Thanks, dad! Never again












78












$begingroup$



No idea why my dad dragged me into this place. Some guy is performing on the stage. He's reading numbers out loud. I think it's some kind of a sequence puzzle.




1... 8... 9... 16... 17... 24... 25...




This is boring. Where is this place, anyway? Yorkshire or something? Everyone else is quiet. I bet they're concentrating on figuring out the pattern.




32... 33... 40... 41... 48... 49... 56...




I'm pretty sure I have this solved already. I won't spoil it for anyone just yet, though. I think somebody else will figure it out soon as well.




57... 64... 65... 72... 73... 80... 81...




This is so simple. How is nobody telling him the answer already?




88... 89... 96... 97... 104...




Everyone's clapping now. Is it over? He's gotten to 100 and nobody guessed it? I better clap as well.




105... 112...




Wait, it's continuing? Okay, he's giving us another chance. I see where this is going. The next number is 113.




113...




And then 120...




120...




This is a nice opportunity to impress my dad. I lean in and whisper to him that the next number will be 121.




(...)




I was wrong?!




What is the next correct number in the sequence? Why do you think I'm not able to enjoy the performance like everyone else?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    78












    $begingroup$



    No idea why my dad dragged me into this place. Some guy is performing on the stage. He's reading numbers out loud. I think it's some kind of a sequence puzzle.




    1... 8... 9... 16... 17... 24... 25...




    This is boring. Where is this place, anyway? Yorkshire or something? Everyone else is quiet. I bet they're concentrating on figuring out the pattern.




    32... 33... 40... 41... 48... 49... 56...




    I'm pretty sure I have this solved already. I won't spoil it for anyone just yet, though. I think somebody else will figure it out soon as well.




    57... 64... 65... 72... 73... 80... 81...




    This is so simple. How is nobody telling him the answer already?




    88... 89... 96... 97... 104...




    Everyone's clapping now. Is it over? He's gotten to 100 and nobody guessed it? I better clap as well.




    105... 112...




    Wait, it's continuing? Okay, he's giving us another chance. I see where this is going. The next number is 113.




    113...




    And then 120...




    120...




    This is a nice opportunity to impress my dad. I lean in and whisper to him that the next number will be 121.




    (...)




    I was wrong?!




    What is the next correct number in the sequence? Why do you think I'm not able to enjoy the performance like everyone else?










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      78












      78








      78


      6



      $begingroup$



      No idea why my dad dragged me into this place. Some guy is performing on the stage. He's reading numbers out loud. I think it's some kind of a sequence puzzle.




      1... 8... 9... 16... 17... 24... 25...




      This is boring. Where is this place, anyway? Yorkshire or something? Everyone else is quiet. I bet they're concentrating on figuring out the pattern.




      32... 33... 40... 41... 48... 49... 56...




      I'm pretty sure I have this solved already. I won't spoil it for anyone just yet, though. I think somebody else will figure it out soon as well.




      57... 64... 65... 72... 73... 80... 81...




      This is so simple. How is nobody telling him the answer already?




      88... 89... 96... 97... 104...




      Everyone's clapping now. Is it over? He's gotten to 100 and nobody guessed it? I better clap as well.




      105... 112...




      Wait, it's continuing? Okay, he's giving us another chance. I see where this is going. The next number is 113.




      113...




      And then 120...




      120...




      This is a nice opportunity to impress my dad. I lean in and whisper to him that the next number will be 121.




      (...)




      I was wrong?!




      What is the next correct number in the sequence? Why do you think I'm not able to enjoy the performance like everyone else?










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$





      No idea why my dad dragged me into this place. Some guy is performing on the stage. He's reading numbers out loud. I think it's some kind of a sequence puzzle.




      1... 8... 9... 16... 17... 24... 25...




      This is boring. Where is this place, anyway? Yorkshire or something? Everyone else is quiet. I bet they're concentrating on figuring out the pattern.




      32... 33... 40... 41... 48... 49... 56...




      I'm pretty sure I have this solved already. I won't spoil it for anyone just yet, though. I think somebody else will figure it out soon as well.




      57... 64... 65... 72... 73... 80... 81...




      This is so simple. How is nobody telling him the answer already?




      88... 89... 96... 97... 104...




      Everyone's clapping now. Is it over? He's gotten to 100 and nobody guessed it? I better clap as well.




      105... 112...




      Wait, it's continuing? Okay, he's giving us another chance. I see where this is going. The next number is 113.




      113...




      And then 120...




      120...




      This is a nice opportunity to impress my dad. I lean in and whisper to him that the next number will be 121.




      (...)




      I was wrong?!




      What is the next correct number in the sequence? Why do you think I'm not able to enjoy the performance like everyone else?







      logical-deduction knowledge story sequence






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Jan 9 at 12:12









      jafejafe

      20.1k457200




      20.1k457200






















          7 Answers
          7






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          72












          $begingroup$

          I think that the next number will be




          122




          Because you are watching




          A snooker match (potentially at The Crucible in Sheffield)




          The numbers are called out by




          The referee, when declaring the size of the break (the score accumulated so far without missing a shot). The sequence of numbers suggests that the current player has potted 15 red balls and 15 blacks without missing and it's still possible to achieve the maximum 147 (very rare in snooker). The next ball will be the yellow ball which is worth 2, taking the score up to 122.

          NB In professional snooker matches, it is normal for the audience to applaud when a player reaches a century (surpasses 100) so this would certainly happen in your case.




          Addendum




          As pointed out by celtschk, the author may not be able to enjoy the performance due to blindness or some other visual impairment.

          To clarify about the rules of snooker, when a player comes to the table the aim is to pot a red ball, worth 1 point, followed by a ball of any other colour (yellow=2, green=3, brown=4, blue=5, pink=6, black=7) and proceed alternately in that fashion. Red balls are not replaced when potted, while the others are. Once all 15 reds have been potted, the aim is to pot all the other colours in increasing order of value. On this occasion, they are not replaced once potted. Thanks to zakinster and bornfromanegg for addressing this.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Could you clarify the link between the 1 and 7 alternate increments observed and the content of your answer for someone not familiar with the field? I think I get it but it but I'm not sure and I'm too lazy to check Wikipedia.
            $endgroup$
            – zakinster
            Jan 9 at 15:29






          • 8




            $begingroup$
            The rules of snooker are such that you must pot alternately red balls and balls of another colour, starting with a red. Coloured balls are replaced on the table when they are potted, red balls are not. The player potted red, black, red, black, red, black, and so on, until all the reds were potted. The red is worth 1 point, and the coloured balls potted in this case were all blacks, worth 7 points each, hence the number sequence (the current score). Having potted the final red, and one more black, the rules state that the next ball you pot must be the yellow, which is worth 2 points.
            $endgroup$
            – bornfromanegg
            Jan 9 at 15:48












          • $begingroup$
            Yup, this is correct. Nice work!
            $endgroup$
            – jafe
            Jan 10 at 13:00






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            As for the impairement, I would suggest that if you're there with "Dad", then you might be one of the youngest -- and potentially shortest -- people there.
            $endgroup$
            – Admiral Jota
            Jan 10 at 14:28






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @AdmiralJota, this could be, but the crucible has some pretty steep seating, at least compared to a lot of venues, so shortness might not impair their ability to see, there is also lots of screens above the table to watch, and we all know kids hate watching stuff on a TV...
            $endgroup$
            – Blade Wraith
            Jan 10 at 15:01



















          22












          $begingroup$

          To address the one part that hexomino didn't already answer:




          Why do you think I'm not able to enjoy the performance like everyone else?




          My answer would be:




          You're blind.




          This is hinted at by the fact that




          while acoustic observations (like everyone being quiet) are given, no optical impressions are, which is atypical for someone able to see. The fact that you are unsure about the location may also be a hint. And finally, it explains why you didn't see the table.







          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            (dang, I should have googled before fixing. The word untypical really bothered me.... until i just googled to learn it is actually a word. Sorry.)
            $endgroup$
            – kaine
            Jan 9 at 16:47






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            Or alternatively, since there is mention of a dad in the story, the child could be too small to see what's happening.
            $endgroup$
            – rybo111
            Jan 9 at 17:03










          • $begingroup$
            Maybe he couldn't see the table because a big guy sat in front of him? Just that part would have other explanations.
            $endgroup$
            – findusl
            Jan 9 at 18:45






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            What kind of a cruel father takes his blind son to watch a snooker match, and doesn't even explain what's happening? =/
            $endgroup$
            – Adrian Petrescu
            Jan 11 at 13:54










          • $begingroup$
            How does a blind person know that "Some guy is performing on the stage" when they cannot see the stage?
            $endgroup$
            – hkBst
            Jan 13 at 11:24



















          13












          $begingroup$

          You are not able to enjoy the performance because




          you are blind, all of the descriptions are of sounds, not sights







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            5












            $begingroup$

            Just a small nuance / addendum to the already good solutions posted so far.



            You're potentially




            Watch... errr... hearing a perfect snooker frame.
            So far the player has been potting, alternately, a red ball (worth 1 point) and the black ball (worth 7). Instead of black, the player could have potted a ball worth less points, but then she would not be going for the perfect game.




            If all goes well,




            the player, after cleaning the red balls off the table, will be potting the other balls in order, from lowest value (yellow) to highest (black).




            Therefore, the full sequence is:




            122, 125, 129, 134, 140, 147







            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$





















              3












              $begingroup$

              In addition to everything else...




              There is a clue in the line "Where is this place, anyway? Yorkshire or something?" As the most famous place to play snooker is The Crucible which is in Sheffield, Yorkshire.







              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$





















                3












                $begingroup$

                As Mentioned previously:




                You are at a snooker match and hear the commentator call out a perfect snooker frame.




                Possible answer to why you were unable to enjoy the performance like everyone else was because:




                At the crucible they sometimes have two matches played on stage at the same time, separated by a screen. If you are sat on one side of the stage and nothing was being played on your half, but a game was being played on the other half, you would only here the commentary for that game. The referee would be sometimes visible from some seats on the side that the child is sat as the screen does not go the full length of the stage. Hence why you could not see what was going on.







                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$





















                  3












                  $begingroup$

                  The equation is:




                  floor(n ÷ 2) x 8 + n % 2




                  So the next six numbers will be:




                  121, 128, 129, 136, 137 and 144







                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$









                  • 16




                    $begingroup$
                    but it wasn't....
                    $endgroup$
                    – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
                    Jan 10 at 3:06






                  • 4




                    $begingroup$
                    Nice to have an explanation for the whispered 121 though.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Justin
                    Jan 10 at 19:40










                  • $begingroup$
                    129 is missing from your list.
                    $endgroup$
                    – hkBst
                    Jan 13 at 11:21











                  Your Answer





                  StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                  return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                  StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                  StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                  });
                  });
                  }, "mathjax-editing");

                  StackExchange.ready(function() {
                  var channelOptions = {
                  tags: "".split(" "),
                  id: "559"
                  };
                  initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                  StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                  // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                  if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                  StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                  createEditor();
                  });
                  }
                  else {
                  createEditor();
                  }
                  });

                  function createEditor() {
                  StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                  heartbeatType: 'answer',
                  autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                  convertImagesToLinks: false,
                  noModals: true,
                  showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                  reputationToPostImages: null,
                  bindNavPrevention: true,
                  postfix: "",
                  imageUploader: {
                  brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                  contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                  allowUrls: true
                  },
                  noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                  discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                  ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                  });


                  }
                  });














                  draft saved

                  draft discarded


















                  StackExchange.ready(
                  function () {
                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78260%2fthanks-dad-never-again%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                  }
                  );

                  Post as a guest















                  Required, but never shown

























                  7 Answers
                  7






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  7 Answers
                  7






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  active

                  oldest

                  votes






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  72












                  $begingroup$

                  I think that the next number will be




                  122




                  Because you are watching




                  A snooker match (potentially at The Crucible in Sheffield)




                  The numbers are called out by




                  The referee, when declaring the size of the break (the score accumulated so far without missing a shot). The sequence of numbers suggests that the current player has potted 15 red balls and 15 blacks without missing and it's still possible to achieve the maximum 147 (very rare in snooker). The next ball will be the yellow ball which is worth 2, taking the score up to 122.

                  NB In professional snooker matches, it is normal for the audience to applaud when a player reaches a century (surpasses 100) so this would certainly happen in your case.




                  Addendum




                  As pointed out by celtschk, the author may not be able to enjoy the performance due to blindness or some other visual impairment.

                  To clarify about the rules of snooker, when a player comes to the table the aim is to pot a red ball, worth 1 point, followed by a ball of any other colour (yellow=2, green=3, brown=4, blue=5, pink=6, black=7) and proceed alternately in that fashion. Red balls are not replaced when potted, while the others are. Once all 15 reds have been potted, the aim is to pot all the other colours in increasing order of value. On this occasion, they are not replaced once potted. Thanks to zakinster and bornfromanegg for addressing this.







                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$









                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    Could you clarify the link between the 1 and 7 alternate increments observed and the content of your answer for someone not familiar with the field? I think I get it but it but I'm not sure and I'm too lazy to check Wikipedia.
                    $endgroup$
                    – zakinster
                    Jan 9 at 15:29






                  • 8




                    $begingroup$
                    The rules of snooker are such that you must pot alternately red balls and balls of another colour, starting with a red. Coloured balls are replaced on the table when they are potted, red balls are not. The player potted red, black, red, black, red, black, and so on, until all the reds were potted. The red is worth 1 point, and the coloured balls potted in this case were all blacks, worth 7 points each, hence the number sequence (the current score). Having potted the final red, and one more black, the rules state that the next ball you pot must be the yellow, which is worth 2 points.
                    $endgroup$
                    – bornfromanegg
                    Jan 9 at 15:48












                  • $begingroup$
                    Yup, this is correct. Nice work!
                    $endgroup$
                    – jafe
                    Jan 10 at 13:00






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    As for the impairement, I would suggest that if you're there with "Dad", then you might be one of the youngest -- and potentially shortest -- people there.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Admiral Jota
                    Jan 10 at 14:28






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @AdmiralJota, this could be, but the crucible has some pretty steep seating, at least compared to a lot of venues, so shortness might not impair their ability to see, there is also lots of screens above the table to watch, and we all know kids hate watching stuff on a TV...
                    $endgroup$
                    – Blade Wraith
                    Jan 10 at 15:01
















                  72












                  $begingroup$

                  I think that the next number will be




                  122




                  Because you are watching




                  A snooker match (potentially at The Crucible in Sheffield)




                  The numbers are called out by




                  The referee, when declaring the size of the break (the score accumulated so far without missing a shot). The sequence of numbers suggests that the current player has potted 15 red balls and 15 blacks without missing and it's still possible to achieve the maximum 147 (very rare in snooker). The next ball will be the yellow ball which is worth 2, taking the score up to 122.

                  NB In professional snooker matches, it is normal for the audience to applaud when a player reaches a century (surpasses 100) so this would certainly happen in your case.




                  Addendum




                  As pointed out by celtschk, the author may not be able to enjoy the performance due to blindness or some other visual impairment.

                  To clarify about the rules of snooker, when a player comes to the table the aim is to pot a red ball, worth 1 point, followed by a ball of any other colour (yellow=2, green=3, brown=4, blue=5, pink=6, black=7) and proceed alternately in that fashion. Red balls are not replaced when potted, while the others are. Once all 15 reds have been potted, the aim is to pot all the other colours in increasing order of value. On this occasion, they are not replaced once potted. Thanks to zakinster and bornfromanegg for addressing this.







                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$









                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    Could you clarify the link between the 1 and 7 alternate increments observed and the content of your answer for someone not familiar with the field? I think I get it but it but I'm not sure and I'm too lazy to check Wikipedia.
                    $endgroup$
                    – zakinster
                    Jan 9 at 15:29






                  • 8




                    $begingroup$
                    The rules of snooker are such that you must pot alternately red balls and balls of another colour, starting with a red. Coloured balls are replaced on the table when they are potted, red balls are not. The player potted red, black, red, black, red, black, and so on, until all the reds were potted. The red is worth 1 point, and the coloured balls potted in this case were all blacks, worth 7 points each, hence the number sequence (the current score). Having potted the final red, and one more black, the rules state that the next ball you pot must be the yellow, which is worth 2 points.
                    $endgroup$
                    – bornfromanegg
                    Jan 9 at 15:48












                  • $begingroup$
                    Yup, this is correct. Nice work!
                    $endgroup$
                    – jafe
                    Jan 10 at 13:00






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    As for the impairement, I would suggest that if you're there with "Dad", then you might be one of the youngest -- and potentially shortest -- people there.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Admiral Jota
                    Jan 10 at 14:28






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @AdmiralJota, this could be, but the crucible has some pretty steep seating, at least compared to a lot of venues, so shortness might not impair their ability to see, there is also lots of screens above the table to watch, and we all know kids hate watching stuff on a TV...
                    $endgroup$
                    – Blade Wraith
                    Jan 10 at 15:01














                  72












                  72








                  72





                  $begingroup$

                  I think that the next number will be




                  122




                  Because you are watching




                  A snooker match (potentially at The Crucible in Sheffield)




                  The numbers are called out by




                  The referee, when declaring the size of the break (the score accumulated so far without missing a shot). The sequence of numbers suggests that the current player has potted 15 red balls and 15 blacks without missing and it's still possible to achieve the maximum 147 (very rare in snooker). The next ball will be the yellow ball which is worth 2, taking the score up to 122.

                  NB In professional snooker matches, it is normal for the audience to applaud when a player reaches a century (surpasses 100) so this would certainly happen in your case.




                  Addendum




                  As pointed out by celtschk, the author may not be able to enjoy the performance due to blindness or some other visual impairment.

                  To clarify about the rules of snooker, when a player comes to the table the aim is to pot a red ball, worth 1 point, followed by a ball of any other colour (yellow=2, green=3, brown=4, blue=5, pink=6, black=7) and proceed alternately in that fashion. Red balls are not replaced when potted, while the others are. Once all 15 reds have been potted, the aim is to pot all the other colours in increasing order of value. On this occasion, they are not replaced once potted. Thanks to zakinster and bornfromanegg for addressing this.







                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  I think that the next number will be




                  122




                  Because you are watching




                  A snooker match (potentially at The Crucible in Sheffield)




                  The numbers are called out by




                  The referee, when declaring the size of the break (the score accumulated so far without missing a shot). The sequence of numbers suggests that the current player has potted 15 red balls and 15 blacks without missing and it's still possible to achieve the maximum 147 (very rare in snooker). The next ball will be the yellow ball which is worth 2, taking the score up to 122.

                  NB In professional snooker matches, it is normal for the audience to applaud when a player reaches a century (surpasses 100) so this would certainly happen in your case.




                  Addendum




                  As pointed out by celtschk, the author may not be able to enjoy the performance due to blindness or some other visual impairment.

                  To clarify about the rules of snooker, when a player comes to the table the aim is to pot a red ball, worth 1 point, followed by a ball of any other colour (yellow=2, green=3, brown=4, blue=5, pink=6, black=7) and proceed alternately in that fashion. Red balls are not replaced when potted, while the others are. Once all 15 reds have been potted, the aim is to pot all the other colours in increasing order of value. On this occasion, they are not replaced once potted. Thanks to zakinster and bornfromanegg for addressing this.








                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 10 at 0:35

























                  answered Jan 9 at 12:21









                  hexominohexomino

                  39.2k3114184




                  39.2k3114184








                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    Could you clarify the link between the 1 and 7 alternate increments observed and the content of your answer for someone not familiar with the field? I think I get it but it but I'm not sure and I'm too lazy to check Wikipedia.
                    $endgroup$
                    – zakinster
                    Jan 9 at 15:29






                  • 8




                    $begingroup$
                    The rules of snooker are such that you must pot alternately red balls and balls of another colour, starting with a red. Coloured balls are replaced on the table when they are potted, red balls are not. The player potted red, black, red, black, red, black, and so on, until all the reds were potted. The red is worth 1 point, and the coloured balls potted in this case were all blacks, worth 7 points each, hence the number sequence (the current score). Having potted the final red, and one more black, the rules state that the next ball you pot must be the yellow, which is worth 2 points.
                    $endgroup$
                    – bornfromanegg
                    Jan 9 at 15:48












                  • $begingroup$
                    Yup, this is correct. Nice work!
                    $endgroup$
                    – jafe
                    Jan 10 at 13:00






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    As for the impairement, I would suggest that if you're there with "Dad", then you might be one of the youngest -- and potentially shortest -- people there.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Admiral Jota
                    Jan 10 at 14:28






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @AdmiralJota, this could be, but the crucible has some pretty steep seating, at least compared to a lot of venues, so shortness might not impair their ability to see, there is also lots of screens above the table to watch, and we all know kids hate watching stuff on a TV...
                    $endgroup$
                    – Blade Wraith
                    Jan 10 at 15:01














                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    Could you clarify the link between the 1 and 7 alternate increments observed and the content of your answer for someone not familiar with the field? I think I get it but it but I'm not sure and I'm too lazy to check Wikipedia.
                    $endgroup$
                    – zakinster
                    Jan 9 at 15:29






                  • 8




                    $begingroup$
                    The rules of snooker are such that you must pot alternately red balls and balls of another colour, starting with a red. Coloured balls are replaced on the table when they are potted, red balls are not. The player potted red, black, red, black, red, black, and so on, until all the reds were potted. The red is worth 1 point, and the coloured balls potted in this case were all blacks, worth 7 points each, hence the number sequence (the current score). Having potted the final red, and one more black, the rules state that the next ball you pot must be the yellow, which is worth 2 points.
                    $endgroup$
                    – bornfromanegg
                    Jan 9 at 15:48












                  • $begingroup$
                    Yup, this is correct. Nice work!
                    $endgroup$
                    – jafe
                    Jan 10 at 13:00






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    As for the impairement, I would suggest that if you're there with "Dad", then you might be one of the youngest -- and potentially shortest -- people there.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Admiral Jota
                    Jan 10 at 14:28






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @AdmiralJota, this could be, but the crucible has some pretty steep seating, at least compared to a lot of venues, so shortness might not impair their ability to see, there is also lots of screens above the table to watch, and we all know kids hate watching stuff on a TV...
                    $endgroup$
                    – Blade Wraith
                    Jan 10 at 15:01








                  2




                  2




                  $begingroup$
                  Could you clarify the link between the 1 and 7 alternate increments observed and the content of your answer for someone not familiar with the field? I think I get it but it but I'm not sure and I'm too lazy to check Wikipedia.
                  $endgroup$
                  – zakinster
                  Jan 9 at 15:29




                  $begingroup$
                  Could you clarify the link between the 1 and 7 alternate increments observed and the content of your answer for someone not familiar with the field? I think I get it but it but I'm not sure and I'm too lazy to check Wikipedia.
                  $endgroup$
                  – zakinster
                  Jan 9 at 15:29




                  8




                  8




                  $begingroup$
                  The rules of snooker are such that you must pot alternately red balls and balls of another colour, starting with a red. Coloured balls are replaced on the table when they are potted, red balls are not. The player potted red, black, red, black, red, black, and so on, until all the reds were potted. The red is worth 1 point, and the coloured balls potted in this case were all blacks, worth 7 points each, hence the number sequence (the current score). Having potted the final red, and one more black, the rules state that the next ball you pot must be the yellow, which is worth 2 points.
                  $endgroup$
                  – bornfromanegg
                  Jan 9 at 15:48






                  $begingroup$
                  The rules of snooker are such that you must pot alternately red balls and balls of another colour, starting with a red. Coloured balls are replaced on the table when they are potted, red balls are not. The player potted red, black, red, black, red, black, and so on, until all the reds were potted. The red is worth 1 point, and the coloured balls potted in this case were all blacks, worth 7 points each, hence the number sequence (the current score). Having potted the final red, and one more black, the rules state that the next ball you pot must be the yellow, which is worth 2 points.
                  $endgroup$
                  – bornfromanegg
                  Jan 9 at 15:48














                  $begingroup$
                  Yup, this is correct. Nice work!
                  $endgroup$
                  – jafe
                  Jan 10 at 13:00




                  $begingroup$
                  Yup, this is correct. Nice work!
                  $endgroup$
                  – jafe
                  Jan 10 at 13:00




                  1




                  1




                  $begingroup$
                  As for the impairement, I would suggest that if you're there with "Dad", then you might be one of the youngest -- and potentially shortest -- people there.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Admiral Jota
                  Jan 10 at 14:28




                  $begingroup$
                  As for the impairement, I would suggest that if you're there with "Dad", then you might be one of the youngest -- and potentially shortest -- people there.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Admiral Jota
                  Jan 10 at 14:28




                  1




                  1




                  $begingroup$
                  @AdmiralJota, this could be, but the crucible has some pretty steep seating, at least compared to a lot of venues, so shortness might not impair their ability to see, there is also lots of screens above the table to watch, and we all know kids hate watching stuff on a TV...
                  $endgroup$
                  – Blade Wraith
                  Jan 10 at 15:01




                  $begingroup$
                  @AdmiralJota, this could be, but the crucible has some pretty steep seating, at least compared to a lot of venues, so shortness might not impair their ability to see, there is also lots of screens above the table to watch, and we all know kids hate watching stuff on a TV...
                  $endgroup$
                  – Blade Wraith
                  Jan 10 at 15:01











                  22












                  $begingroup$

                  To address the one part that hexomino didn't already answer:




                  Why do you think I'm not able to enjoy the performance like everyone else?




                  My answer would be:




                  You're blind.




                  This is hinted at by the fact that




                  while acoustic observations (like everyone being quiet) are given, no optical impressions are, which is atypical for someone able to see. The fact that you are unsure about the location may also be a hint. And finally, it explains why you didn't see the table.







                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$









                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    (dang, I should have googled before fixing. The word untypical really bothered me.... until i just googled to learn it is actually a word. Sorry.)
                    $endgroup$
                    – kaine
                    Jan 9 at 16:47






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    Or alternatively, since there is mention of a dad in the story, the child could be too small to see what's happening.
                    $endgroup$
                    – rybo111
                    Jan 9 at 17:03










                  • $begingroup$
                    Maybe he couldn't see the table because a big guy sat in front of him? Just that part would have other explanations.
                    $endgroup$
                    – findusl
                    Jan 9 at 18:45






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    What kind of a cruel father takes his blind son to watch a snooker match, and doesn't even explain what's happening? =/
                    $endgroup$
                    – Adrian Petrescu
                    Jan 11 at 13:54










                  • $begingroup$
                    How does a blind person know that "Some guy is performing on the stage" when they cannot see the stage?
                    $endgroup$
                    – hkBst
                    Jan 13 at 11:24
















                  22












                  $begingroup$

                  To address the one part that hexomino didn't already answer:




                  Why do you think I'm not able to enjoy the performance like everyone else?




                  My answer would be:




                  You're blind.




                  This is hinted at by the fact that




                  while acoustic observations (like everyone being quiet) are given, no optical impressions are, which is atypical for someone able to see. The fact that you are unsure about the location may also be a hint. And finally, it explains why you didn't see the table.







                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$









                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    (dang, I should have googled before fixing. The word untypical really bothered me.... until i just googled to learn it is actually a word. Sorry.)
                    $endgroup$
                    – kaine
                    Jan 9 at 16:47






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    Or alternatively, since there is mention of a dad in the story, the child could be too small to see what's happening.
                    $endgroup$
                    – rybo111
                    Jan 9 at 17:03










                  • $begingroup$
                    Maybe he couldn't see the table because a big guy sat in front of him? Just that part would have other explanations.
                    $endgroup$
                    – findusl
                    Jan 9 at 18:45






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    What kind of a cruel father takes his blind son to watch a snooker match, and doesn't even explain what's happening? =/
                    $endgroup$
                    – Adrian Petrescu
                    Jan 11 at 13:54










                  • $begingroup$
                    How does a blind person know that "Some guy is performing on the stage" when they cannot see the stage?
                    $endgroup$
                    – hkBst
                    Jan 13 at 11:24














                  22












                  22








                  22





                  $begingroup$

                  To address the one part that hexomino didn't already answer:




                  Why do you think I'm not able to enjoy the performance like everyone else?




                  My answer would be:




                  You're blind.




                  This is hinted at by the fact that




                  while acoustic observations (like everyone being quiet) are given, no optical impressions are, which is atypical for someone able to see. The fact that you are unsure about the location may also be a hint. And finally, it explains why you didn't see the table.







                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  To address the one part that hexomino didn't already answer:




                  Why do you think I'm not able to enjoy the performance like everyone else?




                  My answer would be:




                  You're blind.




                  This is hinted at by the fact that




                  while acoustic observations (like everyone being quiet) are given, no optical impressions are, which is atypical for someone able to see. The fact that you are unsure about the location may also be a hint. And finally, it explains why you didn't see the table.








                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 9 at 21:21

























                  answered Jan 9 at 14:19









                  celtschkceltschk

                  2,018323




                  2,018323








                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    (dang, I should have googled before fixing. The word untypical really bothered me.... until i just googled to learn it is actually a word. Sorry.)
                    $endgroup$
                    – kaine
                    Jan 9 at 16:47






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    Or alternatively, since there is mention of a dad in the story, the child could be too small to see what's happening.
                    $endgroup$
                    – rybo111
                    Jan 9 at 17:03










                  • $begingroup$
                    Maybe he couldn't see the table because a big guy sat in front of him? Just that part would have other explanations.
                    $endgroup$
                    – findusl
                    Jan 9 at 18:45






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    What kind of a cruel father takes his blind son to watch a snooker match, and doesn't even explain what's happening? =/
                    $endgroup$
                    – Adrian Petrescu
                    Jan 11 at 13:54










                  • $begingroup$
                    How does a blind person know that "Some guy is performing on the stage" when they cannot see the stage?
                    $endgroup$
                    – hkBst
                    Jan 13 at 11:24














                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    (dang, I should have googled before fixing. The word untypical really bothered me.... until i just googled to learn it is actually a word. Sorry.)
                    $endgroup$
                    – kaine
                    Jan 9 at 16:47






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    Or alternatively, since there is mention of a dad in the story, the child could be too small to see what's happening.
                    $endgroup$
                    – rybo111
                    Jan 9 at 17:03










                  • $begingroup$
                    Maybe he couldn't see the table because a big guy sat in front of him? Just that part would have other explanations.
                    $endgroup$
                    – findusl
                    Jan 9 at 18:45






                  • 3




                    $begingroup$
                    What kind of a cruel father takes his blind son to watch a snooker match, and doesn't even explain what's happening? =/
                    $endgroup$
                    – Adrian Petrescu
                    Jan 11 at 13:54










                  • $begingroup$
                    How does a blind person know that "Some guy is performing on the stage" when they cannot see the stage?
                    $endgroup$
                    – hkBst
                    Jan 13 at 11:24








                  1




                  1




                  $begingroup$
                  (dang, I should have googled before fixing. The word untypical really bothered me.... until i just googled to learn it is actually a word. Sorry.)
                  $endgroup$
                  – kaine
                  Jan 9 at 16:47




                  $begingroup$
                  (dang, I should have googled before fixing. The word untypical really bothered me.... until i just googled to learn it is actually a word. Sorry.)
                  $endgroup$
                  – kaine
                  Jan 9 at 16:47




                  3




                  3




                  $begingroup$
                  Or alternatively, since there is mention of a dad in the story, the child could be too small to see what's happening.
                  $endgroup$
                  – rybo111
                  Jan 9 at 17:03




                  $begingroup$
                  Or alternatively, since there is mention of a dad in the story, the child could be too small to see what's happening.
                  $endgroup$
                  – rybo111
                  Jan 9 at 17:03












                  $begingroup$
                  Maybe he couldn't see the table because a big guy sat in front of him? Just that part would have other explanations.
                  $endgroup$
                  – findusl
                  Jan 9 at 18:45




                  $begingroup$
                  Maybe he couldn't see the table because a big guy sat in front of him? Just that part would have other explanations.
                  $endgroup$
                  – findusl
                  Jan 9 at 18:45




                  3




                  3




                  $begingroup$
                  What kind of a cruel father takes his blind son to watch a snooker match, and doesn't even explain what's happening? =/
                  $endgroup$
                  – Adrian Petrescu
                  Jan 11 at 13:54




                  $begingroup$
                  What kind of a cruel father takes his blind son to watch a snooker match, and doesn't even explain what's happening? =/
                  $endgroup$
                  – Adrian Petrescu
                  Jan 11 at 13:54












                  $begingroup$
                  How does a blind person know that "Some guy is performing on the stage" when they cannot see the stage?
                  $endgroup$
                  – hkBst
                  Jan 13 at 11:24




                  $begingroup$
                  How does a blind person know that "Some guy is performing on the stage" when they cannot see the stage?
                  $endgroup$
                  – hkBst
                  Jan 13 at 11:24











                  13












                  $begingroup$

                  You are not able to enjoy the performance because




                  you are blind, all of the descriptions are of sounds, not sights







                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$


















                    13












                    $begingroup$

                    You are not able to enjoy the performance because




                    you are blind, all of the descriptions are of sounds, not sights







                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$
















                      13












                      13








                      13





                      $begingroup$

                      You are not able to enjoy the performance because




                      you are blind, all of the descriptions are of sounds, not sights







                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      You are not able to enjoy the performance because




                      you are blind, all of the descriptions are of sounds, not sights








                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Jan 9 at 14:18









                      user3067860user3067860

                      23114




                      23114























                          5












                          $begingroup$

                          Just a small nuance / addendum to the already good solutions posted so far.



                          You're potentially




                          Watch... errr... hearing a perfect snooker frame.
                          So far the player has been potting, alternately, a red ball (worth 1 point) and the black ball (worth 7). Instead of black, the player could have potted a ball worth less points, but then she would not be going for the perfect game.




                          If all goes well,




                          the player, after cleaning the red balls off the table, will be potting the other balls in order, from lowest value (yellow) to highest (black).




                          Therefore, the full sequence is:




                          122, 125, 129, 134, 140, 147







                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$


















                            5












                            $begingroup$

                            Just a small nuance / addendum to the already good solutions posted so far.



                            You're potentially




                            Watch... errr... hearing a perfect snooker frame.
                            So far the player has been potting, alternately, a red ball (worth 1 point) and the black ball (worth 7). Instead of black, the player could have potted a ball worth less points, but then she would not be going for the perfect game.




                            If all goes well,




                            the player, after cleaning the red balls off the table, will be potting the other balls in order, from lowest value (yellow) to highest (black).




                            Therefore, the full sequence is:




                            122, 125, 129, 134, 140, 147







                            share|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$
















                              5












                              5








                              5





                              $begingroup$

                              Just a small nuance / addendum to the already good solutions posted so far.



                              You're potentially




                              Watch... errr... hearing a perfect snooker frame.
                              So far the player has been potting, alternately, a red ball (worth 1 point) and the black ball (worth 7). Instead of black, the player could have potted a ball worth less points, but then she would not be going for the perfect game.




                              If all goes well,




                              the player, after cleaning the red balls off the table, will be potting the other balls in order, from lowest value (yellow) to highest (black).




                              Therefore, the full sequence is:




                              122, 125, 129, 134, 140, 147







                              share|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$



                              Just a small nuance / addendum to the already good solutions posted so far.



                              You're potentially




                              Watch... errr... hearing a perfect snooker frame.
                              So far the player has been potting, alternately, a red ball (worth 1 point) and the black ball (worth 7). Instead of black, the player could have potted a ball worth less points, but then she would not be going for the perfect game.




                              If all goes well,




                              the player, after cleaning the red balls off the table, will be potting the other balls in order, from lowest value (yellow) to highest (black).




                              Therefore, the full sequence is:




                              122, 125, 129, 134, 140, 147








                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited Jan 10 at 14:44

























                              answered Jan 10 at 12:03









                              legrojanlegrojan

                              1614




                              1614























                                  3












                                  $begingroup$

                                  In addition to everything else...




                                  There is a clue in the line "Where is this place, anyway? Yorkshire or something?" As the most famous place to play snooker is The Crucible which is in Sheffield, Yorkshire.







                                  share|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$


















                                    3












                                    $begingroup$

                                    In addition to everything else...




                                    There is a clue in the line "Where is this place, anyway? Yorkshire or something?" As the most famous place to play snooker is The Crucible which is in Sheffield, Yorkshire.







                                    share|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$
















                                      3












                                      3








                                      3





                                      $begingroup$

                                      In addition to everything else...




                                      There is a clue in the line "Where is this place, anyway? Yorkshire or something?" As the most famous place to play snooker is The Crucible which is in Sheffield, Yorkshire.







                                      share|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$



                                      In addition to everything else...




                                      There is a clue in the line "Where is this place, anyway? Yorkshire or something?" As the most famous place to play snooker is The Crucible which is in Sheffield, Yorkshire.








                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered Jan 9 at 16:54









                                      AHKieranAHKieran

                                      5,0081040




                                      5,0081040























                                          3












                                          $begingroup$

                                          As Mentioned previously:




                                          You are at a snooker match and hear the commentator call out a perfect snooker frame.




                                          Possible answer to why you were unable to enjoy the performance like everyone else was because:




                                          At the crucible they sometimes have two matches played on stage at the same time, separated by a screen. If you are sat on one side of the stage and nothing was being played on your half, but a game was being played on the other half, you would only here the commentary for that game. The referee would be sometimes visible from some seats on the side that the child is sat as the screen does not go the full length of the stage. Hence why you could not see what was going on.







                                          share|improve this answer









                                          $endgroup$


















                                            3












                                            $begingroup$

                                            As Mentioned previously:




                                            You are at a snooker match and hear the commentator call out a perfect snooker frame.




                                            Possible answer to why you were unable to enjoy the performance like everyone else was because:




                                            At the crucible they sometimes have two matches played on stage at the same time, separated by a screen. If you are sat on one side of the stage and nothing was being played on your half, but a game was being played on the other half, you would only here the commentary for that game. The referee would be sometimes visible from some seats on the side that the child is sat as the screen does not go the full length of the stage. Hence why you could not see what was going on.







                                            share|improve this answer









                                            $endgroup$
















                                              3












                                              3








                                              3





                                              $begingroup$

                                              As Mentioned previously:




                                              You are at a snooker match and hear the commentator call out a perfect snooker frame.




                                              Possible answer to why you were unable to enjoy the performance like everyone else was because:




                                              At the crucible they sometimes have two matches played on stage at the same time, separated by a screen. If you are sat on one side of the stage and nothing was being played on your half, but a game was being played on the other half, you would only here the commentary for that game. The referee would be sometimes visible from some seats on the side that the child is sat as the screen does not go the full length of the stage. Hence why you could not see what was going on.







                                              share|improve this answer









                                              $endgroup$



                                              As Mentioned previously:




                                              You are at a snooker match and hear the commentator call out a perfect snooker frame.




                                              Possible answer to why you were unable to enjoy the performance like everyone else was because:




                                              At the crucible they sometimes have two matches played on stage at the same time, separated by a screen. If you are sat on one side of the stage and nothing was being played on your half, but a game was being played on the other half, you would only here the commentary for that game. The referee would be sometimes visible from some seats on the side that the child is sat as the screen does not go the full length of the stage. Hence why you could not see what was going on.








                                              share|improve this answer












                                              share|improve this answer



                                              share|improve this answer










                                              answered Jan 10 at 14:49









                                              52024565202456

                                              35711




                                              35711























                                                  3












                                                  $begingroup$

                                                  The equation is:




                                                  floor(n ÷ 2) x 8 + n % 2




                                                  So the next six numbers will be:




                                                  121, 128, 129, 136, 137 and 144







                                                  share|improve this answer











                                                  $endgroup$









                                                  • 16




                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    but it wasn't....
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
                                                    Jan 10 at 3:06






                                                  • 4




                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    Nice to have an explanation for the whispered 121 though.
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Justin
                                                    Jan 10 at 19:40










                                                  • $begingroup$
                                                    129 is missing from your list.
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – hkBst
                                                    Jan 13 at 11:21
















                                                  3












                                                  $begingroup$

                                                  The equation is:




                                                  floor(n ÷ 2) x 8 + n % 2




                                                  So the next six numbers will be:




                                                  121, 128, 129, 136, 137 and 144







                                                  share|improve this answer











                                                  $endgroup$









                                                  • 16




                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    but it wasn't....
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
                                                    Jan 10 at 3:06






                                                  • 4




                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    Nice to have an explanation for the whispered 121 though.
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Justin
                                                    Jan 10 at 19:40










                                                  • $begingroup$
                                                    129 is missing from your list.
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – hkBst
                                                    Jan 13 at 11:21














                                                  3












                                                  3








                                                  3





                                                  $begingroup$

                                                  The equation is:




                                                  floor(n ÷ 2) x 8 + n % 2




                                                  So the next six numbers will be:




                                                  121, 128, 129, 136, 137 and 144







                                                  share|improve this answer











                                                  $endgroup$



                                                  The equation is:




                                                  floor(n ÷ 2) x 8 + n % 2




                                                  So the next six numbers will be:




                                                  121, 128, 129, 136, 137 and 144








                                                  share|improve this answer














                                                  share|improve this answer



                                                  share|improve this answer








                                                  edited Jan 14 at 4:39

























                                                  answered Jan 10 at 0:37









                                                  SpeedySpeedy

                                                  392




                                                  392








                                                  • 16




                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    but it wasn't....
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
                                                    Jan 10 at 3:06






                                                  • 4




                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    Nice to have an explanation for the whispered 121 though.
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Justin
                                                    Jan 10 at 19:40










                                                  • $begingroup$
                                                    129 is missing from your list.
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – hkBst
                                                    Jan 13 at 11:21














                                                  • 16




                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    but it wasn't....
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
                                                    Jan 10 at 3:06






                                                  • 4




                                                    $begingroup$
                                                    Nice to have an explanation for the whispered 121 though.
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – Justin
                                                    Jan 10 at 19:40










                                                  • $begingroup$
                                                    129 is missing from your list.
                                                    $endgroup$
                                                    – hkBst
                                                    Jan 13 at 11:21








                                                  16




                                                  16




                                                  $begingroup$
                                                  but it wasn't....
                                                  $endgroup$
                                                  – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
                                                  Jan 10 at 3:06




                                                  $begingroup$
                                                  but it wasn't....
                                                  $endgroup$
                                                  – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
                                                  Jan 10 at 3:06




                                                  4




                                                  4




                                                  $begingroup$
                                                  Nice to have an explanation for the whispered 121 though.
                                                  $endgroup$
                                                  – Justin
                                                  Jan 10 at 19:40




                                                  $begingroup$
                                                  Nice to have an explanation for the whispered 121 though.
                                                  $endgroup$
                                                  – Justin
                                                  Jan 10 at 19:40












                                                  $begingroup$
                                                  129 is missing from your list.
                                                  $endgroup$
                                                  – hkBst
                                                  Jan 13 at 11:21




                                                  $begingroup$
                                                  129 is missing from your list.
                                                  $endgroup$
                                                  – hkBst
                                                  Jan 13 at 11:21


















                                                  draft saved

                                                  draft discarded




















































                                                  Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


                                                  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                  But avoid



                                                  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                                  Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                  To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                  draft saved


                                                  draft discarded














                                                  StackExchange.ready(
                                                  function () {
                                                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78260%2fthanks-dad-never-again%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                                  }
                                                  );

                                                  Post as a guest















                                                  Required, but never shown





















































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown

































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Popular posts from this blog

                                                  MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                                                  How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                                                  in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith