Philosophy of mathematics












-1












$begingroup$


There is a question which made my mind busy for a while: assume that we are working with the function: $ y = sqrt x$. when we draw it continuously, it means that for example the $x = pi $ or $x = sqrt 2$ exists.



but in real world it is impossible to specify a specefic length to these numbers (because in our best performance, we can divide the length to the subatomic levels).
what is the difference between length in the mathematics world and in reality?



it would be my pleasure to have your answers.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In reality, you cannot even draw , lets say , a square with sides EXACTLY $1cm$ long.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter
    Jan 9 at 13:12












  • $begingroup$
    Well, I think you said it yourself already. In some sense, the real world is quantized and length (for example) can only get certain values ... Is there something else you're wondering about?
    $endgroup$
    – Matti P.
    Jan 9 at 13:13








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The entirety of mathematics is idealized.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 9 at 13:14






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nobody knows whether "reality" contains real lengths like $sqrt{2}$ or not. Probably nobody will ever know. Almost certainly not in our lifetime. Sorry!
    $endgroup$
    – dbx
    Jan 9 at 13:57






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    All objects in mathematics are ideal objects that obey very simple rules with absolute certainty. It is not surprising that the real world does not exactly match these ideals. What is surprising is that the real world is close enough to these ideals to allow us to build pyramids, land on the Moon and talk to people on the other side of the world at the touch of a button.
    $endgroup$
    – gandalf61
    Jan 9 at 15:34
















-1












$begingroup$


There is a question which made my mind busy for a while: assume that we are working with the function: $ y = sqrt x$. when we draw it continuously, it means that for example the $x = pi $ or $x = sqrt 2$ exists.



but in real world it is impossible to specify a specefic length to these numbers (because in our best performance, we can divide the length to the subatomic levels).
what is the difference between length in the mathematics world and in reality?



it would be my pleasure to have your answers.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In reality, you cannot even draw , lets say , a square with sides EXACTLY $1cm$ long.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter
    Jan 9 at 13:12












  • $begingroup$
    Well, I think you said it yourself already. In some sense, the real world is quantized and length (for example) can only get certain values ... Is there something else you're wondering about?
    $endgroup$
    – Matti P.
    Jan 9 at 13:13








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The entirety of mathematics is idealized.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 9 at 13:14






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nobody knows whether "reality" contains real lengths like $sqrt{2}$ or not. Probably nobody will ever know. Almost certainly not in our lifetime. Sorry!
    $endgroup$
    – dbx
    Jan 9 at 13:57






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    All objects in mathematics are ideal objects that obey very simple rules with absolute certainty. It is not surprising that the real world does not exactly match these ideals. What is surprising is that the real world is close enough to these ideals to allow us to build pyramids, land on the Moon and talk to people on the other side of the world at the touch of a button.
    $endgroup$
    – gandalf61
    Jan 9 at 15:34














-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$


There is a question which made my mind busy for a while: assume that we are working with the function: $ y = sqrt x$. when we draw it continuously, it means that for example the $x = pi $ or $x = sqrt 2$ exists.



but in real world it is impossible to specify a specefic length to these numbers (because in our best performance, we can divide the length to the subatomic levels).
what is the difference between length in the mathematics world and in reality?



it would be my pleasure to have your answers.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




There is a question which made my mind busy for a while: assume that we are working with the function: $ y = sqrt x$. when we draw it continuously, it means that for example the $x = pi $ or $x = sqrt 2$ exists.



but in real world it is impossible to specify a specefic length to these numbers (because in our best performance, we can divide the length to the subatomic levels).
what is the difference between length in the mathematics world and in reality?



it would be my pleasure to have your answers.







algebra-precalculus philosophy






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 9 at 17:43









user

4,0001627




4,0001627










asked Jan 9 at 13:03









AmirAmir

6




6












  • $begingroup$
    In reality, you cannot even draw , lets say , a square with sides EXACTLY $1cm$ long.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter
    Jan 9 at 13:12












  • $begingroup$
    Well, I think you said it yourself already. In some sense, the real world is quantized and length (for example) can only get certain values ... Is there something else you're wondering about?
    $endgroup$
    – Matti P.
    Jan 9 at 13:13








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The entirety of mathematics is idealized.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 9 at 13:14






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nobody knows whether "reality" contains real lengths like $sqrt{2}$ or not. Probably nobody will ever know. Almost certainly not in our lifetime. Sorry!
    $endgroup$
    – dbx
    Jan 9 at 13:57






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    All objects in mathematics are ideal objects that obey very simple rules with absolute certainty. It is not surprising that the real world does not exactly match these ideals. What is surprising is that the real world is close enough to these ideals to allow us to build pyramids, land on the Moon and talk to people on the other side of the world at the touch of a button.
    $endgroup$
    – gandalf61
    Jan 9 at 15:34


















  • $begingroup$
    In reality, you cannot even draw , lets say , a square with sides EXACTLY $1cm$ long.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter
    Jan 9 at 13:12












  • $begingroup$
    Well, I think you said it yourself already. In some sense, the real world is quantized and length (for example) can only get certain values ... Is there something else you're wondering about?
    $endgroup$
    – Matti P.
    Jan 9 at 13:13








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The entirety of mathematics is idealized.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 9 at 13:14






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Nobody knows whether "reality" contains real lengths like $sqrt{2}$ or not. Probably nobody will ever know. Almost certainly not in our lifetime. Sorry!
    $endgroup$
    – dbx
    Jan 9 at 13:57






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    All objects in mathematics are ideal objects that obey very simple rules with absolute certainty. It is not surprising that the real world does not exactly match these ideals. What is surprising is that the real world is close enough to these ideals to allow us to build pyramids, land on the Moon and talk to people on the other side of the world at the touch of a button.
    $endgroup$
    – gandalf61
    Jan 9 at 15:34
















$begingroup$
In reality, you cannot even draw , lets say , a square with sides EXACTLY $1cm$ long.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Jan 9 at 13:12






$begingroup$
In reality, you cannot even draw , lets say , a square with sides EXACTLY $1cm$ long.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Jan 9 at 13:12














$begingroup$
Well, I think you said it yourself already. In some sense, the real world is quantized and length (for example) can only get certain values ... Is there something else you're wondering about?
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Jan 9 at 13:13






$begingroup$
Well, I think you said it yourself already. In some sense, the real world is quantized and length (for example) can only get certain values ... Is there something else you're wondering about?
$endgroup$
– Matti P.
Jan 9 at 13:13






1




1




$begingroup$
The entirety of mathematics is idealized.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Jan 9 at 13:14




$begingroup$
The entirety of mathematics is idealized.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Jan 9 at 13:14




1




1




$begingroup$
Nobody knows whether "reality" contains real lengths like $sqrt{2}$ or not. Probably nobody will ever know. Almost certainly not in our lifetime. Sorry!
$endgroup$
– dbx
Jan 9 at 13:57




$begingroup$
Nobody knows whether "reality" contains real lengths like $sqrt{2}$ or not. Probably nobody will ever know. Almost certainly not in our lifetime. Sorry!
$endgroup$
– dbx
Jan 9 at 13:57




1




1




$begingroup$
All objects in mathematics are ideal objects that obey very simple rules with absolute certainty. It is not surprising that the real world does not exactly match these ideals. What is surprising is that the real world is close enough to these ideals to allow us to build pyramids, land on the Moon and talk to people on the other side of the world at the touch of a button.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Jan 9 at 15:34




$begingroup$
All objects in mathematics are ideal objects that obey very simple rules with absolute certainty. It is not surprising that the real world does not exactly match these ideals. What is surprising is that the real world is close enough to these ideals to allow us to build pyramids, land on the Moon and talk to people on the other side of the world at the touch of a button.
$endgroup$
– gandalf61
Jan 9 at 15:34










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067426%2fphilosophy-of-mathematics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067426%2fphilosophy-of-mathematics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith