Characteristic Function of Gaussian/ Change of Variables in Complex Plane












1












$begingroup$


In the process of finding the characteristic function of a Guassian random variable, one must evaluate the following integral:
$$
int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-(x- it)^2} dx.
$$
One way to evaluate this is to use a contour integral over a rectangle and then use the residue theorem. This is presumably rigorous. Another short cut is to use the substitution $y = x-it$, which converts the integral into a standard integral on the real line. Note that $dy/dx = 1$. My question is whether this method is rigorous or can be rigorously justified?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The substitution doesn't convert the integral into one on the real line as the integration path is a line parallel to the real axis.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    Jul 21 '18 at 16:03












  • $begingroup$
    The substitution seems to shift the parallel line to the real line. The final integral is $int e^{-y^2} dy$.
    $endgroup$
    – JohnKnoxV
    Jul 21 '18 at 16:05












  • $begingroup$
    No because the integration path is not $mathbb R$ but the line $x-it$ for $x in mathbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    Jul 21 '18 at 16:08
















1












$begingroup$


In the process of finding the characteristic function of a Guassian random variable, one must evaluate the following integral:
$$
int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-(x- it)^2} dx.
$$
One way to evaluate this is to use a contour integral over a rectangle and then use the residue theorem. This is presumably rigorous. Another short cut is to use the substitution $y = x-it$, which converts the integral into a standard integral on the real line. Note that $dy/dx = 1$. My question is whether this method is rigorous or can be rigorously justified?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The substitution doesn't convert the integral into one on the real line as the integration path is a line parallel to the real axis.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    Jul 21 '18 at 16:03












  • $begingroup$
    The substitution seems to shift the parallel line to the real line. The final integral is $int e^{-y^2} dy$.
    $endgroup$
    – JohnKnoxV
    Jul 21 '18 at 16:05












  • $begingroup$
    No because the integration path is not $mathbb R$ but the line $x-it$ for $x in mathbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    Jul 21 '18 at 16:08














1












1








1





$begingroup$


In the process of finding the characteristic function of a Guassian random variable, one must evaluate the following integral:
$$
int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-(x- it)^2} dx.
$$
One way to evaluate this is to use a contour integral over a rectangle and then use the residue theorem. This is presumably rigorous. Another short cut is to use the substitution $y = x-it$, which converts the integral into a standard integral on the real line. Note that $dy/dx = 1$. My question is whether this method is rigorous or can be rigorously justified?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




In the process of finding the characteristic function of a Guassian random variable, one must evaluate the following integral:
$$
int_{-infty}^{infty} e^{-(x- it)^2} dx.
$$
One way to evaluate this is to use a contour integral over a rectangle and then use the residue theorem. This is presumably rigorous. Another short cut is to use the substitution $y = x-it$, which converts the integral into a standard integral on the real line. Note that $dy/dx = 1$. My question is whether this method is rigorous or can be rigorously justified?







probability complex-analysis analysis






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jul 21 '18 at 15:46









JohnKnoxVJohnKnoxV

517213




517213












  • $begingroup$
    The substitution doesn't convert the integral into one on the real line as the integration path is a line parallel to the real axis.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    Jul 21 '18 at 16:03












  • $begingroup$
    The substitution seems to shift the parallel line to the real line. The final integral is $int e^{-y^2} dy$.
    $endgroup$
    – JohnKnoxV
    Jul 21 '18 at 16:05












  • $begingroup$
    No because the integration path is not $mathbb R$ but the line $x-it$ for $x in mathbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    Jul 21 '18 at 16:08


















  • $begingroup$
    The substitution doesn't convert the integral into one on the real line as the integration path is a line parallel to the real axis.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    Jul 21 '18 at 16:03












  • $begingroup$
    The substitution seems to shift the parallel line to the real line. The final integral is $int e^{-y^2} dy$.
    $endgroup$
    – JohnKnoxV
    Jul 21 '18 at 16:05












  • $begingroup$
    No because the integration path is not $mathbb R$ but the line $x-it$ for $x in mathbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    Jul 21 '18 at 16:08
















$begingroup$
The substitution doesn't convert the integral into one on the real line as the integration path is a line parallel to the real axis.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jul 21 '18 at 16:03






$begingroup$
The substitution doesn't convert the integral into one on the real line as the integration path is a line parallel to the real axis.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jul 21 '18 at 16:03














$begingroup$
The substitution seems to shift the parallel line to the real line. The final integral is $int e^{-y^2} dy$.
$endgroup$
– JohnKnoxV
Jul 21 '18 at 16:05






$begingroup$
The substitution seems to shift the parallel line to the real line. The final integral is $int e^{-y^2} dy$.
$endgroup$
– JohnKnoxV
Jul 21 '18 at 16:05














$begingroup$
No because the integration path is not $mathbb R$ but the line $x-it$ for $x in mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jul 21 '18 at 16:08




$begingroup$
No because the integration path is not $mathbb R$ but the line $x-it$ for $x in mathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Jul 21 '18 at 16:08










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Here is one approach that does not require a change of variables and contour deformation. First we write



$$begin{align}
int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx&=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2+i2xt},dx\\
&=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag1
end{align}$$



Let $f(t)$ be given by the integral



$$f(t)=int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag2$$



Differentiation reveals of $(2)$



$$f'(t)=int_{-infty}^infty (-2xe^{-x^2})sin(2tx),dxtag3$$



Integrating by parts the integral in $(3)$ with $u=sin(2tx)$ and $v=e^{-x^2}$ we obtain the ODE



$$f'(t)=-2tf(t) tag4$$



Using $f(0)=sqrt pi$, we find from $(4)$ that



$$f(t)=sqrtpi e^{-t^2}tag5$$



Substituting $(5)$ into $(1)$ yields the coveted result



$$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx=sqrt pi$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Jul 21 '18 at 18:14



















0












$begingroup$


Another short cut is to use the substitution $y = x-it$, which converts the integral into a standard integral on the real line.




Unless $t = 0$, the substitution transforms the integral into an integral over the horizontal line $operatorname{Im}(z) = -t$, not over the real line. This method is really part of the contour integral method. If $t > 0$, we consider the contour integral $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz$, where $Gamma(R)$ is a clockwise-oriented rectangle in the complex plane with vertices at $-R, R, R - it$, and $-R - it$. The integrals of $e^{-z^2}$ along the vertical edges can be shown to be $O(e^{-R^2})$ as $R to infty$. Since $e^{-z^2}$ is entire, Cauchy's theorem gives $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz = 0$. Hence $displaystylelim_{Rto infty} int_{-R - it}^{R - it} e^{-z^2}, dz = lim_{Rto infty} int_{-R}^R e^{-x^2}, dx$, or $$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2}, dx = int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}, dx$$A similar argument holds when $t < 0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858612%2fcharacteristic-function-of-gaussian-change-of-variables-in-complex-plane%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    Here is one approach that does not require a change of variables and contour deformation. First we write



    $$begin{align}
    int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx&=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2+i2xt},dx\\
    &=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag1
    end{align}$$



    Let $f(t)$ be given by the integral



    $$f(t)=int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag2$$



    Differentiation reveals of $(2)$



    $$f'(t)=int_{-infty}^infty (-2xe^{-x^2})sin(2tx),dxtag3$$



    Integrating by parts the integral in $(3)$ with $u=sin(2tx)$ and $v=e^{-x^2}$ we obtain the ODE



    $$f'(t)=-2tf(t) tag4$$



    Using $f(0)=sqrt pi$, we find from $(4)$ that



    $$f(t)=sqrtpi e^{-t^2}tag5$$



    Substituting $(5)$ into $(1)$ yields the coveted result



    $$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx=sqrt pi$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can.
      $endgroup$
      – Mark Viola
      Jul 21 '18 at 18:14
















    2












    $begingroup$

    Here is one approach that does not require a change of variables and contour deformation. First we write



    $$begin{align}
    int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx&=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2+i2xt},dx\\
    &=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag1
    end{align}$$



    Let $f(t)$ be given by the integral



    $$f(t)=int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag2$$



    Differentiation reveals of $(2)$



    $$f'(t)=int_{-infty}^infty (-2xe^{-x^2})sin(2tx),dxtag3$$



    Integrating by parts the integral in $(3)$ with $u=sin(2tx)$ and $v=e^{-x^2}$ we obtain the ODE



    $$f'(t)=-2tf(t) tag4$$



    Using $f(0)=sqrt pi$, we find from $(4)$ that



    $$f(t)=sqrtpi e^{-t^2}tag5$$



    Substituting $(5)$ into $(1)$ yields the coveted result



    $$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx=sqrt pi$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can.
      $endgroup$
      – Mark Viola
      Jul 21 '18 at 18:14














    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    Here is one approach that does not require a change of variables and contour deformation. First we write



    $$begin{align}
    int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx&=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2+i2xt},dx\\
    &=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag1
    end{align}$$



    Let $f(t)$ be given by the integral



    $$f(t)=int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag2$$



    Differentiation reveals of $(2)$



    $$f'(t)=int_{-infty}^infty (-2xe^{-x^2})sin(2tx),dxtag3$$



    Integrating by parts the integral in $(3)$ with $u=sin(2tx)$ and $v=e^{-x^2}$ we obtain the ODE



    $$f'(t)=-2tf(t) tag4$$



    Using $f(0)=sqrt pi$, we find from $(4)$ that



    $$f(t)=sqrtpi e^{-t^2}tag5$$



    Substituting $(5)$ into $(1)$ yields the coveted result



    $$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx=sqrt pi$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Here is one approach that does not require a change of variables and contour deformation. First we write



    $$begin{align}
    int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx&=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2+i2xt},dx\\
    &=e^{t^2}int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag1
    end{align}$$



    Let $f(t)$ be given by the integral



    $$f(t)=int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}cos(2tx),dxtag2$$



    Differentiation reveals of $(2)$



    $$f'(t)=int_{-infty}^infty (-2xe^{-x^2})sin(2tx),dxtag3$$



    Integrating by parts the integral in $(3)$ with $u=sin(2tx)$ and $v=e^{-x^2}$ we obtain the ODE



    $$f'(t)=-2tf(t) tag4$$



    Using $f(0)=sqrt pi$, we find from $(4)$ that



    $$f(t)=sqrtpi e^{-t^2}tag5$$



    Substituting $(5)$ into $(1)$ yields the coveted result



    $$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2},dx=sqrt pi$$







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Feb 2 at 21:11

























    answered Jul 21 '18 at 18:05









    Mark ViolaMark Viola

    134k1278177




    134k1278177








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can.
      $endgroup$
      – Mark Viola
      Jul 21 '18 at 18:14














    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can.
      $endgroup$
      – Mark Viola
      Jul 21 '18 at 18:14








    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Jul 21 '18 at 18:14




    $begingroup$
    Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Viola
    Jul 21 '18 at 18:14











    0












    $begingroup$


    Another short cut is to use the substitution $y = x-it$, which converts the integral into a standard integral on the real line.




    Unless $t = 0$, the substitution transforms the integral into an integral over the horizontal line $operatorname{Im}(z) = -t$, not over the real line. This method is really part of the contour integral method. If $t > 0$, we consider the contour integral $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz$, where $Gamma(R)$ is a clockwise-oriented rectangle in the complex plane with vertices at $-R, R, R - it$, and $-R - it$. The integrals of $e^{-z^2}$ along the vertical edges can be shown to be $O(e^{-R^2})$ as $R to infty$. Since $e^{-z^2}$ is entire, Cauchy's theorem gives $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz = 0$. Hence $displaystylelim_{Rto infty} int_{-R - it}^{R - it} e^{-z^2}, dz = lim_{Rto infty} int_{-R}^R e^{-x^2}, dx$, or $$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2}, dx = int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}, dx$$A similar argument holds when $t < 0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$


      Another short cut is to use the substitution $y = x-it$, which converts the integral into a standard integral on the real line.




      Unless $t = 0$, the substitution transforms the integral into an integral over the horizontal line $operatorname{Im}(z) = -t$, not over the real line. This method is really part of the contour integral method. If $t > 0$, we consider the contour integral $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz$, where $Gamma(R)$ is a clockwise-oriented rectangle in the complex plane with vertices at $-R, R, R - it$, and $-R - it$. The integrals of $e^{-z^2}$ along the vertical edges can be shown to be $O(e^{-R^2})$ as $R to infty$. Since $e^{-z^2}$ is entire, Cauchy's theorem gives $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz = 0$. Hence $displaystylelim_{Rto infty} int_{-R - it}^{R - it} e^{-z^2}, dz = lim_{Rto infty} int_{-R}^R e^{-x^2}, dx$, or $$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2}, dx = int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}, dx$$A similar argument holds when $t < 0$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$


        Another short cut is to use the substitution $y = x-it$, which converts the integral into a standard integral on the real line.




        Unless $t = 0$, the substitution transforms the integral into an integral over the horizontal line $operatorname{Im}(z) = -t$, not over the real line. This method is really part of the contour integral method. If $t > 0$, we consider the contour integral $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz$, where $Gamma(R)$ is a clockwise-oriented rectangle in the complex plane with vertices at $-R, R, R - it$, and $-R - it$. The integrals of $e^{-z^2}$ along the vertical edges can be shown to be $O(e^{-R^2})$ as $R to infty$. Since $e^{-z^2}$ is entire, Cauchy's theorem gives $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz = 0$. Hence $displaystylelim_{Rto infty} int_{-R - it}^{R - it} e^{-z^2}, dz = lim_{Rto infty} int_{-R}^R e^{-x^2}, dx$, or $$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2}, dx = int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}, dx$$A similar argument holds when $t < 0$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$




        Another short cut is to use the substitution $y = x-it$, which converts the integral into a standard integral on the real line.




        Unless $t = 0$, the substitution transforms the integral into an integral over the horizontal line $operatorname{Im}(z) = -t$, not over the real line. This method is really part of the contour integral method. If $t > 0$, we consider the contour integral $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz$, where $Gamma(R)$ is a clockwise-oriented rectangle in the complex plane with vertices at $-R, R, R - it$, and $-R - it$. The integrals of $e^{-z^2}$ along the vertical edges can be shown to be $O(e^{-R^2})$ as $R to infty$. Since $e^{-z^2}$ is entire, Cauchy's theorem gives $displaystyleoint_{Gamma(R)} e^{-z^2}, dz = 0$. Hence $displaystylelim_{Rto infty} int_{-R - it}^{R - it} e^{-z^2}, dz = lim_{Rto infty} int_{-R}^R e^{-x^2}, dx$, or $$int_{-infty}^infty e^{-(x-it)^2}, dx = int_{-infty}^infty e^{-x^2}, dx$$A similar argument holds when $t < 0$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jul 22 '18 at 20:45









        kobekobe

        35.1k22248




        35.1k22248






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858612%2fcharacteristic-function-of-gaussian-change-of-variables-in-complex-plane%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith