Another form of partial sum of Fourier series












1












$begingroup$


I've been struggling to prove that partial sum of Fourier series can be defined in the following form:



$$ S_{n}(f)(x) = frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t-x)D_{n}(t)dt, $$ where:



$$ D_{n}(t) = frac{1}{2} + sum_{k=1}^n cos(kt)=frac{sin(t(n+frac{1}{2}))}{2sin(frac{t}{2})}.$$ And $f$ is a $2pi$-periodic function. I've managed to show that $$ S_{n}(f)(x) = frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t)D_{n}(t-x)dt $$, but I don't know how to use the fact of $f$ being $2pi$-periodic.



Any ideas?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I've been struggling to prove that partial sum of Fourier series can be defined in the following form:



    $$ S_{n}(f)(x) = frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t-x)D_{n}(t)dt, $$ where:



    $$ D_{n}(t) = frac{1}{2} + sum_{k=1}^n cos(kt)=frac{sin(t(n+frac{1}{2}))}{2sin(frac{t}{2})}.$$ And $f$ is a $2pi$-periodic function. I've managed to show that $$ S_{n}(f)(x) = frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t)D_{n}(t-x)dt $$, but I don't know how to use the fact of $f$ being $2pi$-periodic.



    Any ideas?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I've been struggling to prove that partial sum of Fourier series can be defined in the following form:



      $$ S_{n}(f)(x) = frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t-x)D_{n}(t)dt, $$ where:



      $$ D_{n}(t) = frac{1}{2} + sum_{k=1}^n cos(kt)=frac{sin(t(n+frac{1}{2}))}{2sin(frac{t}{2})}.$$ And $f$ is a $2pi$-periodic function. I've managed to show that $$ S_{n}(f)(x) = frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t)D_{n}(t-x)dt $$, but I don't know how to use the fact of $f$ being $2pi$-periodic.



      Any ideas?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I've been struggling to prove that partial sum of Fourier series can be defined in the following form:



      $$ S_{n}(f)(x) = frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t-x)D_{n}(t)dt, $$ where:



      $$ D_{n}(t) = frac{1}{2} + sum_{k=1}^n cos(kt)=frac{sin(t(n+frac{1}{2}))}{2sin(frac{t}{2})}.$$ And $f$ is a $2pi$-periodic function. I've managed to show that $$ S_{n}(f)(x) = frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t)D_{n}(t-x)dt $$, but I don't know how to use the fact of $f$ being $2pi$-periodic.



      Any ideas?







      real-analysis integration fourier-series






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 19 at 15:51









      Scientifica

      6,79641335




      6,79641335










      asked Jan 19 at 15:48









      BreadBread

      104




      104






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Note that $D_n$ is even, so we have
          $$S_{n}(f)(x) = frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t)D_{n}(t-x)dt=frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t)D_{n}(x-t)dt$$



          Write $s=x-t$, so that $t=x-s$, and
          $$frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t)D_{n}(t-x)dt=frac{1}{pi}int_{x-pi}^{x+pi}f(x-s)D_n(s)ds=frac{1}{pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}f(x-s)D_n(s)ds.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            So we use being $2pi$-periodic to change the integration interval after substitution $s=x-t$? Additionally I can't see how to proceed any further. :(
            $endgroup$
            – Bread
            Jan 21 at 22:30










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, and this is about as far as you'll get. the idea is to show that $S_n(f)$ is the convolution of $f$ and $D_n$, and that is exactly what the last integral in my answer is.
            $endgroup$
            – Aweygan
            Jan 21 at 22:40










          • $begingroup$
            Isn't convolution defined on interval $[-inf, inf]$?
            $endgroup$
            – Bread
            Jan 23 at 21:27










          • $begingroup$
            Convolution on the circle (or equivalently, of $2pi$-periodic functions) is different from convolution on the reals. See here, for instance. Also, type infty for $infty$.
            $endgroup$
            – Aweygan
            Jan 24 at 2:37













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079483%2fanother-form-of-partial-sum-of-fourier-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          Note that $D_n$ is even, so we have
          $$S_{n}(f)(x) = frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t)D_{n}(t-x)dt=frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t)D_{n}(x-t)dt$$



          Write $s=x-t$, so that $t=x-s$, and
          $$frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t)D_{n}(t-x)dt=frac{1}{pi}int_{x-pi}^{x+pi}f(x-s)D_n(s)ds=frac{1}{pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}f(x-s)D_n(s)ds.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            So we use being $2pi$-periodic to change the integration interval after substitution $s=x-t$? Additionally I can't see how to proceed any further. :(
            $endgroup$
            – Bread
            Jan 21 at 22:30










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, and this is about as far as you'll get. the idea is to show that $S_n(f)$ is the convolution of $f$ and $D_n$, and that is exactly what the last integral in my answer is.
            $endgroup$
            – Aweygan
            Jan 21 at 22:40










          • $begingroup$
            Isn't convolution defined on interval $[-inf, inf]$?
            $endgroup$
            – Bread
            Jan 23 at 21:27










          • $begingroup$
            Convolution on the circle (or equivalently, of $2pi$-periodic functions) is different from convolution on the reals. See here, for instance. Also, type infty for $infty$.
            $endgroup$
            – Aweygan
            Jan 24 at 2:37


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Note that $D_n$ is even, so we have
          $$S_{n}(f)(x) = frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t)D_{n}(t-x)dt=frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t)D_{n}(x-t)dt$$



          Write $s=x-t$, so that $t=x-s$, and
          $$frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t)D_{n}(t-x)dt=frac{1}{pi}int_{x-pi}^{x+pi}f(x-s)D_n(s)ds=frac{1}{pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}f(x-s)D_n(s)ds.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            So we use being $2pi$-periodic to change the integration interval after substitution $s=x-t$? Additionally I can't see how to proceed any further. :(
            $endgroup$
            – Bread
            Jan 21 at 22:30










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, and this is about as far as you'll get. the idea is to show that $S_n(f)$ is the convolution of $f$ and $D_n$, and that is exactly what the last integral in my answer is.
            $endgroup$
            – Aweygan
            Jan 21 at 22:40










          • $begingroup$
            Isn't convolution defined on interval $[-inf, inf]$?
            $endgroup$
            – Bread
            Jan 23 at 21:27










          • $begingroup$
            Convolution on the circle (or equivalently, of $2pi$-periodic functions) is different from convolution on the reals. See here, for instance. Also, type infty for $infty$.
            $endgroup$
            – Aweygan
            Jan 24 at 2:37
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Note that $D_n$ is even, so we have
          $$S_{n}(f)(x) = frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t)D_{n}(t-x)dt=frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t)D_{n}(x-t)dt$$



          Write $s=x-t$, so that $t=x-s$, and
          $$frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t)D_{n}(t-x)dt=frac{1}{pi}int_{x-pi}^{x+pi}f(x-s)D_n(s)ds=frac{1}{pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}f(x-s)D_n(s)ds.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Note that $D_n$ is even, so we have
          $$S_{n}(f)(x) = frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t)D_{n}(t-x)dt=frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t)D_{n}(x-t)dt$$



          Write $s=x-t$, so that $t=x-s$, and
          $$frac{1}{pi} int_{-pi}^{pi} f(t)D_{n}(t-x)dt=frac{1}{pi}int_{x-pi}^{x+pi}f(x-s)D_n(s)ds=frac{1}{pi}int_{-pi}^{pi}f(x-s)D_n(s)ds.$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 19 at 16:04









          AweyganAweygan

          14.4k21441




          14.4k21441












          • $begingroup$
            So we use being $2pi$-periodic to change the integration interval after substitution $s=x-t$? Additionally I can't see how to proceed any further. :(
            $endgroup$
            – Bread
            Jan 21 at 22:30










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, and this is about as far as you'll get. the idea is to show that $S_n(f)$ is the convolution of $f$ and $D_n$, and that is exactly what the last integral in my answer is.
            $endgroup$
            – Aweygan
            Jan 21 at 22:40










          • $begingroup$
            Isn't convolution defined on interval $[-inf, inf]$?
            $endgroup$
            – Bread
            Jan 23 at 21:27










          • $begingroup$
            Convolution on the circle (or equivalently, of $2pi$-periodic functions) is different from convolution on the reals. See here, for instance. Also, type infty for $infty$.
            $endgroup$
            – Aweygan
            Jan 24 at 2:37




















          • $begingroup$
            So we use being $2pi$-periodic to change the integration interval after substitution $s=x-t$? Additionally I can't see how to proceed any further. :(
            $endgroup$
            – Bread
            Jan 21 at 22:30










          • $begingroup$
            Yes, and this is about as far as you'll get. the idea is to show that $S_n(f)$ is the convolution of $f$ and $D_n$, and that is exactly what the last integral in my answer is.
            $endgroup$
            – Aweygan
            Jan 21 at 22:40










          • $begingroup$
            Isn't convolution defined on interval $[-inf, inf]$?
            $endgroup$
            – Bread
            Jan 23 at 21:27










          • $begingroup$
            Convolution on the circle (or equivalently, of $2pi$-periodic functions) is different from convolution on the reals. See here, for instance. Also, type infty for $infty$.
            $endgroup$
            – Aweygan
            Jan 24 at 2:37


















          $begingroup$
          So we use being $2pi$-periodic to change the integration interval after substitution $s=x-t$? Additionally I can't see how to proceed any further. :(
          $endgroup$
          – Bread
          Jan 21 at 22:30




          $begingroup$
          So we use being $2pi$-periodic to change the integration interval after substitution $s=x-t$? Additionally I can't see how to proceed any further. :(
          $endgroup$
          – Bread
          Jan 21 at 22:30












          $begingroup$
          Yes, and this is about as far as you'll get. the idea is to show that $S_n(f)$ is the convolution of $f$ and $D_n$, and that is exactly what the last integral in my answer is.
          $endgroup$
          – Aweygan
          Jan 21 at 22:40




          $begingroup$
          Yes, and this is about as far as you'll get. the idea is to show that $S_n(f)$ is the convolution of $f$ and $D_n$, and that is exactly what the last integral in my answer is.
          $endgroup$
          – Aweygan
          Jan 21 at 22:40












          $begingroup$
          Isn't convolution defined on interval $[-inf, inf]$?
          $endgroup$
          – Bread
          Jan 23 at 21:27




          $begingroup$
          Isn't convolution defined on interval $[-inf, inf]$?
          $endgroup$
          – Bread
          Jan 23 at 21:27












          $begingroup$
          Convolution on the circle (or equivalently, of $2pi$-periodic functions) is different from convolution on the reals. See here, for instance. Also, type infty for $infty$.
          $endgroup$
          – Aweygan
          Jan 24 at 2:37






          $begingroup$
          Convolution on the circle (or equivalently, of $2pi$-periodic functions) is different from convolution on the reals. See here, for instance. Also, type infty for $infty$.
          $endgroup$
          – Aweygan
          Jan 24 at 2:37




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079483%2fanother-form-of-partial-sum-of-fourier-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

          in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith