How to show $operatorname{card}(omega+1)=omega$












0












$begingroup$


Apparently $operatorname{card}(omega+1)=omega$. This means that there is an order $<$ on $omega+1$ such that there is an isomorphism of ordered set $f$, $(omega+1,<) cong (omega,in)$, but to what does $f$ send $omega in omega+1$?



Edit



Also to show $card(omega+1)=omega$ I think I need to show that any ordinal $alpha$ that is in bijection with $omega+1$ is such that $alpha ge omega$ no? [I know also that if two ordinals are isomorphic ($langle beta, in rangle cong langle gamma, in rangle$ i.e. isomorphism of ordered set) then $beta=gamma$, is this usefull here?.]










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Apparently $operatorname{card}(omega+1)=omega$. This means that there is an order $<$ on $omega+1$ such that there is an isomorphism of ordered set $f$, $(omega+1,<) cong (omega,in)$, but to what does $f$ send $omega in omega+1$?



    Edit



    Also to show $card(omega+1)=omega$ I think I need to show that any ordinal $alpha$ that is in bijection with $omega+1$ is such that $alpha ge omega$ no? [I know also that if two ordinals are isomorphic ($langle beta, in rangle cong langle gamma, in rangle$ i.e. isomorphism of ordered set) then $beta=gamma$, is this usefull here?.]










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Apparently $operatorname{card}(omega+1)=omega$. This means that there is an order $<$ on $omega+1$ such that there is an isomorphism of ordered set $f$, $(omega+1,<) cong (omega,in)$, but to what does $f$ send $omega in omega+1$?



      Edit



      Also to show $card(omega+1)=omega$ I think I need to show that any ordinal $alpha$ that is in bijection with $omega+1$ is such that $alpha ge omega$ no? [I know also that if two ordinals are isomorphic ($langle beta, in rangle cong langle gamma, in rangle$ i.e. isomorphism of ordered set) then $beta=gamma$, is this usefull here?.]










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Apparently $operatorname{card}(omega+1)=omega$. This means that there is an order $<$ on $omega+1$ such that there is an isomorphism of ordered set $f$, $(omega+1,<) cong (omega,in)$, but to what does $f$ send $omega in omega+1$?



      Edit



      Also to show $card(omega+1)=omega$ I think I need to show that any ordinal $alpha$ that is in bijection with $omega+1$ is such that $alpha ge omega$ no? [I know also that if two ordinals are isomorphic ($langle beta, in rangle cong langle gamma, in rangle$ i.e. isomorphism of ordered set) then $beta=gamma$, is this usefull here?.]







      elementary-set-theory cardinals






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 22 at 15:09







      roi_saumon

















      asked Jan 22 at 14:29









      roi_saumonroi_saumon

      59438




      59438






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          If it it only concerns cardinality then a bijection is enough.



          If you insist on an order preserving bijection then:



          Let $<$ on $omega+1$ be defined by $omega<0$ and $n<m$ if $n,minomega$ with $nin m$.



          Then $f$ can be prescribed by:




          • $omegamapsto0$


          • $nmapsto n+1$ for $ninomega$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, I forgot one thing though that I edited in the question.
            $endgroup$
            – roi_saumon
            Jan 22 at 15:10





















          1












          $begingroup$

          This is know as the Hilbert hotel paradox.



          enter image description here



          The Hilbert hotel have an infinite number rooms (all aligned in one dimension), so we assimilate it to $omega$.



          $1$ new customer arrives, but the hotel is full, every room is occupied by $omega$ customers.



          But the butler just invites the new customer to take the first room (labelled $1$) and asks the initial occupant to move to the next room ($1mapsto 2$) and so on ($nmapsto n+1$) for successive occupants.



          Finally $omega+1$ customers can fit in the Hilbert hotel.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083233%2fhow-to-show-operatornamecard-omega1-omega%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            If it it only concerns cardinality then a bijection is enough.



            If you insist on an order preserving bijection then:



            Let $<$ on $omega+1$ be defined by $omega<0$ and $n<m$ if $n,minomega$ with $nin m$.



            Then $f$ can be prescribed by:




            • $omegamapsto0$


            • $nmapsto n+1$ for $ninomega$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thanks, I forgot one thing though that I edited in the question.
              $endgroup$
              – roi_saumon
              Jan 22 at 15:10


















            3












            $begingroup$

            If it it only concerns cardinality then a bijection is enough.



            If you insist on an order preserving bijection then:



            Let $<$ on $omega+1$ be defined by $omega<0$ and $n<m$ if $n,minomega$ with $nin m$.



            Then $f$ can be prescribed by:




            • $omegamapsto0$


            • $nmapsto n+1$ for $ninomega$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thanks, I forgot one thing though that I edited in the question.
              $endgroup$
              – roi_saumon
              Jan 22 at 15:10
















            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            If it it only concerns cardinality then a bijection is enough.



            If you insist on an order preserving bijection then:



            Let $<$ on $omega+1$ be defined by $omega<0$ and $n<m$ if $n,minomega$ with $nin m$.



            Then $f$ can be prescribed by:




            • $omegamapsto0$


            • $nmapsto n+1$ for $ninomega$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            If it it only concerns cardinality then a bijection is enough.



            If you insist on an order preserving bijection then:



            Let $<$ on $omega+1$ be defined by $omega<0$ and $n<m$ if $n,minomega$ with $nin m$.



            Then $f$ can be prescribed by:




            • $omegamapsto0$


            • $nmapsto n+1$ for $ninomega$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Jan 22 at 14:41

























            answered Jan 22 at 14:37









            drhabdrhab

            103k545136




            103k545136












            • $begingroup$
              Thanks, I forgot one thing though that I edited in the question.
              $endgroup$
              – roi_saumon
              Jan 22 at 15:10




















            • $begingroup$
              Thanks, I forgot one thing though that I edited in the question.
              $endgroup$
              – roi_saumon
              Jan 22 at 15:10


















            $begingroup$
            Thanks, I forgot one thing though that I edited in the question.
            $endgroup$
            – roi_saumon
            Jan 22 at 15:10






            $begingroup$
            Thanks, I forgot one thing though that I edited in the question.
            $endgroup$
            – roi_saumon
            Jan 22 at 15:10













            1












            $begingroup$

            This is know as the Hilbert hotel paradox.



            enter image description here



            The Hilbert hotel have an infinite number rooms (all aligned in one dimension), so we assimilate it to $omega$.



            $1$ new customer arrives, but the hotel is full, every room is occupied by $omega$ customers.



            But the butler just invites the new customer to take the first room (labelled $1$) and asks the initial occupant to move to the next room ($1mapsto 2$) and so on ($nmapsto n+1$) for successive occupants.



            Finally $omega+1$ customers can fit in the Hilbert hotel.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              This is know as the Hilbert hotel paradox.



              enter image description here



              The Hilbert hotel have an infinite number rooms (all aligned in one dimension), so we assimilate it to $omega$.



              $1$ new customer arrives, but the hotel is full, every room is occupied by $omega$ customers.



              But the butler just invites the new customer to take the first room (labelled $1$) and asks the initial occupant to move to the next room ($1mapsto 2$) and so on ($nmapsto n+1$) for successive occupants.



              Finally $omega+1$ customers can fit in the Hilbert hotel.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                This is know as the Hilbert hotel paradox.



                enter image description here



                The Hilbert hotel have an infinite number rooms (all aligned in one dimension), so we assimilate it to $omega$.



                $1$ new customer arrives, but the hotel is full, every room is occupied by $omega$ customers.



                But the butler just invites the new customer to take the first room (labelled $1$) and asks the initial occupant to move to the next room ($1mapsto 2$) and so on ($nmapsto n+1$) for successive occupants.



                Finally $omega+1$ customers can fit in the Hilbert hotel.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                This is know as the Hilbert hotel paradox.



                enter image description here



                The Hilbert hotel have an infinite number rooms (all aligned in one dimension), so we assimilate it to $omega$.



                $1$ new customer arrives, but the hotel is full, every room is occupied by $omega$ customers.



                But the butler just invites the new customer to take the first room (labelled $1$) and asks the initial occupant to move to the next room ($1mapsto 2$) and so on ($nmapsto n+1$) for successive occupants.



                Finally $omega+1$ customers can fit in the Hilbert hotel.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 22 at 15:24









                zwimzwim

                12.5k831




                12.5k831






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083233%2fhow-to-show-operatornamecard-omega1-omega%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                    SQL update select statement

                    'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules