If $E$ is Banach and $E^*$ is its dual, is every $T:E^*rightarrow E^*$ an adjoint?
$begingroup$
If $E$ is a (complex) Banach and $E^*$ is it's dual, is every bounded $T:E^*rightarrow E^*$ an adjoint? I am mostly interested in when $T$ is an automorphism.
If not, is ${T: E^*rightarrow E^* | mbox{T is an adjoint}}$ dense in $B(E^*)$?
Thanks in advance!
real-analysis functional-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $E$ is a (complex) Banach and $E^*$ is it's dual, is every bounded $T:E^*rightarrow E^*$ an adjoint? I am mostly interested in when $T$ is an automorphism.
If not, is ${T: E^*rightarrow E^* | mbox{T is an adjoint}}$ dense in $B(E^*)$?
Thanks in advance!
real-analysis functional-analysis
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can you define what means to be an adjoint map?
$endgroup$
– alexp9
Jan 19 at 21:30
$begingroup$
@Rhcpy99 Presumbaly $T$ is an adjoint if $T=S^*$ for some $Sin B(E)$.
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 21:33
$begingroup$
@Aweygan Yes, that's what I meant. Sorry for the confusion
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 21:34
$begingroup$
What is easy: if $E$ is reflexive, then every $Tin B(E^*)$ is an adjoint.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Jan 19 at 21:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $E$ is a (complex) Banach and $E^*$ is it's dual, is every bounded $T:E^*rightarrow E^*$ an adjoint? I am mostly interested in when $T$ is an automorphism.
If not, is ${T: E^*rightarrow E^* | mbox{T is an adjoint}}$ dense in $B(E^*)$?
Thanks in advance!
real-analysis functional-analysis
$endgroup$
If $E$ is a (complex) Banach and $E^*$ is it's dual, is every bounded $T:E^*rightarrow E^*$ an adjoint? I am mostly interested in when $T$ is an automorphism.
If not, is ${T: E^*rightarrow E^* | mbox{T is an adjoint}}$ dense in $B(E^*)$?
Thanks in advance!
real-analysis functional-analysis
real-analysis functional-analysis
asked Jan 19 at 21:24
RandomWalkerRandomWalker
1919
1919
$begingroup$
Can you define what means to be an adjoint map?
$endgroup$
– alexp9
Jan 19 at 21:30
$begingroup$
@Rhcpy99 Presumbaly $T$ is an adjoint if $T=S^*$ for some $Sin B(E)$.
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 21:33
$begingroup$
@Aweygan Yes, that's what I meant. Sorry for the confusion
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 21:34
$begingroup$
What is easy: if $E$ is reflexive, then every $Tin B(E^*)$ is an adjoint.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Jan 19 at 21:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can you define what means to be an adjoint map?
$endgroup$
– alexp9
Jan 19 at 21:30
$begingroup$
@Rhcpy99 Presumbaly $T$ is an adjoint if $T=S^*$ for some $Sin B(E)$.
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 21:33
$begingroup$
@Aweygan Yes, that's what I meant. Sorry for the confusion
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 21:34
$begingroup$
What is easy: if $E$ is reflexive, then every $Tin B(E^*)$ is an adjoint.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Jan 19 at 21:55
$begingroup$
Can you define what means to be an adjoint map?
$endgroup$
– alexp9
Jan 19 at 21:30
$begingroup$
Can you define what means to be an adjoint map?
$endgroup$
– alexp9
Jan 19 at 21:30
$begingroup$
@Rhcpy99 Presumbaly $T$ is an adjoint if $T=S^*$ for some $Sin B(E)$.
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 21:33
$begingroup$
@Rhcpy99 Presumbaly $T$ is an adjoint if $T=S^*$ for some $Sin B(E)$.
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 21:33
$begingroup$
@Aweygan Yes, that's what I meant. Sorry for the confusion
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 21:34
$begingroup$
@Aweygan Yes, that's what I meant. Sorry for the confusion
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 21:34
$begingroup$
What is easy: if $E$ is reflexive, then every $Tin B(E^*)$ is an adjoint.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Jan 19 at 21:55
$begingroup$
What is easy: if $E$ is reflexive, then every $Tin B(E^*)$ is an adjoint.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Jan 19 at 21:55
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A linear map $Tin B(E^*)$ is of the form $T=S^*$ for some $Sin B(E)$ if an only if $T$ is weak$^*$-to-weak$^*$ continuous.
Indeed, the reverse implication is easy (take a weak$^*$-convergent net $(x_gamma^*)$, and show that $(Tx_gamma^*)$ is weak$^*$-convergent). For the forward implication, for each $xin X$, the map $E^*tomathbb C$ given by $x^*mapsto langle Tx^*,xrangle$ is a weak$^*$-continuous linear functional, whence there is some $Sxin E$ such that $langle Tx^*,xrangle=langle x^*,Sxrangle$ for all $x^*in E^*$. Showing that the map $S:xmapsto Sx$ is in $B(E)$ and $S^*=T$ isn't terribly difficult (the former follows from the closed graph theorem, and the latter is by construction).
As for the question about density, I'm not aware of any general results. If $E$ is reflexive, then ${T: E^*rightarrow E^* mid Tmbox{ is an adjoint}}=B(E^*)$, but there are some weird Banach spaces, and I imagine counterexamples exist.
EDIT Note that the adjoint map $B(E)to B(E^*)$, $Tmapsto T^*$ is an isometry, whence the image is closed. Thus to show that the image of $B(E)$ under the adjoint map is not dense, it suffices to show that there is some element of $ B(E^*)$ which is not an adjoint. An example of such an operator is provided the comments following the answer on this question.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Extremely thorough and helpful. Thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 22:12
$begingroup$
You're welcome. Glad to help!
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 22:14
$begingroup$
Follow up: is the subspace of adjoints complemented in $B(E^*)$?
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 22:14
$begingroup$
Interesting question. I can't say anything concrete, but I doubt it.
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 22:24
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079853%2fif-e-is-banach-and-e-is-its-dual-is-every-te-rightarrow-e-an-adjoi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A linear map $Tin B(E^*)$ is of the form $T=S^*$ for some $Sin B(E)$ if an only if $T$ is weak$^*$-to-weak$^*$ continuous.
Indeed, the reverse implication is easy (take a weak$^*$-convergent net $(x_gamma^*)$, and show that $(Tx_gamma^*)$ is weak$^*$-convergent). For the forward implication, for each $xin X$, the map $E^*tomathbb C$ given by $x^*mapsto langle Tx^*,xrangle$ is a weak$^*$-continuous linear functional, whence there is some $Sxin E$ such that $langle Tx^*,xrangle=langle x^*,Sxrangle$ for all $x^*in E^*$. Showing that the map $S:xmapsto Sx$ is in $B(E)$ and $S^*=T$ isn't terribly difficult (the former follows from the closed graph theorem, and the latter is by construction).
As for the question about density, I'm not aware of any general results. If $E$ is reflexive, then ${T: E^*rightarrow E^* mid Tmbox{ is an adjoint}}=B(E^*)$, but there are some weird Banach spaces, and I imagine counterexamples exist.
EDIT Note that the adjoint map $B(E)to B(E^*)$, $Tmapsto T^*$ is an isometry, whence the image is closed. Thus to show that the image of $B(E)$ under the adjoint map is not dense, it suffices to show that there is some element of $ B(E^*)$ which is not an adjoint. An example of such an operator is provided the comments following the answer on this question.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Extremely thorough and helpful. Thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 22:12
$begingroup$
You're welcome. Glad to help!
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 22:14
$begingroup$
Follow up: is the subspace of adjoints complemented in $B(E^*)$?
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 22:14
$begingroup$
Interesting question. I can't say anything concrete, but I doubt it.
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 22:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A linear map $Tin B(E^*)$ is of the form $T=S^*$ for some $Sin B(E)$ if an only if $T$ is weak$^*$-to-weak$^*$ continuous.
Indeed, the reverse implication is easy (take a weak$^*$-convergent net $(x_gamma^*)$, and show that $(Tx_gamma^*)$ is weak$^*$-convergent). For the forward implication, for each $xin X$, the map $E^*tomathbb C$ given by $x^*mapsto langle Tx^*,xrangle$ is a weak$^*$-continuous linear functional, whence there is some $Sxin E$ such that $langle Tx^*,xrangle=langle x^*,Sxrangle$ for all $x^*in E^*$. Showing that the map $S:xmapsto Sx$ is in $B(E)$ and $S^*=T$ isn't terribly difficult (the former follows from the closed graph theorem, and the latter is by construction).
As for the question about density, I'm not aware of any general results. If $E$ is reflexive, then ${T: E^*rightarrow E^* mid Tmbox{ is an adjoint}}=B(E^*)$, but there are some weird Banach spaces, and I imagine counterexamples exist.
EDIT Note that the adjoint map $B(E)to B(E^*)$, $Tmapsto T^*$ is an isometry, whence the image is closed. Thus to show that the image of $B(E)$ under the adjoint map is not dense, it suffices to show that there is some element of $ B(E^*)$ which is not an adjoint. An example of such an operator is provided the comments following the answer on this question.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Extremely thorough and helpful. Thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 22:12
$begingroup$
You're welcome. Glad to help!
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 22:14
$begingroup$
Follow up: is the subspace of adjoints complemented in $B(E^*)$?
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 22:14
$begingroup$
Interesting question. I can't say anything concrete, but I doubt it.
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 22:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A linear map $Tin B(E^*)$ is of the form $T=S^*$ for some $Sin B(E)$ if an only if $T$ is weak$^*$-to-weak$^*$ continuous.
Indeed, the reverse implication is easy (take a weak$^*$-convergent net $(x_gamma^*)$, and show that $(Tx_gamma^*)$ is weak$^*$-convergent). For the forward implication, for each $xin X$, the map $E^*tomathbb C$ given by $x^*mapsto langle Tx^*,xrangle$ is a weak$^*$-continuous linear functional, whence there is some $Sxin E$ such that $langle Tx^*,xrangle=langle x^*,Sxrangle$ for all $x^*in E^*$. Showing that the map $S:xmapsto Sx$ is in $B(E)$ and $S^*=T$ isn't terribly difficult (the former follows from the closed graph theorem, and the latter is by construction).
As for the question about density, I'm not aware of any general results. If $E$ is reflexive, then ${T: E^*rightarrow E^* mid Tmbox{ is an adjoint}}=B(E^*)$, but there are some weird Banach spaces, and I imagine counterexamples exist.
EDIT Note that the adjoint map $B(E)to B(E^*)$, $Tmapsto T^*$ is an isometry, whence the image is closed. Thus to show that the image of $B(E)$ under the adjoint map is not dense, it suffices to show that there is some element of $ B(E^*)$ which is not an adjoint. An example of such an operator is provided the comments following the answer on this question.
$endgroup$
A linear map $Tin B(E^*)$ is of the form $T=S^*$ for some $Sin B(E)$ if an only if $T$ is weak$^*$-to-weak$^*$ continuous.
Indeed, the reverse implication is easy (take a weak$^*$-convergent net $(x_gamma^*)$, and show that $(Tx_gamma^*)$ is weak$^*$-convergent). For the forward implication, for each $xin X$, the map $E^*tomathbb C$ given by $x^*mapsto langle Tx^*,xrangle$ is a weak$^*$-continuous linear functional, whence there is some $Sxin E$ such that $langle Tx^*,xrangle=langle x^*,Sxrangle$ for all $x^*in E^*$. Showing that the map $S:xmapsto Sx$ is in $B(E)$ and $S^*=T$ isn't terribly difficult (the former follows from the closed graph theorem, and the latter is by construction).
As for the question about density, I'm not aware of any general results. If $E$ is reflexive, then ${T: E^*rightarrow E^* mid Tmbox{ is an adjoint}}=B(E^*)$, but there are some weird Banach spaces, and I imagine counterexamples exist.
EDIT Note that the adjoint map $B(E)to B(E^*)$, $Tmapsto T^*$ is an isometry, whence the image is closed. Thus to show that the image of $B(E)$ under the adjoint map is not dense, it suffices to show that there is some element of $ B(E^*)$ which is not an adjoint. An example of such an operator is provided the comments following the answer on this question.
edited Jan 19 at 22:07
answered Jan 19 at 21:53


AweyganAweygan
14.4k21441
14.4k21441
$begingroup$
Extremely thorough and helpful. Thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 22:12
$begingroup$
You're welcome. Glad to help!
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 22:14
$begingroup$
Follow up: is the subspace of adjoints complemented in $B(E^*)$?
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 22:14
$begingroup$
Interesting question. I can't say anything concrete, but I doubt it.
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 22:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Extremely thorough and helpful. Thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 22:12
$begingroup$
You're welcome. Glad to help!
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 22:14
$begingroup$
Follow up: is the subspace of adjoints complemented in $B(E^*)$?
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 22:14
$begingroup$
Interesting question. I can't say anything concrete, but I doubt it.
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 22:24
$begingroup$
Extremely thorough and helpful. Thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 22:12
$begingroup$
Extremely thorough and helpful. Thank you very much.
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 22:12
$begingroup$
You're welcome. Glad to help!
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 22:14
$begingroup$
You're welcome. Glad to help!
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 22:14
$begingroup$
Follow up: is the subspace of adjoints complemented in $B(E^*)$?
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 22:14
$begingroup$
Follow up: is the subspace of adjoints complemented in $B(E^*)$?
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 22:14
$begingroup$
Interesting question. I can't say anything concrete, but I doubt it.
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 22:24
$begingroup$
Interesting question. I can't say anything concrete, but I doubt it.
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 22:24
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079853%2fif-e-is-banach-and-e-is-its-dual-is-every-te-rightarrow-e-an-adjoi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Can you define what means to be an adjoint map?
$endgroup$
– alexp9
Jan 19 at 21:30
$begingroup$
@Rhcpy99 Presumbaly $T$ is an adjoint if $T=S^*$ for some $Sin B(E)$.
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 19 at 21:33
$begingroup$
@Aweygan Yes, that's what I meant. Sorry for the confusion
$endgroup$
– RandomWalker
Jan 19 at 21:34
$begingroup$
What is easy: if $E$ is reflexive, then every $Tin B(E^*)$ is an adjoint.
$endgroup$
– amsmath
Jan 19 at 21:55