Event equaling the impossible event with probability $1$












-1












$begingroup$


I have a question regarding events with probability $1$. On page 21 of Papoulis (Probability,Random Variables and Stochastic Process), there is an equation:




$P(A) = P(B) = P(AB)$




Now using this equation one conclusion has been derived that "If an event $N$ equals the impossible event with probability $1$ then $P(N)=0$. This does not, of course, mean that $N=phi$



Now my question why is $N$ not equal to $phi$ ?





Papoulis, A., Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes, New York: McGraw-Hill, XI, 583 p. (1965). ZBL0191.46704.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is "phi"${}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Feb 3 at 6:48










  • $begingroup$
    I think "phi" means the empty set.
    $endgroup$
    – Tori
    Feb 3 at 7:43










  • $begingroup$
    I would be curious to read how the OP understands the hypothesis that "an event A equals an event B with probability 1". I can think of a translation of this rather bizarre assertion into solid mathematics, but somehow, I doubt anyone asking the present question can reach it easily... Although I would love to be proven wrong. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Feb 3 at 8:32
















-1












$begingroup$


I have a question regarding events with probability $1$. On page 21 of Papoulis (Probability,Random Variables and Stochastic Process), there is an equation:




$P(A) = P(B) = P(AB)$




Now using this equation one conclusion has been derived that "If an event $N$ equals the impossible event with probability $1$ then $P(N)=0$. This does not, of course, mean that $N=phi$



Now my question why is $N$ not equal to $phi$ ?





Papoulis, A., Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes, New York: McGraw-Hill, XI, 583 p. (1965). ZBL0191.46704.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is "phi"${}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Feb 3 at 6:48










  • $begingroup$
    I think "phi" means the empty set.
    $endgroup$
    – Tori
    Feb 3 at 7:43










  • $begingroup$
    I would be curious to read how the OP understands the hypothesis that "an event A equals an event B with probability 1". I can think of a translation of this rather bizarre assertion into solid mathematics, but somehow, I doubt anyone asking the present question can reach it easily... Although I would love to be proven wrong. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Feb 3 at 8:32














-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$


I have a question regarding events with probability $1$. On page 21 of Papoulis (Probability,Random Variables and Stochastic Process), there is an equation:




$P(A) = P(B) = P(AB)$




Now using this equation one conclusion has been derived that "If an event $N$ equals the impossible event with probability $1$ then $P(N)=0$. This does not, of course, mean that $N=phi$



Now my question why is $N$ not equal to $phi$ ?





Papoulis, A., Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes, New York: McGraw-Hill, XI, 583 p. (1965). ZBL0191.46704.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have a question regarding events with probability $1$. On page 21 of Papoulis (Probability,Random Variables and Stochastic Process), there is an equation:




$P(A) = P(B) = P(AB)$




Now using this equation one conclusion has been derived that "If an event $N$ equals the impossible event with probability $1$ then $P(N)=0$. This does not, of course, mean that $N=phi$



Now my question why is $N$ not equal to $phi$ ?





Papoulis, A., Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes, New York: McGraw-Hill, XI, 583 p. (1965). ZBL0191.46704.







probability-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 3 at 7:49









El borito

664216




664216










asked Feb 3 at 6:31









Navneet DharNavneet Dhar

1




1








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is "phi"${}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Feb 3 at 6:48










  • $begingroup$
    I think "phi" means the empty set.
    $endgroup$
    – Tori
    Feb 3 at 7:43










  • $begingroup$
    I would be curious to read how the OP understands the hypothesis that "an event A equals an event B with probability 1". I can think of a translation of this rather bizarre assertion into solid mathematics, but somehow, I doubt anyone asking the present question can reach it easily... Although I would love to be proven wrong. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Feb 3 at 8:32














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What is "phi"${}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Feb 3 at 6:48










  • $begingroup$
    I think "phi" means the empty set.
    $endgroup$
    – Tori
    Feb 3 at 7:43










  • $begingroup$
    I would be curious to read how the OP understands the hypothesis that "an event A equals an event B with probability 1". I can think of a translation of this rather bizarre assertion into solid mathematics, but somehow, I doubt anyone asking the present question can reach it easily... Although I would love to be proven wrong. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Feb 3 at 8:32








1




1




$begingroup$
What is "phi"${}$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Feb 3 at 6:48




$begingroup$
What is "phi"${}$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Feb 3 at 6:48












$begingroup$
I think "phi" means the empty set.
$endgroup$
– Tori
Feb 3 at 7:43




$begingroup$
I think "phi" means the empty set.
$endgroup$
– Tori
Feb 3 at 7:43












$begingroup$
I would be curious to read how the OP understands the hypothesis that "an event A equals an event B with probability 1". I can think of a translation of this rather bizarre assertion into solid mathematics, but somehow, I doubt anyone asking the present question can reach it easily... Although I would love to be proven wrong. :-)
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 3 at 8:32




$begingroup$
I would be curious to read how the OP understands the hypothesis that "an event A equals an event B with probability 1". I can think of a translation of this rather bizarre assertion into solid mathematics, but somehow, I doubt anyone asking the present question can reach it easily... Although I would love to be proven wrong. :-)
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 3 at 8:32










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Your question is basically asking: If an event $N$ has probability 0, then why can't we conclude that $N = {varnothing}$? Now, note that ${varnothing} not= varnothing$. In other words, ${varnothing}$ is $underline{not}$ the empty set. (I think that you probability meant to ask why we can't conclude that $N = varnothing$.)



Anyhow, one of the three axioms of probability states:



$P(varnothing) = 0$,



however, it does not state that $P(A) = 0 Leftrightarrow A = varnothing$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3098261%2fevent-equaling-the-impossible-event-with-probability-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Your question is basically asking: If an event $N$ has probability 0, then why can't we conclude that $N = {varnothing}$? Now, note that ${varnothing} not= varnothing$. In other words, ${varnothing}$ is $underline{not}$ the empty set. (I think that you probability meant to ask why we can't conclude that $N = varnothing$.)



    Anyhow, one of the three axioms of probability states:



    $P(varnothing) = 0$,



    however, it does not state that $P(A) = 0 Leftrightarrow A = varnothing$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Your question is basically asking: If an event $N$ has probability 0, then why can't we conclude that $N = {varnothing}$? Now, note that ${varnothing} not= varnothing$. In other words, ${varnothing}$ is $underline{not}$ the empty set. (I think that you probability meant to ask why we can't conclude that $N = varnothing$.)



      Anyhow, one of the three axioms of probability states:



      $P(varnothing) = 0$,



      however, it does not state that $P(A) = 0 Leftrightarrow A = varnothing$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Your question is basically asking: If an event $N$ has probability 0, then why can't we conclude that $N = {varnothing}$? Now, note that ${varnothing} not= varnothing$. In other words, ${varnothing}$ is $underline{not}$ the empty set. (I think that you probability meant to ask why we can't conclude that $N = varnothing$.)



        Anyhow, one of the three axioms of probability states:



        $P(varnothing) = 0$,



        however, it does not state that $P(A) = 0 Leftrightarrow A = varnothing$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Your question is basically asking: If an event $N$ has probability 0, then why can't we conclude that $N = {varnothing}$? Now, note that ${varnothing} not= varnothing$. In other words, ${varnothing}$ is $underline{not}$ the empty set. (I think that you probability meant to ask why we can't conclude that $N = varnothing$.)



        Anyhow, one of the three axioms of probability states:



        $P(varnothing) = 0$,



        however, it does not state that $P(A) = 0 Leftrightarrow A = varnothing$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Feb 3 at 7:54









        ToriTori

        936




        936






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3098261%2fevent-equaling-the-impossible-event-with-probability-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith