Why is $w^2$ a complex root for the equation $x^2+x+1=0$?












0












$begingroup$


"Multiplying both sides by $(x-1)$ gives $x^3-1=0$ which is the 3rd roots of unity. Its complex roots are also denoted as $w$ and $w^2$."










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Please write precisely what you are asking for.
    $endgroup$
    – szw1710
    Jan 19 at 20:54






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You can just use the quadratic formula on the original equation. Are you asking why we call this $w$? Often it is $omega$. It is just a number that comes up somewhat frequently, so we give it a name.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 19 at 20:56










  • $begingroup$
    You have to understand what's $w$. Suppose $w$ is a cubic root of the unity, so in particular $|w|=1$. Then, multiplying by $overline{w}$, in the equation $w^3=1$ you get $w^2=overline{w}$. And you know that non-real roots of polynomials with real coefficients are there by conjugate pairs. In this way $w^2$ must be a root since it's the conjugate of a root. You can use a different reasoning to prove every power of a root of unity is a root of unity, too.
    $endgroup$
    – David Molano
    Jan 19 at 20:59


















0












$begingroup$


"Multiplying both sides by $(x-1)$ gives $x^3-1=0$ which is the 3rd roots of unity. Its complex roots are also denoted as $w$ and $w^2$."










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Please write precisely what you are asking for.
    $endgroup$
    – szw1710
    Jan 19 at 20:54






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You can just use the quadratic formula on the original equation. Are you asking why we call this $w$? Often it is $omega$. It is just a number that comes up somewhat frequently, so we give it a name.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 19 at 20:56










  • $begingroup$
    You have to understand what's $w$. Suppose $w$ is a cubic root of the unity, so in particular $|w|=1$. Then, multiplying by $overline{w}$, in the equation $w^3=1$ you get $w^2=overline{w}$. And you know that non-real roots of polynomials with real coefficients are there by conjugate pairs. In this way $w^2$ must be a root since it's the conjugate of a root. You can use a different reasoning to prove every power of a root of unity is a root of unity, too.
    $endgroup$
    – David Molano
    Jan 19 at 20:59
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


"Multiplying both sides by $(x-1)$ gives $x^3-1=0$ which is the 3rd roots of unity. Its complex roots are also denoted as $w$ and $w^2$."










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




"Multiplying both sides by $(x-1)$ gives $x^3-1=0$ which is the 3rd roots of unity. Its complex roots are also denoted as $w$ and $w^2$."







complex-numbers






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 19 at 20:53









N.CN.C

61




61








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Please write precisely what you are asking for.
    $endgroup$
    – szw1710
    Jan 19 at 20:54






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You can just use the quadratic formula on the original equation. Are you asking why we call this $w$? Often it is $omega$. It is just a number that comes up somewhat frequently, so we give it a name.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 19 at 20:56










  • $begingroup$
    You have to understand what's $w$. Suppose $w$ is a cubic root of the unity, so in particular $|w|=1$. Then, multiplying by $overline{w}$, in the equation $w^3=1$ you get $w^2=overline{w}$. And you know that non-real roots of polynomials with real coefficients are there by conjugate pairs. In this way $w^2$ must be a root since it's the conjugate of a root. You can use a different reasoning to prove every power of a root of unity is a root of unity, too.
    $endgroup$
    – David Molano
    Jan 19 at 20:59
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Please write precisely what you are asking for.
    $endgroup$
    – szw1710
    Jan 19 at 20:54






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You can just use the quadratic formula on the original equation. Are you asking why we call this $w$? Often it is $omega$. It is just a number that comes up somewhat frequently, so we give it a name.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 19 at 20:56










  • $begingroup$
    You have to understand what's $w$. Suppose $w$ is a cubic root of the unity, so in particular $|w|=1$. Then, multiplying by $overline{w}$, in the equation $w^3=1$ you get $w^2=overline{w}$. And you know that non-real roots of polynomials with real coefficients are there by conjugate pairs. In this way $w^2$ must be a root since it's the conjugate of a root. You can use a different reasoning to prove every power of a root of unity is a root of unity, too.
    $endgroup$
    – David Molano
    Jan 19 at 20:59










1




1




$begingroup$
Please write precisely what you are asking for.
$endgroup$
– szw1710
Jan 19 at 20:54




$begingroup$
Please write precisely what you are asking for.
$endgroup$
– szw1710
Jan 19 at 20:54




2




2




$begingroup$
You can just use the quadratic formula on the original equation. Are you asking why we call this $w$? Often it is $omega$. It is just a number that comes up somewhat frequently, so we give it a name.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 19 at 20:56




$begingroup$
You can just use the quadratic formula on the original equation. Are you asking why we call this $w$? Often it is $omega$. It is just a number that comes up somewhat frequently, so we give it a name.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 19 at 20:56












$begingroup$
You have to understand what's $w$. Suppose $w$ is a cubic root of the unity, so in particular $|w|=1$. Then, multiplying by $overline{w}$, in the equation $w^3=1$ you get $w^2=overline{w}$. And you know that non-real roots of polynomials with real coefficients are there by conjugate pairs. In this way $w^2$ must be a root since it's the conjugate of a root. You can use a different reasoning to prove every power of a root of unity is a root of unity, too.
$endgroup$
– David Molano
Jan 19 at 20:59






$begingroup$
You have to understand what's $w$. Suppose $w$ is a cubic root of the unity, so in particular $|w|=1$. Then, multiplying by $overline{w}$, in the equation $w^3=1$ you get $w^2=overline{w}$. And you know that non-real roots of polynomials with real coefficients are there by conjugate pairs. In this way $w^2$ must be a root since it's the conjugate of a root. You can use a different reasoning to prove every power of a root of unity is a root of unity, too.
$endgroup$
– David Molano
Jan 19 at 20:59












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Let $w$ be a complex root of $x^2+x+1$. Then $w^2+w+1=0$ so $w^3-1 = (w^2+w+1)(w-1) = 0$, so $w^3=1$, so $w^4=w$. Therefore $w^4+w^2+1=w+w^2+1=w^2+w+1=0$, so $w^2$ is also a root of $x^2+x+1$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    Its pretty obvious after you examime the geometric sum;
    $$x^2+x+1=frac{x^3-1}{x-1}$$
    In general
    $$sum_{j=0}^{n-1} x^j=frac{x^n-1}{x-1}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079814%2fwhy-is-w2-a-complex-root-for-the-equation-x2x1-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      Let $w$ be a complex root of $x^2+x+1$. Then $w^2+w+1=0$ so $w^3-1 = (w^2+w+1)(w-1) = 0$, so $w^3=1$, so $w^4=w$. Therefore $w^4+w^2+1=w+w^2+1=w^2+w+1=0$, so $w^2$ is also a root of $x^2+x+1$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        Let $w$ be a complex root of $x^2+x+1$. Then $w^2+w+1=0$ so $w^3-1 = (w^2+w+1)(w-1) = 0$, so $w^3=1$, so $w^4=w$. Therefore $w^4+w^2+1=w+w^2+1=w^2+w+1=0$, so $w^2$ is also a root of $x^2+x+1$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Let $w$ be a complex root of $x^2+x+1$. Then $w^2+w+1=0$ so $w^3-1 = (w^2+w+1)(w-1) = 0$, so $w^3=1$, so $w^4=w$. Therefore $w^4+w^2+1=w+w^2+1=w^2+w+1=0$, so $w^2$ is also a root of $x^2+x+1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Let $w$ be a complex root of $x^2+x+1$. Then $w^2+w+1=0$ so $w^3-1 = (w^2+w+1)(w-1) = 0$, so $w^3=1$, so $w^4=w$. Therefore $w^4+w^2+1=w+w^2+1=w^2+w+1=0$, so $w^2$ is also a root of $x^2+x+1$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 19 at 23:52









          J. W. TannerJ. W. Tanner

          2,6161217




          2,6161217























              0












              $begingroup$

              Its pretty obvious after you examime the geometric sum;
              $$x^2+x+1=frac{x^3-1}{x-1}$$
              In general
              $$sum_{j=0}^{n-1} x^j=frac{x^n-1}{x-1}$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                Its pretty obvious after you examime the geometric sum;
                $$x^2+x+1=frac{x^3-1}{x-1}$$
                In general
                $$sum_{j=0}^{n-1} x^j=frac{x^n-1}{x-1}$$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  Its pretty obvious after you examime the geometric sum;
                  $$x^2+x+1=frac{x^3-1}{x-1}$$
                  In general
                  $$sum_{j=0}^{n-1} x^j=frac{x^n-1}{x-1}$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Its pretty obvious after you examime the geometric sum;
                  $$x^2+x+1=frac{x^3-1}{x-1}$$
                  In general
                  $$sum_{j=0}^{n-1} x^j=frac{x^n-1}{x-1}$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 19 at 21:23









                  Andrew KovácsAndrew Kovács

                  1264




                  1264






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079814%2fwhy-is-w2-a-complex-root-for-the-equation-x2x1-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                      Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

                      A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$