All the derivatives of distributions are also distributions, but what about the converse?












1












$begingroup$


Say you have some linear functional $f$ well defined on $mathscr{D}(mathbb{R})$: then what if for some test function
$phi$ you have
$$
-f(phi') = g(phi)?
$$



If that $g$ defines a distribution, can you say that $f$ is also a distribution?



It would help me solve so many problems much faster.



Intuitvely I'd say yes, because if $g$ is a distribution then we have that $f(phi'')$ is also a 'distribution' (meaning if every test function could be written as the second derivative of a test function then $f$ would be a distribution)
which I'm not very sure of, main reason I came here to post this question.



Comment, clarification and counter examples will all be greatly appreciated. thanks!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Let $I(phi)(x) = int_{-infty}^x phi(y)dy$ and $langle G, phi rangle = -langle g, I(phi) - I(phi)(infty) psi rangle $ where $psi in C^infty, psi(x) =0 (x < -1), psi(x) = 1 (x > 1)$. Is $G$ a distribution, what is its derivative ?
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 28 at 20:27


















1












$begingroup$


Say you have some linear functional $f$ well defined on $mathscr{D}(mathbb{R})$: then what if for some test function
$phi$ you have
$$
-f(phi') = g(phi)?
$$



If that $g$ defines a distribution, can you say that $f$ is also a distribution?



It would help me solve so many problems much faster.



Intuitvely I'd say yes, because if $g$ is a distribution then we have that $f(phi'')$ is also a 'distribution' (meaning if every test function could be written as the second derivative of a test function then $f$ would be a distribution)
which I'm not very sure of, main reason I came here to post this question.



Comment, clarification and counter examples will all be greatly appreciated. thanks!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Let $I(phi)(x) = int_{-infty}^x phi(y)dy$ and $langle G, phi rangle = -langle g, I(phi) - I(phi)(infty) psi rangle $ where $psi in C^infty, psi(x) =0 (x < -1), psi(x) = 1 (x > 1)$. Is $G$ a distribution, what is its derivative ?
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 28 at 20:27
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


Say you have some linear functional $f$ well defined on $mathscr{D}(mathbb{R})$: then what if for some test function
$phi$ you have
$$
-f(phi') = g(phi)?
$$



If that $g$ defines a distribution, can you say that $f$ is also a distribution?



It would help me solve so many problems much faster.



Intuitvely I'd say yes, because if $g$ is a distribution then we have that $f(phi'')$ is also a 'distribution' (meaning if every test function could be written as the second derivative of a test function then $f$ would be a distribution)
which I'm not very sure of, main reason I came here to post this question.



Comment, clarification and counter examples will all be greatly appreciated. thanks!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Say you have some linear functional $f$ well defined on $mathscr{D}(mathbb{R})$: then what if for some test function
$phi$ you have
$$
-f(phi') = g(phi)?
$$



If that $g$ defines a distribution, can you say that $f$ is also a distribution?



It would help me solve so many problems much faster.



Intuitvely I'd say yes, because if $g$ is a distribution then we have that $f(phi'')$ is also a 'distribution' (meaning if every test function could be written as the second derivative of a test function then $f$ would be a distribution)
which I'm not very sure of, main reason I came here to post this question.



Comment, clarification and counter examples will all be greatly appreciated. thanks!







functional-analysis soft-question distribution-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 29 at 16:15









Daniele Tampieri

2,58721022




2,58721022










asked Jan 28 at 18:30









rapidracimrapidracim

1,7291419




1,7291419








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Let $I(phi)(x) = int_{-infty}^x phi(y)dy$ and $langle G, phi rangle = -langle g, I(phi) - I(phi)(infty) psi rangle $ where $psi in C^infty, psi(x) =0 (x < -1), psi(x) = 1 (x > 1)$. Is $G$ a distribution, what is its derivative ?
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 28 at 20:27
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Let $I(phi)(x) = int_{-infty}^x phi(y)dy$ and $langle G, phi rangle = -langle g, I(phi) - I(phi)(infty) psi rangle $ where $psi in C^infty, psi(x) =0 (x < -1), psi(x) = 1 (x > 1)$. Is $G$ a distribution, what is its derivative ?
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 28 at 20:27










1




1




$begingroup$
Let $I(phi)(x) = int_{-infty}^x phi(y)dy$ and $langle G, phi rangle = -langle g, I(phi) - I(phi)(infty) psi rangle $ where $psi in C^infty, psi(x) =0 (x < -1), psi(x) = 1 (x > 1)$. Is $G$ a distribution, what is its derivative ?
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 28 at 20:27






$begingroup$
Let $I(phi)(x) = int_{-infty}^x phi(y)dy$ and $langle G, phi rangle = -langle g, I(phi) - I(phi)(infty) psi rangle $ where $psi in C^infty, psi(x) =0 (x < -1), psi(x) = 1 (x > 1)$. Is $G$ a distribution, what is its derivative ?
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 28 at 20:27












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$


The answer to the question you are asking is yes: it is a standard property of distributions of one variable.




Precisely, the following theorem is a standard fact of the general theory of distributions:
Theorem ([1], §1.5.3. pp. 26-27) Equation eqref{1}
$$
f^prime=glabel{1}tag{1}
$$

has a solution $finmathscr{D}^prime$ for all distributions $ginmathscr{D}^prime$.
Sketch of proof. We have that eqref{1} is equivalent to the following equation
$$
(f,-varphi^prime)=(f^prime,varphi)=(g,varphi)=Bigg( g,intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi^prime(y),mathrm{d}y Bigg)quad forallvarphiinmathscr{D}(Bbb R).
$$

Thus the functional $f$ is already defined on any test function $varphi$ which is the derivative of some other test functions: now define
$$
varphi_o(x)=varphi(x)-omega(x)intlimits_{-infty}^{+infty}varphi(x),mathrm{d}x quad forall varphiinmathscr{D}(Bbb R),label{p}tag{P}
$$

where $omega(x)$ is an arbitrary test function such that
$$
intlimits_{-infty}^{+infty}omega(x),mathrm{d}x=1.
$$

It can be proved that $varphi_o$ is a test function which is the derivative of another test function, and that if we choose a sequence ${varphi_nu}_{nuinBbb N}$ covering to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$, then the sequence ${varphi_{onu}}_{nuinBbb N}$ associated to it by the projection eqref{p} converges to to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$.
Now, defining the antiderivative functional $g^{(-1)}$ as
$$
big(,g^{(-1)},varphibig)=-Bigg( g,intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_o(y),mathrm{d}y Bigg)quad forallvarphiinmathscr{D}(Bbb R),label{a}tag{A}
$$

the linearity of such functional is an immediate consequence of the linearity of the integral and of the distribution $g$. The continuity follows from the continuity of the map
$$
varphi(x)mapstointlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_o(y),mathrm{d}y.
$$

Precisely, as said above, for any sequence of test functions ${varphi_nu}_{nuinBbb N}$ converging to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$ the sequence ${varphi_{onu}}_{nuinBbb N}$ converges to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$ therefore
$$
begin{split}
varphi_{onu}underset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0 ; &implies intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_{onu}(y),mathrm{d}yunderset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0 \
frac{mathrm{d}^kvarphi_{onu}}{mathrm{d}x^k}underset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0 ; &implies frac{mathrm{d}^k}{mathrm{d}x^k}intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_{onu}(y),mathrm{d}y=frac{mathrm{d}^{k-1}varphi_{onu}}{mathrm{d}x^{k-1}}underset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0quad kinBbb N
end{split}text{in }mathscr{D}(Bbb R)
$$

thus $Big{intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_{onu}(y),mathrm{d}yBig}_{nuinBbb N}$ is a sequence of functions in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$ coverging to $0$ in of $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$.
This implies that the antiderivative eqref{a} of a a distribution is a distribution: then
$$
f=g^{(-1)} +C label{2}tag{2}
$$

where $C$ is an arbitrary constant is the sought for primitive of $f$. $blacksquare$



Notes




  • The development offered above is only a sketch of the standard proof offered by Shilov, since the rigorous proof justifying all steps, particularly the properties of $varphi_o(x)$, while entirely elementary, is nevertheless not too short.

  • Vladimirov ([1], §2.2 pp. 27-29) offers a similar proof of the solvability of eqref{1} in $mathscr{D}^prime$: he works in $mathscr{D}^primebig(]a,b[big)$ for arbitrary $a,binoverline{Bbb R}$ with $a<b$ (i.e. including $a=-infty$ and $b=+infty$).

  • Erik Talvila used the solution of eqref{1} to define a generalized integral which is more general of the ones o Henstock and Kurzweil. Recently also Ricardo Estrada and Jasson Vindas proposed a definition of distributional integral based on a similar concept.


[1] G. E. Shilov (1968), Generalized functions and partial differential equations, Mathematics and Its Applications, Vol. 7, (English)
New York-London-Paris: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, XII+345, MR0230129, Zbl 0177.36302.



[2] V. S. Vladimirov (2002), Methods of the theory of generalized functions, Analytical Methods and Special Functions, Vol. 6, London–New York: Taylor & Francis, pp. XII+353, ISBN 0-415-27356-0, MR2012831, Zbl 1078.46029.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You meant $varphi mapsto int_{-infty}^. varphi_o(y)dy$ is continuous in the $C^infty_c(mathbb{R})$ topology, not only $varphi mapsto varphi_o$, this is what makes $varphi mapsto langle g,int_{-infty}^. varphi_o(y)dy rangle$ a distribution
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 28 at 23:38












  • $begingroup$
    @reuns. Exactly: I added a section on this to my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniele Tampieri
    Jan 29 at 9:53










  • $begingroup$
    @reuns. I also apologize for not noting your comment to the question. Probably I started editing my answer, then had lunch and finished answering later, without refreshing the post.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniele Tampieri
    Jan 29 at 10:22












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3091223%2fall-the-derivatives-of-distributions-are-also-distributions-but-what-about-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$


The answer to the question you are asking is yes: it is a standard property of distributions of one variable.




Precisely, the following theorem is a standard fact of the general theory of distributions:
Theorem ([1], §1.5.3. pp. 26-27) Equation eqref{1}
$$
f^prime=glabel{1}tag{1}
$$

has a solution $finmathscr{D}^prime$ for all distributions $ginmathscr{D}^prime$.
Sketch of proof. We have that eqref{1} is equivalent to the following equation
$$
(f,-varphi^prime)=(f^prime,varphi)=(g,varphi)=Bigg( g,intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi^prime(y),mathrm{d}y Bigg)quad forallvarphiinmathscr{D}(Bbb R).
$$

Thus the functional $f$ is already defined on any test function $varphi$ which is the derivative of some other test functions: now define
$$
varphi_o(x)=varphi(x)-omega(x)intlimits_{-infty}^{+infty}varphi(x),mathrm{d}x quad forall varphiinmathscr{D}(Bbb R),label{p}tag{P}
$$

where $omega(x)$ is an arbitrary test function such that
$$
intlimits_{-infty}^{+infty}omega(x),mathrm{d}x=1.
$$

It can be proved that $varphi_o$ is a test function which is the derivative of another test function, and that if we choose a sequence ${varphi_nu}_{nuinBbb N}$ covering to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$, then the sequence ${varphi_{onu}}_{nuinBbb N}$ associated to it by the projection eqref{p} converges to to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$.
Now, defining the antiderivative functional $g^{(-1)}$ as
$$
big(,g^{(-1)},varphibig)=-Bigg( g,intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_o(y),mathrm{d}y Bigg)quad forallvarphiinmathscr{D}(Bbb R),label{a}tag{A}
$$

the linearity of such functional is an immediate consequence of the linearity of the integral and of the distribution $g$. The continuity follows from the continuity of the map
$$
varphi(x)mapstointlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_o(y),mathrm{d}y.
$$

Precisely, as said above, for any sequence of test functions ${varphi_nu}_{nuinBbb N}$ converging to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$ the sequence ${varphi_{onu}}_{nuinBbb N}$ converges to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$ therefore
$$
begin{split}
varphi_{onu}underset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0 ; &implies intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_{onu}(y),mathrm{d}yunderset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0 \
frac{mathrm{d}^kvarphi_{onu}}{mathrm{d}x^k}underset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0 ; &implies frac{mathrm{d}^k}{mathrm{d}x^k}intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_{onu}(y),mathrm{d}y=frac{mathrm{d}^{k-1}varphi_{onu}}{mathrm{d}x^{k-1}}underset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0quad kinBbb N
end{split}text{in }mathscr{D}(Bbb R)
$$

thus $Big{intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_{onu}(y),mathrm{d}yBig}_{nuinBbb N}$ is a sequence of functions in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$ coverging to $0$ in of $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$.
This implies that the antiderivative eqref{a} of a a distribution is a distribution: then
$$
f=g^{(-1)} +C label{2}tag{2}
$$

where $C$ is an arbitrary constant is the sought for primitive of $f$. $blacksquare$



Notes




  • The development offered above is only a sketch of the standard proof offered by Shilov, since the rigorous proof justifying all steps, particularly the properties of $varphi_o(x)$, while entirely elementary, is nevertheless not too short.

  • Vladimirov ([1], §2.2 pp. 27-29) offers a similar proof of the solvability of eqref{1} in $mathscr{D}^prime$: he works in $mathscr{D}^primebig(]a,b[big)$ for arbitrary $a,binoverline{Bbb R}$ with $a<b$ (i.e. including $a=-infty$ and $b=+infty$).

  • Erik Talvila used the solution of eqref{1} to define a generalized integral which is more general of the ones o Henstock and Kurzweil. Recently also Ricardo Estrada and Jasson Vindas proposed a definition of distributional integral based on a similar concept.


[1] G. E. Shilov (1968), Generalized functions and partial differential equations, Mathematics and Its Applications, Vol. 7, (English)
New York-London-Paris: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, XII+345, MR0230129, Zbl 0177.36302.



[2] V. S. Vladimirov (2002), Methods of the theory of generalized functions, Analytical Methods and Special Functions, Vol. 6, London–New York: Taylor & Francis, pp. XII+353, ISBN 0-415-27356-0, MR2012831, Zbl 1078.46029.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You meant $varphi mapsto int_{-infty}^. varphi_o(y)dy$ is continuous in the $C^infty_c(mathbb{R})$ topology, not only $varphi mapsto varphi_o$, this is what makes $varphi mapsto langle g,int_{-infty}^. varphi_o(y)dy rangle$ a distribution
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 28 at 23:38












  • $begingroup$
    @reuns. Exactly: I added a section on this to my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniele Tampieri
    Jan 29 at 9:53










  • $begingroup$
    @reuns. I also apologize for not noting your comment to the question. Probably I started editing my answer, then had lunch and finished answering later, without refreshing the post.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniele Tampieri
    Jan 29 at 10:22
















2












$begingroup$


The answer to the question you are asking is yes: it is a standard property of distributions of one variable.




Precisely, the following theorem is a standard fact of the general theory of distributions:
Theorem ([1], §1.5.3. pp. 26-27) Equation eqref{1}
$$
f^prime=glabel{1}tag{1}
$$

has a solution $finmathscr{D}^prime$ for all distributions $ginmathscr{D}^prime$.
Sketch of proof. We have that eqref{1} is equivalent to the following equation
$$
(f,-varphi^prime)=(f^prime,varphi)=(g,varphi)=Bigg( g,intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi^prime(y),mathrm{d}y Bigg)quad forallvarphiinmathscr{D}(Bbb R).
$$

Thus the functional $f$ is already defined on any test function $varphi$ which is the derivative of some other test functions: now define
$$
varphi_o(x)=varphi(x)-omega(x)intlimits_{-infty}^{+infty}varphi(x),mathrm{d}x quad forall varphiinmathscr{D}(Bbb R),label{p}tag{P}
$$

where $omega(x)$ is an arbitrary test function such that
$$
intlimits_{-infty}^{+infty}omega(x),mathrm{d}x=1.
$$

It can be proved that $varphi_o$ is a test function which is the derivative of another test function, and that if we choose a sequence ${varphi_nu}_{nuinBbb N}$ covering to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$, then the sequence ${varphi_{onu}}_{nuinBbb N}$ associated to it by the projection eqref{p} converges to to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$.
Now, defining the antiderivative functional $g^{(-1)}$ as
$$
big(,g^{(-1)},varphibig)=-Bigg( g,intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_o(y),mathrm{d}y Bigg)quad forallvarphiinmathscr{D}(Bbb R),label{a}tag{A}
$$

the linearity of such functional is an immediate consequence of the linearity of the integral and of the distribution $g$. The continuity follows from the continuity of the map
$$
varphi(x)mapstointlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_o(y),mathrm{d}y.
$$

Precisely, as said above, for any sequence of test functions ${varphi_nu}_{nuinBbb N}$ converging to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$ the sequence ${varphi_{onu}}_{nuinBbb N}$ converges to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$ therefore
$$
begin{split}
varphi_{onu}underset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0 ; &implies intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_{onu}(y),mathrm{d}yunderset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0 \
frac{mathrm{d}^kvarphi_{onu}}{mathrm{d}x^k}underset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0 ; &implies frac{mathrm{d}^k}{mathrm{d}x^k}intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_{onu}(y),mathrm{d}y=frac{mathrm{d}^{k-1}varphi_{onu}}{mathrm{d}x^{k-1}}underset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0quad kinBbb N
end{split}text{in }mathscr{D}(Bbb R)
$$

thus $Big{intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_{onu}(y),mathrm{d}yBig}_{nuinBbb N}$ is a sequence of functions in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$ coverging to $0$ in of $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$.
This implies that the antiderivative eqref{a} of a a distribution is a distribution: then
$$
f=g^{(-1)} +C label{2}tag{2}
$$

where $C$ is an arbitrary constant is the sought for primitive of $f$. $blacksquare$



Notes




  • The development offered above is only a sketch of the standard proof offered by Shilov, since the rigorous proof justifying all steps, particularly the properties of $varphi_o(x)$, while entirely elementary, is nevertheless not too short.

  • Vladimirov ([1], §2.2 pp. 27-29) offers a similar proof of the solvability of eqref{1} in $mathscr{D}^prime$: he works in $mathscr{D}^primebig(]a,b[big)$ for arbitrary $a,binoverline{Bbb R}$ with $a<b$ (i.e. including $a=-infty$ and $b=+infty$).

  • Erik Talvila used the solution of eqref{1} to define a generalized integral which is more general of the ones o Henstock and Kurzweil. Recently also Ricardo Estrada and Jasson Vindas proposed a definition of distributional integral based on a similar concept.


[1] G. E. Shilov (1968), Generalized functions and partial differential equations, Mathematics and Its Applications, Vol. 7, (English)
New York-London-Paris: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, XII+345, MR0230129, Zbl 0177.36302.



[2] V. S. Vladimirov (2002), Methods of the theory of generalized functions, Analytical Methods and Special Functions, Vol. 6, London–New York: Taylor & Francis, pp. XII+353, ISBN 0-415-27356-0, MR2012831, Zbl 1078.46029.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You meant $varphi mapsto int_{-infty}^. varphi_o(y)dy$ is continuous in the $C^infty_c(mathbb{R})$ topology, not only $varphi mapsto varphi_o$, this is what makes $varphi mapsto langle g,int_{-infty}^. varphi_o(y)dy rangle$ a distribution
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 28 at 23:38












  • $begingroup$
    @reuns. Exactly: I added a section on this to my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniele Tampieri
    Jan 29 at 9:53










  • $begingroup$
    @reuns. I also apologize for not noting your comment to the question. Probably I started editing my answer, then had lunch and finished answering later, without refreshing the post.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniele Tampieri
    Jan 29 at 10:22














2












2








2





$begingroup$


The answer to the question you are asking is yes: it is a standard property of distributions of one variable.




Precisely, the following theorem is a standard fact of the general theory of distributions:
Theorem ([1], §1.5.3. pp. 26-27) Equation eqref{1}
$$
f^prime=glabel{1}tag{1}
$$

has a solution $finmathscr{D}^prime$ for all distributions $ginmathscr{D}^prime$.
Sketch of proof. We have that eqref{1} is equivalent to the following equation
$$
(f,-varphi^prime)=(f^prime,varphi)=(g,varphi)=Bigg( g,intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi^prime(y),mathrm{d}y Bigg)quad forallvarphiinmathscr{D}(Bbb R).
$$

Thus the functional $f$ is already defined on any test function $varphi$ which is the derivative of some other test functions: now define
$$
varphi_o(x)=varphi(x)-omega(x)intlimits_{-infty}^{+infty}varphi(x),mathrm{d}x quad forall varphiinmathscr{D}(Bbb R),label{p}tag{P}
$$

where $omega(x)$ is an arbitrary test function such that
$$
intlimits_{-infty}^{+infty}omega(x),mathrm{d}x=1.
$$

It can be proved that $varphi_o$ is a test function which is the derivative of another test function, and that if we choose a sequence ${varphi_nu}_{nuinBbb N}$ covering to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$, then the sequence ${varphi_{onu}}_{nuinBbb N}$ associated to it by the projection eqref{p} converges to to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$.
Now, defining the antiderivative functional $g^{(-1)}$ as
$$
big(,g^{(-1)},varphibig)=-Bigg( g,intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_o(y),mathrm{d}y Bigg)quad forallvarphiinmathscr{D}(Bbb R),label{a}tag{A}
$$

the linearity of such functional is an immediate consequence of the linearity of the integral and of the distribution $g$. The continuity follows from the continuity of the map
$$
varphi(x)mapstointlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_o(y),mathrm{d}y.
$$

Precisely, as said above, for any sequence of test functions ${varphi_nu}_{nuinBbb N}$ converging to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$ the sequence ${varphi_{onu}}_{nuinBbb N}$ converges to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$ therefore
$$
begin{split}
varphi_{onu}underset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0 ; &implies intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_{onu}(y),mathrm{d}yunderset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0 \
frac{mathrm{d}^kvarphi_{onu}}{mathrm{d}x^k}underset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0 ; &implies frac{mathrm{d}^k}{mathrm{d}x^k}intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_{onu}(y),mathrm{d}y=frac{mathrm{d}^{k-1}varphi_{onu}}{mathrm{d}x^{k-1}}underset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0quad kinBbb N
end{split}text{in }mathscr{D}(Bbb R)
$$

thus $Big{intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_{onu}(y),mathrm{d}yBig}_{nuinBbb N}$ is a sequence of functions in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$ coverging to $0$ in of $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$.
This implies that the antiderivative eqref{a} of a a distribution is a distribution: then
$$
f=g^{(-1)} +C label{2}tag{2}
$$

where $C$ is an arbitrary constant is the sought for primitive of $f$. $blacksquare$



Notes




  • The development offered above is only a sketch of the standard proof offered by Shilov, since the rigorous proof justifying all steps, particularly the properties of $varphi_o(x)$, while entirely elementary, is nevertheless not too short.

  • Vladimirov ([1], §2.2 pp. 27-29) offers a similar proof of the solvability of eqref{1} in $mathscr{D}^prime$: he works in $mathscr{D}^primebig(]a,b[big)$ for arbitrary $a,binoverline{Bbb R}$ with $a<b$ (i.e. including $a=-infty$ and $b=+infty$).

  • Erik Talvila used the solution of eqref{1} to define a generalized integral which is more general of the ones o Henstock and Kurzweil. Recently also Ricardo Estrada and Jasson Vindas proposed a definition of distributional integral based on a similar concept.


[1] G. E. Shilov (1968), Generalized functions and partial differential equations, Mathematics and Its Applications, Vol. 7, (English)
New York-London-Paris: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, XII+345, MR0230129, Zbl 0177.36302.



[2] V. S. Vladimirov (2002), Methods of the theory of generalized functions, Analytical Methods and Special Functions, Vol. 6, London–New York: Taylor & Francis, pp. XII+353, ISBN 0-415-27356-0, MR2012831, Zbl 1078.46029.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




The answer to the question you are asking is yes: it is a standard property of distributions of one variable.




Precisely, the following theorem is a standard fact of the general theory of distributions:
Theorem ([1], §1.5.3. pp. 26-27) Equation eqref{1}
$$
f^prime=glabel{1}tag{1}
$$

has a solution $finmathscr{D}^prime$ for all distributions $ginmathscr{D}^prime$.
Sketch of proof. We have that eqref{1} is equivalent to the following equation
$$
(f,-varphi^prime)=(f^prime,varphi)=(g,varphi)=Bigg( g,intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi^prime(y),mathrm{d}y Bigg)quad forallvarphiinmathscr{D}(Bbb R).
$$

Thus the functional $f$ is already defined on any test function $varphi$ which is the derivative of some other test functions: now define
$$
varphi_o(x)=varphi(x)-omega(x)intlimits_{-infty}^{+infty}varphi(x),mathrm{d}x quad forall varphiinmathscr{D}(Bbb R),label{p}tag{P}
$$

where $omega(x)$ is an arbitrary test function such that
$$
intlimits_{-infty}^{+infty}omega(x),mathrm{d}x=1.
$$

It can be proved that $varphi_o$ is a test function which is the derivative of another test function, and that if we choose a sequence ${varphi_nu}_{nuinBbb N}$ covering to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$, then the sequence ${varphi_{onu}}_{nuinBbb N}$ associated to it by the projection eqref{p} converges to to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$.
Now, defining the antiderivative functional $g^{(-1)}$ as
$$
big(,g^{(-1)},varphibig)=-Bigg( g,intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_o(y),mathrm{d}y Bigg)quad forallvarphiinmathscr{D}(Bbb R),label{a}tag{A}
$$

the linearity of such functional is an immediate consequence of the linearity of the integral and of the distribution $g$. The continuity follows from the continuity of the map
$$
varphi(x)mapstointlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_o(y),mathrm{d}y.
$$

Precisely, as said above, for any sequence of test functions ${varphi_nu}_{nuinBbb N}$ converging to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$ the sequence ${varphi_{onu}}_{nuinBbb N}$ converges to $0$ in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$ therefore
$$
begin{split}
varphi_{onu}underset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0 ; &implies intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_{onu}(y),mathrm{d}yunderset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0 \
frac{mathrm{d}^kvarphi_{onu}}{mathrm{d}x^k}underset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0 ; &implies frac{mathrm{d}^k}{mathrm{d}x^k}intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_{onu}(y),mathrm{d}y=frac{mathrm{d}^{k-1}varphi_{onu}}{mathrm{d}x^{k-1}}underset{nutoinfty}{longrightarrow} 0quad kinBbb N
end{split}text{in }mathscr{D}(Bbb R)
$$

thus $Big{intlimits_{-infty}^x varphi_{onu}(y),mathrm{d}yBig}_{nuinBbb N}$ is a sequence of functions in $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$ coverging to $0$ in of $mathscr{D}(Bbb R)$.
This implies that the antiderivative eqref{a} of a a distribution is a distribution: then
$$
f=g^{(-1)} +C label{2}tag{2}
$$

where $C$ is an arbitrary constant is the sought for primitive of $f$. $blacksquare$



Notes




  • The development offered above is only a sketch of the standard proof offered by Shilov, since the rigorous proof justifying all steps, particularly the properties of $varphi_o(x)$, while entirely elementary, is nevertheless not too short.

  • Vladimirov ([1], §2.2 pp. 27-29) offers a similar proof of the solvability of eqref{1} in $mathscr{D}^prime$: he works in $mathscr{D}^primebig(]a,b[big)$ for arbitrary $a,binoverline{Bbb R}$ with $a<b$ (i.e. including $a=-infty$ and $b=+infty$).

  • Erik Talvila used the solution of eqref{1} to define a generalized integral which is more general of the ones o Henstock and Kurzweil. Recently also Ricardo Estrada and Jasson Vindas proposed a definition of distributional integral based on a similar concept.


[1] G. E. Shilov (1968), Generalized functions and partial differential equations, Mathematics and Its Applications, Vol. 7, (English)
New York-London-Paris: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, XII+345, MR0230129, Zbl 0177.36302.



[2] V. S. Vladimirov (2002), Methods of the theory of generalized functions, Analytical Methods and Special Functions, Vol. 6, London–New York: Taylor & Francis, pp. XII+353, ISBN 0-415-27356-0, MR2012831, Zbl 1078.46029.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 29 at 13:40

























answered Jan 28 at 22:16









Daniele TampieriDaniele Tampieri

2,58721022




2,58721022












  • $begingroup$
    You meant $varphi mapsto int_{-infty}^. varphi_o(y)dy$ is continuous in the $C^infty_c(mathbb{R})$ topology, not only $varphi mapsto varphi_o$, this is what makes $varphi mapsto langle g,int_{-infty}^. varphi_o(y)dy rangle$ a distribution
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 28 at 23:38












  • $begingroup$
    @reuns. Exactly: I added a section on this to my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniele Tampieri
    Jan 29 at 9:53










  • $begingroup$
    @reuns. I also apologize for not noting your comment to the question. Probably I started editing my answer, then had lunch and finished answering later, without refreshing the post.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniele Tampieri
    Jan 29 at 10:22


















  • $begingroup$
    You meant $varphi mapsto int_{-infty}^. varphi_o(y)dy$ is continuous in the $C^infty_c(mathbb{R})$ topology, not only $varphi mapsto varphi_o$, this is what makes $varphi mapsto langle g,int_{-infty}^. varphi_o(y)dy rangle$ a distribution
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Jan 28 at 23:38












  • $begingroup$
    @reuns. Exactly: I added a section on this to my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniele Tampieri
    Jan 29 at 9:53










  • $begingroup$
    @reuns. I also apologize for not noting your comment to the question. Probably I started editing my answer, then had lunch and finished answering later, without refreshing the post.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniele Tampieri
    Jan 29 at 10:22
















$begingroup$
You meant $varphi mapsto int_{-infty}^. varphi_o(y)dy$ is continuous in the $C^infty_c(mathbb{R})$ topology, not only $varphi mapsto varphi_o$, this is what makes $varphi mapsto langle g,int_{-infty}^. varphi_o(y)dy rangle$ a distribution
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 28 at 23:38






$begingroup$
You meant $varphi mapsto int_{-infty}^. varphi_o(y)dy$ is continuous in the $C^infty_c(mathbb{R})$ topology, not only $varphi mapsto varphi_o$, this is what makes $varphi mapsto langle g,int_{-infty}^. varphi_o(y)dy rangle$ a distribution
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 28 at 23:38














$begingroup$
@reuns. Exactly: I added a section on this to my answer.
$endgroup$
– Daniele Tampieri
Jan 29 at 9:53




$begingroup$
@reuns. Exactly: I added a section on this to my answer.
$endgroup$
– Daniele Tampieri
Jan 29 at 9:53












$begingroup$
@reuns. I also apologize for not noting your comment to the question. Probably I started editing my answer, then had lunch and finished answering later, without refreshing the post.
$endgroup$
– Daniele Tampieri
Jan 29 at 10:22




$begingroup$
@reuns. I also apologize for not noting your comment to the question. Probably I started editing my answer, then had lunch and finished answering later, without refreshing the post.
$endgroup$
– Daniele Tampieri
Jan 29 at 10:22


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3091223%2fall-the-derivatives-of-distributions-are-also-distributions-but-what-about-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter