Meaningful State Representations with Autoencoders & Embedding Layers












1















As I understand, Embedding Layers are simply lookup matrices, weights of which are learned by the optimisation problem.



Suppose, for this example, my dataset contains a single categorical variable. For example, I would like to auto encode a sentence of words to itself, to learn the sentence representation.



# example model
input = tf.keras.layers.Input()
embed = tf.keras.layers.Embedding(99)(input)
encoder = tf.keras.layers.LSTM()(embed)
decoder = tf.keras.layers.LSTM()(encoder)
model = tf.keras.models.Model(input, decoder)


The error will minimise the difference between embed and decoder outputs.



However, since embeddings are learned depending on optimisation condition, I think that I will end up learning trivial representations e.g.



the embedding matrix is all ones, and decoder always outputs ones. (Or zeros even), giving me a 100% accuracy in training.



For example, in the embedding matrix all words are just a vector of ones, and the auto encoder simply returns ones.



What I would like to do is to learn a meaningful representation of categorical variables.










share|improve this question





























    1















    As I understand, Embedding Layers are simply lookup matrices, weights of which are learned by the optimisation problem.



    Suppose, for this example, my dataset contains a single categorical variable. For example, I would like to auto encode a sentence of words to itself, to learn the sentence representation.



    # example model
    input = tf.keras.layers.Input()
    embed = tf.keras.layers.Embedding(99)(input)
    encoder = tf.keras.layers.LSTM()(embed)
    decoder = tf.keras.layers.LSTM()(encoder)
    model = tf.keras.models.Model(input, decoder)


    The error will minimise the difference between embed and decoder outputs.



    However, since embeddings are learned depending on optimisation condition, I think that I will end up learning trivial representations e.g.



    the embedding matrix is all ones, and decoder always outputs ones. (Or zeros even), giving me a 100% accuracy in training.



    For example, in the embedding matrix all words are just a vector of ones, and the auto encoder simply returns ones.



    What I would like to do is to learn a meaningful representation of categorical variables.










    share|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1








      As I understand, Embedding Layers are simply lookup matrices, weights of which are learned by the optimisation problem.



      Suppose, for this example, my dataset contains a single categorical variable. For example, I would like to auto encode a sentence of words to itself, to learn the sentence representation.



      # example model
      input = tf.keras.layers.Input()
      embed = tf.keras.layers.Embedding(99)(input)
      encoder = tf.keras.layers.LSTM()(embed)
      decoder = tf.keras.layers.LSTM()(encoder)
      model = tf.keras.models.Model(input, decoder)


      The error will minimise the difference between embed and decoder outputs.



      However, since embeddings are learned depending on optimisation condition, I think that I will end up learning trivial representations e.g.



      the embedding matrix is all ones, and decoder always outputs ones. (Or zeros even), giving me a 100% accuracy in training.



      For example, in the embedding matrix all words are just a vector of ones, and the auto encoder simply returns ones.



      What I would like to do is to learn a meaningful representation of categorical variables.










      share|improve this question
















      As I understand, Embedding Layers are simply lookup matrices, weights of which are learned by the optimisation problem.



      Suppose, for this example, my dataset contains a single categorical variable. For example, I would like to auto encode a sentence of words to itself, to learn the sentence representation.



      # example model
      input = tf.keras.layers.Input()
      embed = tf.keras.layers.Embedding(99)(input)
      encoder = tf.keras.layers.LSTM()(embed)
      decoder = tf.keras.layers.LSTM()(encoder)
      model = tf.keras.models.Model(input, decoder)


      The error will minimise the difference between embed and decoder outputs.



      However, since embeddings are learned depending on optimisation condition, I think that I will end up learning trivial representations e.g.



      the embedding matrix is all ones, and decoder always outputs ones. (Or zeros even), giving me a 100% accuracy in training.



      For example, in the embedding matrix all words are just a vector of ones, and the auto encoder simply returns ones.



      What I would like to do is to learn a meaningful representation of categorical variables.







      python tensorflow keras






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jan 1 at 16:48







      user10430178

















      asked Jan 1 at 15:06









      user10430178user10430178

      856




      856
























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53996520%2fmeaningful-state-representations-with-autoencoders-embedding-layers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53996520%2fmeaningful-state-representations-with-autoencoders-embedding-layers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

          android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

          WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]