Internal angles in regular 18-gon












8












$begingroup$


This (seemingly simple) problem is driving me nuts.




Find angle $alpha$ shown in the following regular 18-gon.




enter image description here



It was easy to find the angle between pink diagonals ($60^circ$). And I was able to solve the problem with some trigonometry (getting nice integer angle). However, all my attempts to solve the problem without use of trigonometry have failed. It looked like I was close to solution all the time (so many angles are equal to $60^circ$ or $120^circ$. I felt like I had to draw just one more line and the problem would break apart. I also tried with internal symmetries and rotations but eventually I had to give up.



Is there a way to solve this kind of problem without sines and cosines?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You should mention what the "nice integer angle" is, to save people some time.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:47










  • $begingroup$
    It's $20^circ$. Even more interesting is that if you extend the black line to the southeast it will pass through a vertex of the polygon.
    $endgroup$
    – Oldboy
    Dec 4 '18 at 12:02












  • $begingroup$
    Say, the triangle with $alpha$ has vertices $A_1,A_2$ from the 18-gon. You claim the black line is $A_2A_8$. Once it's known, we can finish by observing $A_2A_8parallel A_3A_7$ and $A_1A_7A_3angle =20^circ$.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Dec 7 '18 at 8:25
















8












$begingroup$


This (seemingly simple) problem is driving me nuts.




Find angle $alpha$ shown in the following regular 18-gon.




enter image description here



It was easy to find the angle between pink diagonals ($60^circ$). And I was able to solve the problem with some trigonometry (getting nice integer angle). However, all my attempts to solve the problem without use of trigonometry have failed. It looked like I was close to solution all the time (so many angles are equal to $60^circ$ or $120^circ$. I felt like I had to draw just one more line and the problem would break apart. I also tried with internal symmetries and rotations but eventually I had to give up.



Is there a way to solve this kind of problem without sines and cosines?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You should mention what the "nice integer angle" is, to save people some time.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:47










  • $begingroup$
    It's $20^circ$. Even more interesting is that if you extend the black line to the southeast it will pass through a vertex of the polygon.
    $endgroup$
    – Oldboy
    Dec 4 '18 at 12:02












  • $begingroup$
    Say, the triangle with $alpha$ has vertices $A_1,A_2$ from the 18-gon. You claim the black line is $A_2A_8$. Once it's known, we can finish by observing $A_2A_8parallel A_3A_7$ and $A_1A_7A_3angle =20^circ$.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Dec 7 '18 at 8:25














8












8








8


1



$begingroup$


This (seemingly simple) problem is driving me nuts.




Find angle $alpha$ shown in the following regular 18-gon.




enter image description here



It was easy to find the angle between pink diagonals ($60^circ$). And I was able to solve the problem with some trigonometry (getting nice integer angle). However, all my attempts to solve the problem without use of trigonometry have failed. It looked like I was close to solution all the time (so many angles are equal to $60^circ$ or $120^circ$. I felt like I had to draw just one more line and the problem would break apart. I also tried with internal symmetries and rotations but eventually I had to give up.



Is there a way to solve this kind of problem without sines and cosines?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




This (seemingly simple) problem is driving me nuts.




Find angle $alpha$ shown in the following regular 18-gon.




enter image description here



It was easy to find the angle between pink diagonals ($60^circ$). And I was able to solve the problem with some trigonometry (getting nice integer angle). However, all my attempts to solve the problem without use of trigonometry have failed. It looked like I was close to solution all the time (so many angles are equal to $60^circ$ or $120^circ$. I felt like I had to draw just one more line and the problem would break apart. I also tried with internal symmetries and rotations but eventually I had to give up.



Is there a way to solve this kind of problem without sines and cosines?







euclidean-geometry polygons plane-geometry angle






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 20 at 13:32









Rosie F

1,349416




1,349416










asked Dec 4 '18 at 10:51









OldboyOldboy

8,59011036




8,59011036












  • $begingroup$
    You should mention what the "nice integer angle" is, to save people some time.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:47










  • $begingroup$
    It's $20^circ$. Even more interesting is that if you extend the black line to the southeast it will pass through a vertex of the polygon.
    $endgroup$
    – Oldboy
    Dec 4 '18 at 12:02












  • $begingroup$
    Say, the triangle with $alpha$ has vertices $A_1,A_2$ from the 18-gon. You claim the black line is $A_2A_8$. Once it's known, we can finish by observing $A_2A_8parallel A_3A_7$ and $A_1A_7A_3angle =20^circ$.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Dec 7 '18 at 8:25


















  • $begingroup$
    You should mention what the "nice integer angle" is, to save people some time.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Dec 4 '18 at 11:47










  • $begingroup$
    It's $20^circ$. Even more interesting is that if you extend the black line to the southeast it will pass through a vertex of the polygon.
    $endgroup$
    – Oldboy
    Dec 4 '18 at 12:02












  • $begingroup$
    Say, the triangle with $alpha$ has vertices $A_1,A_2$ from the 18-gon. You claim the black line is $A_2A_8$. Once it's known, we can finish by observing $A_2A_8parallel A_3A_7$ and $A_1A_7A_3angle =20^circ$.
    $endgroup$
    – Berci
    Dec 7 '18 at 8:25
















$begingroup$
You should mention what the "nice integer angle" is, to save people some time.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Dec 4 '18 at 11:47




$begingroup$
You should mention what the "nice integer angle" is, to save people some time.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Dec 4 '18 at 11:47












$begingroup$
It's $20^circ$. Even more interesting is that if you extend the black line to the southeast it will pass through a vertex of the polygon.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 4 '18 at 12:02






$begingroup$
It's $20^circ$. Even more interesting is that if you extend the black line to the southeast it will pass through a vertex of the polygon.
$endgroup$
– Oldboy
Dec 4 '18 at 12:02














$begingroup$
Say, the triangle with $alpha$ has vertices $A_1,A_2$ from the 18-gon. You claim the black line is $A_2A_8$. Once it's known, we can finish by observing $A_2A_8parallel A_3A_7$ and $A_1A_7A_3angle =20^circ$.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Dec 7 '18 at 8:25




$begingroup$
Say, the triangle with $alpha$ has vertices $A_1,A_2$ from the 18-gon. You claim the black line is $A_2A_8$. Once it's known, we can finish by observing $A_2A_8parallel A_3A_7$ and $A_1A_7A_3angle =20^circ$.
$endgroup$
– Berci
Dec 7 '18 at 8:25










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

I don't have a direct solution. The best I have relates to a different problem, so I show the latter's solution, then show how the two problems correspond.



Lemma. Let $OAC$ be a triangle, and $X$ a point in it, and let angles $CAX=40^{circ}, XAO=10^{circ}, AOX=10^{circ}, XOC=70^{circ}$. What is $angle OCX$?



solution of lemma



Solution of lemma.
$angle AOC=80^{circ}$ and $angle CAO=50^{circ}$ so $angle OCA=50^{circ}= angle CAO$ so $triangle ACO$ is isosceles on base $AC$, so $OA=OC$.



$angle AOX = 10^{circ} = angle XAO$, so $triangle OAX$ is isosceles on base $OA$, so $AX=OX$.



$angle OXA = 180^{circ} - angle XAO - angle AOX = 160^{circ}$.



Erect an equilateral $triangle OXE$ on base $OX$. Join $CE$.
$angle EOC = angle XOC - angle XOE = 70^{circ} - 60^{circ} = 10^{circ} = angle AOX$.
Thus $triangle$s $OAX, OCE$ are congruent (SAS, opposite sense) because $angle EOC = angle AOX, OA=OC$ and $OX=OE$.
Thus $angle OCE = angle XAO = 10^{circ}$.
$CE=AX=OX=XE$.
Thus $triangle XCE$ is isosceles on base $XC$.
$angle XEC = 360^{circ} - angle CEO - angle OEX = 360^{circ} - 160^{circ} - 60^{circ} = 140^{circ}$.
Thus $angle ECX = (180^{circ}-140^{circ})/2 = 20^{circ}$.
Thus $angle OCX = angle ECX + angle OCE = 20^{circ}+10^{circ} = 30^{circ}$, which solves the lemma.



solution of original problem



Solution of the original problem.
Let $P_0dots P_{17}$ be a regular 18-gon. Let $P_1P_{13}$ cross $P_{5}P_{15}$ at $X$. What is $alpha=angle P_0XP_1$?



Let the centre of the 18-gon be $O$. $triangle P_0P_{1}O$ is isosceles on base $P_{0}P_1$, and $angle P_0OP_1=20^circ$, so $angle OP_1P_0=80^circ$.



$triangle P_{13}P_1O$ is isosceles on base $P_{13}P_1$, and $angle P_{13}OP_1=120^circ$, so $angle OP_1P_{13}=30^circ=angle OP_1X$ as $X$ is on $P_1P_{13}$.



$triangle P_{15}P_5O$ is isosceles on base $P_{15}P_5$, and $angle P_{15}OP_5=160^circ$, so $angle P_5P_{15}O=10^circ=angle XP_{15}O$ as $X$ is on $P_5P_{15}$.



$triangle P_{15}P_1O$ is isosceles on base $P_{15}P_1$, and $angle P_{15}OP_1=80^circ$, so $angle P_1P_{15}O=50^circ$. Thus this $triangle$ has the same angles $80^circ, 50^circ, 50^circ$ as the lemma's $triangle OAC$, so they are similar. Moreover, the angles $OP_1X=30^circ$ and $XP_{15}O=10^circ$ correspond to those in the lemma, so the $X$s correspond. Therefore, by the lemma, $OX=XP_{15}$.



$OP_0=OP_{15}$ and $angle P_{15}OP_0=60^circ$ so $triangle OP_{15}P_0$ is equilateral. Thus $triangle$s $OXP_0$ and $P_{15}XP_0$ are congruent in opposite senses (SSS) because $OX=XP_{15}$, $OP_0=P_{15}P_0$ and $P_0X$ is common. Thus $angle OP_0X=angle XP_0P_{15}$ so $angle OP_0X=30^circ=angle OP_1X$, so quadrilateral $OXP_0P_1$ is cyclic, so $alpha=angle P_0XP_1=angle P_0OP_1=20^circ$, which solves the problem.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025421%2finternal-angles-in-regular-18-gon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    I don't have a direct solution. The best I have relates to a different problem, so I show the latter's solution, then show how the two problems correspond.



    Lemma. Let $OAC$ be a triangle, and $X$ a point in it, and let angles $CAX=40^{circ}, XAO=10^{circ}, AOX=10^{circ}, XOC=70^{circ}$. What is $angle OCX$?



    solution of lemma



    Solution of lemma.
    $angle AOC=80^{circ}$ and $angle CAO=50^{circ}$ so $angle OCA=50^{circ}= angle CAO$ so $triangle ACO$ is isosceles on base $AC$, so $OA=OC$.



    $angle AOX = 10^{circ} = angle XAO$, so $triangle OAX$ is isosceles on base $OA$, so $AX=OX$.



    $angle OXA = 180^{circ} - angle XAO - angle AOX = 160^{circ}$.



    Erect an equilateral $triangle OXE$ on base $OX$. Join $CE$.
    $angle EOC = angle XOC - angle XOE = 70^{circ} - 60^{circ} = 10^{circ} = angle AOX$.
    Thus $triangle$s $OAX, OCE$ are congruent (SAS, opposite sense) because $angle EOC = angle AOX, OA=OC$ and $OX=OE$.
    Thus $angle OCE = angle XAO = 10^{circ}$.
    $CE=AX=OX=XE$.
    Thus $triangle XCE$ is isosceles on base $XC$.
    $angle XEC = 360^{circ} - angle CEO - angle OEX = 360^{circ} - 160^{circ} - 60^{circ} = 140^{circ}$.
    Thus $angle ECX = (180^{circ}-140^{circ})/2 = 20^{circ}$.
    Thus $angle OCX = angle ECX + angle OCE = 20^{circ}+10^{circ} = 30^{circ}$, which solves the lemma.



    solution of original problem



    Solution of the original problem.
    Let $P_0dots P_{17}$ be a regular 18-gon. Let $P_1P_{13}$ cross $P_{5}P_{15}$ at $X$. What is $alpha=angle P_0XP_1$?



    Let the centre of the 18-gon be $O$. $triangle P_0P_{1}O$ is isosceles on base $P_{0}P_1$, and $angle P_0OP_1=20^circ$, so $angle OP_1P_0=80^circ$.



    $triangle P_{13}P_1O$ is isosceles on base $P_{13}P_1$, and $angle P_{13}OP_1=120^circ$, so $angle OP_1P_{13}=30^circ=angle OP_1X$ as $X$ is on $P_1P_{13}$.



    $triangle P_{15}P_5O$ is isosceles on base $P_{15}P_5$, and $angle P_{15}OP_5=160^circ$, so $angle P_5P_{15}O=10^circ=angle XP_{15}O$ as $X$ is on $P_5P_{15}$.



    $triangle P_{15}P_1O$ is isosceles on base $P_{15}P_1$, and $angle P_{15}OP_1=80^circ$, so $angle P_1P_{15}O=50^circ$. Thus this $triangle$ has the same angles $80^circ, 50^circ, 50^circ$ as the lemma's $triangle OAC$, so they are similar. Moreover, the angles $OP_1X=30^circ$ and $XP_{15}O=10^circ$ correspond to those in the lemma, so the $X$s correspond. Therefore, by the lemma, $OX=XP_{15}$.



    $OP_0=OP_{15}$ and $angle P_{15}OP_0=60^circ$ so $triangle OP_{15}P_0$ is equilateral. Thus $triangle$s $OXP_0$ and $P_{15}XP_0$ are congruent in opposite senses (SSS) because $OX=XP_{15}$, $OP_0=P_{15}P_0$ and $P_0X$ is common. Thus $angle OP_0X=angle XP_0P_{15}$ so $angle OP_0X=30^circ=angle OP_1X$, so quadrilateral $OXP_0P_1$ is cyclic, so $alpha=angle P_0XP_1=angle P_0OP_1=20^circ$, which solves the problem.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      I don't have a direct solution. The best I have relates to a different problem, so I show the latter's solution, then show how the two problems correspond.



      Lemma. Let $OAC$ be a triangle, and $X$ a point in it, and let angles $CAX=40^{circ}, XAO=10^{circ}, AOX=10^{circ}, XOC=70^{circ}$. What is $angle OCX$?



      solution of lemma



      Solution of lemma.
      $angle AOC=80^{circ}$ and $angle CAO=50^{circ}$ so $angle OCA=50^{circ}= angle CAO$ so $triangle ACO$ is isosceles on base $AC$, so $OA=OC$.



      $angle AOX = 10^{circ} = angle XAO$, so $triangle OAX$ is isosceles on base $OA$, so $AX=OX$.



      $angle OXA = 180^{circ} - angle XAO - angle AOX = 160^{circ}$.



      Erect an equilateral $triangle OXE$ on base $OX$. Join $CE$.
      $angle EOC = angle XOC - angle XOE = 70^{circ} - 60^{circ} = 10^{circ} = angle AOX$.
      Thus $triangle$s $OAX, OCE$ are congruent (SAS, opposite sense) because $angle EOC = angle AOX, OA=OC$ and $OX=OE$.
      Thus $angle OCE = angle XAO = 10^{circ}$.
      $CE=AX=OX=XE$.
      Thus $triangle XCE$ is isosceles on base $XC$.
      $angle XEC = 360^{circ} - angle CEO - angle OEX = 360^{circ} - 160^{circ} - 60^{circ} = 140^{circ}$.
      Thus $angle ECX = (180^{circ}-140^{circ})/2 = 20^{circ}$.
      Thus $angle OCX = angle ECX + angle OCE = 20^{circ}+10^{circ} = 30^{circ}$, which solves the lemma.



      solution of original problem



      Solution of the original problem.
      Let $P_0dots P_{17}$ be a regular 18-gon. Let $P_1P_{13}$ cross $P_{5}P_{15}$ at $X$. What is $alpha=angle P_0XP_1$?



      Let the centre of the 18-gon be $O$. $triangle P_0P_{1}O$ is isosceles on base $P_{0}P_1$, and $angle P_0OP_1=20^circ$, so $angle OP_1P_0=80^circ$.



      $triangle P_{13}P_1O$ is isosceles on base $P_{13}P_1$, and $angle P_{13}OP_1=120^circ$, so $angle OP_1P_{13}=30^circ=angle OP_1X$ as $X$ is on $P_1P_{13}$.



      $triangle P_{15}P_5O$ is isosceles on base $P_{15}P_5$, and $angle P_{15}OP_5=160^circ$, so $angle P_5P_{15}O=10^circ=angle XP_{15}O$ as $X$ is on $P_5P_{15}$.



      $triangle P_{15}P_1O$ is isosceles on base $P_{15}P_1$, and $angle P_{15}OP_1=80^circ$, so $angle P_1P_{15}O=50^circ$. Thus this $triangle$ has the same angles $80^circ, 50^circ, 50^circ$ as the lemma's $triangle OAC$, so they are similar. Moreover, the angles $OP_1X=30^circ$ and $XP_{15}O=10^circ$ correspond to those in the lemma, so the $X$s correspond. Therefore, by the lemma, $OX=XP_{15}$.



      $OP_0=OP_{15}$ and $angle P_{15}OP_0=60^circ$ so $triangle OP_{15}P_0$ is equilateral. Thus $triangle$s $OXP_0$ and $P_{15}XP_0$ are congruent in opposite senses (SSS) because $OX=XP_{15}$, $OP_0=P_{15}P_0$ and $P_0X$ is common. Thus $angle OP_0X=angle XP_0P_{15}$ so $angle OP_0X=30^circ=angle OP_1X$, so quadrilateral $OXP_0P_1$ is cyclic, so $alpha=angle P_0XP_1=angle P_0OP_1=20^circ$, which solves the problem.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        I don't have a direct solution. The best I have relates to a different problem, so I show the latter's solution, then show how the two problems correspond.



        Lemma. Let $OAC$ be a triangle, and $X$ a point in it, and let angles $CAX=40^{circ}, XAO=10^{circ}, AOX=10^{circ}, XOC=70^{circ}$. What is $angle OCX$?



        solution of lemma



        Solution of lemma.
        $angle AOC=80^{circ}$ and $angle CAO=50^{circ}$ so $angle OCA=50^{circ}= angle CAO$ so $triangle ACO$ is isosceles on base $AC$, so $OA=OC$.



        $angle AOX = 10^{circ} = angle XAO$, so $triangle OAX$ is isosceles on base $OA$, so $AX=OX$.



        $angle OXA = 180^{circ} - angle XAO - angle AOX = 160^{circ}$.



        Erect an equilateral $triangle OXE$ on base $OX$. Join $CE$.
        $angle EOC = angle XOC - angle XOE = 70^{circ} - 60^{circ} = 10^{circ} = angle AOX$.
        Thus $triangle$s $OAX, OCE$ are congruent (SAS, opposite sense) because $angle EOC = angle AOX, OA=OC$ and $OX=OE$.
        Thus $angle OCE = angle XAO = 10^{circ}$.
        $CE=AX=OX=XE$.
        Thus $triangle XCE$ is isosceles on base $XC$.
        $angle XEC = 360^{circ} - angle CEO - angle OEX = 360^{circ} - 160^{circ} - 60^{circ} = 140^{circ}$.
        Thus $angle ECX = (180^{circ}-140^{circ})/2 = 20^{circ}$.
        Thus $angle OCX = angle ECX + angle OCE = 20^{circ}+10^{circ} = 30^{circ}$, which solves the lemma.



        solution of original problem



        Solution of the original problem.
        Let $P_0dots P_{17}$ be a regular 18-gon. Let $P_1P_{13}$ cross $P_{5}P_{15}$ at $X$. What is $alpha=angle P_0XP_1$?



        Let the centre of the 18-gon be $O$. $triangle P_0P_{1}O$ is isosceles on base $P_{0}P_1$, and $angle P_0OP_1=20^circ$, so $angle OP_1P_0=80^circ$.



        $triangle P_{13}P_1O$ is isosceles on base $P_{13}P_1$, and $angle P_{13}OP_1=120^circ$, so $angle OP_1P_{13}=30^circ=angle OP_1X$ as $X$ is on $P_1P_{13}$.



        $triangle P_{15}P_5O$ is isosceles on base $P_{15}P_5$, and $angle P_{15}OP_5=160^circ$, so $angle P_5P_{15}O=10^circ=angle XP_{15}O$ as $X$ is on $P_5P_{15}$.



        $triangle P_{15}P_1O$ is isosceles on base $P_{15}P_1$, and $angle P_{15}OP_1=80^circ$, so $angle P_1P_{15}O=50^circ$. Thus this $triangle$ has the same angles $80^circ, 50^circ, 50^circ$ as the lemma's $triangle OAC$, so they are similar. Moreover, the angles $OP_1X=30^circ$ and $XP_{15}O=10^circ$ correspond to those in the lemma, so the $X$s correspond. Therefore, by the lemma, $OX=XP_{15}$.



        $OP_0=OP_{15}$ and $angle P_{15}OP_0=60^circ$ so $triangle OP_{15}P_0$ is equilateral. Thus $triangle$s $OXP_0$ and $P_{15}XP_0$ are congruent in opposite senses (SSS) because $OX=XP_{15}$, $OP_0=P_{15}P_0$ and $P_0X$ is common. Thus $angle OP_0X=angle XP_0P_{15}$ so $angle OP_0X=30^circ=angle OP_1X$, so quadrilateral $OXP_0P_1$ is cyclic, so $alpha=angle P_0XP_1=angle P_0OP_1=20^circ$, which solves the problem.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        I don't have a direct solution. The best I have relates to a different problem, so I show the latter's solution, then show how the two problems correspond.



        Lemma. Let $OAC$ be a triangle, and $X$ a point in it, and let angles $CAX=40^{circ}, XAO=10^{circ}, AOX=10^{circ}, XOC=70^{circ}$. What is $angle OCX$?



        solution of lemma



        Solution of lemma.
        $angle AOC=80^{circ}$ and $angle CAO=50^{circ}$ so $angle OCA=50^{circ}= angle CAO$ so $triangle ACO$ is isosceles on base $AC$, so $OA=OC$.



        $angle AOX = 10^{circ} = angle XAO$, so $triangle OAX$ is isosceles on base $OA$, so $AX=OX$.



        $angle OXA = 180^{circ} - angle XAO - angle AOX = 160^{circ}$.



        Erect an equilateral $triangle OXE$ on base $OX$. Join $CE$.
        $angle EOC = angle XOC - angle XOE = 70^{circ} - 60^{circ} = 10^{circ} = angle AOX$.
        Thus $triangle$s $OAX, OCE$ are congruent (SAS, opposite sense) because $angle EOC = angle AOX, OA=OC$ and $OX=OE$.
        Thus $angle OCE = angle XAO = 10^{circ}$.
        $CE=AX=OX=XE$.
        Thus $triangle XCE$ is isosceles on base $XC$.
        $angle XEC = 360^{circ} - angle CEO - angle OEX = 360^{circ} - 160^{circ} - 60^{circ} = 140^{circ}$.
        Thus $angle ECX = (180^{circ}-140^{circ})/2 = 20^{circ}$.
        Thus $angle OCX = angle ECX + angle OCE = 20^{circ}+10^{circ} = 30^{circ}$, which solves the lemma.



        solution of original problem



        Solution of the original problem.
        Let $P_0dots P_{17}$ be a regular 18-gon. Let $P_1P_{13}$ cross $P_{5}P_{15}$ at $X$. What is $alpha=angle P_0XP_1$?



        Let the centre of the 18-gon be $O$. $triangle P_0P_{1}O$ is isosceles on base $P_{0}P_1$, and $angle P_0OP_1=20^circ$, so $angle OP_1P_0=80^circ$.



        $triangle P_{13}P_1O$ is isosceles on base $P_{13}P_1$, and $angle P_{13}OP_1=120^circ$, so $angle OP_1P_{13}=30^circ=angle OP_1X$ as $X$ is on $P_1P_{13}$.



        $triangle P_{15}P_5O$ is isosceles on base $P_{15}P_5$, and $angle P_{15}OP_5=160^circ$, so $angle P_5P_{15}O=10^circ=angle XP_{15}O$ as $X$ is on $P_5P_{15}$.



        $triangle P_{15}P_1O$ is isosceles on base $P_{15}P_1$, and $angle P_{15}OP_1=80^circ$, so $angle P_1P_{15}O=50^circ$. Thus this $triangle$ has the same angles $80^circ, 50^circ, 50^circ$ as the lemma's $triangle OAC$, so they are similar. Moreover, the angles $OP_1X=30^circ$ and $XP_{15}O=10^circ$ correspond to those in the lemma, so the $X$s correspond. Therefore, by the lemma, $OX=XP_{15}$.



        $OP_0=OP_{15}$ and $angle P_{15}OP_0=60^circ$ so $triangle OP_{15}P_0$ is equilateral. Thus $triangle$s $OXP_0$ and $P_{15}XP_0$ are congruent in opposite senses (SSS) because $OX=XP_{15}$, $OP_0=P_{15}P_0$ and $P_0X$ is common. Thus $angle OP_0X=angle XP_0P_{15}$ so $angle OP_0X=30^circ=angle OP_1X$, so quadrilateral $OXP_0P_1$ is cyclic, so $alpha=angle P_0XP_1=angle P_0OP_1=20^circ$, which solves the problem.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 19 at 12:52

























        answered Jan 19 at 12:19









        Rosie FRosie F

        1,349416




        1,349416






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3025421%2finternal-angles-in-regular-18-gon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

            android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

            WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]