Every continuous open mapping from $mathbb{R}$ into $mathbb{R}$ is monotonic












0












$begingroup$


Consider the image of an open set $(a,b)$ under the open and continuous mapping $f$. We show, $f$ cannot have any extremum in $(a,b)$.



We know, connected sets are mapped to connected sets under a continuous map. Hence, $f[(a,b)]=(c,d)$ is connected (and open). Suppose, at $xi in (a,b)$, $f(xi)=sup_{(a,b)} f=M$ (or $inf_{(a,b)}f=m$). [Being a continuous function, $f$ must attain its supremum/infimum.]



Hence, the image of the set $(a,b)$ under $f$ becomes $(c,M]$ or $[m,d)$, which is a contradiction of the fact that $f$ maps open sets to open sets. Therefore, in any open interval, the function cannot attain glb/lub at an interior point. So, we conclude that the inf and sup are at the end points, i.e. $sup_{[a,b]}f=f(a)$ or $f(b)$.



Hence the theorem.



Is the proof valid? I am aware of the duplicates. I just want this method verified.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Every continuous open mapping of $mathbb{R}$ into $mathbb{R}$ is monotonic
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 28 at 17:21










  • $begingroup$
    i am going to take down my previous question
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Jan 28 at 17:23










  • $begingroup$
    If the question is essentially the same, you just want to change the presentation, it makes more sense to edit the old question, rather than delete and then immediately re-ask.
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 28 at 17:23










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! will keep that in mind.
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Jan 28 at 17:24










  • $begingroup$
    Your proof is not correct, first because the extreme value theorem doesn't apply on an open interval, and second because such "global" reasoning doesn't invalidate the possibility of a function whose global extrema on $[a,b]$ are at the endpoints but nevertheless has some local extremum.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Jan 28 at 17:25
















0












$begingroup$


Consider the image of an open set $(a,b)$ under the open and continuous mapping $f$. We show, $f$ cannot have any extremum in $(a,b)$.



We know, connected sets are mapped to connected sets under a continuous map. Hence, $f[(a,b)]=(c,d)$ is connected (and open). Suppose, at $xi in (a,b)$, $f(xi)=sup_{(a,b)} f=M$ (or $inf_{(a,b)}f=m$). [Being a continuous function, $f$ must attain its supremum/infimum.]



Hence, the image of the set $(a,b)$ under $f$ becomes $(c,M]$ or $[m,d)$, which is a contradiction of the fact that $f$ maps open sets to open sets. Therefore, in any open interval, the function cannot attain glb/lub at an interior point. So, we conclude that the inf and sup are at the end points, i.e. $sup_{[a,b]}f=f(a)$ or $f(b)$.



Hence the theorem.



Is the proof valid? I am aware of the duplicates. I just want this method verified.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Every continuous open mapping of $mathbb{R}$ into $mathbb{R}$ is monotonic
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 28 at 17:21










  • $begingroup$
    i am going to take down my previous question
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Jan 28 at 17:23










  • $begingroup$
    If the question is essentially the same, you just want to change the presentation, it makes more sense to edit the old question, rather than delete and then immediately re-ask.
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 28 at 17:23










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! will keep that in mind.
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Jan 28 at 17:24










  • $begingroup$
    Your proof is not correct, first because the extreme value theorem doesn't apply on an open interval, and second because such "global" reasoning doesn't invalidate the possibility of a function whose global extrema on $[a,b]$ are at the endpoints but nevertheless has some local extremum.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Jan 28 at 17:25














0












0








0


2



$begingroup$


Consider the image of an open set $(a,b)$ under the open and continuous mapping $f$. We show, $f$ cannot have any extremum in $(a,b)$.



We know, connected sets are mapped to connected sets under a continuous map. Hence, $f[(a,b)]=(c,d)$ is connected (and open). Suppose, at $xi in (a,b)$, $f(xi)=sup_{(a,b)} f=M$ (or $inf_{(a,b)}f=m$). [Being a continuous function, $f$ must attain its supremum/infimum.]



Hence, the image of the set $(a,b)$ under $f$ becomes $(c,M]$ or $[m,d)$, which is a contradiction of the fact that $f$ maps open sets to open sets. Therefore, in any open interval, the function cannot attain glb/lub at an interior point. So, we conclude that the inf and sup are at the end points, i.e. $sup_{[a,b]}f=f(a)$ or $f(b)$.



Hence the theorem.



Is the proof valid? I am aware of the duplicates. I just want this method verified.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Consider the image of an open set $(a,b)$ under the open and continuous mapping $f$. We show, $f$ cannot have any extremum in $(a,b)$.



We know, connected sets are mapped to connected sets under a continuous map. Hence, $f[(a,b)]=(c,d)$ is connected (and open). Suppose, at $xi in (a,b)$, $f(xi)=sup_{(a,b)} f=M$ (or $inf_{(a,b)}f=m$). [Being a continuous function, $f$ must attain its supremum/infimum.]



Hence, the image of the set $(a,b)$ under $f$ becomes $(c,M]$ or $[m,d)$, which is a contradiction of the fact that $f$ maps open sets to open sets. Therefore, in any open interval, the function cannot attain glb/lub at an interior point. So, we conclude that the inf and sup are at the end points, i.e. $sup_{[a,b]}f=f(a)$ or $f(b)$.



Hence the theorem.



Is the proof valid? I am aware of the duplicates. I just want this method verified.







real-analysis proof-verification continuity monotone-functions open-map






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 28 at 17:35







Subhasis Biswas

















asked Jan 28 at 17:17









Subhasis BiswasSubhasis Biswas

512412




512412












  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Every continuous open mapping of $mathbb{R}$ into $mathbb{R}$ is monotonic
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 28 at 17:21










  • $begingroup$
    i am going to take down my previous question
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Jan 28 at 17:23










  • $begingroup$
    If the question is essentially the same, you just want to change the presentation, it makes more sense to edit the old question, rather than delete and then immediately re-ask.
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 28 at 17:23










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! will keep that in mind.
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Jan 28 at 17:24










  • $begingroup$
    Your proof is not correct, first because the extreme value theorem doesn't apply on an open interval, and second because such "global" reasoning doesn't invalidate the possibility of a function whose global extrema on $[a,b]$ are at the endpoints but nevertheless has some local extremum.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Jan 28 at 17:25


















  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Every continuous open mapping of $mathbb{R}$ into $mathbb{R}$ is monotonic
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 28 at 17:21










  • $begingroup$
    i am going to take down my previous question
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Jan 28 at 17:23










  • $begingroup$
    If the question is essentially the same, you just want to change the presentation, it makes more sense to edit the old question, rather than delete and then immediately re-ask.
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    Jan 28 at 17:23










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! will keep that in mind.
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Jan 28 at 17:24










  • $begingroup$
    Your proof is not correct, first because the extreme value theorem doesn't apply on an open interval, and second because such "global" reasoning doesn't invalidate the possibility of a function whose global extrema on $[a,b]$ are at the endpoints but nevertheless has some local extremum.
    $endgroup$
    – Ian
    Jan 28 at 17:25
















$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Every continuous open mapping of $mathbb{R}$ into $mathbb{R}$ is monotonic
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
Jan 28 at 17:21




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Every continuous open mapping of $mathbb{R}$ into $mathbb{R}$ is monotonic
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
Jan 28 at 17:21












$begingroup$
i am going to take down my previous question
$endgroup$
– Subhasis Biswas
Jan 28 at 17:23




$begingroup$
i am going to take down my previous question
$endgroup$
– Subhasis Biswas
Jan 28 at 17:23












$begingroup$
If the question is essentially the same, you just want to change the presentation, it makes more sense to edit the old question, rather than delete and then immediately re-ask.
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
Jan 28 at 17:23




$begingroup$
If the question is essentially the same, you just want to change the presentation, it makes more sense to edit the old question, rather than delete and then immediately re-ask.
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
Jan 28 at 17:23












$begingroup$
Thank you! will keep that in mind.
$endgroup$
– Subhasis Biswas
Jan 28 at 17:24




$begingroup$
Thank you! will keep that in mind.
$endgroup$
– Subhasis Biswas
Jan 28 at 17:24












$begingroup$
Your proof is not correct, first because the extreme value theorem doesn't apply on an open interval, and second because such "global" reasoning doesn't invalidate the possibility of a function whose global extrema on $[a,b]$ are at the endpoints but nevertheless has some local extremum.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Jan 28 at 17:25




$begingroup$
Your proof is not correct, first because the extreme value theorem doesn't apply on an open interval, and second because such "global" reasoning doesn't invalidate the possibility of a function whose global extrema on $[a,b]$ are at the endpoints but nevertheless has some local extremum.
$endgroup$
– Ian
Jan 28 at 17:25










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3091146%2fevery-continuous-open-mapping-from-mathbbr-into-mathbbr-is-monotonic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3091146%2fevery-continuous-open-mapping-from-mathbbr-into-mathbbr-is-monotonic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith