Why does $int_{-1}^1 ((1-x^2)(P_m'P_n-P_n'P_m))',dx = 0$ for Legendre polynomials?












1












$begingroup$


I was looking at a proof of the orthogonality of the Legendre polynomials in Lebedev's Special Functions and their Applications:



enter image description here



I can't understand why the integral of the first term vanishes. I appreciate any help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Start by finding the antiderivative of the first term (this should easy since the entire term is given as a derivative). Then evaluate the result at -1 and 1 (evaluating the Legendre polynomials exactly will turnout to be less important for the problem).
    $endgroup$
    – Testcase
    Jan 19 at 21:14










  • $begingroup$
    It follows from $int_{-1}^{1} F'(x) dx = F(1) - F(-1)$ for any $C^{1}$ function $F$.
    $endgroup$
    – Seewoo Lee
    Jan 19 at 21:17










  • $begingroup$
    There's a typo in your title that would make this trivial.
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Jan 19 at 21:22










  • $begingroup$
    I was ignoring the outer prime for some reason. Must be tired!
    $endgroup$
    – Luke Collins
    Jan 19 at 22:13










  • $begingroup$
    @J.G. It is trival!
    $endgroup$
    – Luke Collins
    Jan 19 at 22:14
















1












$begingroup$


I was looking at a proof of the orthogonality of the Legendre polynomials in Lebedev's Special Functions and their Applications:



enter image description here



I can't understand why the integral of the first term vanishes. I appreciate any help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Start by finding the antiderivative of the first term (this should easy since the entire term is given as a derivative). Then evaluate the result at -1 and 1 (evaluating the Legendre polynomials exactly will turnout to be less important for the problem).
    $endgroup$
    – Testcase
    Jan 19 at 21:14










  • $begingroup$
    It follows from $int_{-1}^{1} F'(x) dx = F(1) - F(-1)$ for any $C^{1}$ function $F$.
    $endgroup$
    – Seewoo Lee
    Jan 19 at 21:17










  • $begingroup$
    There's a typo in your title that would make this trivial.
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Jan 19 at 21:22










  • $begingroup$
    I was ignoring the outer prime for some reason. Must be tired!
    $endgroup$
    – Luke Collins
    Jan 19 at 22:13










  • $begingroup$
    @J.G. It is trival!
    $endgroup$
    – Luke Collins
    Jan 19 at 22:14














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I was looking at a proof of the orthogonality of the Legendre polynomials in Lebedev's Special Functions and their Applications:



enter image description here



I can't understand why the integral of the first term vanishes. I appreciate any help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I was looking at a proof of the orthogonality of the Legendre polynomials in Lebedev's Special Functions and their Applications:



enter image description here



I can't understand why the integral of the first term vanishes. I appreciate any help.







real-analysis functional-analysis legendre-polynomials






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 19 at 22:15









J.G.

28.4k22845




28.4k22845










asked Jan 19 at 20:50









Luke CollinsLuke Collins

749419




749419








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Start by finding the antiderivative of the first term (this should easy since the entire term is given as a derivative). Then evaluate the result at -1 and 1 (evaluating the Legendre polynomials exactly will turnout to be less important for the problem).
    $endgroup$
    – Testcase
    Jan 19 at 21:14










  • $begingroup$
    It follows from $int_{-1}^{1} F'(x) dx = F(1) - F(-1)$ for any $C^{1}$ function $F$.
    $endgroup$
    – Seewoo Lee
    Jan 19 at 21:17










  • $begingroup$
    There's a typo in your title that would make this trivial.
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Jan 19 at 21:22










  • $begingroup$
    I was ignoring the outer prime for some reason. Must be tired!
    $endgroup$
    – Luke Collins
    Jan 19 at 22:13










  • $begingroup$
    @J.G. It is trival!
    $endgroup$
    – Luke Collins
    Jan 19 at 22:14














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Start by finding the antiderivative of the first term (this should easy since the entire term is given as a derivative). Then evaluate the result at -1 and 1 (evaluating the Legendre polynomials exactly will turnout to be less important for the problem).
    $endgroup$
    – Testcase
    Jan 19 at 21:14










  • $begingroup$
    It follows from $int_{-1}^{1} F'(x) dx = F(1) - F(-1)$ for any $C^{1}$ function $F$.
    $endgroup$
    – Seewoo Lee
    Jan 19 at 21:17










  • $begingroup$
    There's a typo in your title that would make this trivial.
    $endgroup$
    – J.G.
    Jan 19 at 21:22










  • $begingroup$
    I was ignoring the outer prime for some reason. Must be tired!
    $endgroup$
    – Luke Collins
    Jan 19 at 22:13










  • $begingroup$
    @J.G. It is trival!
    $endgroup$
    – Luke Collins
    Jan 19 at 22:14








1




1




$begingroup$
Start by finding the antiderivative of the first term (this should easy since the entire term is given as a derivative). Then evaluate the result at -1 and 1 (evaluating the Legendre polynomials exactly will turnout to be less important for the problem).
$endgroup$
– Testcase
Jan 19 at 21:14




$begingroup$
Start by finding the antiderivative of the first term (this should easy since the entire term is given as a derivative). Then evaluate the result at -1 and 1 (evaluating the Legendre polynomials exactly will turnout to be less important for the problem).
$endgroup$
– Testcase
Jan 19 at 21:14












$begingroup$
It follows from $int_{-1}^{1} F'(x) dx = F(1) - F(-1)$ for any $C^{1}$ function $F$.
$endgroup$
– Seewoo Lee
Jan 19 at 21:17




$begingroup$
It follows from $int_{-1}^{1} F'(x) dx = F(1) - F(-1)$ for any $C^{1}$ function $F$.
$endgroup$
– Seewoo Lee
Jan 19 at 21:17












$begingroup$
There's a typo in your title that would make this trivial.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 19 at 21:22




$begingroup$
There's a typo in your title that would make this trivial.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Jan 19 at 21:22












$begingroup$
I was ignoring the outer prime for some reason. Must be tired!
$endgroup$
– Luke Collins
Jan 19 at 22:13




$begingroup$
I was ignoring the outer prime for some reason. Must be tired!
$endgroup$
– Luke Collins
Jan 19 at 22:13












$begingroup$
@J.G. It is trival!
$endgroup$
– Luke Collins
Jan 19 at 22:14




$begingroup$
@J.G. It is trival!
$endgroup$
– Luke Collins
Jan 19 at 22:14










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

$$ int_{-1}^1 Big((1 - x^2)(P_m'P_n - P_n'P_m) Big)' mathrm{d}x = Big[(1 - x^2)(P_m'P_n - P_n'P_m)Big]_{-1}^1 $$
$$= Big[(1 - 1^2)(P_m'(1)P_n(1) - P_n'(1)P_m(1))Big] - Big[(1 - (-1)^2)(P_m'(-1)P_n(-1) - P_n'(-1)P_m(-1))Big]$$
$$ = Big[(0)(P_m'(1)P_n(1) - P_n'(1)P_m(1))Big] - Big[(0)(P_m'(-1)P_n(-1) - P_n'(-1)P_m(-1))Big] $$
$$= 0 - 0 $$
$$= 0 $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I can't believe I missed that. I was ignoring the outer prime. Oh well, time for bed.
    $endgroup$
    – Luke Collins
    Jan 19 at 22:13











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079809%2fwhy-does-int-11-1-x2p-mp-n-p-np-m-dx-0-for-legendre-polynomi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

$$ int_{-1}^1 Big((1 - x^2)(P_m'P_n - P_n'P_m) Big)' mathrm{d}x = Big[(1 - x^2)(P_m'P_n - P_n'P_m)Big]_{-1}^1 $$
$$= Big[(1 - 1^2)(P_m'(1)P_n(1) - P_n'(1)P_m(1))Big] - Big[(1 - (-1)^2)(P_m'(-1)P_n(-1) - P_n'(-1)P_m(-1))Big]$$
$$ = Big[(0)(P_m'(1)P_n(1) - P_n'(1)P_m(1))Big] - Big[(0)(P_m'(-1)P_n(-1) - P_n'(-1)P_m(-1))Big] $$
$$= 0 - 0 $$
$$= 0 $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I can't believe I missed that. I was ignoring the outer prime. Oh well, time for bed.
    $endgroup$
    – Luke Collins
    Jan 19 at 22:13
















3












$begingroup$

$$ int_{-1}^1 Big((1 - x^2)(P_m'P_n - P_n'P_m) Big)' mathrm{d}x = Big[(1 - x^2)(P_m'P_n - P_n'P_m)Big]_{-1}^1 $$
$$= Big[(1 - 1^2)(P_m'(1)P_n(1) - P_n'(1)P_m(1))Big] - Big[(1 - (-1)^2)(P_m'(-1)P_n(-1) - P_n'(-1)P_m(-1))Big]$$
$$ = Big[(0)(P_m'(1)P_n(1) - P_n'(1)P_m(1))Big] - Big[(0)(P_m'(-1)P_n(-1) - P_n'(-1)P_m(-1))Big] $$
$$= 0 - 0 $$
$$= 0 $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I can't believe I missed that. I was ignoring the outer prime. Oh well, time for bed.
    $endgroup$
    – Luke Collins
    Jan 19 at 22:13














3












3








3





$begingroup$

$$ int_{-1}^1 Big((1 - x^2)(P_m'P_n - P_n'P_m) Big)' mathrm{d}x = Big[(1 - x^2)(P_m'P_n - P_n'P_m)Big]_{-1}^1 $$
$$= Big[(1 - 1^2)(P_m'(1)P_n(1) - P_n'(1)P_m(1))Big] - Big[(1 - (-1)^2)(P_m'(-1)P_n(-1) - P_n'(-1)P_m(-1))Big]$$
$$ = Big[(0)(P_m'(1)P_n(1) - P_n'(1)P_m(1))Big] - Big[(0)(P_m'(-1)P_n(-1) - P_n'(-1)P_m(-1))Big] $$
$$= 0 - 0 $$
$$= 0 $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



$$ int_{-1}^1 Big((1 - x^2)(P_m'P_n - P_n'P_m) Big)' mathrm{d}x = Big[(1 - x^2)(P_m'P_n - P_n'P_m)Big]_{-1}^1 $$
$$= Big[(1 - 1^2)(P_m'(1)P_n(1) - P_n'(1)P_m(1))Big] - Big[(1 - (-1)^2)(P_m'(-1)P_n(-1) - P_n'(-1)P_m(-1))Big]$$
$$ = Big[(0)(P_m'(1)P_n(1) - P_n'(1)P_m(1))Big] - Big[(0)(P_m'(-1)P_n(-1) - P_n'(-1)P_m(-1))Big] $$
$$= 0 - 0 $$
$$= 0 $$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 19 at 21:18









Marvin CohenMarvin Cohen

146117




146117












  • $begingroup$
    I can't believe I missed that. I was ignoring the outer prime. Oh well, time for bed.
    $endgroup$
    – Luke Collins
    Jan 19 at 22:13


















  • $begingroup$
    I can't believe I missed that. I was ignoring the outer prime. Oh well, time for bed.
    $endgroup$
    – Luke Collins
    Jan 19 at 22:13
















$begingroup$
I can't believe I missed that. I was ignoring the outer prime. Oh well, time for bed.
$endgroup$
– Luke Collins
Jan 19 at 22:13




$begingroup$
I can't believe I missed that. I was ignoring the outer prime. Oh well, time for bed.
$endgroup$
– Luke Collins
Jan 19 at 22:13


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079809%2fwhy-does-int-11-1-x2p-mp-n-p-np-m-dx-0-for-legendre-polynomi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$