Inverse function of a conformal mapping
$begingroup$
I'm trying to prove that if $f$ is a conformal mapping at $z_0$, then it has an inverse $g$ that is conformal at $w_0=f(z_0)$.
I proved the existence of $g$ using the Inverse Function Thereom. Since $f$ is conformal at $z_0$, then $f$ is analytic in $z_0$ and so $u,vin C^1(D)$.
Tha Jacobian is
$begin{equation*}
J =begin{vmatrix}
u_x & u_y\
v_x & v_y\
end{vmatrix}
=u_xv_y-u_yv_x
end{equation*}$
and using the Cauchy-Riemann equations, we have that
begin{equation*}
J=(u_x)^2+(v_x)^2=|f'(z)|^2
end{equation*}
Since $f'(z_0)neq 0$, $Jneq 0$. So, by the Inverse Function Theorem, $f$ has an inverse $g$.
How can I prove that $g$ is analytic in $w_0$?
That's the only thing that is missing, since I also proved that
begin{equation*}
g'(w)=frac{1}{f'(z_0)}
end{equation*}
and since $f'(z_0)neq 0$, then $g'(w_0)neq 0$. This, coupled with the fact that $g$ is analytic in $w_0$, implies that $g$ is conformal at $w_0$
complex-analysis conformal-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to prove that if $f$ is a conformal mapping at $z_0$, then it has an inverse $g$ that is conformal at $w_0=f(z_0)$.
I proved the existence of $g$ using the Inverse Function Thereom. Since $f$ is conformal at $z_0$, then $f$ is analytic in $z_0$ and so $u,vin C^1(D)$.
Tha Jacobian is
$begin{equation*}
J =begin{vmatrix}
u_x & u_y\
v_x & v_y\
end{vmatrix}
=u_xv_y-u_yv_x
end{equation*}$
and using the Cauchy-Riemann equations, we have that
begin{equation*}
J=(u_x)^2+(v_x)^2=|f'(z)|^2
end{equation*}
Since $f'(z_0)neq 0$, $Jneq 0$. So, by the Inverse Function Theorem, $f$ has an inverse $g$.
How can I prove that $g$ is analytic in $w_0$?
That's the only thing that is missing, since I also proved that
begin{equation*}
g'(w)=frac{1}{f'(z_0)}
end{equation*}
and since $f'(z_0)neq 0$, then $g'(w_0)neq 0$. This, coupled with the fact that $g$ is analytic in $w_0$, implies that $g$ is conformal at $w_0$
complex-analysis conformal-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to prove that if $f$ is a conformal mapping at $z_0$, then it has an inverse $g$ that is conformal at $w_0=f(z_0)$.
I proved the existence of $g$ using the Inverse Function Thereom. Since $f$ is conformal at $z_0$, then $f$ is analytic in $z_0$ and so $u,vin C^1(D)$.
Tha Jacobian is
$begin{equation*}
J =begin{vmatrix}
u_x & u_y\
v_x & v_y\
end{vmatrix}
=u_xv_y-u_yv_x
end{equation*}$
and using the Cauchy-Riemann equations, we have that
begin{equation*}
J=(u_x)^2+(v_x)^2=|f'(z)|^2
end{equation*}
Since $f'(z_0)neq 0$, $Jneq 0$. So, by the Inverse Function Theorem, $f$ has an inverse $g$.
How can I prove that $g$ is analytic in $w_0$?
That's the only thing that is missing, since I also proved that
begin{equation*}
g'(w)=frac{1}{f'(z_0)}
end{equation*}
and since $f'(z_0)neq 0$, then $g'(w_0)neq 0$. This, coupled with the fact that $g$ is analytic in $w_0$, implies that $g$ is conformal at $w_0$
complex-analysis conformal-geometry
$endgroup$
I'm trying to prove that if $f$ is a conformal mapping at $z_0$, then it has an inverse $g$ that is conformal at $w_0=f(z_0)$.
I proved the existence of $g$ using the Inverse Function Thereom. Since $f$ is conformal at $z_0$, then $f$ is analytic in $z_0$ and so $u,vin C^1(D)$.
Tha Jacobian is
$begin{equation*}
J =begin{vmatrix}
u_x & u_y\
v_x & v_y\
end{vmatrix}
=u_xv_y-u_yv_x
end{equation*}$
and using the Cauchy-Riemann equations, we have that
begin{equation*}
J=(u_x)^2+(v_x)^2=|f'(z)|^2
end{equation*}
Since $f'(z_0)neq 0$, $Jneq 0$. So, by the Inverse Function Theorem, $f$ has an inverse $g$.
How can I prove that $g$ is analytic in $w_0$?
That's the only thing that is missing, since I also proved that
begin{equation*}
g'(w)=frac{1}{f'(z_0)}
end{equation*}
and since $f'(z_0)neq 0$, then $g'(w_0)neq 0$. This, coupled with the fact that $g$ is analytic in $w_0$, implies that $g$ is conformal at $w_0$
complex-analysis conformal-geometry
complex-analysis conformal-geometry
asked Nov 15 '15 at 22:59
Fawcett512Fawcett512
30019
30019
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This would be basically an application of the Lagrange inversion theorem, which states the following:
Suppose $w$ is defined as a function of $z$ by an equation of the form
$$f(z)=w,$$
where $f$ is analytic at a point $z_0$ and $f'(z_0)neq 0$. Then it is possible to invert (or solve) the equation for $z$:
$$z=g(w),$$
on a neighborhood of $f(z_0)=w_0$, where $g$ is analytic at the point $w_0$.
Since you have (or have proved) all the hypothesis, you can just apply the theorem.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks man. Better late than never I guess. I can't even remember what happened with this particular problem, whether I solved it or not. I'll think about it again...
$endgroup$
– Fawcett512
Oct 7 '16 at 4:52
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1530962%2finverse-function-of-a-conformal-mapping%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This would be basically an application of the Lagrange inversion theorem, which states the following:
Suppose $w$ is defined as a function of $z$ by an equation of the form
$$f(z)=w,$$
where $f$ is analytic at a point $z_0$ and $f'(z_0)neq 0$. Then it is possible to invert (or solve) the equation for $z$:
$$z=g(w),$$
on a neighborhood of $f(z_0)=w_0$, where $g$ is analytic at the point $w_0$.
Since you have (or have proved) all the hypothesis, you can just apply the theorem.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks man. Better late than never I guess. I can't even remember what happened with this particular problem, whether I solved it or not. I'll think about it again...
$endgroup$
– Fawcett512
Oct 7 '16 at 4:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This would be basically an application of the Lagrange inversion theorem, which states the following:
Suppose $w$ is defined as a function of $z$ by an equation of the form
$$f(z)=w,$$
where $f$ is analytic at a point $z_0$ and $f'(z_0)neq 0$. Then it is possible to invert (or solve) the equation for $z$:
$$z=g(w),$$
on a neighborhood of $f(z_0)=w_0$, where $g$ is analytic at the point $w_0$.
Since you have (or have proved) all the hypothesis, you can just apply the theorem.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks man. Better late than never I guess. I can't even remember what happened with this particular problem, whether I solved it or not. I'll think about it again...
$endgroup$
– Fawcett512
Oct 7 '16 at 4:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This would be basically an application of the Lagrange inversion theorem, which states the following:
Suppose $w$ is defined as a function of $z$ by an equation of the form
$$f(z)=w,$$
where $f$ is analytic at a point $z_0$ and $f'(z_0)neq 0$. Then it is possible to invert (or solve) the equation for $z$:
$$z=g(w),$$
on a neighborhood of $f(z_0)=w_0$, where $g$ is analytic at the point $w_0$.
Since you have (or have proved) all the hypothesis, you can just apply the theorem.
$endgroup$
This would be basically an application of the Lagrange inversion theorem, which states the following:
Suppose $w$ is defined as a function of $z$ by an equation of the form
$$f(z)=w,$$
where $f$ is analytic at a point $z_0$ and $f'(z_0)neq 0$. Then it is possible to invert (or solve) the equation for $z$:
$$z=g(w),$$
on a neighborhood of $f(z_0)=w_0$, where $g$ is analytic at the point $w_0$.
Since you have (or have proved) all the hypothesis, you can just apply the theorem.
answered Oct 5 '16 at 16:12


EduEdu
1,4051619
1,4051619
$begingroup$
Thanks man. Better late than never I guess. I can't even remember what happened with this particular problem, whether I solved it or not. I'll think about it again...
$endgroup$
– Fawcett512
Oct 7 '16 at 4:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks man. Better late than never I guess. I can't even remember what happened with this particular problem, whether I solved it or not. I'll think about it again...
$endgroup$
– Fawcett512
Oct 7 '16 at 4:52
$begingroup$
Thanks man. Better late than never I guess. I can't even remember what happened with this particular problem, whether I solved it or not. I'll think about it again...
$endgroup$
– Fawcett512
Oct 7 '16 at 4:52
$begingroup$
Thanks man. Better late than never I guess. I can't even remember what happened with this particular problem, whether I solved it or not. I'll think about it again...
$endgroup$
– Fawcett512
Oct 7 '16 at 4:52
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1530962%2finverse-function-of-a-conformal-mapping%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown