Closest point on line segment of a great circle
$begingroup$
If I have a sphere of radius R, and two points $A$ and $B$ on its surface, at $(R, theta_A,phi_A)$ and $(R, theta_B,phi_B)$ respectively in spherical coordinates. Call $AB$ the geodesic from $A$ to $B$, i.e. the segment of the great circle connecting the two points.
Given a third point $P$ at $(R, theta_P,phi_P)$, how can I find out the point $Q in AB$ which is closest to $P$ (in the geodesic sense)?
spherical-coordinates spherical-geometry geodesic spherical-trigonometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If I have a sphere of radius R, and two points $A$ and $B$ on its surface, at $(R, theta_A,phi_A)$ and $(R, theta_B,phi_B)$ respectively in spherical coordinates. Call $AB$ the geodesic from $A$ to $B$, i.e. the segment of the great circle connecting the two points.
Given a third point $P$ at $(R, theta_P,phi_P)$, how can I find out the point $Q in AB$ which is closest to $P$ (in the geodesic sense)?
spherical-coordinates spherical-geometry geodesic spherical-trigonometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If I have a sphere of radius R, and two points $A$ and $B$ on its surface, at $(R, theta_A,phi_A)$ and $(R, theta_B,phi_B)$ respectively in spherical coordinates. Call $AB$ the geodesic from $A$ to $B$, i.e. the segment of the great circle connecting the two points.
Given a third point $P$ at $(R, theta_P,phi_P)$, how can I find out the point $Q in AB$ which is closest to $P$ (in the geodesic sense)?
spherical-coordinates spherical-geometry geodesic spherical-trigonometry
$endgroup$
If I have a sphere of radius R, and two points $A$ and $B$ on its surface, at $(R, theta_A,phi_A)$ and $(R, theta_B,phi_B)$ respectively in spherical coordinates. Call $AB$ the geodesic from $A$ to $B$, i.e. the segment of the great circle connecting the two points.
Given a third point $P$ at $(R, theta_P,phi_P)$, how can I find out the point $Q in AB$ which is closest to $P$ (in the geodesic sense)?
spherical-coordinates spherical-geometry geodesic spherical-trigonometry
spherical-coordinates spherical-geometry geodesic spherical-trigonometry
asked Nov 2 '18 at 11:38
mitchusmitchus
310315
310315
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There are a couple of online references.
Mathoverflow
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/101776/altitudes-of-a-triangle
There is a more extensive theory at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305401152_Projective_configuration_theorems_old_wine_into_new_wineskins
page 29. And, no I haven't read the whole article :) but it looks powerful.
Setting R=1.
The “$times$” product below is the normal cross product normalized to 1.
Here is an intuitive method using the picture below with C taking the place of P.
Consider the great circle passing through $A,B$ and say that the Cartesian coordinates of $A,B,C$ are $left[a_{x},a_{y},a_{z}right],left[b_{x},b_{y},b_{z}right],left[c_{x},c_{y},c_{z}right]$
Call the great circle the “equator”.
Define the “North pole” $N$ as the intercept of $Atimes B$ with the spherical surface; i.e. normalized.
Now every great circle passing through the North pole is a geodesic path intercepting the equator.
Thus the polar great circle through $C$ gives the geodesic altitude of $C$ above the equator at $Q$.
At this point, we could revert to Spherical coordinates and find $Q$.
Alternately we can stay with Cartesian coordinates.
We observe that the vector to Q is orthogonal to the axes of the great circles $A,B$ and $text{N,C }$ giving
$Q=left(Atimes Bright)timesleft(left(Atimes Bright)times Cright)$
This can be rephrased by means of compounded vector triple product.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2981618%2fclosest-point-on-line-segment-of-a-great-circle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There are a couple of online references.
Mathoverflow
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/101776/altitudes-of-a-triangle
There is a more extensive theory at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305401152_Projective_configuration_theorems_old_wine_into_new_wineskins
page 29. And, no I haven't read the whole article :) but it looks powerful.
Setting R=1.
The “$times$” product below is the normal cross product normalized to 1.
Here is an intuitive method using the picture below with C taking the place of P.
Consider the great circle passing through $A,B$ and say that the Cartesian coordinates of $A,B,C$ are $left[a_{x},a_{y},a_{z}right],left[b_{x},b_{y},b_{z}right],left[c_{x},c_{y},c_{z}right]$
Call the great circle the “equator”.
Define the “North pole” $N$ as the intercept of $Atimes B$ with the spherical surface; i.e. normalized.
Now every great circle passing through the North pole is a geodesic path intercepting the equator.
Thus the polar great circle through $C$ gives the geodesic altitude of $C$ above the equator at $Q$.
At this point, we could revert to Spherical coordinates and find $Q$.
Alternately we can stay with Cartesian coordinates.
We observe that the vector to Q is orthogonal to the axes of the great circles $A,B$ and $text{N,C }$ giving
$Q=left(Atimes Bright)timesleft(left(Atimes Bright)times Cright)$
This can be rephrased by means of compounded vector triple product.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are a couple of online references.
Mathoverflow
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/101776/altitudes-of-a-triangle
There is a more extensive theory at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305401152_Projective_configuration_theorems_old_wine_into_new_wineskins
page 29. And, no I haven't read the whole article :) but it looks powerful.
Setting R=1.
The “$times$” product below is the normal cross product normalized to 1.
Here is an intuitive method using the picture below with C taking the place of P.
Consider the great circle passing through $A,B$ and say that the Cartesian coordinates of $A,B,C$ are $left[a_{x},a_{y},a_{z}right],left[b_{x},b_{y},b_{z}right],left[c_{x},c_{y},c_{z}right]$
Call the great circle the “equator”.
Define the “North pole” $N$ as the intercept of $Atimes B$ with the spherical surface; i.e. normalized.
Now every great circle passing through the North pole is a geodesic path intercepting the equator.
Thus the polar great circle through $C$ gives the geodesic altitude of $C$ above the equator at $Q$.
At this point, we could revert to Spherical coordinates and find $Q$.
Alternately we can stay with Cartesian coordinates.
We observe that the vector to Q is orthogonal to the axes of the great circles $A,B$ and $text{N,C }$ giving
$Q=left(Atimes Bright)timesleft(left(Atimes Bright)times Cright)$
This can be rephrased by means of compounded vector triple product.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are a couple of online references.
Mathoverflow
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/101776/altitudes-of-a-triangle
There is a more extensive theory at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305401152_Projective_configuration_theorems_old_wine_into_new_wineskins
page 29. And, no I haven't read the whole article :) but it looks powerful.
Setting R=1.
The “$times$” product below is the normal cross product normalized to 1.
Here is an intuitive method using the picture below with C taking the place of P.
Consider the great circle passing through $A,B$ and say that the Cartesian coordinates of $A,B,C$ are $left[a_{x},a_{y},a_{z}right],left[b_{x},b_{y},b_{z}right],left[c_{x},c_{y},c_{z}right]$
Call the great circle the “equator”.
Define the “North pole” $N$ as the intercept of $Atimes B$ with the spherical surface; i.e. normalized.
Now every great circle passing through the North pole is a geodesic path intercepting the equator.
Thus the polar great circle through $C$ gives the geodesic altitude of $C$ above the equator at $Q$.
At this point, we could revert to Spherical coordinates and find $Q$.
Alternately we can stay with Cartesian coordinates.
We observe that the vector to Q is orthogonal to the axes of the great circles $A,B$ and $text{N,C }$ giving
$Q=left(Atimes Bright)timesleft(left(Atimes Bright)times Cright)$
This can be rephrased by means of compounded vector triple product.
$endgroup$
There are a couple of online references.
Mathoverflow
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/101776/altitudes-of-a-triangle
There is a more extensive theory at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305401152_Projective_configuration_theorems_old_wine_into_new_wineskins
page 29. And, no I haven't read the whole article :) but it looks powerful.
Setting R=1.
The “$times$” product below is the normal cross product normalized to 1.
Here is an intuitive method using the picture below with C taking the place of P.
Consider the great circle passing through $A,B$ and say that the Cartesian coordinates of $A,B,C$ are $left[a_{x},a_{y},a_{z}right],left[b_{x},b_{y},b_{z}right],left[c_{x},c_{y},c_{z}right]$
Call the great circle the “equator”.
Define the “North pole” $N$ as the intercept of $Atimes B$ with the spherical surface; i.e. normalized.
Now every great circle passing through the North pole is a geodesic path intercepting the equator.
Thus the polar great circle through $C$ gives the geodesic altitude of $C$ above the equator at $Q$.
At this point, we could revert to Spherical coordinates and find $Q$.
Alternately we can stay with Cartesian coordinates.
We observe that the vector to Q is orthogonal to the axes of the great circles $A,B$ and $text{N,C }$ giving
$Q=left(Atimes Bright)timesleft(left(Atimes Bright)times Cright)$
This can be rephrased by means of compounded vector triple product.
edited Jan 28 at 15:29
answered Jan 27 at 21:43
rrogersrrogers
418312
418312
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2981618%2fclosest-point-on-line-segment-of-a-great-circle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown