Finding the inverse of $phi_{lambda}^2$ where $phi_{lambda}$ is the Mobius transform on $mathbb{D}$












0












$begingroup$


Let $mathbb{D}$ denote the open unit disk. Fix $lambda in mathbb{D}$. Define the Mobius transform $phi_{lambda}:mathbb{D}rightarrowmathbb{D}$ by
$$phi_{lambda}(z) = frac{z-lambda}{1-overline{lambda}z}$$
If possible, I'm trying to find the inverse of $phi_{lambda}^2$; that is, I want to find an analytic function $psi:mathbb{D}rightarrowmathbb{D}$ such that
$$phi_{lambda}^2Big(psi(z)Big) = psiBig(phi_{lambda}^2(z)Big) = z$$



I attempted to find $psi$ analytically by trying to solve the equation
$$phi_{lambda}^2Big(psi(z)Big) = z$$
but I know that "taking the square root on both sides" is not always a valid move in $mathbb{C}$.



Any help will be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I am afraid such an inverse might do not exist. Note that $f(z)=z^2:mathbb{D}tomathbb{D}$ is onto but not one-to-one. Hence, $phi_{lambda}^2:mathbb{D}tomathbb{D}$ is also onto but not one-to-one.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 22 at 14:48
















0












$begingroup$


Let $mathbb{D}$ denote the open unit disk. Fix $lambda in mathbb{D}$. Define the Mobius transform $phi_{lambda}:mathbb{D}rightarrowmathbb{D}$ by
$$phi_{lambda}(z) = frac{z-lambda}{1-overline{lambda}z}$$
If possible, I'm trying to find the inverse of $phi_{lambda}^2$; that is, I want to find an analytic function $psi:mathbb{D}rightarrowmathbb{D}$ such that
$$phi_{lambda}^2Big(psi(z)Big) = psiBig(phi_{lambda}^2(z)Big) = z$$



I attempted to find $psi$ analytically by trying to solve the equation
$$phi_{lambda}^2Big(psi(z)Big) = z$$
but I know that "taking the square root on both sides" is not always a valid move in $mathbb{C}$.



Any help will be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I am afraid such an inverse might do not exist. Note that $f(z)=z^2:mathbb{D}tomathbb{D}$ is onto but not one-to-one. Hence, $phi_{lambda}^2:mathbb{D}tomathbb{D}$ is also onto but not one-to-one.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 22 at 14:48














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $mathbb{D}$ denote the open unit disk. Fix $lambda in mathbb{D}$. Define the Mobius transform $phi_{lambda}:mathbb{D}rightarrowmathbb{D}$ by
$$phi_{lambda}(z) = frac{z-lambda}{1-overline{lambda}z}$$
If possible, I'm trying to find the inverse of $phi_{lambda}^2$; that is, I want to find an analytic function $psi:mathbb{D}rightarrowmathbb{D}$ such that
$$phi_{lambda}^2Big(psi(z)Big) = psiBig(phi_{lambda}^2(z)Big) = z$$



I attempted to find $psi$ analytically by trying to solve the equation
$$phi_{lambda}^2Big(psi(z)Big) = z$$
but I know that "taking the square root on both sides" is not always a valid move in $mathbb{C}$.



Any help will be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $mathbb{D}$ denote the open unit disk. Fix $lambda in mathbb{D}$. Define the Mobius transform $phi_{lambda}:mathbb{D}rightarrowmathbb{D}$ by
$$phi_{lambda}(z) = frac{z-lambda}{1-overline{lambda}z}$$
If possible, I'm trying to find the inverse of $phi_{lambda}^2$; that is, I want to find an analytic function $psi:mathbb{D}rightarrowmathbb{D}$ such that
$$phi_{lambda}^2Big(psi(z)Big) = psiBig(phi_{lambda}^2(z)Big) = z$$



I attempted to find $psi$ analytically by trying to solve the equation
$$phi_{lambda}^2Big(psi(z)Big) = z$$
but I know that "taking the square root on both sides" is not always a valid move in $mathbb{C}$.



Any help will be appreciated.







complex-analysis inverse-function mobius-transformation






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 22 at 14:26









Benedict VoltaireBenedict Voltaire

1,317929




1,317929












  • $begingroup$
    I am afraid such an inverse might do not exist. Note that $f(z)=z^2:mathbb{D}tomathbb{D}$ is onto but not one-to-one. Hence, $phi_{lambda}^2:mathbb{D}tomathbb{D}$ is also onto but not one-to-one.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 22 at 14:48


















  • $begingroup$
    I am afraid such an inverse might do not exist. Note that $f(z)=z^2:mathbb{D}tomathbb{D}$ is onto but not one-to-one. Hence, $phi_{lambda}^2:mathbb{D}tomathbb{D}$ is also onto but not one-to-one.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 22 at 14:48
















$begingroup$
I am afraid such an inverse might do not exist. Note that $f(z)=z^2:mathbb{D}tomathbb{D}$ is onto but not one-to-one. Hence, $phi_{lambda}^2:mathbb{D}tomathbb{D}$ is also onto but not one-to-one.
$endgroup$
– hypernova
Jan 22 at 14:48




$begingroup$
I am afraid such an inverse might do not exist. Note that $f(z)=z^2:mathbb{D}tomathbb{D}$ is onto but not one-to-one. Hence, $phi_{lambda}^2:mathbb{D}tomathbb{D}$ is also onto but not one-to-one.
$endgroup$
– hypernova
Jan 22 at 14:48










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The Moebius transforms $$ f(z) = frac{a z + b}{c z + d}$$ under composition are homorphic as a group to the matrices
$$ A = begin{pmatrix} a & b \ c & d end{pmatrix},.$$



Applied for your case, the Moebius transform $phi_lambda$ is associated to the matrix
$$A _ lambda =begin{pmatrix} 1 & -lambda \
-barlambda & 1 end{pmatrix}. $$



You are searching for the inverse of $phi_lambda circ phi_lambda$ which is the Moebius transform associated with the matrix
$$ [(A_lambda)^2 ]^{-1} = [(A_lambda)^{-1}]^2 =frac{1}{(1-|lambda|^2)^2} begin{pmatrix} 1 & lambda \
barlambda & 1 end{pmatrix}^2 =frac{1}{(1-|lambda|^2)^2}begin{pmatrix} 1+ |lambda|^2 &2 lambda\ 2 barlambda& 1+ |lambda|^2 end{pmatrix} .$$

In other words, the inverse transform is given by
$$psi(z) = frac{(1+ |lambda|^2) z + 2 lambda}{2barlambda z + (1+ |lambda|^2)},.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083229%2ffinding-the-inverse-of-phi-lambda2-where-phi-lambda-is-the-mobius-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    The Moebius transforms $$ f(z) = frac{a z + b}{c z + d}$$ under composition are homorphic as a group to the matrices
    $$ A = begin{pmatrix} a & b \ c & d end{pmatrix},.$$



    Applied for your case, the Moebius transform $phi_lambda$ is associated to the matrix
    $$A _ lambda =begin{pmatrix} 1 & -lambda \
    -barlambda & 1 end{pmatrix}. $$



    You are searching for the inverse of $phi_lambda circ phi_lambda$ which is the Moebius transform associated with the matrix
    $$ [(A_lambda)^2 ]^{-1} = [(A_lambda)^{-1}]^2 =frac{1}{(1-|lambda|^2)^2} begin{pmatrix} 1 & lambda \
    barlambda & 1 end{pmatrix}^2 =frac{1}{(1-|lambda|^2)^2}begin{pmatrix} 1+ |lambda|^2 &2 lambda\ 2 barlambda& 1+ |lambda|^2 end{pmatrix} .$$

    In other words, the inverse transform is given by
    $$psi(z) = frac{(1+ |lambda|^2) z + 2 lambda}{2barlambda z + (1+ |lambda|^2)},.$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      The Moebius transforms $$ f(z) = frac{a z + b}{c z + d}$$ under composition are homorphic as a group to the matrices
      $$ A = begin{pmatrix} a & b \ c & d end{pmatrix},.$$



      Applied for your case, the Moebius transform $phi_lambda$ is associated to the matrix
      $$A _ lambda =begin{pmatrix} 1 & -lambda \
      -barlambda & 1 end{pmatrix}. $$



      You are searching for the inverse of $phi_lambda circ phi_lambda$ which is the Moebius transform associated with the matrix
      $$ [(A_lambda)^2 ]^{-1} = [(A_lambda)^{-1}]^2 =frac{1}{(1-|lambda|^2)^2} begin{pmatrix} 1 & lambda \
      barlambda & 1 end{pmatrix}^2 =frac{1}{(1-|lambda|^2)^2}begin{pmatrix} 1+ |lambda|^2 &2 lambda\ 2 barlambda& 1+ |lambda|^2 end{pmatrix} .$$

      In other words, the inverse transform is given by
      $$psi(z) = frac{(1+ |lambda|^2) z + 2 lambda}{2barlambda z + (1+ |lambda|^2)},.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        The Moebius transforms $$ f(z) = frac{a z + b}{c z + d}$$ under composition are homorphic as a group to the matrices
        $$ A = begin{pmatrix} a & b \ c & d end{pmatrix},.$$



        Applied for your case, the Moebius transform $phi_lambda$ is associated to the matrix
        $$A _ lambda =begin{pmatrix} 1 & -lambda \
        -barlambda & 1 end{pmatrix}. $$



        You are searching for the inverse of $phi_lambda circ phi_lambda$ which is the Moebius transform associated with the matrix
        $$ [(A_lambda)^2 ]^{-1} = [(A_lambda)^{-1}]^2 =frac{1}{(1-|lambda|^2)^2} begin{pmatrix} 1 & lambda \
        barlambda & 1 end{pmatrix}^2 =frac{1}{(1-|lambda|^2)^2}begin{pmatrix} 1+ |lambda|^2 &2 lambda\ 2 barlambda& 1+ |lambda|^2 end{pmatrix} .$$

        In other words, the inverse transform is given by
        $$psi(z) = frac{(1+ |lambda|^2) z + 2 lambda}{2barlambda z + (1+ |lambda|^2)},.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The Moebius transforms $$ f(z) = frac{a z + b}{c z + d}$$ under composition are homorphic as a group to the matrices
        $$ A = begin{pmatrix} a & b \ c & d end{pmatrix},.$$



        Applied for your case, the Moebius transform $phi_lambda$ is associated to the matrix
        $$A _ lambda =begin{pmatrix} 1 & -lambda \
        -barlambda & 1 end{pmatrix}. $$



        You are searching for the inverse of $phi_lambda circ phi_lambda$ which is the Moebius transform associated with the matrix
        $$ [(A_lambda)^2 ]^{-1} = [(A_lambda)^{-1}]^2 =frac{1}{(1-|lambda|^2)^2} begin{pmatrix} 1 & lambda \
        barlambda & 1 end{pmatrix}^2 =frac{1}{(1-|lambda|^2)^2}begin{pmatrix} 1+ |lambda|^2 &2 lambda\ 2 barlambda& 1+ |lambda|^2 end{pmatrix} .$$

        In other words, the inverse transform is given by
        $$psi(z) = frac{(1+ |lambda|^2) z + 2 lambda}{2barlambda z + (1+ |lambda|^2)},.$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 22 at 16:10









        FabianFabian

        19.8k3774




        19.8k3774






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083229%2ffinding-the-inverse-of-phi-lambda2-where-phi-lambda-is-the-mobius-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

            ts Property 'filter' does not exist on type '{}'

            mat-slide-toggle shouldn't change it's state when I click cancel in confirmation window