If shuffling distributes cards, can it also ‘undistribute’ them?
$begingroup$
Assuming you have six decks of cards which have been used in a canasta game. If wildcards are randomly placed throughout the six decks before shuffling, what are the odds that there will be $7$ wildcards together after shuffling the cards $10$ times?
combinatorics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assuming you have six decks of cards which have been used in a canasta game. If wildcards are randomly placed throughout the six decks before shuffling, what are the odds that there will be $7$ wildcards together after shuffling the cards $10$ times?
combinatorics
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What have you tried? How many wild cards are there? How large are the decks of cards (I know pinochle uses different decks than bridge for instance)? If you believe the shuffle count is important, then so too is the shuffling mechanism (because the mathematical version of shuffling is a true random permutation and you can't tell the difference between doing it once and doing it twice); what is the mechanism, and is there a mathematical model of that shuffling technique?
$endgroup$
– Dan Uznanski
Jan 19 at 10:56
$begingroup$
My premise is that if, after the game, the wildcards are not distributed before shuffling begins then the wild cards will end up being more widely distributed after shuffling than if the wild cards had been scattered throughout the decks before shuffling. In other words, if they are randomly distributed to begin with does shuffling have a greater chance of keeping them evenly distributed, a less chance of them being evenly distributed, or doesn’t matter?
$endgroup$
– Philena Farmer
Jan 19 at 19:29
$begingroup$
There are 54 cards in each deck - a regular deck plus two jokers. Shuffling is done mechanically.
$endgroup$
– Philena Farmer
Jan 19 at 19:31
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assuming you have six decks of cards which have been used in a canasta game. If wildcards are randomly placed throughout the six decks before shuffling, what are the odds that there will be $7$ wildcards together after shuffling the cards $10$ times?
combinatorics
$endgroup$
Assuming you have six decks of cards which have been used in a canasta game. If wildcards are randomly placed throughout the six decks before shuffling, what are the odds that there will be $7$ wildcards together after shuffling the cards $10$ times?
combinatorics
combinatorics
edited Jan 19 at 10:46
N. F. Taussig
44.5k103357
44.5k103357
asked Jan 19 at 7:14


Philena FarmerPhilena Farmer
62
62
$begingroup$
What have you tried? How many wild cards are there? How large are the decks of cards (I know pinochle uses different decks than bridge for instance)? If you believe the shuffle count is important, then so too is the shuffling mechanism (because the mathematical version of shuffling is a true random permutation and you can't tell the difference between doing it once and doing it twice); what is the mechanism, and is there a mathematical model of that shuffling technique?
$endgroup$
– Dan Uznanski
Jan 19 at 10:56
$begingroup$
My premise is that if, after the game, the wildcards are not distributed before shuffling begins then the wild cards will end up being more widely distributed after shuffling than if the wild cards had been scattered throughout the decks before shuffling. In other words, if they are randomly distributed to begin with does shuffling have a greater chance of keeping them evenly distributed, a less chance of them being evenly distributed, or doesn’t matter?
$endgroup$
– Philena Farmer
Jan 19 at 19:29
$begingroup$
There are 54 cards in each deck - a regular deck plus two jokers. Shuffling is done mechanically.
$endgroup$
– Philena Farmer
Jan 19 at 19:31
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What have you tried? How many wild cards are there? How large are the decks of cards (I know pinochle uses different decks than bridge for instance)? If you believe the shuffle count is important, then so too is the shuffling mechanism (because the mathematical version of shuffling is a true random permutation and you can't tell the difference between doing it once and doing it twice); what is the mechanism, and is there a mathematical model of that shuffling technique?
$endgroup$
– Dan Uznanski
Jan 19 at 10:56
$begingroup$
My premise is that if, after the game, the wildcards are not distributed before shuffling begins then the wild cards will end up being more widely distributed after shuffling than if the wild cards had been scattered throughout the decks before shuffling. In other words, if they are randomly distributed to begin with does shuffling have a greater chance of keeping them evenly distributed, a less chance of them being evenly distributed, or doesn’t matter?
$endgroup$
– Philena Farmer
Jan 19 at 19:29
$begingroup$
There are 54 cards in each deck - a regular deck plus two jokers. Shuffling is done mechanically.
$endgroup$
– Philena Farmer
Jan 19 at 19:31
$begingroup$
What have you tried? How many wild cards are there? How large are the decks of cards (I know pinochle uses different decks than bridge for instance)? If you believe the shuffle count is important, then so too is the shuffling mechanism (because the mathematical version of shuffling is a true random permutation and you can't tell the difference between doing it once and doing it twice); what is the mechanism, and is there a mathematical model of that shuffling technique?
$endgroup$
– Dan Uznanski
Jan 19 at 10:56
$begingroup$
What have you tried? How many wild cards are there? How large are the decks of cards (I know pinochle uses different decks than bridge for instance)? If you believe the shuffle count is important, then so too is the shuffling mechanism (because the mathematical version of shuffling is a true random permutation and you can't tell the difference between doing it once and doing it twice); what is the mechanism, and is there a mathematical model of that shuffling technique?
$endgroup$
– Dan Uznanski
Jan 19 at 10:56
$begingroup$
My premise is that if, after the game, the wildcards are not distributed before shuffling begins then the wild cards will end up being more widely distributed after shuffling than if the wild cards had been scattered throughout the decks before shuffling. In other words, if they are randomly distributed to begin with does shuffling have a greater chance of keeping them evenly distributed, a less chance of them being evenly distributed, or doesn’t matter?
$endgroup$
– Philena Farmer
Jan 19 at 19:29
$begingroup$
My premise is that if, after the game, the wildcards are not distributed before shuffling begins then the wild cards will end up being more widely distributed after shuffling than if the wild cards had been scattered throughout the decks before shuffling. In other words, if they are randomly distributed to begin with does shuffling have a greater chance of keeping them evenly distributed, a less chance of them being evenly distributed, or doesn’t matter?
$endgroup$
– Philena Farmer
Jan 19 at 19:29
$begingroup$
There are 54 cards in each deck - a regular deck plus two jokers. Shuffling is done mechanically.
$endgroup$
– Philena Farmer
Jan 19 at 19:31
$begingroup$
There are 54 cards in each deck - a regular deck plus two jokers. Shuffling is done mechanically.
$endgroup$
– Philena Farmer
Jan 19 at 19:31
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079080%2fif-shuffling-distributes-cards-can-it-also-undistribute-them%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079080%2fif-shuffling-distributes-cards-can-it-also-undistribute-them%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What have you tried? How many wild cards are there? How large are the decks of cards (I know pinochle uses different decks than bridge for instance)? If you believe the shuffle count is important, then so too is the shuffling mechanism (because the mathematical version of shuffling is a true random permutation and you can't tell the difference between doing it once and doing it twice); what is the mechanism, and is there a mathematical model of that shuffling technique?
$endgroup$
– Dan Uznanski
Jan 19 at 10:56
$begingroup$
My premise is that if, after the game, the wildcards are not distributed before shuffling begins then the wild cards will end up being more widely distributed after shuffling than if the wild cards had been scattered throughout the decks before shuffling. In other words, if they are randomly distributed to begin with does shuffling have a greater chance of keeping them evenly distributed, a less chance of them being evenly distributed, or doesn’t matter?
$endgroup$
– Philena Farmer
Jan 19 at 19:29
$begingroup$
There are 54 cards in each deck - a regular deck plus two jokers. Shuffling is done mechanically.
$endgroup$
– Philena Farmer
Jan 19 at 19:31