Event equaling the impossible event with probability $1$
$begingroup$
I have a question regarding events with probability $1$. On page 21 of Papoulis (Probability,Random Variables and Stochastic Process), there is an equation:
$P(A) = P(B) = P(AB)$
Now using this equation one conclusion has been derived that "If an event $N$ equals the impossible event with probability $1$ then $P(N)=0$. This does not, of course, mean that $N=phi$
Now my question why is $N$ not equal to $phi$ ?
Papoulis, A., Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes, New York: McGraw-Hill, XI, 583 p. (1965). ZBL0191.46704.
probability-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a question regarding events with probability $1$. On page 21 of Papoulis (Probability,Random Variables and Stochastic Process), there is an equation:
$P(A) = P(B) = P(AB)$
Now using this equation one conclusion has been derived that "If an event $N$ equals the impossible event with probability $1$ then $P(N)=0$. This does not, of course, mean that $N=phi$
Now my question why is $N$ not equal to $phi$ ?
Papoulis, A., Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes, New York: McGraw-Hill, XI, 583 p. (1965). ZBL0191.46704.
probability-theory
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
What is "phi"${}$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Feb 3 at 6:48
$begingroup$
I think "phi" means the empty set.
$endgroup$
– Tori
Feb 3 at 7:43
$begingroup$
I would be curious to read how the OP understands the hypothesis that "an event A equals an event B with probability 1". I can think of a translation of this rather bizarre assertion into solid mathematics, but somehow, I doubt anyone asking the present question can reach it easily... Although I would love to be proven wrong. :-)
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 3 at 8:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a question regarding events with probability $1$. On page 21 of Papoulis (Probability,Random Variables and Stochastic Process), there is an equation:
$P(A) = P(B) = P(AB)$
Now using this equation one conclusion has been derived that "If an event $N$ equals the impossible event with probability $1$ then $P(N)=0$. This does not, of course, mean that $N=phi$
Now my question why is $N$ not equal to $phi$ ?
Papoulis, A., Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes, New York: McGraw-Hill, XI, 583 p. (1965). ZBL0191.46704.
probability-theory
$endgroup$
I have a question regarding events with probability $1$. On page 21 of Papoulis (Probability,Random Variables and Stochastic Process), there is an equation:
$P(A) = P(B) = P(AB)$
Now using this equation one conclusion has been derived that "If an event $N$ equals the impossible event with probability $1$ then $P(N)=0$. This does not, of course, mean that $N=phi$
Now my question why is $N$ not equal to $phi$ ?
Papoulis, A., Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes, New York: McGraw-Hill, XI, 583 p. (1965). ZBL0191.46704.
probability-theory
probability-theory
edited Feb 3 at 7:49


El borito
664216
664216
asked Feb 3 at 6:31
Navneet DharNavneet Dhar
1
1
1
$begingroup$
What is "phi"${}$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Feb 3 at 6:48
$begingroup$
I think "phi" means the empty set.
$endgroup$
– Tori
Feb 3 at 7:43
$begingroup$
I would be curious to read how the OP understands the hypothesis that "an event A equals an event B with probability 1". I can think of a translation of this rather bizarre assertion into solid mathematics, but somehow, I doubt anyone asking the present question can reach it easily... Although I would love to be proven wrong. :-)
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 3 at 8:32
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
What is "phi"${}$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Feb 3 at 6:48
$begingroup$
I think "phi" means the empty set.
$endgroup$
– Tori
Feb 3 at 7:43
$begingroup$
I would be curious to read how the OP understands the hypothesis that "an event A equals an event B with probability 1". I can think of a translation of this rather bizarre assertion into solid mathematics, but somehow, I doubt anyone asking the present question can reach it easily... Although I would love to be proven wrong. :-)
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 3 at 8:32
1
1
$begingroup$
What is "phi"${}$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Feb 3 at 6:48
$begingroup$
What is "phi"${}$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Feb 3 at 6:48
$begingroup$
I think "phi" means the empty set.
$endgroup$
– Tori
Feb 3 at 7:43
$begingroup$
I think "phi" means the empty set.
$endgroup$
– Tori
Feb 3 at 7:43
$begingroup$
I would be curious to read how the OP understands the hypothesis that "an event A equals an event B with probability 1". I can think of a translation of this rather bizarre assertion into solid mathematics, but somehow, I doubt anyone asking the present question can reach it easily... Although I would love to be proven wrong. :-)
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 3 at 8:32
$begingroup$
I would be curious to read how the OP understands the hypothesis that "an event A equals an event B with probability 1". I can think of a translation of this rather bizarre assertion into solid mathematics, but somehow, I doubt anyone asking the present question can reach it easily... Although I would love to be proven wrong. :-)
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 3 at 8:32
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your question is basically asking: If an event $N$ has probability 0, then why can't we conclude that $N = {varnothing}$? Now, note that ${varnothing} not= varnothing$. In other words, ${varnothing}$ is $underline{not}$ the empty set. (I think that you probability meant to ask why we can't conclude that $N = varnothing$.)
Anyhow, one of the three axioms of probability states:
$P(varnothing) = 0$,
however, it does not state that $P(A) = 0 Leftrightarrow A = varnothing$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3098261%2fevent-equaling-the-impossible-event-with-probability-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your question is basically asking: If an event $N$ has probability 0, then why can't we conclude that $N = {varnothing}$? Now, note that ${varnothing} not= varnothing$. In other words, ${varnothing}$ is $underline{not}$ the empty set. (I think that you probability meant to ask why we can't conclude that $N = varnothing$.)
Anyhow, one of the three axioms of probability states:
$P(varnothing) = 0$,
however, it does not state that $P(A) = 0 Leftrightarrow A = varnothing$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your question is basically asking: If an event $N$ has probability 0, then why can't we conclude that $N = {varnothing}$? Now, note that ${varnothing} not= varnothing$. In other words, ${varnothing}$ is $underline{not}$ the empty set. (I think that you probability meant to ask why we can't conclude that $N = varnothing$.)
Anyhow, one of the three axioms of probability states:
$P(varnothing) = 0$,
however, it does not state that $P(A) = 0 Leftrightarrow A = varnothing$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your question is basically asking: If an event $N$ has probability 0, then why can't we conclude that $N = {varnothing}$? Now, note that ${varnothing} not= varnothing$. In other words, ${varnothing}$ is $underline{not}$ the empty set. (I think that you probability meant to ask why we can't conclude that $N = varnothing$.)
Anyhow, one of the three axioms of probability states:
$P(varnothing) = 0$,
however, it does not state that $P(A) = 0 Leftrightarrow A = varnothing$.
$endgroup$
Your question is basically asking: If an event $N$ has probability 0, then why can't we conclude that $N = {varnothing}$? Now, note that ${varnothing} not= varnothing$. In other words, ${varnothing}$ is $underline{not}$ the empty set. (I think that you probability meant to ask why we can't conclude that $N = varnothing$.)
Anyhow, one of the three axioms of probability states:
$P(varnothing) = 0$,
however, it does not state that $P(A) = 0 Leftrightarrow A = varnothing$.
answered Feb 3 at 7:54


ToriTori
936
936
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3098261%2fevent-equaling-the-impossible-event-with-probability-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
What is "phi"${}$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Feb 3 at 6:48
$begingroup$
I think "phi" means the empty set.
$endgroup$
– Tori
Feb 3 at 7:43
$begingroup$
I would be curious to read how the OP understands the hypothesis that "an event A equals an event B with probability 1". I can think of a translation of this rather bizarre assertion into solid mathematics, but somehow, I doubt anyone asking the present question can reach it easily... Although I would love to be proven wrong. :-)
$endgroup$
– Did
Feb 3 at 8:32