmetry, each of the digits appears the same number of times $(72)$ in each column, and since the sum of the numbers from $0$ t $9$ is $45,$ the sum of the numbers is $$72cdot45cdot111=359640,$$ where the $111$ comes from the fact that we are summing the ones, tens, and hundreds columns.



Now we just have to subtract out the sum of the numbers that started with $0$. There are $9cdot8=72$ of these, since the last two digits must be distinct, and neither can be $0.$ So, to finish this off, we need to subtract the sum of the two-digit numbers with distinct non-zero digits, and divide by $648(720-72).$



I'll leave that to you.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    can you verify my answer I got 548.888 (repeating)
    $endgroup$
    – semicolon822
    Jan 25 at 22:16
















1












$begingroup$

The only thing that makes this hard is that the numbers can't start with $0.$ If they were allowed to start with $0,$ it would be easy, so let's do the problem on the assumption that numbers are allowed to start with $0,$ and then adjust the result.



If numbers can start with $0$, there are $10cdot9cdot8=720$ nunbers with distinct digits. By symmetry, each of the digits appears the same number of times $(72)$ in each column, and since the sum of the numbers from $0$ t $9$ is $45,$ the sum of the numbers is $$72cdot45cdot111=359640,$$ where the $111$ comes from the fact that we are summing the ones, tens, and hundreds columns.



Now we just have to subtract out the sum of the numbers that started with $0$. There are $9cdot8=72$ of these, since the last two digits must be distinct, and neither can be $0.$ So, to finish this off, we need to subtract the sum of the two-digit numbers with distinct non-zero digits, and divide by $648(720-72).$



I'll leave that to you.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    can you verify my answer I got 548.888 (repeating)
    $endgroup$
    – semicolon822
    Jan 25 at 22:16














1












1








1





$begingroup$

The only thing that makes this hard is that the numbers can't start with $0.$ If they were allowed to start with $0,$ it would be easy, so let's do the problem on the assumption that numbers are allowed to start with $0,$ and then adjust the result.



If numbers can start with $0$, there are $10cdot9cdot8=720$ nunbers with distinct digits. By symmetry, each of the digits appears the same number of times $(72)$ in each column, and since the sum of the numbers from $0$ t $9$ is $45,$ the sum of the numbers is $$72cdot45cdot111=359640,$$ where the $111$ comes from the fact that we are summing the ones, tens, and hundreds columns.



Now we just have to subtract out the sum of the numbers that started with $0$. There are $9cdot8=72$ of these, since the last two digits must be distinct, and neither can be $0.$ So, to finish this off, we need to subtract the sum of the two-digit numbers with distinct non-zero digits, and divide by $648(720-72).$



I'll leave that to you.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The only thing that makes this hard is that the numbers can't start with $0.$ If they were allowed to start with $0,$ it would be easy, so let's do the problem on the assumption that numbers are allowed to start with $0,$ and then adjust the result.



If numbers can start with $0$, there are $10cdot9cdot8=720$ nunbers with distinct digits. By symmetry, each of the digits appears the same number of times $(72)$ in each column, and since the sum of the numbers from $0$ t $9$ is $45,$ the sum of the numbers is $$72cdot45cdot111=359640,$$ where the $111$ comes from the fact that we are summing the ones, tens, and hundreds columns.



Now we just have to subtract out the sum of the numbers that started with $0$. There are $9cdot8=72$ of these, since the last two digits must be distinct, and neither can be $0.$ So, to finish this off, we need to subtract the sum of the two-digit numbers with distinct non-zero digits, and divide by $648(720-72).$



I'll leave that to you.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 25 at 2:58









saulspatzsaulspatz

17k31435




17k31435












  • $begingroup$
    can you verify my answer I got 548.888 (repeating)
    $endgroup$
    – semicolon822
    Jan 25 at 22:16


















  • $begingroup$
    can you verify my answer I got 548.888 (repeating)
    $endgroup$
    – semicolon822
    Jan 25 at 22:16
















$begingroup$
can you verify my answer I got 548.888 (repeating)
$endgroup$
– semicolon822
Jan 25 at 22:16




$begingroup$
can you verify my answer I got 548.888 (repeating)
$endgroup$
– semicolon822
Jan 25 at 22:16


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086622%2faverage-of-all-3-digit-numbers-with-distinct-digits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter