If $f(frac{x+y}{x-y})=frac{f(x)+f(y)}{f(x)-f(y)}$, which of the following statement is correct
$begingroup$
If $f(frac{x+y}{x-y})=frac{f(x)+f(y)}{f(x)-f(y)}$ for $x ne y$, $x$ and $y$ are integer. Which of the following statement is correct :
(1) $f(0)=0$
(2) $f(1)=1$
(3) $f(-x)=-f(x)$
(4) $f(-x)=f(x)$
I thinks it's (1),(2), and (3) are the correct statement. But I don't know if I'm doing it in right way or not.
Here's my attempt :
For (1):
$frac{x+y}{x-y}=0\
x=-y\
f(0)=frac{f(x)+f(-y)}{f(x)-f(-y)}
\f(0)=0$ (I'm not sure about this part)
For (2) :
$frac{x+y}{x-y}=1\
x+y=x-y\
-2y=0\
y=0\
f(1)=frac{f(x)+f(0)}{f(x)-f(0)}
\f(1)=1$
For (3) :
$frac{x+y}{x-y}=-x\
x+y=xy-x^2\ ??$ (I'm stuck from this part)
functions functional-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $f(frac{x+y}{x-y})=frac{f(x)+f(y)}{f(x)-f(y)}$ for $x ne y$, $x$ and $y$ are integer. Which of the following statement is correct :
(1) $f(0)=0$
(2) $f(1)=1$
(3) $f(-x)=-f(x)$
(4) $f(-x)=f(x)$
I thinks it's (1),(2), and (3) are the correct statement. But I don't know if I'm doing it in right way or not.
Here's my attempt :
For (1):
$frac{x+y}{x-y}=0\
x=-y\
f(0)=frac{f(x)+f(-y)}{f(x)-f(-y)}
\f(0)=0$ (I'm not sure about this part)
For (2) :
$frac{x+y}{x-y}=1\
x+y=x-y\
-2y=0\
y=0\
f(1)=frac{f(x)+f(0)}{f(x)-f(0)}
\f(1)=1$
For (3) :
$frac{x+y}{x-y}=-x\
x+y=xy-x^2\ ??$ (I'm stuck from this part)
functions functional-equations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $f(frac{x+y}{x-y})=frac{f(x)+f(y)}{f(x)-f(y)}$ for $x ne y$, $x$ and $y$ are integer. Which of the following statement is correct :
(1) $f(0)=0$
(2) $f(1)=1$
(3) $f(-x)=-f(x)$
(4) $f(-x)=f(x)$
I thinks it's (1),(2), and (3) are the correct statement. But I don't know if I'm doing it in right way or not.
Here's my attempt :
For (1):
$frac{x+y}{x-y}=0\
x=-y\
f(0)=frac{f(x)+f(-y)}{f(x)-f(-y)}
\f(0)=0$ (I'm not sure about this part)
For (2) :
$frac{x+y}{x-y}=1\
x+y=x-y\
-2y=0\
y=0\
f(1)=frac{f(x)+f(0)}{f(x)-f(0)}
\f(1)=1$
For (3) :
$frac{x+y}{x-y}=-x\
x+y=xy-x^2\ ??$ (I'm stuck from this part)
functions functional-equations
$endgroup$
If $f(frac{x+y}{x-y})=frac{f(x)+f(y)}{f(x)-f(y)}$ for $x ne y$, $x$ and $y$ are integer. Which of the following statement is correct :
(1) $f(0)=0$
(2) $f(1)=1$
(3) $f(-x)=-f(x)$
(4) $f(-x)=f(x)$
I thinks it's (1),(2), and (3) are the correct statement. But I don't know if I'm doing it in right way or not.
Here's my attempt :
For (1):
$frac{x+y}{x-y}=0\
x=-y\
f(0)=frac{f(x)+f(-y)}{f(x)-f(-y)}
\f(0)=0$ (I'm not sure about this part)
For (2) :
$frac{x+y}{x-y}=1\
x+y=x-y\
-2y=0\
y=0\
f(1)=frac{f(x)+f(0)}{f(x)-f(0)}
\f(1)=1$
For (3) :
$frac{x+y}{x-y}=-x\
x+y=xy-x^2\ ??$ (I'm stuck from this part)
functions functional-equations
functions functional-equations
edited Jan 20 at 7:48
Jyrki Lahtonen
110k13171378
110k13171378
asked Jan 20 at 6:20
airlanggaairlangga
775
775
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $f : mathbb{Z} to mathbb{R}$ solve the functional equation
$$ forall x, y in mathbb{Z} text{s.t.} frac{x+y}{x-y} in mathbb{Z}, quad fleft(frac{x+y}{x-y}right) = frac{f(x) + f(y)}{f(x) - f(y)}. tag{*} $$
Step 1. $f(1) = 1$ and $f(0) = 0$.
For $x neq 0$, plug $y=0$ to see that $f(1)=frac{f(x)+f(0)}{f(x)-f(0)}$ holds. If $f(1) neq 1$, then solving in terms of $f(x)$ gives
$$ f(x) = f(0) frac{f(1) + 1}{f(1) - 1}, $$
and so, $f$ is constant on $mathbb{Z}setminus{0}$. This immediately yields a contradiction to $text{(*)}$, since plugging $x = 2$ and $y = 1$ renders the right-hand side of $text{(*)}$ undefined. This forces $f(1) = 1$, which then implies $f(0) = 0$.
Step 2. $f(-x) = -f(x)$.
In view of Step 1, it suffices to assume $x neq 0$. Plugging $y = -x$, we have
$$ 0 = f(0) = frac{f(x) + f(-x)}{f(x) - f(-x)}, $$
and so, $f(x) + f(-x) = 0$ and the desired claim follows.
By Step 1 and 2, (1), (2) and (3) are correct. Also, notice that $f(x) = x$ solves $text{(*)}$ but does not satisfy (4). So (4) cannot be true.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your argument for (1) fails; if we choose $x=-y$ so that $frac{x+y}{x-y}=0$, that doesn't do what you claimed to the right hand side. Instead, we get
$$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
by substituting $-x$ everywhere $y$ shows up.
Not enough information yet. That'll be zero if we can prove (3), but we haven't.
For (2) - well, that'll work if we can prove (1).
For (3), you know you don't have it.
Wait, $x$ and $y$ are restricted to integers in the functional equation? That'll limit us.
So, how do we prove (3)? Well, let's go back to what we got looking into (1);
$$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
for all nonzero integer $y$. But then, it's also true at $-y$, and
$$f(0)=frac{f(y)+f(-y)}{f(y)-f(-y)}=-frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}=-f(0)$$
Aha - we must have $f(0)=0$, and (1) is true. From there, $f(-y)+f(y)=0$ for all integer $y$, and we have (3) for integer $y$. For other rational values $f(frac mn)$, we can write $frac{2m}{2n}=frac{(m+n)+(m-n)}{(m+n)-(m-n)}$ and
$$fleft(frac mnright) = frac{f(m+n)+f(m-n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}$$
$$fleft(frac {-m}{n}right) = frac{f(-m+n)+f(-m-n)}{f(-m+n)-f(-m-n)}=frac{-f(m-n)-f(m+n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}=-fleft(frac mnright)$$
That's (3) for rational $x$. If the domain of $f$ extends any farther, we can't say anything about it there, and (3) may fail.
So, as long as the domain of $f$ is restricted to rationals, we have (1), (2), and (3). Since $f(1)=1$ and $f(-1)=-1$, we definitely don't have (4).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080253%2fif-f-fracxyx-y-fracfxfyfx-fy-which-of-the-following-stat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $f : mathbb{Z} to mathbb{R}$ solve the functional equation
$$ forall x, y in mathbb{Z} text{s.t.} frac{x+y}{x-y} in mathbb{Z}, quad fleft(frac{x+y}{x-y}right) = frac{f(x) + f(y)}{f(x) - f(y)}. tag{*} $$
Step 1. $f(1) = 1$ and $f(0) = 0$.
For $x neq 0$, plug $y=0$ to see that $f(1)=frac{f(x)+f(0)}{f(x)-f(0)}$ holds. If $f(1) neq 1$, then solving in terms of $f(x)$ gives
$$ f(x) = f(0) frac{f(1) + 1}{f(1) - 1}, $$
and so, $f$ is constant on $mathbb{Z}setminus{0}$. This immediately yields a contradiction to $text{(*)}$, since plugging $x = 2$ and $y = 1$ renders the right-hand side of $text{(*)}$ undefined. This forces $f(1) = 1$, which then implies $f(0) = 0$.
Step 2. $f(-x) = -f(x)$.
In view of Step 1, it suffices to assume $x neq 0$. Plugging $y = -x$, we have
$$ 0 = f(0) = frac{f(x) + f(-x)}{f(x) - f(-x)}, $$
and so, $f(x) + f(-x) = 0$ and the desired claim follows.
By Step 1 and 2, (1), (2) and (3) are correct. Also, notice that $f(x) = x$ solves $text{(*)}$ but does not satisfy (4). So (4) cannot be true.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f : mathbb{Z} to mathbb{R}$ solve the functional equation
$$ forall x, y in mathbb{Z} text{s.t.} frac{x+y}{x-y} in mathbb{Z}, quad fleft(frac{x+y}{x-y}right) = frac{f(x) + f(y)}{f(x) - f(y)}. tag{*} $$
Step 1. $f(1) = 1$ and $f(0) = 0$.
For $x neq 0$, plug $y=0$ to see that $f(1)=frac{f(x)+f(0)}{f(x)-f(0)}$ holds. If $f(1) neq 1$, then solving in terms of $f(x)$ gives
$$ f(x) = f(0) frac{f(1) + 1}{f(1) - 1}, $$
and so, $f$ is constant on $mathbb{Z}setminus{0}$. This immediately yields a contradiction to $text{(*)}$, since plugging $x = 2$ and $y = 1$ renders the right-hand side of $text{(*)}$ undefined. This forces $f(1) = 1$, which then implies $f(0) = 0$.
Step 2. $f(-x) = -f(x)$.
In view of Step 1, it suffices to assume $x neq 0$. Plugging $y = -x$, we have
$$ 0 = f(0) = frac{f(x) + f(-x)}{f(x) - f(-x)}, $$
and so, $f(x) + f(-x) = 0$ and the desired claim follows.
By Step 1 and 2, (1), (2) and (3) are correct. Also, notice that $f(x) = x$ solves $text{(*)}$ but does not satisfy (4). So (4) cannot be true.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f : mathbb{Z} to mathbb{R}$ solve the functional equation
$$ forall x, y in mathbb{Z} text{s.t.} frac{x+y}{x-y} in mathbb{Z}, quad fleft(frac{x+y}{x-y}right) = frac{f(x) + f(y)}{f(x) - f(y)}. tag{*} $$
Step 1. $f(1) = 1$ and $f(0) = 0$.
For $x neq 0$, plug $y=0$ to see that $f(1)=frac{f(x)+f(0)}{f(x)-f(0)}$ holds. If $f(1) neq 1$, then solving in terms of $f(x)$ gives
$$ f(x) = f(0) frac{f(1) + 1}{f(1) - 1}, $$
and so, $f$ is constant on $mathbb{Z}setminus{0}$. This immediately yields a contradiction to $text{(*)}$, since plugging $x = 2$ and $y = 1$ renders the right-hand side of $text{(*)}$ undefined. This forces $f(1) = 1$, which then implies $f(0) = 0$.
Step 2. $f(-x) = -f(x)$.
In view of Step 1, it suffices to assume $x neq 0$. Plugging $y = -x$, we have
$$ 0 = f(0) = frac{f(x) + f(-x)}{f(x) - f(-x)}, $$
and so, $f(x) + f(-x) = 0$ and the desired claim follows.
By Step 1 and 2, (1), (2) and (3) are correct. Also, notice that $f(x) = x$ solves $text{(*)}$ but does not satisfy (4). So (4) cannot be true.
$endgroup$
Let $f : mathbb{Z} to mathbb{R}$ solve the functional equation
$$ forall x, y in mathbb{Z} text{s.t.} frac{x+y}{x-y} in mathbb{Z}, quad fleft(frac{x+y}{x-y}right) = frac{f(x) + f(y)}{f(x) - f(y)}. tag{*} $$
Step 1. $f(1) = 1$ and $f(0) = 0$.
For $x neq 0$, plug $y=0$ to see that $f(1)=frac{f(x)+f(0)}{f(x)-f(0)}$ holds. If $f(1) neq 1$, then solving in terms of $f(x)$ gives
$$ f(x) = f(0) frac{f(1) + 1}{f(1) - 1}, $$
and so, $f$ is constant on $mathbb{Z}setminus{0}$. This immediately yields a contradiction to $text{(*)}$, since plugging $x = 2$ and $y = 1$ renders the right-hand side of $text{(*)}$ undefined. This forces $f(1) = 1$, which then implies $f(0) = 0$.
Step 2. $f(-x) = -f(x)$.
In view of Step 1, it suffices to assume $x neq 0$. Plugging $y = -x$, we have
$$ 0 = f(0) = frac{f(x) + f(-x)}{f(x) - f(-x)}, $$
and so, $f(x) + f(-x) = 0$ and the desired claim follows.
By Step 1 and 2, (1), (2) and (3) are correct. Also, notice that $f(x) = x$ solves $text{(*)}$ but does not satisfy (4). So (4) cannot be true.
answered Jan 20 at 7:17
Sangchul LeeSangchul Lee
95.4k12171278
95.4k12171278
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your argument for (1) fails; if we choose $x=-y$ so that $frac{x+y}{x-y}=0$, that doesn't do what you claimed to the right hand side. Instead, we get
$$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
by substituting $-x$ everywhere $y$ shows up.
Not enough information yet. That'll be zero if we can prove (3), but we haven't.
For (2) - well, that'll work if we can prove (1).
For (3), you know you don't have it.
Wait, $x$ and $y$ are restricted to integers in the functional equation? That'll limit us.
So, how do we prove (3)? Well, let's go back to what we got looking into (1);
$$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
for all nonzero integer $y$. But then, it's also true at $-y$, and
$$f(0)=frac{f(y)+f(-y)}{f(y)-f(-y)}=-frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}=-f(0)$$
Aha - we must have $f(0)=0$, and (1) is true. From there, $f(-y)+f(y)=0$ for all integer $y$, and we have (3) for integer $y$. For other rational values $f(frac mn)$, we can write $frac{2m}{2n}=frac{(m+n)+(m-n)}{(m+n)-(m-n)}$ and
$$fleft(frac mnright) = frac{f(m+n)+f(m-n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}$$
$$fleft(frac {-m}{n}right) = frac{f(-m+n)+f(-m-n)}{f(-m+n)-f(-m-n)}=frac{-f(m-n)-f(m+n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}=-fleft(frac mnright)$$
That's (3) for rational $x$. If the domain of $f$ extends any farther, we can't say anything about it there, and (3) may fail.
So, as long as the domain of $f$ is restricted to rationals, we have (1), (2), and (3). Since $f(1)=1$ and $f(-1)=-1$, we definitely don't have (4).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your argument for (1) fails; if we choose $x=-y$ so that $frac{x+y}{x-y}=0$, that doesn't do what you claimed to the right hand side. Instead, we get
$$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
by substituting $-x$ everywhere $y$ shows up.
Not enough information yet. That'll be zero if we can prove (3), but we haven't.
For (2) - well, that'll work if we can prove (1).
For (3), you know you don't have it.
Wait, $x$ and $y$ are restricted to integers in the functional equation? That'll limit us.
So, how do we prove (3)? Well, let's go back to what we got looking into (1);
$$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
for all nonzero integer $y$. But then, it's also true at $-y$, and
$$f(0)=frac{f(y)+f(-y)}{f(y)-f(-y)}=-frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}=-f(0)$$
Aha - we must have $f(0)=0$, and (1) is true. From there, $f(-y)+f(y)=0$ for all integer $y$, and we have (3) for integer $y$. For other rational values $f(frac mn)$, we can write $frac{2m}{2n}=frac{(m+n)+(m-n)}{(m+n)-(m-n)}$ and
$$fleft(frac mnright) = frac{f(m+n)+f(m-n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}$$
$$fleft(frac {-m}{n}right) = frac{f(-m+n)+f(-m-n)}{f(-m+n)-f(-m-n)}=frac{-f(m-n)-f(m+n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}=-fleft(frac mnright)$$
That's (3) for rational $x$. If the domain of $f$ extends any farther, we can't say anything about it there, and (3) may fail.
So, as long as the domain of $f$ is restricted to rationals, we have (1), (2), and (3). Since $f(1)=1$ and $f(-1)=-1$, we definitely don't have (4).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your argument for (1) fails; if we choose $x=-y$ so that $frac{x+y}{x-y}=0$, that doesn't do what you claimed to the right hand side. Instead, we get
$$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
by substituting $-x$ everywhere $y$ shows up.
Not enough information yet. That'll be zero if we can prove (3), but we haven't.
For (2) - well, that'll work if we can prove (1).
For (3), you know you don't have it.
Wait, $x$ and $y$ are restricted to integers in the functional equation? That'll limit us.
So, how do we prove (3)? Well, let's go back to what we got looking into (1);
$$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
for all nonzero integer $y$. But then, it's also true at $-y$, and
$$f(0)=frac{f(y)+f(-y)}{f(y)-f(-y)}=-frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}=-f(0)$$
Aha - we must have $f(0)=0$, and (1) is true. From there, $f(-y)+f(y)=0$ for all integer $y$, and we have (3) for integer $y$. For other rational values $f(frac mn)$, we can write $frac{2m}{2n}=frac{(m+n)+(m-n)}{(m+n)-(m-n)}$ and
$$fleft(frac mnright) = frac{f(m+n)+f(m-n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}$$
$$fleft(frac {-m}{n}right) = frac{f(-m+n)+f(-m-n)}{f(-m+n)-f(-m-n)}=frac{-f(m-n)-f(m+n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}=-fleft(frac mnright)$$
That's (3) for rational $x$. If the domain of $f$ extends any farther, we can't say anything about it there, and (3) may fail.
So, as long as the domain of $f$ is restricted to rationals, we have (1), (2), and (3). Since $f(1)=1$ and $f(-1)=-1$, we definitely don't have (4).
$endgroup$
Your argument for (1) fails; if we choose $x=-y$ so that $frac{x+y}{x-y}=0$, that doesn't do what you claimed to the right hand side. Instead, we get
$$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
by substituting $-x$ everywhere $y$ shows up.
Not enough information yet. That'll be zero if we can prove (3), but we haven't.
For (2) - well, that'll work if we can prove (1).
For (3), you know you don't have it.
Wait, $x$ and $y$ are restricted to integers in the functional equation? That'll limit us.
So, how do we prove (3)? Well, let's go back to what we got looking into (1);
$$f(0)=frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}$$
for all nonzero integer $y$. But then, it's also true at $-y$, and
$$f(0)=frac{f(y)+f(-y)}{f(y)-f(-y)}=-frac{f(-y)+f(y)}{f(-y)-f(y)}=-f(0)$$
Aha - we must have $f(0)=0$, and (1) is true. From there, $f(-y)+f(y)=0$ for all integer $y$, and we have (3) for integer $y$. For other rational values $f(frac mn)$, we can write $frac{2m}{2n}=frac{(m+n)+(m-n)}{(m+n)-(m-n)}$ and
$$fleft(frac mnright) = frac{f(m+n)+f(m-n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}$$
$$fleft(frac {-m}{n}right) = frac{f(-m+n)+f(-m-n)}{f(-m+n)-f(-m-n)}=frac{-f(m-n)-f(m+n)}{f(m+n)-f(m-n)}=-fleft(frac mnright)$$
That's (3) for rational $x$. If the domain of $f$ extends any farther, we can't say anything about it there, and (3) may fail.
So, as long as the domain of $f$ is restricted to rationals, we have (1), (2), and (3). Since $f(1)=1$ and $f(-1)=-1$, we definitely don't have (4).
answered Jan 20 at 7:16
jmerryjmerry
11.8k1528
11.8k1528
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080253%2fif-f-fracxyx-y-fracfxfyfx-fy-which-of-the-following-stat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown