If $(a,b)$ is a multiple of $(c,d)$, show that $(a,c)$ is a multiple of $(b,d)$












1












$begingroup$


I need help with this problem:



If $(a,b)$ is a multiple of $(c,d)$ with $abcdneq0$, show that $(a,c)$ is a multiple of $(b,d)$. This is suprisingly important: call it a challenge question. You could use numbers first to see how $a,b,c$ and $d$ are related. The question will lead to:



If A = $left[begin{array}{l}a&b\c&dend{array}right]$ has dependent rows the it has dependent columns.



I tried to do it this way:



$(a,b)=x(c,d)Rightarrow(a,b)=(xc,xd)$



$(a,c)=(xc,c)Rightarrow c(x,1)$ and $(b,d)=(xd,d)Rightarrow d(x,1)$



I don't know what to do after that, what should I do next?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean that $a=lambda c, b=lambda d$ for some constant $lambda$? But then $(a,c)=(lambda c, c)=ctimes (lambda ,1) $ and $(b,d)=(lambda d,d)=dtimes (lambda ,1)$ so...
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 27 at 17:30










  • $begingroup$
    I think that I can solve oneof the ecuations for $(x,1)$, right? For example, if I solve $(b,d)=d(x,1)$, I end up with $(x,1)={(b,d)over d}$, and the I can substitute that on the first ecuation like this: $(a,c)={c over d}(b,d)$, am I right?
    $endgroup$
    – davidllerenav
    Jan 27 at 19:15










  • $begingroup$
    yes, that's right.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 27 at 19:17
















1












$begingroup$


I need help with this problem:



If $(a,b)$ is a multiple of $(c,d)$ with $abcdneq0$, show that $(a,c)$ is a multiple of $(b,d)$. This is suprisingly important: call it a challenge question. You could use numbers first to see how $a,b,c$ and $d$ are related. The question will lead to:



If A = $left[begin{array}{l}a&b\c&dend{array}right]$ has dependent rows the it has dependent columns.



I tried to do it this way:



$(a,b)=x(c,d)Rightarrow(a,b)=(xc,xd)$



$(a,c)=(xc,c)Rightarrow c(x,1)$ and $(b,d)=(xd,d)Rightarrow d(x,1)$



I don't know what to do after that, what should I do next?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean that $a=lambda c, b=lambda d$ for some constant $lambda$? But then $(a,c)=(lambda c, c)=ctimes (lambda ,1) $ and $(b,d)=(lambda d,d)=dtimes (lambda ,1)$ so...
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 27 at 17:30










  • $begingroup$
    I think that I can solve oneof the ecuations for $(x,1)$, right? For example, if I solve $(b,d)=d(x,1)$, I end up with $(x,1)={(b,d)over d}$, and the I can substitute that on the first ecuation like this: $(a,c)={c over d}(b,d)$, am I right?
    $endgroup$
    – davidllerenav
    Jan 27 at 19:15










  • $begingroup$
    yes, that's right.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 27 at 19:17














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I need help with this problem:



If $(a,b)$ is a multiple of $(c,d)$ with $abcdneq0$, show that $(a,c)$ is a multiple of $(b,d)$. This is suprisingly important: call it a challenge question. You could use numbers first to see how $a,b,c$ and $d$ are related. The question will lead to:



If A = $left[begin{array}{l}a&b\c&dend{array}right]$ has dependent rows the it has dependent columns.



I tried to do it this way:



$(a,b)=x(c,d)Rightarrow(a,b)=(xc,xd)$



$(a,c)=(xc,c)Rightarrow c(x,1)$ and $(b,d)=(xd,d)Rightarrow d(x,1)$



I don't know what to do after that, what should I do next?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I need help with this problem:



If $(a,b)$ is a multiple of $(c,d)$ with $abcdneq0$, show that $(a,c)$ is a multiple of $(b,d)$. This is suprisingly important: call it a challenge question. You could use numbers first to see how $a,b,c$ and $d$ are related. The question will lead to:



If A = $left[begin{array}{l}a&b\c&dend{array}right]$ has dependent rows the it has dependent columns.



I tried to do it this way:



$(a,b)=x(c,d)Rightarrow(a,b)=(xc,xd)$



$(a,c)=(xc,c)Rightarrow c(x,1)$ and $(b,d)=(xd,d)Rightarrow d(x,1)$



I don't know what to do after that, what should I do next?







linear-algebra matrices






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 27 at 17:27









davidllerenavdavidllerenav

3078




3078












  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean that $a=lambda c, b=lambda d$ for some constant $lambda$? But then $(a,c)=(lambda c, c)=ctimes (lambda ,1) $ and $(b,d)=(lambda d,d)=dtimes (lambda ,1)$ so...
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 27 at 17:30










  • $begingroup$
    I think that I can solve oneof the ecuations for $(x,1)$, right? For example, if I solve $(b,d)=d(x,1)$, I end up with $(x,1)={(b,d)over d}$, and the I can substitute that on the first ecuation like this: $(a,c)={c over d}(b,d)$, am I right?
    $endgroup$
    – davidllerenav
    Jan 27 at 19:15










  • $begingroup$
    yes, that's right.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 27 at 19:17


















  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean that $a=lambda c, b=lambda d$ for some constant $lambda$? But then $(a,c)=(lambda c, c)=ctimes (lambda ,1) $ and $(b,d)=(lambda d,d)=dtimes (lambda ,1)$ so...
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 27 at 17:30










  • $begingroup$
    I think that I can solve oneof the ecuations for $(x,1)$, right? For example, if I solve $(b,d)=d(x,1)$, I end up with $(x,1)={(b,d)over d}$, and the I can substitute that on the first ecuation like this: $(a,c)={c over d}(b,d)$, am I right?
    $endgroup$
    – davidllerenav
    Jan 27 at 19:15










  • $begingroup$
    yes, that's right.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 27 at 19:17
















$begingroup$
Do you mean that $a=lambda c, b=lambda d$ for some constant $lambda$? But then $(a,c)=(lambda c, c)=ctimes (lambda ,1) $ and $(b,d)=(lambda d,d)=dtimes (lambda ,1)$ so...
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 27 at 17:30




$begingroup$
Do you mean that $a=lambda c, b=lambda d$ for some constant $lambda$? But then $(a,c)=(lambda c, c)=ctimes (lambda ,1) $ and $(b,d)=(lambda d,d)=dtimes (lambda ,1)$ so...
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 27 at 17:30












$begingroup$
I think that I can solve oneof the ecuations for $(x,1)$, right? For example, if I solve $(b,d)=d(x,1)$, I end up with $(x,1)={(b,d)over d}$, and the I can substitute that on the first ecuation like this: $(a,c)={c over d}(b,d)$, am I right?
$endgroup$
– davidllerenav
Jan 27 at 19:15




$begingroup$
I think that I can solve oneof the ecuations for $(x,1)$, right? For example, if I solve $(b,d)=d(x,1)$, I end up with $(x,1)={(b,d)over d}$, and the I can substitute that on the first ecuation like this: $(a,c)={c over d}(b,d)$, am I right?
$endgroup$
– davidllerenav
Jan 27 at 19:15












$begingroup$
yes, that's right.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 27 at 19:17




$begingroup$
yes, that's right.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 27 at 19:17










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Hint: If $ad=bc$ then $dfrac ab=dfrac cd$ and also $dfrac ac=dfrac bd$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You can skip $ad=bc$, as it's not really the relevant hypothesis in this problem (is just important for the application mentioned afterwards). $frac ac=frac bd$ is the hypothesis, and $frac ab=frac cd$ is the conclusion
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Jan 27 at 17:36












  • $begingroup$
    It just helps visually to see why the fractions are equal, as they only result from simple manipulations of this equation. Also OP went with determinant, and it relates well to ad-bc=0.
    $endgroup$
    – zwim
    Jan 27 at 17:41










  • $begingroup$
    You have to be careful lest you end up dividing by 0.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike
    Jan 27 at 17:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Mike OP specified $abcdneq 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – zwim
    Jan 27 at 17:42












  • $begingroup$
    You are right, $abcd not =0$ is assumed. But I also don't think it is clear (to the person assigning this nor to the person asking) that $ad=bc$ either
    $endgroup$
    – Mike
    Jan 27 at 17:44





















0












$begingroup$

First note the following: $(a,b) = (a,(frac{b}{a}) a)$. [As $abcd not =0$ we can assume that $frac{b}{a}$ exists]



So for some scalar $x$ we note: $(c,d) = x(a,b) = (xa,xb)$ $=(xa,x(frac{b}{a}) a)$. Thus $c$ can be written $c=xa$ and $d$ can be written $d=x(frac{b}{a}) a$.



Thus $(b,d) = (frac{b}{a} a, x(frac{b}{a})a) = frac{b}{a}(a,xa) = frac{b}{a}(a,c)$. So $(b,d) = y(a,c)$ where $y = frac{b}{a}$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    So I just need to make that algebraic trick, and that's all, right?
    $endgroup$
    – davidllerenav
    Jan 27 at 19:08










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike
    Jan 28 at 1:29











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3089849%2fif-a-b-is-a-multiple-of-c-d-show-that-a-c-is-a-multiple-of-b-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Hint: If $ad=bc$ then $dfrac ab=dfrac cd$ and also $dfrac ac=dfrac bd$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You can skip $ad=bc$, as it's not really the relevant hypothesis in this problem (is just important for the application mentioned afterwards). $frac ac=frac bd$ is the hypothesis, and $frac ab=frac cd$ is the conclusion
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Jan 27 at 17:36












  • $begingroup$
    It just helps visually to see why the fractions are equal, as they only result from simple manipulations of this equation. Also OP went with determinant, and it relates well to ad-bc=0.
    $endgroup$
    – zwim
    Jan 27 at 17:41










  • $begingroup$
    You have to be careful lest you end up dividing by 0.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike
    Jan 27 at 17:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Mike OP specified $abcdneq 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – zwim
    Jan 27 at 17:42












  • $begingroup$
    You are right, $abcd not =0$ is assumed. But I also don't think it is clear (to the person assigning this nor to the person asking) that $ad=bc$ either
    $endgroup$
    – Mike
    Jan 27 at 17:44


















0












$begingroup$

Hint: If $ad=bc$ then $dfrac ab=dfrac cd$ and also $dfrac ac=dfrac bd$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You can skip $ad=bc$, as it's not really the relevant hypothesis in this problem (is just important for the application mentioned afterwards). $frac ac=frac bd$ is the hypothesis, and $frac ab=frac cd$ is the conclusion
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Jan 27 at 17:36












  • $begingroup$
    It just helps visually to see why the fractions are equal, as they only result from simple manipulations of this equation. Also OP went with determinant, and it relates well to ad-bc=0.
    $endgroup$
    – zwim
    Jan 27 at 17:41










  • $begingroup$
    You have to be careful lest you end up dividing by 0.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike
    Jan 27 at 17:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Mike OP specified $abcdneq 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – zwim
    Jan 27 at 17:42












  • $begingroup$
    You are right, $abcd not =0$ is assumed. But I also don't think it is clear (to the person assigning this nor to the person asking) that $ad=bc$ either
    $endgroup$
    – Mike
    Jan 27 at 17:44
















0












0








0





$begingroup$

Hint: If $ad=bc$ then $dfrac ab=dfrac cd$ and also $dfrac ac=dfrac bd$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Hint: If $ad=bc$ then $dfrac ab=dfrac cd$ and also $dfrac ac=dfrac bd$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 27 at 17:33









zwimzwim

12.6k831




12.6k831












  • $begingroup$
    You can skip $ad=bc$, as it's not really the relevant hypothesis in this problem (is just important for the application mentioned afterwards). $frac ac=frac bd$ is the hypothesis, and $frac ab=frac cd$ is the conclusion
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Jan 27 at 17:36












  • $begingroup$
    It just helps visually to see why the fractions are equal, as they only result from simple manipulations of this equation. Also OP went with determinant, and it relates well to ad-bc=0.
    $endgroup$
    – zwim
    Jan 27 at 17:41










  • $begingroup$
    You have to be careful lest you end up dividing by 0.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike
    Jan 27 at 17:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Mike OP specified $abcdneq 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – zwim
    Jan 27 at 17:42












  • $begingroup$
    You are right, $abcd not =0$ is assumed. But I also don't think it is clear (to the person assigning this nor to the person asking) that $ad=bc$ either
    $endgroup$
    – Mike
    Jan 27 at 17:44




















  • $begingroup$
    You can skip $ad=bc$, as it's not really the relevant hypothesis in this problem (is just important for the application mentioned afterwards). $frac ac=frac bd$ is the hypothesis, and $frac ab=frac cd$ is the conclusion
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Jan 27 at 17:36












  • $begingroup$
    It just helps visually to see why the fractions are equal, as they only result from simple manipulations of this equation. Also OP went with determinant, and it relates well to ad-bc=0.
    $endgroup$
    – zwim
    Jan 27 at 17:41










  • $begingroup$
    You have to be careful lest you end up dividing by 0.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike
    Jan 27 at 17:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Mike OP specified $abcdneq 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – zwim
    Jan 27 at 17:42












  • $begingroup$
    You are right, $abcd not =0$ is assumed. But I also don't think it is clear (to the person assigning this nor to the person asking) that $ad=bc$ either
    $endgroup$
    – Mike
    Jan 27 at 17:44


















$begingroup$
You can skip $ad=bc$, as it's not really the relevant hypothesis in this problem (is just important for the application mentioned afterwards). $frac ac=frac bd$ is the hypothesis, and $frac ab=frac cd$ is the conclusion
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 27 at 17:36






$begingroup$
You can skip $ad=bc$, as it's not really the relevant hypothesis in this problem (is just important for the application mentioned afterwards). $frac ac=frac bd$ is the hypothesis, and $frac ab=frac cd$ is the conclusion
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 27 at 17:36














$begingroup$
It just helps visually to see why the fractions are equal, as they only result from simple manipulations of this equation. Also OP went with determinant, and it relates well to ad-bc=0.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 27 at 17:41




$begingroup$
It just helps visually to see why the fractions are equal, as they only result from simple manipulations of this equation. Also OP went with determinant, and it relates well to ad-bc=0.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 27 at 17:41












$begingroup$
You have to be careful lest you end up dividing by 0.
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 27 at 17:42




$begingroup$
You have to be careful lest you end up dividing by 0.
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 27 at 17:42




1




1




$begingroup$
@Mike OP specified $abcdneq 0$.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 27 at 17:42






$begingroup$
@Mike OP specified $abcdneq 0$.
$endgroup$
– zwim
Jan 27 at 17:42














$begingroup$
You are right, $abcd not =0$ is assumed. But I also don't think it is clear (to the person assigning this nor to the person asking) that $ad=bc$ either
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 27 at 17:44






$begingroup$
You are right, $abcd not =0$ is assumed. But I also don't think it is clear (to the person assigning this nor to the person asking) that $ad=bc$ either
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 27 at 17:44













0












$begingroup$

First note the following: $(a,b) = (a,(frac{b}{a}) a)$. [As $abcd not =0$ we can assume that $frac{b}{a}$ exists]



So for some scalar $x$ we note: $(c,d) = x(a,b) = (xa,xb)$ $=(xa,x(frac{b}{a}) a)$. Thus $c$ can be written $c=xa$ and $d$ can be written $d=x(frac{b}{a}) a$.



Thus $(b,d) = (frac{b}{a} a, x(frac{b}{a})a) = frac{b}{a}(a,xa) = frac{b}{a}(a,c)$. So $(b,d) = y(a,c)$ where $y = frac{b}{a}$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    So I just need to make that algebraic trick, and that's all, right?
    $endgroup$
    – davidllerenav
    Jan 27 at 19:08










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike
    Jan 28 at 1:29
















0












$begingroup$

First note the following: $(a,b) = (a,(frac{b}{a}) a)$. [As $abcd not =0$ we can assume that $frac{b}{a}$ exists]



So for some scalar $x$ we note: $(c,d) = x(a,b) = (xa,xb)$ $=(xa,x(frac{b}{a}) a)$. Thus $c$ can be written $c=xa$ and $d$ can be written $d=x(frac{b}{a}) a$.



Thus $(b,d) = (frac{b}{a} a, x(frac{b}{a})a) = frac{b}{a}(a,xa) = frac{b}{a}(a,c)$. So $(b,d) = y(a,c)$ where $y = frac{b}{a}$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    So I just need to make that algebraic trick, and that's all, right?
    $endgroup$
    – davidllerenav
    Jan 27 at 19:08










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike
    Jan 28 at 1:29














0












0








0





$begingroup$

First note the following: $(a,b) = (a,(frac{b}{a}) a)$. [As $abcd not =0$ we can assume that $frac{b}{a}$ exists]



So for some scalar $x$ we note: $(c,d) = x(a,b) = (xa,xb)$ $=(xa,x(frac{b}{a}) a)$. Thus $c$ can be written $c=xa$ and $d$ can be written $d=x(frac{b}{a}) a$.



Thus $(b,d) = (frac{b}{a} a, x(frac{b}{a})a) = frac{b}{a}(a,xa) = frac{b}{a}(a,c)$. So $(b,d) = y(a,c)$ where $y = frac{b}{a}$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



First note the following: $(a,b) = (a,(frac{b}{a}) a)$. [As $abcd not =0$ we can assume that $frac{b}{a}$ exists]



So for some scalar $x$ we note: $(c,d) = x(a,b) = (xa,xb)$ $=(xa,x(frac{b}{a}) a)$. Thus $c$ can be written $c=xa$ and $d$ can be written $d=x(frac{b}{a}) a$.



Thus $(b,d) = (frac{b}{a} a, x(frac{b}{a})a) = frac{b}{a}(a,xa) = frac{b}{a}(a,c)$. So $(b,d) = y(a,c)$ where $y = frac{b}{a}$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 27 at 17:46

























answered Jan 27 at 17:33









MikeMike

4,461512




4,461512












  • $begingroup$
    So I just need to make that algebraic trick, and that's all, right?
    $endgroup$
    – davidllerenav
    Jan 27 at 19:08










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike
    Jan 28 at 1:29


















  • $begingroup$
    So I just need to make that algebraic trick, and that's all, right?
    $endgroup$
    – davidllerenav
    Jan 27 at 19:08










  • $begingroup$
    Yes that is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike
    Jan 28 at 1:29
















$begingroup$
So I just need to make that algebraic trick, and that's all, right?
$endgroup$
– davidllerenav
Jan 27 at 19:08




$begingroup$
So I just need to make that algebraic trick, and that's all, right?
$endgroup$
– davidllerenav
Jan 27 at 19:08












$begingroup$
Yes that is correct.
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 28 at 1:29




$begingroup$
Yes that is correct.
$endgroup$
– Mike
Jan 28 at 1:29


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3089849%2fif-a-b-is-a-multiple-of-c-d-show-that-a-c-is-a-multiple-of-b-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith