Characteristic Function of Gaussian/ Change of Variables in Complex Plane
$begingroup$
In the process of finding the characteristic function of a Guassian random variable, one must evaluate the following integral:
$$
int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-(x- it)^2} dx.
$$
One way to evaluate this is to use a contour integral over a rectangle and then use the residue theorem. This is presumably rigorous. Another short cut is to use the substitution $y = x-it$, which converts the integral into a standard integral on the real line. Note that $dy/dx = 1$. My question is whether this method is rigorous or can be rigorously justified?
probability complex-analysis analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the process of finding the characteristic function of a Guassian random variable, one must evaluate the following integral:
$$
int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-(x- it)^2} dx.
$$
One way to evaluate this is to use a contour integral over a rectangle and then use the residue theorem. This is presumably rigorous. Another short cut is to use the substitution $y = x-it$, which converts the integral into a standard integral on the real line. Note that $dy/dx = 1$. My question is whether this method is rigorous or can be rigorously justified?
probability complex-analysis analysis
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The substitution doesn't convert the integral into one on the real line as the integration path is a line parallel to the real axis.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jul 21 '18 at 16:03
$begingroup$
The substitution seems to shift the parallel line to the real line. The final integral is $int e^{-y^2} dy$.
$endgroup$
– JohnKnoxV
Jul 21 '18 at 16:05
$begingroup$
No because the integration path is not $mathbb R$ but the line $x-it$ for $x in mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jul 21 '18 at 16:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the process of finding the characteristic function of a Guassian random variable, one must evaluate the following integral:
$$
int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-(x- it)^2} dx.
$$
One way to evaluate this is to use a contour integral over a rectangle and then use the residue theorem. This is presumably rigorous. Another short cut is to use the substitution $y = x-it$, which converts the integral into a standard integral on the real line. Note that $dy/dx = 1$. My question is whether this method is rigorous or can be rigorously justified?
probability complex-analysis analysis
$endgroup$
In the process of finding the characteristic function of a Guassian random variable, one must evaluate the following integral:
$$
int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-(x- it)^2} dx.
$$
One way to evaluate this is to use a contour integral over a rectangle and then use the residue theorem. This is presumably rigorous. Another short cut is to use the substitution $y = x-it$, which converts the integral into a standard integral on the real line. Note that $dy/dx = 1$. My question is whether this method is rigorous or can be rigorously justified?
probability complex-analysis analysis
probability complex-analysis analysis
asked Jul 21 '18 at 15:46
JohnKnoxVJohnKnoxV
517213
517213
$begingroup$
The substitution doesn't convert the integral into one on the real line as the integration path is a line parallel to the real axis.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jul 21 '18 at 16:03
$begingroup$
The substitution seems to shift the parallel line to the real line. The final integral is $int e^{-y^2} dy$.
$endgroup$
– JohnKnoxV
Jul 21 '18 at 16:05
$begingroup$
No because the integration path is not $mathbb R$ but the line $x-it$ for $x in mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jul 21 '18 at 16:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The substitution doesn't convert the integral into one on the real line as the integration path is a line parallel to the real axis.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jul 21 '18 at 16:03
$begingroup$
The substitution seems to shift the parallel line to the real line. The final integral is $int e^{-y^2} dy$.
$endgroup$
– JohnKnoxV
Jul 21 '18 at 16:05
$begingroup$
No because the integration path is not $mathbb R$ but the line $x-it$ for $x in mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jul 21 '18 at 16:08
$begingroup$
The substitution doesn't convert the integral into one on the real line as the integration path is a line parallel to the real axis.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jul 21 '18 at 16:03
$begingroup$
The substitution doesn't convert the integral into one on the real line as the integration path is a line parallel to the real axis.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jul 21 '18 at 16:03
$begingroup$
The substitution seems to shift the parallel line to the real line. The final integral is $int e^{-y^2} dy$.
$endgroup$
– JohnKnoxV
Jul 21 '18 at 16:05
$begingroup$
The substitution seems to shift the parallel line to the real line. The final integral is $int e^{-y^2} dy$.
$endgroup$
– JohnKnoxV
Jul 21 '18 at 16:05
$begingroup$
No because the integration path is not $mathbb R$ but the line $x-it$ for $x in mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jul 21 '18 at 16:08
$begingroup$
No because the integration path is not $mathbb R$ but the line $x-it$ for $x in mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jul 21 '18 at 16:08
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is one approach that does not require a change of variables and contour deformation. First we write
$$begin{align}
int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx&=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2+i2xt},dx\\
&=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag1
end{align}$$
Let $f(t)$ be given by the integral
$$f(t)=int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag2$$
Differentiation reveals of $(2)$
$$f'(t)=int_{-infty}^infty (-2xe^{-x^2})sin(2tx),dxtag3$$
Integrating by parts the integral in $(3)$ with $u=sin(2tx)$ and $v=e^{-x^2}$ we obtain the ODE
$$f'(t)=-2tf(t) tag4$$
Using $f(0)=sqrt pi$, we find from $(4)$ that
$$f(t)=sqrtpi e^{-t^2}tag5$$
Substituting $(5)$ into $(1)$ yields the coveted result
$$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx=sqrt pi$$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Jul 21 '18 at 18:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another short cut is to use the substitution $y = x-it$, which converts the integral into a standard integral on the real line.
Unless $t = 0$, the substitution transforms the integral into an integral over the horizontal line $operatorname{Im}(z) = -t$, not over the real line. This method is really part of the contour integral method. If $t > 0$, we consider the contour integral $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz$, where $Gamma(R)$ is a clockwise-oriented rectangle in the complex plane with vertices at $-R, R, R - it$, and $-R - it$. The integrals of $e^{-z^2}$ along the vertical edges can be shown to be $O(e^{-R^2})$ as $R to infty$. Since $e^{-z^2}$ is entire, Cauchy's theorem gives $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz = 0$. Hence $displaystylelim_{Rto infty} int_{-R - it}^{R - it} e^{-z^2}, dz = lim_{Rto infty} int_{-R}^R e^{-x^2}, dx$, or $$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2}, dx = int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}, dx$$A similar argument holds when $t < 0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858612%2fcharacteristic-function-of-gaussian-change-of-variables-in-complex-plane%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is one approach that does not require a change of variables and contour deformation. First we write
$$begin{align}
int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx&=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2+i2xt},dx\\
&=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag1
end{align}$$
Let $f(t)$ be given by the integral
$$f(t)=int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag2$$
Differentiation reveals of $(2)$
$$f'(t)=int_{-infty}^infty (-2xe^{-x^2})sin(2tx),dxtag3$$
Integrating by parts the integral in $(3)$ with $u=sin(2tx)$ and $v=e^{-x^2}$ we obtain the ODE
$$f'(t)=-2tf(t) tag4$$
Using $f(0)=sqrt pi$, we find from $(4)$ that
$$f(t)=sqrtpi e^{-t^2}tag5$$
Substituting $(5)$ into $(1)$ yields the coveted result
$$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx=sqrt pi$$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Jul 21 '18 at 18:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is one approach that does not require a change of variables and contour deformation. First we write
$$begin{align}
int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx&=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2+i2xt},dx\\
&=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag1
end{align}$$
Let $f(t)$ be given by the integral
$$f(t)=int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag2$$
Differentiation reveals of $(2)$
$$f'(t)=int_{-infty}^infty (-2xe^{-x^2})sin(2tx),dxtag3$$
Integrating by parts the integral in $(3)$ with $u=sin(2tx)$ and $v=e^{-x^2}$ we obtain the ODE
$$f'(t)=-2tf(t) tag4$$
Using $f(0)=sqrt pi$, we find from $(4)$ that
$$f(t)=sqrtpi e^{-t^2}tag5$$
Substituting $(5)$ into $(1)$ yields the coveted result
$$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx=sqrt pi$$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Jul 21 '18 at 18:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is one approach that does not require a change of variables and contour deformation. First we write
$$begin{align}
int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx&=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2+i2xt},dx\\
&=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag1
end{align}$$
Let $f(t)$ be given by the integral
$$f(t)=int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag2$$
Differentiation reveals of $(2)$
$$f'(t)=int_{-infty}^infty (-2xe^{-x^2})sin(2tx),dxtag3$$
Integrating by parts the integral in $(3)$ with $u=sin(2tx)$ and $v=e^{-x^2}$ we obtain the ODE
$$f'(t)=-2tf(t) tag4$$
Using $f(0)=sqrt pi$, we find from $(4)$ that
$$f(t)=sqrtpi e^{-t^2}tag5$$
Substituting $(5)$ into $(1)$ yields the coveted result
$$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx=sqrt pi$$
$endgroup$
Here is one approach that does not require a change of variables and contour deformation. First we write
$$begin{align}
int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx&=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2+i2xt},dx\\
&=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag1
end{align}$$
Let $f(t)$ be given by the integral
$$f(t)=int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag2$$
Differentiation reveals of $(2)$
$$f'(t)=int_{-infty}^infty (-2xe^{-x^2})sin(2tx),dxtag3$$
Integrating by parts the integral in $(3)$ with $u=sin(2tx)$ and $v=e^{-x^2}$ we obtain the ODE
$$f'(t)=-2tf(t) tag4$$
Using $f(0)=sqrt pi$, we find from $(4)$ that
$$f(t)=sqrtpi e^{-t^2}tag5$$
Substituting $(5)$ into $(1)$ yields the coveted result
$$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx=sqrt pi$$
edited Feb 2 at 21:11
answered Jul 21 '18 at 18:05
Mark ViolaMark Viola
134k1278177
134k1278177
1
$begingroup$
Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Jul 21 '18 at 18:14
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Jul 21 '18 at 18:14
1
1
$begingroup$
Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Jul 21 '18 at 18:14
$begingroup$
Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can.
$endgroup$
– Mark Viola
Jul 21 '18 at 18:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another short cut is to use the substitution $y = x-it$, which converts the integral into a standard integral on the real line.
Unless $t = 0$, the substitution transforms the integral into an integral over the horizontal line $operatorname{Im}(z) = -t$, not over the real line. This method is really part of the contour integral method. If $t > 0$, we consider the contour integral $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz$, where $Gamma(R)$ is a clockwise-oriented rectangle in the complex plane with vertices at $-R, R, R - it$, and $-R - it$. The integrals of $e^{-z^2}$ along the vertical edges can be shown to be $O(e^{-R^2})$ as $R to infty$. Since $e^{-z^2}$ is entire, Cauchy's theorem gives $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz = 0$. Hence $displaystylelim_{Rto infty} int_{-R - it}^{R - it} e^{-z^2}, dz = lim_{Rto infty} int_{-R}^R e^{-x^2}, dx$, or $$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2}, dx = int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}, dx$$A similar argument holds when $t < 0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another short cut is to use the substitution $y = x-it$, which converts the integral into a standard integral on the real line.
Unless $t = 0$, the substitution transforms the integral into an integral over the horizontal line $operatorname{Im}(z) = -t$, not over the real line. This method is really part of the contour integral method. If $t > 0$, we consider the contour integral $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz$, where $Gamma(R)$ is a clockwise-oriented rectangle in the complex plane with vertices at $-R, R, R - it$, and $-R - it$. The integrals of $e^{-z^2}$ along the vertical edges can be shown to be $O(e^{-R^2})$ as $R to infty$. Since $e^{-z^2}$ is entire, Cauchy's theorem gives $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz = 0$. Hence $displaystylelim_{Rto infty} int_{-R - it}^{R - it} e^{-z^2}, dz = lim_{Rto infty} int_{-R}^R e^{-x^2}, dx$, or $$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2}, dx = int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}, dx$$A similar argument holds when $t < 0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another short cut is to use the substitution $y = x-it$, which converts the integral into a standard integral on the real line.
Unless $t = 0$, the substitution transforms the integral into an integral over the horizontal line $operatorname{Im}(z) = -t$, not over the real line. This method is really part of the contour integral method. If $t > 0$, we consider the contour integral $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz$, where $Gamma(R)$ is a clockwise-oriented rectangle in the complex plane with vertices at $-R, R, R - it$, and $-R - it$. The integrals of $e^{-z^2}$ along the vertical edges can be shown to be $O(e^{-R^2})$ as $R to infty$. Since $e^{-z^2}$ is entire, Cauchy's theorem gives $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz = 0$. Hence $displaystylelim_{Rto infty} int_{-R - it}^{R - it} e^{-z^2}, dz = lim_{Rto infty} int_{-R}^R e^{-x^2}, dx$, or $$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2}, dx = int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}, dx$$A similar argument holds when $t < 0$.
$endgroup$
Another short cut is to use the substitution $y = x-it$, which converts the integral into a standard integral on the real line.
Unless $t = 0$, the substitution transforms the integral into an integral over the horizontal line $operatorname{Im}(z) = -t$, not over the real line. This method is really part of the contour integral method. If $t > 0$, we consider the contour integral $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz$, where $Gamma(R)$ is a clockwise-oriented rectangle in the complex plane with vertices at $-R, R, R - it$, and $-R - it$. The integrals of $e^{-z^2}$ along the vertical edges can be shown to be $O(e^{-R^2})$ as $R to infty$. Since $e^{-z^2}$ is entire, Cauchy's theorem gives $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz = 0$. Hence $displaystylelim_{Rto infty} int_{-R - it}^{R - it} e^{-z^2}, dz = lim_{Rto infty} int_{-R}^R e^{-x^2}, dx$, or $$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2}, dx = int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}, dx$$A similar argument holds when $t < 0$.
answered Jul 22 '18 at 20:45
kobekobe
35.1k22248
35.1k22248
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858612%2fcharacteristic-function-of-gaussian-change-of-variables-in-complex-plane%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
The substitution doesn't convert the integral into one on the real line as the integration path is a line parallel to the real axis.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jul 21 '18 at 16:03
$begingroup$
The substitution seems to shift the parallel line to the real line. The final integral is $int e^{-y^2} dy$.
$endgroup$
– JohnKnoxV
Jul 21 '18 at 16:05
$begingroup$
No because the integration path is not $mathbb R$ but the line $x-it$ for $x in mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jul 21 '18 at 16:08