If $(a,b)$ is a multiple of $(c,d)$, show that $(a,c)$ is a multiple of $(b,d)$
$begingroup$
I need help with this problem:
If $(a,b)$ is a multiple of $(c,d)$ with $abcdneq0$, show that $(a,c)$ is a multiple of $(b,d)$. This is suprisingly important: call it a challenge question. You could use numbers first to see how $a,b,c$ and $d$ are related. The question will lead to:
If A = $left[begin{array}{l}a&b\c&dend{array}right]$ has dependent rows the it has dependent columns.
I tried to do it this way:
$(a,b)=x(c,d)Rightarrow(a,b)=(xc,xd)$
$(a,c)=(xc,c)Rightarrow c(x,1)$ and $(b,d)=(xd,d)Rightarrow d(x,1)$
I don't know what to do after that, what should I do next?
linear-algebra matrices
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I need help with this problem:
If $(a,b)$ is a multiple of $(c,d)$ with $abcdneq0$, show that $(a,c)$ is a multiple of $(b,d)$. This is suprisingly important: call it a challenge question. You could use numbers first to see how $a,b,c$ and $d$ are related. The question will lead to:
If A = $left[begin{array}{l}a&b\c&dend{array}right]$ has dependent rows the it has dependent columns.
I tried to do it this way:
$(a,b)=x(c,d)Rightarrow(a,b)=(xc,xd)$
$(a,c)=(xc,c)Rightarrow c(x,1)$ and $(b,d)=(xd,d)Rightarrow d(x,1)$
I don't know what to do after that, what should I do next?
linear-algebra matrices
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Do you mean that $a=lambda c, b=lambda d$ for some constant $lambda$? But then $(a,c)=(lambda c, c)=ctimes (lambda ,1) $ and $(b,d)=(lambda d,d)=dtimes (lambda ,1)$ so...
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 27 at 17:30
$begingroup$
I think that I can solve oneof the ecuations for $(x,1)$, right? For example, if I solve $(b,d)=d(x,1)$, I end up with $(x,1)={(b,d)over d}$, and the I can substitute that on the first ecuation like this: $(a,c)={c over d}(b,d)$, am I right?
$endgroup$
– davidllerenav
Jan 27 at 19:15
$begingroup$
yes, that's right.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 27 at 19:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I need help with this problem:
If $(a,b)$ is a multiple of $(c,d)$ with $abcdneq0$, show that $(a,c)$ is a multiple of $(b,d)$. This is suprisingly important: call it a challenge question. You could use numbers first to see how $a,b,c$ and $d$ are related. The question will lead to:
If A = $left[begin{array}{l}a&b\c&dend{array}right]$ has dependent rows the it has dependent columns.
I tried to do it this way:
$(a,b)=x(c,d)Rightarrow(a,b)=(xc,xd)$
$(a,c)=(xc,c)Rightarrow c(x,1)$ and $(b,d)=(xd,d)Rightarrow d(x,1)$
I don't know what to do after that, what should I do next?
linear-algebra matrices
$endgroup$
I need help with this problem:
If $(a,b)$ is a multiple of $(c,d)$ with $abcdneq0$, show that $(a,c)$ is a multiple of $(b,d)$. This is suprisingly important: call it a challenge question. You could use numbers first to see how $a,b,c$ and $d$ are related. The question will lead to:
If A = $left[begin{array}{l}a&b\c&dend{array}right]$ has dependent rows the it has dependent columns.
I tried to do it this way:
$(a,b)=x(c,d)Rightarrow(a,b)=(xc,xd)$
$(a,c)=(xc,c)Rightarrow c(x,1)$ and $(b,d)=(xd,d)Rightarrow d(x,1)$
I don't know what to do after that, what should I do next?
linear-algebra matrices
linear-algebra matrices
asked Jan 27 at 17:27
davidllerenavdavidllerenav
3078
3078
$begingroup$
Do you mean that $a=lambda c, b=lambda d$ for some constant $lambda$? But then $(a,c)=(lambda c, c)=ctimes (lambda ,1) $ and $(b,d)=(lambda d,d)=dtimes (lambda ,1)$ so...
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 27 at 17:30
$begingroup$
I think that I can solve oneof the ecuations for $(x,1)$, right? For example, if I solve $(b,d)=d(x,1)$, I end up with $(x,1)={(b,d)over d}$, and the I can substitute that on the first ecuation like this: $(a,c)={c over d}(b,d)$, am I right?
$endgroup$
– davidllerenav
Jan 27 at 19:15
$begingroup$
yes, that's right.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 27 at 19:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Do you mean that $a=lambda c, b=lambda d$ for some constant $lambda$? But then $(a,c)=(lambda c, c)=ctimes (lambda ,1) $ and $(b,d)=(lambda d,d)=dtimes (lambda ,1)$ so...
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 27 at 17:30
$begingroup$
I think that I can solve oneof the ecuations for $(x,1)$, right? For example, if I solve $(b,d)=d(x,1)$, I end up with $(x,1)={(b,d)over d}$, and the I can substitute that on the first ecuation like this: $(a,c)={c over d}(b,d)$, am I right?
$endgroup$
– davidllerenav
Jan 27 at 19:15
$begingroup$
yes, that's right.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 27 at 19:17
$begingroup$
Do you mean that $a=lambda c, b=lambda d$ for some constant $lambda$? But then $(a,c)=(lambda c, c)=ctimes (lambda ,1) $ and $(b,d)=(lambda d,d)=dtimes (lambda ,1)$ so...
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 27 at 17:30
$begingroup$
Do you mean that $a=lambda c, b=lambda d$ for some constant $lambda$? But then $(a,c)=(lambda c, c)=ctimes (lambda ,1) $ and $(b,d)=(lambda d,d)=dtimes (lambda ,1)$ so...
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 27 at 17:30
$begingroup$
I think that I can solve oneof the ecuations for $(x,1)$, right? For example, if I solve $(b,d)=d(x,1)$, I end up with $(x,1)={(b,d)over d}$, and the I can substitute that on the first ecuation like this: $(a,c)={c over d}(b,d)$, am I right?
$endgroup$
– davidllerenav
Jan 27 at 19:15
$begingroup$
I think that I can solve oneof the ecuations for $(x,1)$, right? For example, if I solve $(b,d)=d(x,1)$, I end up with $(x,1)={(b,d)over d}$, and the I can substitute that on the first ecuation like this: $(a,c)={c over d}(b,d)$, am I right?
$endgroup$
– davidllerenav
Jan 27 at 19:15
$begingroup$
yes, that's right.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 27 at 19:17
$begingroup$
yes, that's right.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 27 at 19:17
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint: If $ad=bc$ then $dfrac ab=dfrac cd$ and also $dfrac ac=dfrac bd$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You can skip $ad=bc$, as it's not really the relevant hypothesis in this problem (is just important for the application mentioned afterwards). $frac ac=frac bd$ is the hypothesis, and $frac ab=frac cd$ is the conclusion
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 27 at 17:36
$begingroup$
It just helps visually to see why the fractions are equal, as they only result from simple manipulations of this equation. Also OP went with determinant, and it relates well to ad-bc=0.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 27 at 17:41
$begingroup$
You have to be careful lest you end up dividing by 0.
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 27 at 17:42
1
$begingroup$
@Mike OP specified $abcdneq 0$.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 27 at 17:42
$begingroup$
You are right, $abcd not =0$ is assumed. But I also don't think it is clear (to the person assigning this nor to the person asking) that $ad=bc$ either
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 27 at 17:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First note the following: $(a,b) = (a,(frac{b}{a}) a)$. [As $abcd not =0$ we can assume that $frac{b}{a}$ exists]
So for some scalar $x$ we note: $(c,d) = x(a,b) = (xa,xb)$ $=(xa,x(frac{b}{a}) a)$. Thus $c$ can be written $c=xa$ and $d$ can be written $d=x(frac{b}{a}) a$.
Thus $(b,d) = (frac{b}{a} a, x(frac{b}{a})a) = frac{b}{a}(a,xa) = frac{b}{a}(a,c)$. So $(b,d) = y(a,c)$ where $y = frac{b}{a}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So I just need to make that algebraic trick, and that's all, right?
$endgroup$
– davidllerenav
Jan 27 at 19:08
$begingroup$
Yes that is correct.
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 28 at 1:29
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3089849%2fif-a-b-is-a-multiple-of-c-d-show-that-a-c-is-a-multiple-of-b-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint: If $ad=bc$ then $dfrac ab=dfrac cd$ and also $dfrac ac=dfrac bd$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You can skip $ad=bc$, as it's not really the relevant hypothesis in this problem (is just important for the application mentioned afterwards). $frac ac=frac bd$ is the hypothesis, and $frac ab=frac cd$ is the conclusion
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 27 at 17:36
$begingroup$
It just helps visually to see why the fractions are equal, as they only result from simple manipulations of this equation. Also OP went with determinant, and it relates well to ad-bc=0.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 27 at 17:41
$begingroup$
You have to be careful lest you end up dividing by 0.
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 27 at 17:42
1
$begingroup$
@Mike OP specified $abcdneq 0$.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 27 at 17:42
$begingroup$
You are right, $abcd not =0$ is assumed. But I also don't think it is clear (to the person assigning this nor to the person asking) that $ad=bc$ either
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 27 at 17:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: If $ad=bc$ then $dfrac ab=dfrac cd$ and also $dfrac ac=dfrac bd$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You can skip $ad=bc$, as it's not really the relevant hypothesis in this problem (is just important for the application mentioned afterwards). $frac ac=frac bd$ is the hypothesis, and $frac ab=frac cd$ is the conclusion
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 27 at 17:36
$begingroup$
It just helps visually to see why the fractions are equal, as they only result from simple manipulations of this equation. Also OP went with determinant, and it relates well to ad-bc=0.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 27 at 17:41
$begingroup$
You have to be careful lest you end up dividing by 0.
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 27 at 17:42
1
$begingroup$
@Mike OP specified $abcdneq 0$.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 27 at 17:42
$begingroup$
You are right, $abcd not =0$ is assumed. But I also don't think it is clear (to the person assigning this nor to the person asking) that $ad=bc$ either
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 27 at 17:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: If $ad=bc$ then $dfrac ab=dfrac cd$ and also $dfrac ac=dfrac bd$
$endgroup$
Hint: If $ad=bc$ then $dfrac ab=dfrac cd$ and also $dfrac ac=dfrac bd$
answered Jan 27 at 17:33


zwimzwim
12.6k831
12.6k831
$begingroup$
You can skip $ad=bc$, as it's not really the relevant hypothesis in this problem (is just important for the application mentioned afterwards). $frac ac=frac bd$ is the hypothesis, and $frac ab=frac cd$ is the conclusion
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 27 at 17:36
$begingroup$
It just helps visually to see why the fractions are equal, as they only result from simple manipulations of this equation. Also OP went with determinant, and it relates well to ad-bc=0.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 27 at 17:41
$begingroup$
You have to be careful lest you end up dividing by 0.
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 27 at 17:42
1
$begingroup$
@Mike OP specified $abcdneq 0$.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 27 at 17:42
$begingroup$
You are right, $abcd not =0$ is assumed. But I also don't think it is clear (to the person assigning this nor to the person asking) that $ad=bc$ either
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 27 at 17:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can skip $ad=bc$, as it's not really the relevant hypothesis in this problem (is just important for the application mentioned afterwards). $frac ac=frac bd$ is the hypothesis, and $frac ab=frac cd$ is the conclusion
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 27 at 17:36
$begingroup$
It just helps visually to see why the fractions are equal, as they only result from simple manipulations of this equation. Also OP went with determinant, and it relates well to ad-bc=0.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 27 at 17:41
$begingroup$
You have to be careful lest you end up dividing by 0.
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 27 at 17:42
1
$begingroup$
@Mike OP specified $abcdneq 0$.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 27 at 17:42
$begingroup$
You are right, $abcd not =0$ is assumed. But I also don't think it is clear (to the person assigning this nor to the person asking) that $ad=bc$ either
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 27 at 17:44
$begingroup$
You can skip $ad=bc$, as it's not really the relevant hypothesis in this problem (is just important for the application mentioned afterwards). $frac ac=frac bd$ is the hypothesis, and $frac ab=frac cd$ is the conclusion
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 27 at 17:36
$begingroup$
You can skip $ad=bc$, as it's not really the relevant hypothesis in this problem (is just important for the application mentioned afterwards). $frac ac=frac bd$ is the hypothesis, and $frac ab=frac cd$ is the conclusion
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 27 at 17:36
$begingroup$
It just helps visually to see why the fractions are equal, as they only result from simple manipulations of this equation. Also OP went with determinant, and it relates well to ad-bc=0.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 27 at 17:41
$begingroup$
It just helps visually to see why the fractions are equal, as they only result from simple manipulations of this equation. Also OP went with determinant, and it relates well to ad-bc=0.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 27 at 17:41
$begingroup$
You have to be careful lest you end up dividing by 0.
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 27 at 17:42
$begingroup$
You have to be careful lest you end up dividing by 0.
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 27 at 17:42
1
1
$begingroup$
@Mike OP specified $abcdneq 0$.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 27 at 17:42
$begingroup$
@Mike OP specified $abcdneq 0$.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 27 at 17:42
$begingroup$
You are right, $abcd not =0$ is assumed. But I also don't think it is clear (to the person assigning this nor to the person asking) that $ad=bc$ either
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 27 at 17:44
$begingroup$
You are right, $abcd not =0$ is assumed. But I also don't think it is clear (to the person assigning this nor to the person asking) that $ad=bc$ either
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 27 at 17:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First note the following: $(a,b) = (a,(frac{b}{a}) a)$. [As $abcd not =0$ we can assume that $frac{b}{a}$ exists]
So for some scalar $x$ we note: $(c,d) = x(a,b) = (xa,xb)$ $=(xa,x(frac{b}{a}) a)$. Thus $c$ can be written $c=xa$ and $d$ can be written $d=x(frac{b}{a}) a$.
Thus $(b,d) = (frac{b}{a} a, x(frac{b}{a})a) = frac{b}{a}(a,xa) = frac{b}{a}(a,c)$. So $(b,d) = y(a,c)$ where $y = frac{b}{a}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So I just need to make that algebraic trick, and that's all, right?
$endgroup$
– davidllerenav
Jan 27 at 19:08
$begingroup$
Yes that is correct.
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 28 at 1:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First note the following: $(a,b) = (a,(frac{b}{a}) a)$. [As $abcd not =0$ we can assume that $frac{b}{a}$ exists]
So for some scalar $x$ we note: $(c,d) = x(a,b) = (xa,xb)$ $=(xa,x(frac{b}{a}) a)$. Thus $c$ can be written $c=xa$ and $d$ can be written $d=x(frac{b}{a}) a$.
Thus $(b,d) = (frac{b}{a} a, x(frac{b}{a})a) = frac{b}{a}(a,xa) = frac{b}{a}(a,c)$. So $(b,d) = y(a,c)$ where $y = frac{b}{a}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So I just need to make that algebraic trick, and that's all, right?
$endgroup$
– davidllerenav
Jan 27 at 19:08
$begingroup$
Yes that is correct.
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 28 at 1:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First note the following: $(a,b) = (a,(frac{b}{a}) a)$. [As $abcd not =0$ we can assume that $frac{b}{a}$ exists]
So for some scalar $x$ we note: $(c,d) = x(a,b) = (xa,xb)$ $=(xa,x(frac{b}{a}) a)$. Thus $c$ can be written $c=xa$ and $d$ can be written $d=x(frac{b}{a}) a$.
Thus $(b,d) = (frac{b}{a} a, x(frac{b}{a})a) = frac{b}{a}(a,xa) = frac{b}{a}(a,c)$. So $(b,d) = y(a,c)$ where $y = frac{b}{a}$.
$endgroup$
First note the following: $(a,b) = (a,(frac{b}{a}) a)$. [As $abcd not =0$ we can assume that $frac{b}{a}$ exists]
So for some scalar $x$ we note: $(c,d) = x(a,b) = (xa,xb)$ $=(xa,x(frac{b}{a}) a)$. Thus $c$ can be written $c=xa$ and $d$ can be written $d=x(frac{b}{a}) a$.
Thus $(b,d) = (frac{b}{a} a, x(frac{b}{a})a) = frac{b}{a}(a,xa) = frac{b}{a}(a,c)$. So $(b,d) = y(a,c)$ where $y = frac{b}{a}$.
edited Jan 27 at 17:46
answered Jan 27 at 17:33
MikeMike
4,461512
4,461512
$begingroup$
So I just need to make that algebraic trick, and that's all, right?
$endgroup$
– davidllerenav
Jan 27 at 19:08
$begingroup$
Yes that is correct.
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 28 at 1:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So I just need to make that algebraic trick, and that's all, right?
$endgroup$
– davidllerenav
Jan 27 at 19:08
$begingroup$
Yes that is correct.
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 28 at 1:29
$begingroup$
So I just need to make that algebraic trick, and that's all, right?
$endgroup$
– davidllerenav
Jan 27 at 19:08
$begingroup$
So I just need to make that algebraic trick, and that's all, right?
$endgroup$
– davidllerenav
Jan 27 at 19:08
$begingroup$
Yes that is correct.
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 28 at 1:29
$begingroup$
Yes that is correct.
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 28 at 1:29
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3089849%2fif-a-b-is-a-multiple-of-c-d-show-that-a-c-is-a-multiple-of-b-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Do you mean that $a=lambda c, b=lambda d$ for some constant $lambda$? But then $(a,c)=(lambda c, c)=ctimes (lambda ,1) $ and $(b,d)=(lambda d,d)=dtimes (lambda ,1)$ so...
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 27 at 17:30
$begingroup$
I think that I can solve oneof the ecuations for $(x,1)$, right? For example, if I solve $(b,d)=d(x,1)$, I end up with $(x,1)={(b,d)over d}$, and the I can substitute that on the first ecuation like this: $(a,c)={c over d}(b,d)$, am I right?
$endgroup$
– davidllerenav
Jan 27 at 19:15
$begingroup$
yes, that's right.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 27 at 19:17