Existence of a unique solution of $dX_t=X_tB_tdB_t+X_tB_tdt, X_0=1$
$begingroup$
Does this SDE have a unique solution:
$$dX_t=X_tB_tdB_t+X_tB_tdt, quad X_0=1?$$
I have to check if the Lipschitz condition holds and if the growth condition holds.
I presume not, as the Brownian motion can take any value (it is unbounded, so the growth and the Lipschitz condition are not satisfied. But how can I formally prove this, if my intuition is indeed correct?
How can one generally prove/disprove the conditions for existence and uniqueness, besides showing if it is differentiable?
brownian-motion stochastic-pde
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Does this SDE have a unique solution:
$$dX_t=X_tB_tdB_t+X_tB_tdt, quad X_0=1?$$
I have to check if the Lipschitz condition holds and if the growth condition holds.
I presume not, as the Brownian motion can take any value (it is unbounded, so the growth and the Lipschitz condition are not satisfied. But how can I formally prove this, if my intuition is indeed correct?
How can one generally prove/disprove the conditions for existence and uniqueness, besides showing if it is differentiable?
brownian-motion stochastic-pde
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The classical Lipschitz conditions are for SDEs of the form $$dX_t = b(t,X_t) ,dt + sigma(t,X_t) , dB_t$$ where $b$ and $sigma$ are deterministic functions. Note that your coefficients are not deterministic and, hence, the classical results do not apply.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 28 at 18:44
$begingroup$
Ah, I see, thank you. And how can I then prove whether or not a unique solution exists?
$endgroup$
– Ravonrip
Jan 28 at 18:56
$begingroup$
Well, there are general uniqueness results for SDEs with random coefficients; I'm just saying that you should be careful which kind of results are applicable.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 28 at 19:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Does this SDE have a unique solution:
$$dX_t=X_tB_tdB_t+X_tB_tdt, quad X_0=1?$$
I have to check if the Lipschitz condition holds and if the growth condition holds.
I presume not, as the Brownian motion can take any value (it is unbounded, so the growth and the Lipschitz condition are not satisfied. But how can I formally prove this, if my intuition is indeed correct?
How can one generally prove/disprove the conditions for existence and uniqueness, besides showing if it is differentiable?
brownian-motion stochastic-pde
$endgroup$
Does this SDE have a unique solution:
$$dX_t=X_tB_tdB_t+X_tB_tdt, quad X_0=1?$$
I have to check if the Lipschitz condition holds and if the growth condition holds.
I presume not, as the Brownian motion can take any value (it is unbounded, so the growth and the Lipschitz condition are not satisfied. But how can I formally prove this, if my intuition is indeed correct?
How can one generally prove/disprove the conditions for existence and uniqueness, besides showing if it is differentiable?
brownian-motion stochastic-pde
brownian-motion stochastic-pde
asked Jan 28 at 18:27
RavonripRavonrip
898
898
$begingroup$
The classical Lipschitz conditions are for SDEs of the form $$dX_t = b(t,X_t) ,dt + sigma(t,X_t) , dB_t$$ where $b$ and $sigma$ are deterministic functions. Note that your coefficients are not deterministic and, hence, the classical results do not apply.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 28 at 18:44
$begingroup$
Ah, I see, thank you. And how can I then prove whether or not a unique solution exists?
$endgroup$
– Ravonrip
Jan 28 at 18:56
$begingroup$
Well, there are general uniqueness results for SDEs with random coefficients; I'm just saying that you should be careful which kind of results are applicable.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 28 at 19:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The classical Lipschitz conditions are for SDEs of the form $$dX_t = b(t,X_t) ,dt + sigma(t,X_t) , dB_t$$ where $b$ and $sigma$ are deterministic functions. Note that your coefficients are not deterministic and, hence, the classical results do not apply.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 28 at 18:44
$begingroup$
Ah, I see, thank you. And how can I then prove whether or not a unique solution exists?
$endgroup$
– Ravonrip
Jan 28 at 18:56
$begingroup$
Well, there are general uniqueness results for SDEs with random coefficients; I'm just saying that you should be careful which kind of results are applicable.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 28 at 19:22
$begingroup$
The classical Lipschitz conditions are for SDEs of the form $$dX_t = b(t,X_t) ,dt + sigma(t,X_t) , dB_t$$ where $b$ and $sigma$ are deterministic functions. Note that your coefficients are not deterministic and, hence, the classical results do not apply.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 28 at 18:44
$begingroup$
The classical Lipschitz conditions are for SDEs of the form $$dX_t = b(t,X_t) ,dt + sigma(t,X_t) , dB_t$$ where $b$ and $sigma$ are deterministic functions. Note that your coefficients are not deterministic and, hence, the classical results do not apply.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 28 at 18:44
$begingroup$
Ah, I see, thank you. And how can I then prove whether or not a unique solution exists?
$endgroup$
– Ravonrip
Jan 28 at 18:56
$begingroup$
Ah, I see, thank you. And how can I then prove whether or not a unique solution exists?
$endgroup$
– Ravonrip
Jan 28 at 18:56
$begingroup$
Well, there are general uniqueness results for SDEs with random coefficients; I'm just saying that you should be careful which kind of results are applicable.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 28 at 19:22
$begingroup$
Well, there are general uniqueness results for SDEs with random coefficients; I'm just saying that you should be careful which kind of results are applicable.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 28 at 19:22
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3091216%2fexistence-of-a-unique-solution-of-dx-t-x-tb-tdb-tx-tb-tdt-x-0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3091216%2fexistence-of-a-unique-solution-of-dx-t-x-tb-tdb-tx-tb-tdt-x-0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
The classical Lipschitz conditions are for SDEs of the form $$dX_t = b(t,X_t) ,dt + sigma(t,X_t) , dB_t$$ where $b$ and $sigma$ are deterministic functions. Note that your coefficients are not deterministic and, hence, the classical results do not apply.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 28 at 18:44
$begingroup$
Ah, I see, thank you. And how can I then prove whether or not a unique solution exists?
$endgroup$
– Ravonrip
Jan 28 at 18:56
$begingroup$
Well, there are general uniqueness results for SDEs with random coefficients; I'm just saying that you should be careful which kind of results are applicable.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 28 at 19:22