$A$ and $B$ are $3times 3$ real matrices such that $operatorname{rank}(AB)=1$, then $operatorname{rank}(BA$)...












8












$begingroup$


I was thinking about the problem that says:




If $A$ and $B$ are $3times 3$ real matrices such that $operatorname{rank}(AB)=1$, then $operatorname{rank}(BA)$ can not be which of the following?

(a) $0$

(b) $1$

(c) $2$

(d) $3$.




My attempt: I have chosen suitable $3 times 3 $ matrices for $A$ and $B$ keeping in mind that $operatorname{rank}(AB)=1$. Say for example if I take $A$ and $B$ to be
$$A = begin{pmatrix}
1 &2 &0 \
0 & 0 &0 \
0 & 0 &0
end{pmatrix}$$
and
$$B = begin{pmatrix}
-2 &1 &0 \
1 & 0 &0 \
0 & 0 &0
end{pmatrix}$$

respectively, then I see $operatorname{rank}(AB) = operatorname{rank}(BA) = 1$. So, option (b) can not be correct. Do I have to keep choosing the matrices and then observe which of the option holds good. Is this kind of approach right to tackle the problem? I am looking for a direct way (e.g. application to some theorem) which can give me the result. I have also noticed that $AB$ and $BA$ are similar matrices as we see that $A^{-1}(AB)A=BA$. Is this observation going to help me in any way? Thanks in advance for your time.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How do you know det$Aneq0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Sugata Adhya
    Dec 31 '12 at 15:55












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for pointing out..Yes ,indeed det($A$) can be zero.
    $endgroup$
    – learner
    Dec 31 '12 at 15:59
















8












$begingroup$


I was thinking about the problem that says:




If $A$ and $B$ are $3times 3$ real matrices such that $operatorname{rank}(AB)=1$, then $operatorname{rank}(BA)$ can not be which of the following?

(a) $0$

(b) $1$

(c) $2$

(d) $3$.




My attempt: I have chosen suitable $3 times 3 $ matrices for $A$ and $B$ keeping in mind that $operatorname{rank}(AB)=1$. Say for example if I take $A$ and $B$ to be
$$A = begin{pmatrix}
1 &2 &0 \
0 & 0 &0 \
0 & 0 &0
end{pmatrix}$$
and
$$B = begin{pmatrix}
-2 &1 &0 \
1 & 0 &0 \
0 & 0 &0
end{pmatrix}$$

respectively, then I see $operatorname{rank}(AB) = operatorname{rank}(BA) = 1$. So, option (b) can not be correct. Do I have to keep choosing the matrices and then observe which of the option holds good. Is this kind of approach right to tackle the problem? I am looking for a direct way (e.g. application to some theorem) which can give me the result. I have also noticed that $AB$ and $BA$ are similar matrices as we see that $A^{-1}(AB)A=BA$. Is this observation going to help me in any way? Thanks in advance for your time.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How do you know det$Aneq0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Sugata Adhya
    Dec 31 '12 at 15:55












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for pointing out..Yes ,indeed det($A$) can be zero.
    $endgroup$
    – learner
    Dec 31 '12 at 15:59














8












8








8


8



$begingroup$


I was thinking about the problem that says:




If $A$ and $B$ are $3times 3$ real matrices such that $operatorname{rank}(AB)=1$, then $operatorname{rank}(BA)$ can not be which of the following?

(a) $0$

(b) $1$

(c) $2$

(d) $3$.




My attempt: I have chosen suitable $3 times 3 $ matrices for $A$ and $B$ keeping in mind that $operatorname{rank}(AB)=1$. Say for example if I take $A$ and $B$ to be
$$A = begin{pmatrix}
1 &2 &0 \
0 & 0 &0 \
0 & 0 &0
end{pmatrix}$$
and
$$B = begin{pmatrix}
-2 &1 &0 \
1 & 0 &0 \
0 & 0 &0
end{pmatrix}$$

respectively, then I see $operatorname{rank}(AB) = operatorname{rank}(BA) = 1$. So, option (b) can not be correct. Do I have to keep choosing the matrices and then observe which of the option holds good. Is this kind of approach right to tackle the problem? I am looking for a direct way (e.g. application to some theorem) which can give me the result. I have also noticed that $AB$ and $BA$ are similar matrices as we see that $A^{-1}(AB)A=BA$. Is this observation going to help me in any way? Thanks in advance for your time.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I was thinking about the problem that says:




If $A$ and $B$ are $3times 3$ real matrices such that $operatorname{rank}(AB)=1$, then $operatorname{rank}(BA)$ can not be which of the following?

(a) $0$

(b) $1$

(c) $2$

(d) $3$.




My attempt: I have chosen suitable $3 times 3 $ matrices for $A$ and $B$ keeping in mind that $operatorname{rank}(AB)=1$. Say for example if I take $A$ and $B$ to be
$$A = begin{pmatrix}
1 &2 &0 \
0 & 0 &0 \
0 & 0 &0
end{pmatrix}$$
and
$$B = begin{pmatrix}
-2 &1 &0 \
1 & 0 &0 \
0 & 0 &0
end{pmatrix}$$

respectively, then I see $operatorname{rank}(AB) = operatorname{rank}(BA) = 1$. So, option (b) can not be correct. Do I have to keep choosing the matrices and then observe which of the option holds good. Is this kind of approach right to tackle the problem? I am looking for a direct way (e.g. application to some theorem) which can give me the result. I have also noticed that $AB$ and $BA$ are similar matrices as we see that $A^{-1}(AB)A=BA$. Is this observation going to help me in any way? Thanks in advance for your time.







linear-algebra matrices






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 31 '12 at 15:25









TMM

9,12032848




9,12032848










asked Dec 31 '12 at 13:41









learnerlearner

3,39532268




3,39532268












  • $begingroup$
    How do you know det$Aneq0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Sugata Adhya
    Dec 31 '12 at 15:55












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for pointing out..Yes ,indeed det($A$) can be zero.
    $endgroup$
    – learner
    Dec 31 '12 at 15:59


















  • $begingroup$
    How do you know det$Aneq0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Sugata Adhya
    Dec 31 '12 at 15:55












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for pointing out..Yes ,indeed det($A$) can be zero.
    $endgroup$
    – learner
    Dec 31 '12 at 15:59
















$begingroup$
How do you know det$Aneq0$?
$endgroup$
– Sugata Adhya
Dec 31 '12 at 15:55






$begingroup$
How do you know det$Aneq0$?
$endgroup$
– Sugata Adhya
Dec 31 '12 at 15:55














$begingroup$
Thanks for pointing out..Yes ,indeed det($A$) can be zero.
$endgroup$
– learner
Dec 31 '12 at 15:59




$begingroup$
Thanks for pointing out..Yes ,indeed det($A$) can be zero.
$endgroup$
– learner
Dec 31 '12 at 15:59










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

According to these properties of ranks listed on Wikiepdia :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rank_(linear_algebra)



If $A$ is $m times n$




  1. $operatorname{rank}(AB) leq min(operatorname{rank}(A), operatorname{rank}(B))$ if $B$ is $n times k$

  2. $operatorname{rank}(AB) = operatorname{rank}(A)$ if $B$ is $n times k$ of rank $n$


Note that in your situation $m$, $n$ and $k$ is $3$



By property (1) the only way to have $operatorname{rank}(BA) = 3$ is to have both $operatorname{rank}(A) = 3$ and $operatorname{rank}(B) = 3$. Since $min(operatorname{rank}(A), operatorname{rank}(B)) = min(operatorname{rank}(B), operatorname{rank}(A))$.



But in that situation, we can apply property (2): $B$ is $3 times 3$ of rank $3$ and so $operatorname{rank}(AB) = operatorname{rank}(A) = 3$.



So you can't have at the same time $operatorname{rank}(BA) = 3$ and $operatorname{rank}(AB) neq 3$ using $3 times 3$ matrix only.



Thus answer (d) is correct.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    thanks a lot.I have got it.
    $endgroup$
    – learner
    Dec 31 '12 at 14:31



















7












$begingroup$

If you only want to solve the problem, then as the others have pointed out, (d) is impossible and hence the answer is (d). It is helpful, however, to constuct some examples to convince yourself that (a)-(c) are really possible (this is also a sanity check against misprints). For this purpose, you may consider the matrices
$$
A=begin{pmatrix}1\&1\&&0end{pmatrix}, B=begin{pmatrix}b&0&1\0&0&0\0&c&0end{pmatrix}.
$$
Then $operatorname{rank}(AB)=1$. Now you may try to choose some appropriate values of $b$ and $c$ to make $operatorname{rank}(BA)$ equal to $0,1$ or $2$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    4












    $begingroup$

    The answer is (d), i.e. if $rank(AB)=1$, then $rank(BA)$ cannot be $3$. Let's prove it by contradiction. Suppose $A, B$ are $3times 3$ matrices such that $rank(AB)=3$, then $AB$ is invertible. This implies that $A$ and $B$ are invertible (otherwise, if $A$ is not invertible, then $A$ could not be full rank, i.e. $rank(A)<3$. This would imply that $rank(AB)leq rank(A)<3$, which contradicts $rank(AB)=3$. Similarly you can prove that $B$ is invertible). Then $BA$ is invertible since product of invertible matrices is invertible. This implies that $rank(BA)=3$, which contradicts to the assumption that $rank(AB)=1$.



    To see that (a), (b), (c) are possible, we can construct some examples of $A$ and $B$. As you have shown that (b) is possible (In fact, we can just take $A$ to be any rank 1 matrix, i.e. $rank(A)=1$ and $B$ to be the identity. Then $AB=BA=A$ has rank $1$).
    I will leave other cases to you.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      i have one question.If i want to prove it by contradiction,then should not i keep the condition that $rank(AB)=1$ intact and then take the supposition that if possible let us assume that $rank(BA)=3$ and then finally see what happens? with regards..
      $endgroup$
      – learner
      Dec 31 '12 at 14:26










    • $begingroup$
      @Paul: Is (a) possible? For rank$(BA)=0implies BA=0implies (AB)^2=0implies$ rank$(AB)^2=0implies$ min{rank($AB$), rank($AB$)} $ =0implies$rank $(AB)=0.$
      $endgroup$
      – Sugata Adhya
      Dec 31 '12 at 15:40





















    3












    $begingroup$

    This question has lots of good answers.But I just want to share a very short answer.It may already be discussed in the previous answers,so really sorry to answer again.



    $AB$ is a $3times 3$ matrix,rank$(AB)=1ne3Rightarrow AB$ is not of full rank$Rightarrow operatorname{det}(AB)=0Rightarrow operatorname{det}(BA)=0Rightarrow BA$ is not of full rank$Rightarrow$rank$(BA)ne3$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f268153%2fa-and-b-are-3-times-3-real-matrices-such-that-operatornamerankab-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      5












      $begingroup$

      According to these properties of ranks listed on Wikiepdia :
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rank_(linear_algebra)



      If $A$ is $m times n$




      1. $operatorname{rank}(AB) leq min(operatorname{rank}(A), operatorname{rank}(B))$ if $B$ is $n times k$

      2. $operatorname{rank}(AB) = operatorname{rank}(A)$ if $B$ is $n times k$ of rank $n$


      Note that in your situation $m$, $n$ and $k$ is $3$



      By property (1) the only way to have $operatorname{rank}(BA) = 3$ is to have both $operatorname{rank}(A) = 3$ and $operatorname{rank}(B) = 3$. Since $min(operatorname{rank}(A), operatorname{rank}(B)) = min(operatorname{rank}(B), operatorname{rank}(A))$.



      But in that situation, we can apply property (2): $B$ is $3 times 3$ of rank $3$ and so $operatorname{rank}(AB) = operatorname{rank}(A) = 3$.



      So you can't have at the same time $operatorname{rank}(BA) = 3$ and $operatorname{rank}(AB) neq 3$ using $3 times 3$ matrix only.



      Thus answer (d) is correct.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        thanks a lot.I have got it.
        $endgroup$
        – learner
        Dec 31 '12 at 14:31
















      5












      $begingroup$

      According to these properties of ranks listed on Wikiepdia :
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rank_(linear_algebra)



      If $A$ is $m times n$




      1. $operatorname{rank}(AB) leq min(operatorname{rank}(A), operatorname{rank}(B))$ if $B$ is $n times k$

      2. $operatorname{rank}(AB) = operatorname{rank}(A)$ if $B$ is $n times k$ of rank $n$


      Note that in your situation $m$, $n$ and $k$ is $3$



      By property (1) the only way to have $operatorname{rank}(BA) = 3$ is to have both $operatorname{rank}(A) = 3$ and $operatorname{rank}(B) = 3$. Since $min(operatorname{rank}(A), operatorname{rank}(B)) = min(operatorname{rank}(B), operatorname{rank}(A))$.



      But in that situation, we can apply property (2): $B$ is $3 times 3$ of rank $3$ and so $operatorname{rank}(AB) = operatorname{rank}(A) = 3$.



      So you can't have at the same time $operatorname{rank}(BA) = 3$ and $operatorname{rank}(AB) neq 3$ using $3 times 3$ matrix only.



      Thus answer (d) is correct.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        thanks a lot.I have got it.
        $endgroup$
        – learner
        Dec 31 '12 at 14:31














      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$

      According to these properties of ranks listed on Wikiepdia :
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rank_(linear_algebra)



      If $A$ is $m times n$




      1. $operatorname{rank}(AB) leq min(operatorname{rank}(A), operatorname{rank}(B))$ if $B$ is $n times k$

      2. $operatorname{rank}(AB) = operatorname{rank}(A)$ if $B$ is $n times k$ of rank $n$


      Note that in your situation $m$, $n$ and $k$ is $3$



      By property (1) the only way to have $operatorname{rank}(BA) = 3$ is to have both $operatorname{rank}(A) = 3$ and $operatorname{rank}(B) = 3$. Since $min(operatorname{rank}(A), operatorname{rank}(B)) = min(operatorname{rank}(B), operatorname{rank}(A))$.



      But in that situation, we can apply property (2): $B$ is $3 times 3$ of rank $3$ and so $operatorname{rank}(AB) = operatorname{rank}(A) = 3$.



      So you can't have at the same time $operatorname{rank}(BA) = 3$ and $operatorname{rank}(AB) neq 3$ using $3 times 3$ matrix only.



      Thus answer (d) is correct.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      According to these properties of ranks listed on Wikiepdia :
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rank_(linear_algebra)



      If $A$ is $m times n$




      1. $operatorname{rank}(AB) leq min(operatorname{rank}(A), operatorname{rank}(B))$ if $B$ is $n times k$

      2. $operatorname{rank}(AB) = operatorname{rank}(A)$ if $B$ is $n times k$ of rank $n$


      Note that in your situation $m$, $n$ and $k$ is $3$



      By property (1) the only way to have $operatorname{rank}(BA) = 3$ is to have both $operatorname{rank}(A) = 3$ and $operatorname{rank}(B) = 3$. Since $min(operatorname{rank}(A), operatorname{rank}(B)) = min(operatorname{rank}(B), operatorname{rank}(A))$.



      But in that situation, we can apply property (2): $B$ is $3 times 3$ of rank $3$ and so $operatorname{rank}(AB) = operatorname{rank}(A) = 3$.



      So you can't have at the same time $operatorname{rank}(BA) = 3$ and $operatorname{rank}(AB) neq 3$ using $3 times 3$ matrix only.



      Thus answer (d) is correct.







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited Dec 31 '12 at 14:49









      TMM

      9,12032848




      9,12032848










      answered Dec 31 '12 at 13:52









      almathiealmathie

      1663




      1663












      • $begingroup$
        thanks a lot.I have got it.
        $endgroup$
        – learner
        Dec 31 '12 at 14:31


















      • $begingroup$
        thanks a lot.I have got it.
        $endgroup$
        – learner
        Dec 31 '12 at 14:31
















      $begingroup$
      thanks a lot.I have got it.
      $endgroup$
      – learner
      Dec 31 '12 at 14:31




      $begingroup$
      thanks a lot.I have got it.
      $endgroup$
      – learner
      Dec 31 '12 at 14:31











      7












      $begingroup$

      If you only want to solve the problem, then as the others have pointed out, (d) is impossible and hence the answer is (d). It is helpful, however, to constuct some examples to convince yourself that (a)-(c) are really possible (this is also a sanity check against misprints). For this purpose, you may consider the matrices
      $$
      A=begin{pmatrix}1\&1\&&0end{pmatrix}, B=begin{pmatrix}b&0&1\0&0&0\0&c&0end{pmatrix}.
      $$
      Then $operatorname{rank}(AB)=1$. Now you may try to choose some appropriate values of $b$ and $c$ to make $operatorname{rank}(BA)$ equal to $0,1$ or $2$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        7












        $begingroup$

        If you only want to solve the problem, then as the others have pointed out, (d) is impossible and hence the answer is (d). It is helpful, however, to constuct some examples to convince yourself that (a)-(c) are really possible (this is also a sanity check against misprints). For this purpose, you may consider the matrices
        $$
        A=begin{pmatrix}1\&1\&&0end{pmatrix}, B=begin{pmatrix}b&0&1\0&0&0\0&c&0end{pmatrix}.
        $$
        Then $operatorname{rank}(AB)=1$. Now you may try to choose some appropriate values of $b$ and $c$ to make $operatorname{rank}(BA)$ equal to $0,1$ or $2$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          7












          7








          7





          $begingroup$

          If you only want to solve the problem, then as the others have pointed out, (d) is impossible and hence the answer is (d). It is helpful, however, to constuct some examples to convince yourself that (a)-(c) are really possible (this is also a sanity check against misprints). For this purpose, you may consider the matrices
          $$
          A=begin{pmatrix}1\&1\&&0end{pmatrix}, B=begin{pmatrix}b&0&1\0&0&0\0&c&0end{pmatrix}.
          $$
          Then $operatorname{rank}(AB)=1$. Now you may try to choose some appropriate values of $b$ and $c$ to make $operatorname{rank}(BA)$ equal to $0,1$ or $2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          If you only want to solve the problem, then as the others have pointed out, (d) is impossible and hence the answer is (d). It is helpful, however, to constuct some examples to convince yourself that (a)-(c) are really possible (this is also a sanity check against misprints). For this purpose, you may consider the matrices
          $$
          A=begin{pmatrix}1\&1\&&0end{pmatrix}, B=begin{pmatrix}b&0&1\0&0&0\0&c&0end{pmatrix}.
          $$
          Then $operatorname{rank}(AB)=1$. Now you may try to choose some appropriate values of $b$ and $c$ to make $operatorname{rank}(BA)$ equal to $0,1$ or $2$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 31 '12 at 14:45









          user1551user1551

          72.5k566127




          72.5k566127























              4












              $begingroup$

              The answer is (d), i.e. if $rank(AB)=1$, then $rank(BA)$ cannot be $3$. Let's prove it by contradiction. Suppose $A, B$ are $3times 3$ matrices such that $rank(AB)=3$, then $AB$ is invertible. This implies that $A$ and $B$ are invertible (otherwise, if $A$ is not invertible, then $A$ could not be full rank, i.e. $rank(A)<3$. This would imply that $rank(AB)leq rank(A)<3$, which contradicts $rank(AB)=3$. Similarly you can prove that $B$ is invertible). Then $BA$ is invertible since product of invertible matrices is invertible. This implies that $rank(BA)=3$, which contradicts to the assumption that $rank(AB)=1$.



              To see that (a), (b), (c) are possible, we can construct some examples of $A$ and $B$. As you have shown that (b) is possible (In fact, we can just take $A$ to be any rank 1 matrix, i.e. $rank(A)=1$ and $B$ to be the identity. Then $AB=BA=A$ has rank $1$).
              I will leave other cases to you.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$









              • 1




                $begingroup$
                i have one question.If i want to prove it by contradiction,then should not i keep the condition that $rank(AB)=1$ intact and then take the supposition that if possible let us assume that $rank(BA)=3$ and then finally see what happens? with regards..
                $endgroup$
                – learner
                Dec 31 '12 at 14:26










              • $begingroup$
                @Paul: Is (a) possible? For rank$(BA)=0implies BA=0implies (AB)^2=0implies$ rank$(AB)^2=0implies$ min{rank($AB$), rank($AB$)} $ =0implies$rank $(AB)=0.$
                $endgroup$
                – Sugata Adhya
                Dec 31 '12 at 15:40


















              4












              $begingroup$

              The answer is (d), i.e. if $rank(AB)=1$, then $rank(BA)$ cannot be $3$. Let's prove it by contradiction. Suppose $A, B$ are $3times 3$ matrices such that $rank(AB)=3$, then $AB$ is invertible. This implies that $A$ and $B$ are invertible (otherwise, if $A$ is not invertible, then $A$ could not be full rank, i.e. $rank(A)<3$. This would imply that $rank(AB)leq rank(A)<3$, which contradicts $rank(AB)=3$. Similarly you can prove that $B$ is invertible). Then $BA$ is invertible since product of invertible matrices is invertible. This implies that $rank(BA)=3$, which contradicts to the assumption that $rank(AB)=1$.



              To see that (a), (b), (c) are possible, we can construct some examples of $A$ and $B$. As you have shown that (b) is possible (In fact, we can just take $A$ to be any rank 1 matrix, i.e. $rank(A)=1$ and $B$ to be the identity. Then $AB=BA=A$ has rank $1$).
              I will leave other cases to you.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$









              • 1




                $begingroup$
                i have one question.If i want to prove it by contradiction,then should not i keep the condition that $rank(AB)=1$ intact and then take the supposition that if possible let us assume that $rank(BA)=3$ and then finally see what happens? with regards..
                $endgroup$
                – learner
                Dec 31 '12 at 14:26










              • $begingroup$
                @Paul: Is (a) possible? For rank$(BA)=0implies BA=0implies (AB)^2=0implies$ rank$(AB)^2=0implies$ min{rank($AB$), rank($AB$)} $ =0implies$rank $(AB)=0.$
                $endgroup$
                – Sugata Adhya
                Dec 31 '12 at 15:40
















              4












              4








              4





              $begingroup$

              The answer is (d), i.e. if $rank(AB)=1$, then $rank(BA)$ cannot be $3$. Let's prove it by contradiction. Suppose $A, B$ are $3times 3$ matrices such that $rank(AB)=3$, then $AB$ is invertible. This implies that $A$ and $B$ are invertible (otherwise, if $A$ is not invertible, then $A$ could not be full rank, i.e. $rank(A)<3$. This would imply that $rank(AB)leq rank(A)<3$, which contradicts $rank(AB)=3$. Similarly you can prove that $B$ is invertible). Then $BA$ is invertible since product of invertible matrices is invertible. This implies that $rank(BA)=3$, which contradicts to the assumption that $rank(AB)=1$.



              To see that (a), (b), (c) are possible, we can construct some examples of $A$ and $B$. As you have shown that (b) is possible (In fact, we can just take $A$ to be any rank 1 matrix, i.e. $rank(A)=1$ and $B$ to be the identity. Then $AB=BA=A$ has rank $1$).
              I will leave other cases to you.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              The answer is (d), i.e. if $rank(AB)=1$, then $rank(BA)$ cannot be $3$. Let's prove it by contradiction. Suppose $A, B$ are $3times 3$ matrices such that $rank(AB)=3$, then $AB$ is invertible. This implies that $A$ and $B$ are invertible (otherwise, if $A$ is not invertible, then $A$ could not be full rank, i.e. $rank(A)<3$. This would imply that $rank(AB)leq rank(A)<3$, which contradicts $rank(AB)=3$. Similarly you can prove that $B$ is invertible). Then $BA$ is invertible since product of invertible matrices is invertible. This implies that $rank(BA)=3$, which contradicts to the assumption that $rank(AB)=1$.



              To see that (a), (b), (c) are possible, we can construct some examples of $A$ and $B$. As you have shown that (b) is possible (In fact, we can just take $A$ to be any rank 1 matrix, i.e. $rank(A)=1$ and $B$ to be the identity. Then $AB=BA=A$ has rank $1$).
              I will leave other cases to you.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Dec 31 '12 at 14:13









              PaulPaul

              15.9k33767




              15.9k33767








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                i have one question.If i want to prove it by contradiction,then should not i keep the condition that $rank(AB)=1$ intact and then take the supposition that if possible let us assume that $rank(BA)=3$ and then finally see what happens? with regards..
                $endgroup$
                – learner
                Dec 31 '12 at 14:26










              • $begingroup$
                @Paul: Is (a) possible? For rank$(BA)=0implies BA=0implies (AB)^2=0implies$ rank$(AB)^2=0implies$ min{rank($AB$), rank($AB$)} $ =0implies$rank $(AB)=0.$
                $endgroup$
                – Sugata Adhya
                Dec 31 '12 at 15:40
















              • 1




                $begingroup$
                i have one question.If i want to prove it by contradiction,then should not i keep the condition that $rank(AB)=1$ intact and then take the supposition that if possible let us assume that $rank(BA)=3$ and then finally see what happens? with regards..
                $endgroup$
                – learner
                Dec 31 '12 at 14:26










              • $begingroup$
                @Paul: Is (a) possible? For rank$(BA)=0implies BA=0implies (AB)^2=0implies$ rank$(AB)^2=0implies$ min{rank($AB$), rank($AB$)} $ =0implies$rank $(AB)=0.$
                $endgroup$
                – Sugata Adhya
                Dec 31 '12 at 15:40










              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              i have one question.If i want to prove it by contradiction,then should not i keep the condition that $rank(AB)=1$ intact and then take the supposition that if possible let us assume that $rank(BA)=3$ and then finally see what happens? with regards..
              $endgroup$
              – learner
              Dec 31 '12 at 14:26




              $begingroup$
              i have one question.If i want to prove it by contradiction,then should not i keep the condition that $rank(AB)=1$ intact and then take the supposition that if possible let us assume that $rank(BA)=3$ and then finally see what happens? with regards..
              $endgroup$
              – learner
              Dec 31 '12 at 14:26












              $begingroup$
              @Paul: Is (a) possible? For rank$(BA)=0implies BA=0implies (AB)^2=0implies$ rank$(AB)^2=0implies$ min{rank($AB$), rank($AB$)} $ =0implies$rank $(AB)=0.$
              $endgroup$
              – Sugata Adhya
              Dec 31 '12 at 15:40






              $begingroup$
              @Paul: Is (a) possible? For rank$(BA)=0implies BA=0implies (AB)^2=0implies$ rank$(AB)^2=0implies$ min{rank($AB$), rank($AB$)} $ =0implies$rank $(AB)=0.$
              $endgroup$
              – Sugata Adhya
              Dec 31 '12 at 15:40













              3












              $begingroup$

              This question has lots of good answers.But I just want to share a very short answer.It may already be discussed in the previous answers,so really sorry to answer again.



              $AB$ is a $3times 3$ matrix,rank$(AB)=1ne3Rightarrow AB$ is not of full rank$Rightarrow operatorname{det}(AB)=0Rightarrow operatorname{det}(BA)=0Rightarrow BA$ is not of full rank$Rightarrow$rank$(BA)ne3$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                3












                $begingroup$

                This question has lots of good answers.But I just want to share a very short answer.It may already be discussed in the previous answers,so really sorry to answer again.



                $AB$ is a $3times 3$ matrix,rank$(AB)=1ne3Rightarrow AB$ is not of full rank$Rightarrow operatorname{det}(AB)=0Rightarrow operatorname{det}(BA)=0Rightarrow BA$ is not of full rank$Rightarrow$rank$(BA)ne3$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  This question has lots of good answers.But I just want to share a very short answer.It may already be discussed in the previous answers,so really sorry to answer again.



                  $AB$ is a $3times 3$ matrix,rank$(AB)=1ne3Rightarrow AB$ is not of full rank$Rightarrow operatorname{det}(AB)=0Rightarrow operatorname{det}(BA)=0Rightarrow BA$ is not of full rank$Rightarrow$rank$(BA)ne3$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  This question has lots of good answers.But I just want to share a very short answer.It may already be discussed in the previous answers,so really sorry to answer again.



                  $AB$ is a $3times 3$ matrix,rank$(AB)=1ne3Rightarrow AB$ is not of full rank$Rightarrow operatorname{det}(AB)=0Rightarrow operatorname{det}(BA)=0Rightarrow BA$ is not of full rank$Rightarrow$rank$(BA)ne3$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jun 12 '14 at 6:36









                  usermathusermath

                  2,5561227




                  2,5561227






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f268153%2fa-and-b-are-3-times-3-real-matrices-such-that-operatornamerankab-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                      How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                      in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith