Cauchy a.e. implies existence of a measurable function to which this sequence converges a.e












3












$begingroup$


I have seen a similar exercise in Royden (if I recall correctly), but the statement included Cauchy convergence in measure.



In this case, there are measurable functions $f_n:Xrightarrowmathbb{R}$ such that ${f_n}$ is Cauchy a.e.



I need to prove that there exists a measurable function $f$ for which $f_nto f$ a.e.



Every Cauchy sequence has a finite limit then, intuitively, it seems that we can find a function $f$ which is finite-valued so that $f_n to f$ a.e.



I can't, however, justify this in a rigorous way. Can you provide a hint, please?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    For any point $x$ outside a set of measure zero $N,$ the sequence of real numbers $f_n(x)$ is fundamental, hence converging to some $f(x)$ and on $N$ we define $f = 0.$ Q.E.D.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Feb 4 at 21:37
















3












$begingroup$


I have seen a similar exercise in Royden (if I recall correctly), but the statement included Cauchy convergence in measure.



In this case, there are measurable functions $f_n:Xrightarrowmathbb{R}$ such that ${f_n}$ is Cauchy a.e.



I need to prove that there exists a measurable function $f$ for which $f_nto f$ a.e.



Every Cauchy sequence has a finite limit then, intuitively, it seems that we can find a function $f$ which is finite-valued so that $f_n to f$ a.e.



I can't, however, justify this in a rigorous way. Can you provide a hint, please?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    For any point $x$ outside a set of measure zero $N,$ the sequence of real numbers $f_n(x)$ is fundamental, hence converging to some $f(x)$ and on $N$ we define $f = 0.$ Q.E.D.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Feb 4 at 21:37














3












3








3





$begingroup$


I have seen a similar exercise in Royden (if I recall correctly), but the statement included Cauchy convergence in measure.



In this case, there are measurable functions $f_n:Xrightarrowmathbb{R}$ such that ${f_n}$ is Cauchy a.e.



I need to prove that there exists a measurable function $f$ for which $f_nto f$ a.e.



Every Cauchy sequence has a finite limit then, intuitively, it seems that we can find a function $f$ which is finite-valued so that $f_n to f$ a.e.



I can't, however, justify this in a rigorous way. Can you provide a hint, please?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have seen a similar exercise in Royden (if I recall correctly), but the statement included Cauchy convergence in measure.



In this case, there are measurable functions $f_n:Xrightarrowmathbb{R}$ such that ${f_n}$ is Cauchy a.e.



I need to prove that there exists a measurable function $f$ for which $f_nto f$ a.e.



Every Cauchy sequence has a finite limit then, intuitively, it seems that we can find a function $f$ which is finite-valued so that $f_n to f$ a.e.



I can't, however, justify this in a rigorous way. Can you provide a hint, please?







real-analysis measure-theory lebesgue-measure






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 28 at 15:14









Don DraperDon Draper

87110




87110








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    For any point $x$ outside a set of measure zero $N,$ the sequence of real numbers $f_n(x)$ is fundamental, hence converging to some $f(x)$ and on $N$ we define $f = 0.$ Q.E.D.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Feb 4 at 21:37














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    For any point $x$ outside a set of measure zero $N,$ the sequence of real numbers $f_n(x)$ is fundamental, hence converging to some $f(x)$ and on $N$ we define $f = 0.$ Q.E.D.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Feb 4 at 21:37








1




1




$begingroup$
For any point $x$ outside a set of measure zero $N,$ the sequence of real numbers $f_n(x)$ is fundamental, hence converging to some $f(x)$ and on $N$ we define $f = 0.$ Q.E.D.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Feb 4 at 21:37




$begingroup$
For any point $x$ outside a set of measure zero $N,$ the sequence of real numbers $f_n(x)$ is fundamental, hence converging to some $f(x)$ and on $N$ we define $f = 0.$ Q.E.D.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Feb 4 at 21:37










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4





+50







$begingroup$

Let $mu$ be the measure on $X,$ and let $A={xin X: f_n(x) text { is Cauchy }}.$ We are given $Xsetminus A$ is measurable, with $mu(Xsetminus A)=0.$ Hence $A$ is measurable. For $xin A,$ we have $f_n(x)$ Cauchy, hence convergent, hence $f_n(x)to liminf f_n(x).$ But $liminf f_n(x)$ is a measurable function on $A.$ Hence the function



$$f(x) = begin{cases} liminf f_n(x),&xin A\ 0,&xin Xsetminus Aend{cases}$$



is measurable on $X,$ and $f_n(x)to f(x)$ $mu$-a.e.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    The set, on which $(f_n)_n$ is a Cauchy-sequence, can be written as
    $$Omega = bigcap_{k=1}^infty bigcup_{N=1}^infty bigcap_{n,m ge N} { |f_n - f_m| < 1/k}.$$
    Since $mathbb{R}$ is complete, for any $omega in Omega$ the limes $lim_{n rightarrow infty} f_n(omega)$ exists in $mathbb{R}$, Your assumptations says also that $mu(Omega^c) =0$, i.e. $Omega^c$ is a nullset. Next define $$f:= lim_{n rightarrow infty} f_n(omega) 1_Omega(omega).$$
    Then $f_n rightarrow f$ a.e. and, since $f_n 1_{Omega}$ is measurable for any $n in mathbb{N}$, also $f$ is measurable (as a pointwise limes).






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Can you please add more details on the $Omega$ set? What does it stand for?
      $endgroup$
      – Don Draper
      Feb 2 at 17:23












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3090985%2fcauchy-a-e-implies-existence-of-a-measurable-function-to-which-this-sequence-co%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4





    +50







    $begingroup$

    Let $mu$ be the measure on $X,$ and let $A={xin X: f_n(x) text { is Cauchy }}.$ We are given $Xsetminus A$ is measurable, with $mu(Xsetminus A)=0.$ Hence $A$ is measurable. For $xin A,$ we have $f_n(x)$ Cauchy, hence convergent, hence $f_n(x)to liminf f_n(x).$ But $liminf f_n(x)$ is a measurable function on $A.$ Hence the function



    $$f(x) = begin{cases} liminf f_n(x),&xin A\ 0,&xin Xsetminus Aend{cases}$$



    is measurable on $X,$ and $f_n(x)to f(x)$ $mu$-a.e.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      4





      +50







      $begingroup$

      Let $mu$ be the measure on $X,$ and let $A={xin X: f_n(x) text { is Cauchy }}.$ We are given $Xsetminus A$ is measurable, with $mu(Xsetminus A)=0.$ Hence $A$ is measurable. For $xin A,$ we have $f_n(x)$ Cauchy, hence convergent, hence $f_n(x)to liminf f_n(x).$ But $liminf f_n(x)$ is a measurable function on $A.$ Hence the function



      $$f(x) = begin{cases} liminf f_n(x),&xin A\ 0,&xin Xsetminus Aend{cases}$$



      is measurable on $X,$ and $f_n(x)to f(x)$ $mu$-a.e.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        4





        +50







        4





        +50



        4




        +50



        $begingroup$

        Let $mu$ be the measure on $X,$ and let $A={xin X: f_n(x) text { is Cauchy }}.$ We are given $Xsetminus A$ is measurable, with $mu(Xsetminus A)=0.$ Hence $A$ is measurable. For $xin A,$ we have $f_n(x)$ Cauchy, hence convergent, hence $f_n(x)to liminf f_n(x).$ But $liminf f_n(x)$ is a measurable function on $A.$ Hence the function



        $$f(x) = begin{cases} liminf f_n(x),&xin A\ 0,&xin Xsetminus Aend{cases}$$



        is measurable on $X,$ and $f_n(x)to f(x)$ $mu$-a.e.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Let $mu$ be the measure on $X,$ and let $A={xin X: f_n(x) text { is Cauchy }}.$ We are given $Xsetminus A$ is measurable, with $mu(Xsetminus A)=0.$ Hence $A$ is measurable. For $xin A,$ we have $f_n(x)$ Cauchy, hence convergent, hence $f_n(x)to liminf f_n(x).$ But $liminf f_n(x)$ is a measurable function on $A.$ Hence the function



        $$f(x) = begin{cases} liminf f_n(x),&xin A\ 0,&xin Xsetminus Aend{cases}$$



        is measurable on $X,$ and $f_n(x)to f(x)$ $mu$-a.e.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Feb 3 at 16:39

























        answered Feb 2 at 20:11









        zhw.zhw.

        74.8k43175




        74.8k43175























            2












            $begingroup$

            The set, on which $(f_n)_n$ is a Cauchy-sequence, can be written as
            $$Omega = bigcap_{k=1}^infty bigcup_{N=1}^infty bigcap_{n,m ge N} { |f_n - f_m| < 1/k}.$$
            Since $mathbb{R}$ is complete, for any $omega in Omega$ the limes $lim_{n rightarrow infty} f_n(omega)$ exists in $mathbb{R}$, Your assumptations says also that $mu(Omega^c) =0$, i.e. $Omega^c$ is a nullset. Next define $$f:= lim_{n rightarrow infty} f_n(omega) 1_Omega(omega).$$
            Then $f_n rightarrow f$ a.e. and, since $f_n 1_{Omega}$ is measurable for any $n in mathbb{N}$, also $f$ is measurable (as a pointwise limes).






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Can you please add more details on the $Omega$ set? What does it stand for?
              $endgroup$
              – Don Draper
              Feb 2 at 17:23
















            2












            $begingroup$

            The set, on which $(f_n)_n$ is a Cauchy-sequence, can be written as
            $$Omega = bigcap_{k=1}^infty bigcup_{N=1}^infty bigcap_{n,m ge N} { |f_n - f_m| < 1/k}.$$
            Since $mathbb{R}$ is complete, for any $omega in Omega$ the limes $lim_{n rightarrow infty} f_n(omega)$ exists in $mathbb{R}$, Your assumptations says also that $mu(Omega^c) =0$, i.e. $Omega^c$ is a nullset. Next define $$f:= lim_{n rightarrow infty} f_n(omega) 1_Omega(omega).$$
            Then $f_n rightarrow f$ a.e. and, since $f_n 1_{Omega}$ is measurable for any $n in mathbb{N}$, also $f$ is measurable (as a pointwise limes).






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Can you please add more details on the $Omega$ set? What does it stand for?
              $endgroup$
              – Don Draper
              Feb 2 at 17:23














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            The set, on which $(f_n)_n$ is a Cauchy-sequence, can be written as
            $$Omega = bigcap_{k=1}^infty bigcup_{N=1}^infty bigcap_{n,m ge N} { |f_n - f_m| < 1/k}.$$
            Since $mathbb{R}$ is complete, for any $omega in Omega$ the limes $lim_{n rightarrow infty} f_n(omega)$ exists in $mathbb{R}$, Your assumptations says also that $mu(Omega^c) =0$, i.e. $Omega^c$ is a nullset. Next define $$f:= lim_{n rightarrow infty} f_n(omega) 1_Omega(omega).$$
            Then $f_n rightarrow f$ a.e. and, since $f_n 1_{Omega}$ is measurable for any $n in mathbb{N}$, also $f$ is measurable (as a pointwise limes).






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            The set, on which $(f_n)_n$ is a Cauchy-sequence, can be written as
            $$Omega = bigcap_{k=1}^infty bigcup_{N=1}^infty bigcap_{n,m ge N} { |f_n - f_m| < 1/k}.$$
            Since $mathbb{R}$ is complete, for any $omega in Omega$ the limes $lim_{n rightarrow infty} f_n(omega)$ exists in $mathbb{R}$, Your assumptations says also that $mu(Omega^c) =0$, i.e. $Omega^c$ is a nullset. Next define $$f:= lim_{n rightarrow infty} f_n(omega) 1_Omega(omega).$$
            Then $f_n rightarrow f$ a.e. and, since $f_n 1_{Omega}$ is measurable for any $n in mathbb{N}$, also $f$ is measurable (as a pointwise limes).







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Feb 3 at 9:55

























            answered Jan 28 at 16:26









            p4schp4sch

            5,475318




            5,475318












            • $begingroup$
              Can you please add more details on the $Omega$ set? What does it stand for?
              $endgroup$
              – Don Draper
              Feb 2 at 17:23


















            • $begingroup$
              Can you please add more details on the $Omega$ set? What does it stand for?
              $endgroup$
              – Don Draper
              Feb 2 at 17:23
















            $begingroup$
            Can you please add more details on the $Omega$ set? What does it stand for?
            $endgroup$
            – Don Draper
            Feb 2 at 17:23




            $begingroup$
            Can you please add more details on the $Omega$ set? What does it stand for?
            $endgroup$
            – Don Draper
            Feb 2 at 17:23


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3090985%2fcauchy-a-e-implies-existence-of-a-measurable-function-to-which-this-sequence-co%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith