Existence of a unique solution of $dX_t=X_tB_tdB_t+X_tB_tdt, X_0=1$












0












$begingroup$


Does this SDE have a unique solution:
$$dX_t=X_tB_tdB_t+X_tB_tdt, quad X_0=1?$$



I have to check if the Lipschitz condition holds and if the growth condition holds.



I presume not, as the Brownian motion can take any value (it is unbounded, so the growth and the Lipschitz condition are not satisfied. But how can I formally prove this, if my intuition is indeed correct?



How can one generally prove/disprove the conditions for existence and uniqueness, besides showing if it is differentiable?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The classical Lipschitz conditions are for SDEs of the form $$dX_t = b(t,X_t) ,dt + sigma(t,X_t) , dB_t$$ where $b$ and $sigma$ are deterministic functions. Note that your coefficients are not deterministic and, hence, the classical results do not apply.
    $endgroup$
    – saz
    Jan 28 at 18:44










  • $begingroup$
    Ah, I see, thank you. And how can I then prove whether or not a unique solution exists?
    $endgroup$
    – Ravonrip
    Jan 28 at 18:56










  • $begingroup$
    Well, there are general uniqueness results for SDEs with random coefficients; I'm just saying that you should be careful which kind of results are applicable.
    $endgroup$
    – saz
    Jan 28 at 19:22
















0












$begingroup$


Does this SDE have a unique solution:
$$dX_t=X_tB_tdB_t+X_tB_tdt, quad X_0=1?$$



I have to check if the Lipschitz condition holds and if the growth condition holds.



I presume not, as the Brownian motion can take any value (it is unbounded, so the growth and the Lipschitz condition are not satisfied. But how can I formally prove this, if my intuition is indeed correct?



How can one generally prove/disprove the conditions for existence and uniqueness, besides showing if it is differentiable?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The classical Lipschitz conditions are for SDEs of the form $$dX_t = b(t,X_t) ,dt + sigma(t,X_t) , dB_t$$ where $b$ and $sigma$ are deterministic functions. Note that your coefficients are not deterministic and, hence, the classical results do not apply.
    $endgroup$
    – saz
    Jan 28 at 18:44










  • $begingroup$
    Ah, I see, thank you. And how can I then prove whether or not a unique solution exists?
    $endgroup$
    – Ravonrip
    Jan 28 at 18:56










  • $begingroup$
    Well, there are general uniqueness results for SDEs with random coefficients; I'm just saying that you should be careful which kind of results are applicable.
    $endgroup$
    – saz
    Jan 28 at 19:22














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Does this SDE have a unique solution:
$$dX_t=X_tB_tdB_t+X_tB_tdt, quad X_0=1?$$



I have to check if the Lipschitz condition holds and if the growth condition holds.



I presume not, as the Brownian motion can take any value (it is unbounded, so the growth and the Lipschitz condition are not satisfied. But how can I formally prove this, if my intuition is indeed correct?



How can one generally prove/disprove the conditions for existence and uniqueness, besides showing if it is differentiable?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Does this SDE have a unique solution:
$$dX_t=X_tB_tdB_t+X_tB_tdt, quad X_0=1?$$



I have to check if the Lipschitz condition holds and if the growth condition holds.



I presume not, as the Brownian motion can take any value (it is unbounded, so the growth and the Lipschitz condition are not satisfied. But how can I formally prove this, if my intuition is indeed correct?



How can one generally prove/disprove the conditions for existence and uniqueness, besides showing if it is differentiable?







brownian-motion stochastic-pde






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 28 at 18:27









RavonripRavonrip

898




898












  • $begingroup$
    The classical Lipschitz conditions are for SDEs of the form $$dX_t = b(t,X_t) ,dt + sigma(t,X_t) , dB_t$$ where $b$ and $sigma$ are deterministic functions. Note that your coefficients are not deterministic and, hence, the classical results do not apply.
    $endgroup$
    – saz
    Jan 28 at 18:44










  • $begingroup$
    Ah, I see, thank you. And how can I then prove whether or not a unique solution exists?
    $endgroup$
    – Ravonrip
    Jan 28 at 18:56










  • $begingroup$
    Well, there are general uniqueness results for SDEs with random coefficients; I'm just saying that you should be careful which kind of results are applicable.
    $endgroup$
    – saz
    Jan 28 at 19:22


















  • $begingroup$
    The classical Lipschitz conditions are for SDEs of the form $$dX_t = b(t,X_t) ,dt + sigma(t,X_t) , dB_t$$ where $b$ and $sigma$ are deterministic functions. Note that your coefficients are not deterministic and, hence, the classical results do not apply.
    $endgroup$
    – saz
    Jan 28 at 18:44










  • $begingroup$
    Ah, I see, thank you. And how can I then prove whether or not a unique solution exists?
    $endgroup$
    – Ravonrip
    Jan 28 at 18:56










  • $begingroup$
    Well, there are general uniqueness results for SDEs with random coefficients; I'm just saying that you should be careful which kind of results are applicable.
    $endgroup$
    – saz
    Jan 28 at 19:22
















$begingroup$
The classical Lipschitz conditions are for SDEs of the form $$dX_t = b(t,X_t) ,dt + sigma(t,X_t) , dB_t$$ where $b$ and $sigma$ are deterministic functions. Note that your coefficients are not deterministic and, hence, the classical results do not apply.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 28 at 18:44




$begingroup$
The classical Lipschitz conditions are for SDEs of the form $$dX_t = b(t,X_t) ,dt + sigma(t,X_t) , dB_t$$ where $b$ and $sigma$ are deterministic functions. Note that your coefficients are not deterministic and, hence, the classical results do not apply.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 28 at 18:44












$begingroup$
Ah, I see, thank you. And how can I then prove whether or not a unique solution exists?
$endgroup$
– Ravonrip
Jan 28 at 18:56




$begingroup$
Ah, I see, thank you. And how can I then prove whether or not a unique solution exists?
$endgroup$
– Ravonrip
Jan 28 at 18:56












$begingroup$
Well, there are general uniqueness results for SDEs with random coefficients; I'm just saying that you should be careful which kind of results are applicable.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 28 at 19:22




$begingroup$
Well, there are general uniqueness results for SDEs with random coefficients; I'm just saying that you should be careful which kind of results are applicable.
$endgroup$
– saz
Jan 28 at 19:22










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3091216%2fexistence-of-a-unique-solution-of-dx-t-x-tb-tdb-tx-tb-tdt-x-0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3091216%2fexistence-of-a-unique-solution-of-dx-t-x-tb-tdb-tx-tb-tdt-x-0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith