Counting binary integers with a given number of zeroes












0












$begingroup$


Problem:
Let n be a positive integer. A number is randomly chosen from 1 to 2^n. The probability that it has exactly 6 zeroes in its binary representation is 1989/16384. What is n?



Solution:
For n≥7, the number of integers from 1 up to 2^n that has exactly 6 zeroes in its binary representation is (nC7). This can be seen by observing that among n candidates (for places of 0's and 1's), we need to select 7 places, 1 for the leading digit 1 and 6 more after that for the 6 zeroes. So, we get (nC7)/2^n=1989/16384. By looking at the denominators, we notice that n≥14. Since 1989 is a multiple of 9, we get n=15 as the smallest possible n. But checking this, we see it doesn't work. The next smallest n is n=18, which works since (187)=9×13×16×17=1989×16. So n=18.



The correct answer is: 18



My Question:
I don't understand why you have to do nC7 and not nC6 since you are choosing 6 zeroes.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Because the number 0100 is counted as having two zeroes, not three.
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 19 at 20:03
















0












$begingroup$


Problem:
Let n be a positive integer. A number is randomly chosen from 1 to 2^n. The probability that it has exactly 6 zeroes in its binary representation is 1989/16384. What is n?



Solution:
For n≥7, the number of integers from 1 up to 2^n that has exactly 6 zeroes in its binary representation is (nC7). This can be seen by observing that among n candidates (for places of 0's and 1's), we need to select 7 places, 1 for the leading digit 1 and 6 more after that for the 6 zeroes. So, we get (nC7)/2^n=1989/16384. By looking at the denominators, we notice that n≥14. Since 1989 is a multiple of 9, we get n=15 as the smallest possible n. But checking this, we see it doesn't work. The next smallest n is n=18, which works since (187)=9×13×16×17=1989×16. So n=18.



The correct answer is: 18



My Question:
I don't understand why you have to do nC7 and not nC6 since you are choosing 6 zeroes.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Because the number 0100 is counted as having two zeroes, not three.
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 19 at 20:03














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Problem:
Let n be a positive integer. A number is randomly chosen from 1 to 2^n. The probability that it has exactly 6 zeroes in its binary representation is 1989/16384. What is n?



Solution:
For n≥7, the number of integers from 1 up to 2^n that has exactly 6 zeroes in its binary representation is (nC7). This can be seen by observing that among n candidates (for places of 0's and 1's), we need to select 7 places, 1 for the leading digit 1 and 6 more after that for the 6 zeroes. So, we get (nC7)/2^n=1989/16384. By looking at the denominators, we notice that n≥14. Since 1989 is a multiple of 9, we get n=15 as the smallest possible n. But checking this, we see it doesn't work. The next smallest n is n=18, which works since (187)=9×13×16×17=1989×16. So n=18.



The correct answer is: 18



My Question:
I don't understand why you have to do nC7 and not nC6 since you are choosing 6 zeroes.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Problem:
Let n be a positive integer. A number is randomly chosen from 1 to 2^n. The probability that it has exactly 6 zeroes in its binary representation is 1989/16384. What is n?



Solution:
For n≥7, the number of integers from 1 up to 2^n that has exactly 6 zeroes in its binary representation is (nC7). This can be seen by observing that among n candidates (for places of 0's and 1's), we need to select 7 places, 1 for the leading digit 1 and 6 more after that for the 6 zeroes. So, we get (nC7)/2^n=1989/16384. By looking at the denominators, we notice that n≥14. Since 1989 is a multiple of 9, we get n=15 as the smallest possible n. But checking this, we see it doesn't work. The next smallest n is n=18, which works since (187)=9×13×16×17=1989×16. So n=18.



The correct answer is: 18



My Question:
I don't understand why you have to do nC7 and not nC6 since you are choosing 6 zeroes.







combinatorics binary






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 19 at 20:04









Did

248k23224463




248k23224463










asked Jan 19 at 20:00









varunrvarunr

1




1












  • $begingroup$
    Because the number 0100 is counted as having two zeroes, not three.
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 19 at 20:03


















  • $begingroup$
    Because the number 0100 is counted as having two zeroes, not three.
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 19 at 20:03
















$begingroup$
Because the number 0100 is counted as having two zeroes, not three.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 19 at 20:03




$begingroup$
Because the number 0100 is counted as having two zeroes, not three.
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 19 at 20:03










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Starting with $n$ potential bits:



oooooooooooooooooo



Choose $7$ bits: (You are choosing $6$ bits to be $0$s and $1$ bit to be the leftmost $1$)



oooooooooooooooooo
^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^


The leftmost will be a $1$, the other $6$ will be $0$s



oo1o00o0o0o0ooo0o



Of the remaining bits, those to the left of the $1$ will be dropped, and those to the right will be $1$s



..110010101011101






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079749%2fcounting-binary-integers-with-a-given-number-of-zeroes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Starting with $n$ potential bits:



    oooooooooooooooooo



    Choose $7$ bits: (You are choosing $6$ bits to be $0$s and $1$ bit to be the leftmost $1$)



    oooooooooooooooooo
    ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^


    The leftmost will be a $1$, the other $6$ will be $0$s



    oo1o00o0o0o0ooo0o



    Of the remaining bits, those to the left of the $1$ will be dropped, and those to the right will be $1$s



    ..110010101011101






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Starting with $n$ potential bits:



      oooooooooooooooooo



      Choose $7$ bits: (You are choosing $6$ bits to be $0$s and $1$ bit to be the leftmost $1$)



      oooooooooooooooooo
      ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^


      The leftmost will be a $1$, the other $6$ will be $0$s



      oo1o00o0o0o0ooo0o



      Of the remaining bits, those to the left of the $1$ will be dropped, and those to the right will be $1$s



      ..110010101011101






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Starting with $n$ potential bits:



        oooooooooooooooooo



        Choose $7$ bits: (You are choosing $6$ bits to be $0$s and $1$ bit to be the leftmost $1$)



        oooooooooooooooooo
        ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^


        The leftmost will be a $1$, the other $6$ will be $0$s



        oo1o00o0o0o0ooo0o



        Of the remaining bits, those to the left of the $1$ will be dropped, and those to the right will be $1$s



        ..110010101011101






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Starting with $n$ potential bits:



        oooooooooooooooooo



        Choose $7$ bits: (You are choosing $6$ bits to be $0$s and $1$ bit to be the leftmost $1$)



        oooooooooooooooooo
        ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^


        The leftmost will be a $1$, the other $6$ will be $0$s



        oo1o00o0o0o0ooo0o



        Of the remaining bits, those to the left of the $1$ will be dropped, and those to the right will be $1$s



        ..110010101011101







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 19 at 21:47









        Daniel MathiasDaniel Mathias

        1,31518




        1,31518






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079749%2fcounting-binary-integers-with-a-given-number-of-zeroes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

            android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

            WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]