Are eigenvectors a basis set for any invariant subspace?
$begingroup$
Let $Ain mathbb{R}^{ntimes n}$ (i.e., a real square matrix).
Assume that $v_1,dots, v_m$ ($mle n$) are eigenvectors of $A$.
Can any $d-$dimensional invariant subspace of $A$ be constructed using $d$ numbers of $v_i$'s?
linear-algebra matrices linear-transformations
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $Ain mathbb{R}^{ntimes n}$ (i.e., a real square matrix).
Assume that $v_1,dots, v_m$ ($mle n$) are eigenvectors of $A$.
Can any $d-$dimensional invariant subspace of $A$ be constructed using $d$ numbers of $v_i$'s?
linear-algebra matrices linear-transformations
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
What do you mean by "constructed"?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 10 at 7:13
6
$begingroup$
No, even assuming that the vectors are linearly independent and exhaust the eigenspaces. Consider a rotation of $mathbb{R}^3$ about the $z$-axis, e.g. $left(begin{array}{ccc}0 & -1& 0\1 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 1end{array}right)$. The only eigenvectors are multiples of $(0,0,1)$, but $W={(x,y,0)mid x,yinmathbb{R}}$ is invariant.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Jan 10 at 7:13
$begingroup$
The point is precisely that invariant subspaces are more general than spaces generated by eigenvectors...
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Jan 10 at 7:14
$begingroup$
@BigbearZzz, by 'constructing' I mean linear combination.
$endgroup$
– Bashir Sadeghi
Jan 10 at 7:17
1
$begingroup$
However, even in the case of a diagonalizable matrix, the result is not quite right. For example, if you take the identity matrix and you take your $v_i$ to be the standard basis, then any subspace is invariant, but the only subspaces you can generate with subsets of your $v_i$ are the coordinate subspaces. E.g., with $V=mathbb{R}^2$, $v_1=(1,0)$, and $v_2=(0,1)$, you can’t get the subspace ${(x,x)mid xinmathbb{R}}$ which is invariant under the identity map.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Jan 14 at 3:26
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $Ain mathbb{R}^{ntimes n}$ (i.e., a real square matrix).
Assume that $v_1,dots, v_m$ ($mle n$) are eigenvectors of $A$.
Can any $d-$dimensional invariant subspace of $A$ be constructed using $d$ numbers of $v_i$'s?
linear-algebra matrices linear-transformations
$endgroup$
Let $Ain mathbb{R}^{ntimes n}$ (i.e., a real square matrix).
Assume that $v_1,dots, v_m$ ($mle n$) are eigenvectors of $A$.
Can any $d-$dimensional invariant subspace of $A$ be constructed using $d$ numbers of $v_i$'s?
linear-algebra matrices linear-transformations
linear-algebra matrices linear-transformations
edited Jan 10 at 7:08
Bashir Sadeghi
asked Jan 10 at 7:00
Bashir SadeghiBashir Sadeghi
424
424
1
$begingroup$
What do you mean by "constructed"?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 10 at 7:13
6
$begingroup$
No, even assuming that the vectors are linearly independent and exhaust the eigenspaces. Consider a rotation of $mathbb{R}^3$ about the $z$-axis, e.g. $left(begin{array}{ccc}0 & -1& 0\1 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 1end{array}right)$. The only eigenvectors are multiples of $(0,0,1)$, but $W={(x,y,0)mid x,yinmathbb{R}}$ is invariant.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Jan 10 at 7:13
$begingroup$
The point is precisely that invariant subspaces are more general than spaces generated by eigenvectors...
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Jan 10 at 7:14
$begingroup$
@BigbearZzz, by 'constructing' I mean linear combination.
$endgroup$
– Bashir Sadeghi
Jan 10 at 7:17
1
$begingroup$
However, even in the case of a diagonalizable matrix, the result is not quite right. For example, if you take the identity matrix and you take your $v_i$ to be the standard basis, then any subspace is invariant, but the only subspaces you can generate with subsets of your $v_i$ are the coordinate subspaces. E.g., with $V=mathbb{R}^2$, $v_1=(1,0)$, and $v_2=(0,1)$, you can’t get the subspace ${(x,x)mid xinmathbb{R}}$ which is invariant under the identity map.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Jan 14 at 3:26
|
show 2 more comments
1
$begingroup$
What do you mean by "constructed"?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 10 at 7:13
6
$begingroup$
No, even assuming that the vectors are linearly independent and exhaust the eigenspaces. Consider a rotation of $mathbb{R}^3$ about the $z$-axis, e.g. $left(begin{array}{ccc}0 & -1& 0\1 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 1end{array}right)$. The only eigenvectors are multiples of $(0,0,1)$, but $W={(x,y,0)mid x,yinmathbb{R}}$ is invariant.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Jan 10 at 7:13
$begingroup$
The point is precisely that invariant subspaces are more general than spaces generated by eigenvectors...
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Jan 10 at 7:14
$begingroup$
@BigbearZzz, by 'constructing' I mean linear combination.
$endgroup$
– Bashir Sadeghi
Jan 10 at 7:17
1
$begingroup$
However, even in the case of a diagonalizable matrix, the result is not quite right. For example, if you take the identity matrix and you take your $v_i$ to be the standard basis, then any subspace is invariant, but the only subspaces you can generate with subsets of your $v_i$ are the coordinate subspaces. E.g., with $V=mathbb{R}^2$, $v_1=(1,0)$, and $v_2=(0,1)$, you can’t get the subspace ${(x,x)mid xinmathbb{R}}$ which is invariant under the identity map.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Jan 14 at 3:26
1
1
$begingroup$
What do you mean by "constructed"?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 10 at 7:13
$begingroup$
What do you mean by "constructed"?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 10 at 7:13
6
6
$begingroup$
No, even assuming that the vectors are linearly independent and exhaust the eigenspaces. Consider a rotation of $mathbb{R}^3$ about the $z$-axis, e.g. $left(begin{array}{ccc}0 & -1& 0\1 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 1end{array}right)$. The only eigenvectors are multiples of $(0,0,1)$, but $W={(x,y,0)mid x,yinmathbb{R}}$ is invariant.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Jan 10 at 7:13
$begingroup$
No, even assuming that the vectors are linearly independent and exhaust the eigenspaces. Consider a rotation of $mathbb{R}^3$ about the $z$-axis, e.g. $left(begin{array}{ccc}0 & -1& 0\1 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 1end{array}right)$. The only eigenvectors are multiples of $(0,0,1)$, but $W={(x,y,0)mid x,yinmathbb{R}}$ is invariant.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Jan 10 at 7:13
$begingroup$
The point is precisely that invariant subspaces are more general than spaces generated by eigenvectors...
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Jan 10 at 7:14
$begingroup$
The point is precisely that invariant subspaces are more general than spaces generated by eigenvectors...
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Jan 10 at 7:14
$begingroup$
@BigbearZzz, by 'constructing' I mean linear combination.
$endgroup$
– Bashir Sadeghi
Jan 10 at 7:17
$begingroup$
@BigbearZzz, by 'constructing' I mean linear combination.
$endgroup$
– Bashir Sadeghi
Jan 10 at 7:17
1
1
$begingroup$
However, even in the case of a diagonalizable matrix, the result is not quite right. For example, if you take the identity matrix and you take your $v_i$ to be the standard basis, then any subspace is invariant, but the only subspaces you can generate with subsets of your $v_i$ are the coordinate subspaces. E.g., with $V=mathbb{R}^2$, $v_1=(1,0)$, and $v_2=(0,1)$, you can’t get the subspace ${(x,x)mid xinmathbb{R}}$ which is invariant under the identity map.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Jan 14 at 3:26
$begingroup$
However, even in the case of a diagonalizable matrix, the result is not quite right. For example, if you take the identity matrix and you take your $v_i$ to be the standard basis, then any subspace is invariant, but the only subspaces you can generate with subsets of your $v_i$ are the coordinate subspaces. E.g., with $V=mathbb{R}^2$, $v_1=(1,0)$, and $v_2=(0,1)$, you can’t get the subspace ${(x,x)mid xinmathbb{R}}$ which is invariant under the identity map.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Jan 14 at 3:26
|
show 2 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068326%2fare-eigenvectors-a-basis-set-for-any-invariant-subspace%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068326%2fare-eigenvectors-a-basis-set-for-any-invariant-subspace%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
What do you mean by "constructed"?
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Jan 10 at 7:13
6
$begingroup$
No, even assuming that the vectors are linearly independent and exhaust the eigenspaces. Consider a rotation of $mathbb{R}^3$ about the $z$-axis, e.g. $left(begin{array}{ccc}0 & -1& 0\1 & 0 & 0\0 & 0 & 1end{array}right)$. The only eigenvectors are multiples of $(0,0,1)$, but $W={(x,y,0)mid x,yinmathbb{R}}$ is invariant.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Jan 10 at 7:13
$begingroup$
The point is precisely that invariant subspaces are more general than spaces generated by eigenvectors...
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Jan 10 at 7:14
$begingroup$
@BigbearZzz, by 'constructing' I mean linear combination.
$endgroup$
– Bashir Sadeghi
Jan 10 at 7:17
1
$begingroup$
However, even in the case of a diagonalizable matrix, the result is not quite right. For example, if you take the identity matrix and you take your $v_i$ to be the standard basis, then any subspace is invariant, but the only subspaces you can generate with subsets of your $v_i$ are the coordinate subspaces. E.g., with $V=mathbb{R}^2$, $v_1=(1,0)$, and $v_2=(0,1)$, you can’t get the subspace ${(x,x)mid xinmathbb{R}}$ which is invariant under the identity map.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Jan 14 at 3:26