If $f(frac{x+y}{x-y})=frac{f(x)+f(y)}{f(x)-f(y)}$, which of the following statement is correct












5












$begingroup$


If $f(frac{x+y}{x-y})=frac{f(x)+f(y)}{f(x)-f(y)}$ for $x ne y$, $x$ and $y$ are integer. Which of the following statement is correct :



(1) $f(0)=0$



(2) $f(1)=1$



(3) $f(-x)=-f(x)$



(4) $f(-x)=f(x)$



I thinks it's (1),(2), and (3) are the correct statement. But I don't know if I'm doing it in right way or not.
Here's my attempt :



For (1):
$frac{x+y}{x-y}=0\
x=-y\
f(0)=frac{f(x)+f(-y)}{f(x)-f(-y)}
\f(0)=0$
(I'm not sure about this part)



For (2) :
$frac{x+y}{x-y}=1\
x+y=x-y\
-2y=0\
y=0\
f(1)=frac{f(x)+f(0)}{f(x)-f(0)}
\f(1)=1$



For (3) :
$frac{x+y}{x-y}=-x\
x+y=xy-x^2\ ??$
(I'm stuck from this part)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    5












    $begingroup$


    If $f(frac{x+y}{x-y})=frac{f(x)+f(y)}{f(x)-f(y)}$ for $x ne y$, $x$ and $y$ are integer. Which of the following statement is correct :



    (1) $f(0)=0$



    (2) $f(1)=1$



    (3) $f(-x)=-f(x)$



    (4) $f(-x)=f(x)$



    I thinks it's (1),(2), and (3) are the correct statement. But I don't know if I'm doing it in right way or not.
    Here's my attempt :



    For (1):
    $frac{x+y}{x-y}=0\
    x=-y\
    f(0)=frac{f(x)+f(-y)}{f(x)-f(-y)}
    \f(0)=0$
    (I'm not sure about this part)



    For (2) :
    $frac{x+y}{x-y}=1\
    x+y=x-y\
    -2y=0\
    y=0\
    f(1)=frac{f(x)+f(0)}{f(x)-f(0)}
    \f(1)=1$



    For (3) :
    $frac{x+y}{x-y}=-x\
    x+y=xy-x^2\ ??$
    (I'm stuck from this part)










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$


      If $f(frac{x+y}{x-y})=frac{f(x)+f(y)}{f(x)-f(y)}$ for $x ne y$, $x$ and $y$ are integer. Which of the following statement is correct :



      (1) $f(0)=0$



      (2) $f(1)=1$



      (3) $f(-x)=-f(x)$



      (4) $f(-x)=f(x)$



      I thinks it's (1),(2), and (3) are the correct statement. But I don't know if I'm doing it in right way or not.
      Here's my attempt :



      For (1):
      $frac{x+y}{x-y}=0\
      x=-y\
      f(0)=frac{f(x)+f(-y)}{f(x)-f(-y)}
      \f(0)=0$
      (I'm not sure about this part)



      For (2) :
      $frac{x+y}{x-y}=1\
      x+y=x-y\
      -2y=0\
      y=0\
      f(1)=frac{f(x)+f(0)}{f(x)-f(0)}
      \f(1)=1$



      For (3) :
      $frac{x+y}{x-y}=-x\
      x+y=xy-x^2\ ??$
      (I'm stuck from this part)










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      If $f(frac{x+y}{x-y})=frac{f(x)+f(y)}{f(x)-f(y)}$ for $x ne y$, $x$ and $y$ are integer. Which of the following statement is correct :



      (1) $f(0)=0$



      (2) $f(1)=1$



      (3) $f(-x)=-f(x)$



      (4) $f(-x)=f(x)$



      I thinks it's (1),(2), and (3) are the correct statement. But I don't know if I'm doing it in right way or not.
      Here's my attempt :



      For (1):
      $frac{x+y}{x-y}=0\
      x=-y\
      f(0)=frac{f(x)+f(-y)}{f(x)-f(-y)}
      \f(0)=0$
      (I'm not sure about this part)



      For (2) :
      $frac{x+y}{x-y}=1\
      x+y=x-y\
      -2y=0\
      y=0\
      f(1)=frac{f(x)+f(0)}{f(x)-f(0)}
      \f(1)=1$



      For (3) :
      $frac{x+y}{x-y}=-x\
      x+y=xy-x^2\ ??$
      (I'm stuck from this part)







      functions functional-equations






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 20 at 7:48









      Jyrki Lahtonen

      110k13171378




      110k13171378










      asked Jan 20 at 6:20









      airlanggaairlangga

      775




      775






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Let $f : mathbb{Z} to mathbb{R}$ solve the functional equation



          $$ forall x, y in mathbb{Z} text{s.t.} frac{x+y}{x-y} in mathbb{Z}, quad fleft(frac{x+y}{x-y}right) = frac{f(x) + f(y)}{f(x) - f(y)}. tag{*} $$




          Step 1. $f(1) = 1$ and $f(0) = 0$.




          For $x neq 0$, plug $y=0$ to see that $f(1)=frac{f(x)+f(0)}{f(x)-f(0)}$ holds. If $f(1) neq 1$, then solving in terms of $f(x)$ gives



          $$ f(x) = f(0) frac{f(1) + 1}{f(1) - 1}, $$



          and so, $f$ is constant on $mathbb{Z}setminus{0}$. This immediately yields a contradiction to $text{(*)}$, since plugging $x = 2$ and $y = 1$ renders the right-hand side of $text{(*)}$ undefined. This forces $f(1) = 1$, which then implies $f(0) = 0$.




          Step 2. $f(-x) = -f(x)$.




          In view of Step 1, it suffices to assume $x neq 0$. Plugging $y = -x$, we have



          $$ 0 = f(0) = frac{f(x) + f(-x)}{f(x) - f(-x)}, $$



          and so, $f(x) + f(-x) = 0$ and the desired claim follows.





          By Step 1 and 2, (1), (2) and (3) are correct. Also, notice that $f(x) = x$ solves $text{(*)}$ but does not satisfy (4). So (4) cannot be true.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            Your argument for (1) fails; if we choose $x=-y$ so that $frac{x+y}{x-y}=0$, that doesn't do what you claimed to the right hand side. Instead, we get
            $$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
            by substituting $-x$ everywhere $y$ shows up.

            Not enough information yet. That'll be zero if we can prove (3), but we haven't.



            For (2) - well, that'll work if we can prove (1).



            For (3), you know you don't have it.



            Wait, $x$ and $y$ are restricted to integers in the functional equation? That'll limit us.



            So, how do we prove (3)? Well, let's go back to what we got looking into (1);
            $$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
            for all nonzero integer $y$. But then, it's also true at $-y$, and
            $$f(0)=frac{f(y)+f(-y)}{f(y)-f(-y)}=-frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}=-f(0)$$
            Aha - we must have $f(0)=0$, and (1) is true. From there, $f(-y)+f(y)=0$ for all integer $y$, and we have (3) for integer $y$. For other rational values $f(frac mn)$, we can write $frac{2m}{2n}=frac{(m+n)+(m-n)}{(m+n)-(m-n)}$ and
            $$fleft(frac mnright) = frac{f(m+n)+f(m-n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}$$
            $$fleft(frac {-m}{n}right) = frac{f(-m+n)+f(-m-n)}{f(-m+n)-f(-m-n)}=frac{-f(m-n)-f(m+n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}=-fleft(frac mnright)$$
            That's (3) for rational $x$. If the domain of $f$ extends any farther, we can't say anything about it there, and (3) may fail.



            So, as long as the domain of $f$ is restricted to rationals, we have (1), (2), and (3). Since $f(1)=1$ and $f(-1)=-1$, we definitely don't have (4).






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080253%2fif-f-fracxyx-y-fracfxfyfx-fy-which-of-the-following-stat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              4












              $begingroup$

              Let $f : mathbb{Z} to mathbb{R}$ solve the functional equation



              $$ forall x, y in mathbb{Z} text{s.t.} frac{x+y}{x-y} in mathbb{Z}, quad fleft(frac{x+y}{x-y}right) = frac{f(x) + f(y)}{f(x) - f(y)}. tag{*} $$




              Step 1. $f(1) = 1$ and $f(0) = 0$.




              For $x neq 0$, plug $y=0$ to see that $f(1)=frac{f(x)+f(0)}{f(x)-f(0)}$ holds. If $f(1) neq 1$, then solving in terms of $f(x)$ gives



              $$ f(x) = f(0) frac{f(1) + 1}{f(1) - 1}, $$



              and so, $f$ is constant on $mathbb{Z}setminus{0}$. This immediately yields a contradiction to $text{(*)}$, since plugging $x = 2$ and $y = 1$ renders the right-hand side of $text{(*)}$ undefined. This forces $f(1) = 1$, which then implies $f(0) = 0$.




              Step 2. $f(-x) = -f(x)$.




              In view of Step 1, it suffices to assume $x neq 0$. Plugging $y = -x$, we have



              $$ 0 = f(0) = frac{f(x) + f(-x)}{f(x) - f(-x)}, $$



              and so, $f(x) + f(-x) = 0$ and the desired claim follows.





              By Step 1 and 2, (1), (2) and (3) are correct. Also, notice that $f(x) = x$ solves $text{(*)}$ but does not satisfy (4). So (4) cannot be true.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                4












                $begingroup$

                Let $f : mathbb{Z} to mathbb{R}$ solve the functional equation



                $$ forall x, y in mathbb{Z} text{s.t.} frac{x+y}{x-y} in mathbb{Z}, quad fleft(frac{x+y}{x-y}right) = frac{f(x) + f(y)}{f(x) - f(y)}. tag{*} $$




                Step 1. $f(1) = 1$ and $f(0) = 0$.




                For $x neq 0$, plug $y=0$ to see that $f(1)=frac{f(x)+f(0)}{f(x)-f(0)}$ holds. If $f(1) neq 1$, then solving in terms of $f(x)$ gives



                $$ f(x) = f(0) frac{f(1) + 1}{f(1) - 1}, $$



                and so, $f$ is constant on $mathbb{Z}setminus{0}$. This immediately yields a contradiction to $text{(*)}$, since plugging $x = 2$ and $y = 1$ renders the right-hand side of $text{(*)}$ undefined. This forces $f(1) = 1$, which then implies $f(0) = 0$.




                Step 2. $f(-x) = -f(x)$.




                In view of Step 1, it suffices to assume $x neq 0$. Plugging $y = -x$, we have



                $$ 0 = f(0) = frac{f(x) + f(-x)}{f(x) - f(-x)}, $$



                and so, $f(x) + f(-x) = 0$ and the desired claim follows.





                By Step 1 and 2, (1), (2) and (3) are correct. Also, notice that $f(x) = x$ solves $text{(*)}$ but does not satisfy (4). So (4) cannot be true.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  4












                  4








                  4





                  $begingroup$

                  Let $f : mathbb{Z} to mathbb{R}$ solve the functional equation



                  $$ forall x, y in mathbb{Z} text{s.t.} frac{x+y}{x-y} in mathbb{Z}, quad fleft(frac{x+y}{x-y}right) = frac{f(x) + f(y)}{f(x) - f(y)}. tag{*} $$




                  Step 1. $f(1) = 1$ and $f(0) = 0$.




                  For $x neq 0$, plug $y=0$ to see that $f(1)=frac{f(x)+f(0)}{f(x)-f(0)}$ holds. If $f(1) neq 1$, then solving in terms of $f(x)$ gives



                  $$ f(x) = f(0) frac{f(1) + 1}{f(1) - 1}, $$



                  and so, $f$ is constant on $mathbb{Z}setminus{0}$. This immediately yields a contradiction to $text{(*)}$, since plugging $x = 2$ and $y = 1$ renders the right-hand side of $text{(*)}$ undefined. This forces $f(1) = 1$, which then implies $f(0) = 0$.




                  Step 2. $f(-x) = -f(x)$.




                  In view of Step 1, it suffices to assume $x neq 0$. Plugging $y = -x$, we have



                  $$ 0 = f(0) = frac{f(x) + f(-x)}{f(x) - f(-x)}, $$



                  and so, $f(x) + f(-x) = 0$ and the desired claim follows.





                  By Step 1 and 2, (1), (2) and (3) are correct. Also, notice that $f(x) = x$ solves $text{(*)}$ but does not satisfy (4). So (4) cannot be true.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Let $f : mathbb{Z} to mathbb{R}$ solve the functional equation



                  $$ forall x, y in mathbb{Z} text{s.t.} frac{x+y}{x-y} in mathbb{Z}, quad fleft(frac{x+y}{x-y}right) = frac{f(x) + f(y)}{f(x) - f(y)}. tag{*} $$




                  Step 1. $f(1) = 1$ and $f(0) = 0$.




                  For $x neq 0$, plug $y=0$ to see that $f(1)=frac{f(x)+f(0)}{f(x)-f(0)}$ holds. If $f(1) neq 1$, then solving in terms of $f(x)$ gives



                  $$ f(x) = f(0) frac{f(1) + 1}{f(1) - 1}, $$



                  and so, $f$ is constant on $mathbb{Z}setminus{0}$. This immediately yields a contradiction to $text{(*)}$, since plugging $x = 2$ and $y = 1$ renders the right-hand side of $text{(*)}$ undefined. This forces $f(1) = 1$, which then implies $f(0) = 0$.




                  Step 2. $f(-x) = -f(x)$.




                  In view of Step 1, it suffices to assume $x neq 0$. Plugging $y = -x$, we have



                  $$ 0 = f(0) = frac{f(x) + f(-x)}{f(x) - f(-x)}, $$



                  and so, $f(x) + f(-x) = 0$ and the desired claim follows.





                  By Step 1 and 2, (1), (2) and (3) are correct. Also, notice that $f(x) = x$ solves $text{(*)}$ but does not satisfy (4). So (4) cannot be true.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 20 at 7:17









                  Sangchul LeeSangchul Lee

                  95.4k12171278




                  95.4k12171278























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      Your argument for (1) fails; if we choose $x=-y$ so that $frac{x+y}{x-y}=0$, that doesn't do what you claimed to the right hand side. Instead, we get
                      $$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
                      by substituting $-x$ everywhere $y$ shows up.

                      Not enough information yet. That'll be zero if we can prove (3), but we haven't.



                      For (2) - well, that'll work if we can prove (1).



                      For (3), you know you don't have it.



                      Wait, $x$ and $y$ are restricted to integers in the functional equation? That'll limit us.



                      So, how do we prove (3)? Well, let's go back to what we got looking into (1);
                      $$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
                      for all nonzero integer $y$. But then, it's also true at $-y$, and
                      $$f(0)=frac{f(y)+f(-y)}{f(y)-f(-y)}=-frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}=-f(0)$$
                      Aha - we must have $f(0)=0$, and (1) is true. From there, $f(-y)+f(y)=0$ for all integer $y$, and we have (3) for integer $y$. For other rational values $f(frac mn)$, we can write $frac{2m}{2n}=frac{(m+n)+(m-n)}{(m+n)-(m-n)}$ and
                      $$fleft(frac mnright) = frac{f(m+n)+f(m-n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}$$
                      $$fleft(frac {-m}{n}right) = frac{f(-m+n)+f(-m-n)}{f(-m+n)-f(-m-n)}=frac{-f(m-n)-f(m+n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}=-fleft(frac mnright)$$
                      That's (3) for rational $x$. If the domain of $f$ extends any farther, we can't say anything about it there, and (3) may fail.



                      So, as long as the domain of $f$ is restricted to rationals, we have (1), (2), and (3). Since $f(1)=1$ and $f(-1)=-1$, we definitely don't have (4).






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Your argument for (1) fails; if we choose $x=-y$ so that $frac{x+y}{x-y}=0$, that doesn't do what you claimed to the right hand side. Instead, we get
                        $$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
                        by substituting $-x$ everywhere $y$ shows up.

                        Not enough information yet. That'll be zero if we can prove (3), but we haven't.



                        For (2) - well, that'll work if we can prove (1).



                        For (3), you know you don't have it.



                        Wait, $x$ and $y$ are restricted to integers in the functional equation? That'll limit us.



                        So, how do we prove (3)? Well, let's go back to what we got looking into (1);
                        $$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
                        for all nonzero integer $y$. But then, it's also true at $-y$, and
                        $$f(0)=frac{f(y)+f(-y)}{f(y)-f(-y)}=-frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}=-f(0)$$
                        Aha - we must have $f(0)=0$, and (1) is true. From there, $f(-y)+f(y)=0$ for all integer $y$, and we have (3) for integer $y$. For other rational values $f(frac mn)$, we can write $frac{2m}{2n}=frac{(m+n)+(m-n)}{(m+n)-(m-n)}$ and
                        $$fleft(frac mnright) = frac{f(m+n)+f(m-n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}$$
                        $$fleft(frac {-m}{n}right) = frac{f(-m+n)+f(-m-n)}{f(-m+n)-f(-m-n)}=frac{-f(m-n)-f(m+n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}=-fleft(frac mnright)$$
                        That's (3) for rational $x$. If the domain of $f$ extends any farther, we can't say anything about it there, and (3) may fail.



                        So, as long as the domain of $f$ is restricted to rationals, we have (1), (2), and (3). Since $f(1)=1$ and $f(-1)=-1$, we definitely don't have (4).






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          Your argument for (1) fails; if we choose $x=-y$ so that $frac{x+y}{x-y}=0$, that doesn't do what you claimed to the right hand side. Instead, we get
                          $$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
                          by substituting $-x$ everywhere $y$ shows up.

                          Not enough information yet. That'll be zero if we can prove (3), but we haven't.



                          For (2) - well, that'll work if we can prove (1).



                          For (3), you know you don't have it.



                          Wait, $x$ and $y$ are restricted to integers in the functional equation? That'll limit us.



                          So, how do we prove (3)? Well, let's go back to what we got looking into (1);
                          $$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
                          for all nonzero integer $y$. But then, it's also true at $-y$, and
                          $$f(0)=frac{f(y)+f(-y)}{f(y)-f(-y)}=-frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}=-f(0)$$
                          Aha - we must have $f(0)=0$, and (1) is true. From there, $f(-y)+f(y)=0$ for all integer $y$, and we have (3) for integer $y$. For other rational values $f(frac mn)$, we can write $frac{2m}{2n}=frac{(m+n)+(m-n)}{(m+n)-(m-n)}$ and
                          $$fleft(frac mnright) = frac{f(m+n)+f(m-n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}$$
                          $$fleft(frac {-m}{n}right) = frac{f(-m+n)+f(-m-n)}{f(-m+n)-f(-m-n)}=frac{-f(m-n)-f(m+n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}=-fleft(frac mnright)$$
                          That's (3) for rational $x$. If the domain of $f$ extends any farther, we can't say anything about it there, and (3) may fail.



                          So, as long as the domain of $f$ is restricted to rationals, we have (1), (2), and (3). Since $f(1)=1$ and $f(-1)=-1$, we definitely don't have (4).






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Your argument for (1) fails; if we choose $x=-y$ so that $frac{x+y}{x-y}=0$, that doesn't do what you claimed to the right hand side. Instead, we get
                          $$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
                          by substituting $-x$ everywhere $y$ shows up.

                          Not enough information yet. That'll be zero if we can prove (3), but we haven't.



                          For (2) - well, that'll work if we can prove (1).



                          For (3), you know you don't have it.



                          Wait, $x$ and $y$ are restricted to integers in the functional equation? That'll limit us.



                          So, how do we prove (3)? Well, let's go back to what we got looking into (1);
                          $$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
                          for all nonzero integer $y$. But then, it's also true at $-y$, and
                          $$f(0)=frac{f(y)+f(-y)}{f(y)-f(-y)}=-frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}=-f(0)$$
                          Aha - we must have $f(0)=0$, and (1) is true. From there, $f(-y)+f(y)=0$ for all integer $y$, and we have (3) for integer $y$. For other rational values $f(frac mn)$, we can write $frac{2m}{2n}=frac{(m+n)+(m-n)}{(m+n)-(m-n)}$ and
                          $$fleft(frac mnright) = frac{f(m+n)+f(m-n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}$$
                          $$fleft(frac {-m}{n}right) = frac{f(-m+n)+f(-m-n)}{f(-m+n)-f(-m-n)}=frac{-f(m-n)-f(m+n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}=-fleft(frac mnright)$$
                          That's (3) for rational $x$. If the domain of $f$ extends any farther, we can't say anything about it there, and (3) may fail.



                          So, as long as the domain of $f$ is restricted to rationals, we have (1), (2), and (3). Since $f(1)=1$ and $f(-1)=-1$, we definitely don't have (4).







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Jan 20 at 7:16









                          jmerryjmerry

                          11.8k1528




                          11.8k1528






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080253%2fif-f-fracxyx-y-fracfxfyfx-fy-which-of-the-following-stat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                              Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

                              A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$